ライフサイエンスコーパス: the relative risk of

1 % confidence interval, 1.3-4.2; P<0.01), and the relative risk of a 10- to 100-fold increase in tropo

2 The relative risk of a cardiovascular-related adverse ev

3 Survival analysis was used to determine the relative risk of a crash as a function of demographi

4 The relative risk of a diffusion tensor imaging-positive

5 ization showed a 36% reduction (p = 0.03) in the relative risk of a HF-related hospitalization in the

6 The relative risk of a human case was estimated for diff

7 The relative risk of a minor increase in troponin (0.07-

8 r example, on our test of general cognition, the relative risk of a substantial decline in performanc

9 The relative risks of a 15-kg weight gain were 1.32 (95%

10 The purpose of this analysis was to assess the relative risk of acute GVHD in 265 consecutive patie

11 On multivariable analysis, the relative risk of acute rejection with IL2ra was 0.90

12 ere the SCORAD index (treatment studies) and the relative risk of AD (prevention studies).

13 hazard rate ratio (HRR) surface representing the relative risk of AD in relatives of probands with AD

14 To estimate the relative risk of adenoma recurrence for each of thes

15 The relative risk of admission for an interquartile incr

16 Significant (P </= .05) differences in the relative risks of admission between lower versus hig

17 Our simulations indicated that the relative risk of adult obesity increased with age an

18 The relative risk of AF throughout the study was 0.44 (9

19 contrast, among women with new-onset cancer, the relative risk of AF was increased only within the fi

20 7% (95% CI -6% to 19%; p=0.29) reduction in the relative risk of all-cause mortality associated with

21 The relative risk of all-grade bleeding events associate

22 f nuclear waste should be framed in terms of the relative risks of all alternatives.

23 The relative risks of all-cause and cardiac death were n

24 The relative risk of ALS among current smokers compared

25 After adjustment for age, sex, and race, the relative risk of ALS was significantly higher (relat

26 The relative risk of ALS was significantly lower among b

27 When weighing the relative risks of alternative medical procedures, th

28 Purpose To assess the relative risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) among pati

29 e, and cardiovascular risk factors to assess the relative risk of AMI in patients who used rofecoxib

30 The relative risk of an asthma exacerbation in individua

31 Adjusted for age and sex, the relative risk of an unexplained arrhythmic death was

32 Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of antibody responses.

33 dified intent-to-treat analysis, we computed the relative risk of any adenoma after randomization, us

34 The relative risk of any cormorbidity at age 8 years ran

35 The relative risks of any cardiac defect with the use of

36 amines recently published studies describing the relative risk of arrhythmias from macrolides, and co

37 worm burden for each haplotype in China and the relative risk of asthma for the matching haplotype i

38 The RRR is the relative risk of autism in a participant with a sibl

39 pre-SRT PSA doubling increased significantly the relative risk of BcR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; P < .

40 Odds ratios (ORs) were used to measure the relative risk of BDI and BDII in relatives of indivi

41 : 1.2-1.8), which was virtually identical to the relative risk of being at home estimated from an ind

42 After taking account of confounders, the relative risk of being overweight or obese for child

43 the use of generalized estimating equations, the relative risk of bioprosthetic valve use, relative t

44 on regression models were fitted to estimate the relative risk of bladder cancer associated with acti

45 The relative risk of bleeding for each BAS compared with

46 EV bleeding is > or = 0.26 (base case 0.15), the relative risk of bleeding on BB is > or = 0.69 (base

47 The ICUR favored EVL unless the relative risk of bleeding on BB is < 0.46, the relat

48 e relative risk of bleeding on BB is < 0.46, the relative risk of bleeding with EVL is > 0.46, or the

49 on BB is > or = 0.69 (base case 0.58), or if the relative risk of bleeding with EVL is < 0.27 (base c

50 a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor does not accentuate the relative risk of bleeding with prasugrel as compared

51 -SD unit decrease in cardiac index increased the relative risk of both dementia (hazard ratio [HR]=1.

52 e 51.13 mGy) was 3.18 (95% CI 1.46-6.94) and the relative risk of brain cancer for patients who recei

53 10) in the Nurses' Health Study and estimate the relative risk of breast cancer according to the numb

54 n who had never used hormonal contraception, the relative risk of breast cancer among all current and

55 Relative risks of cancer varied by CJM, with the relative risk of breast cancer being significantly l

56 Tamoxifen reduces the relative risk of breast cancer developing from speci

57 The relative risk of breast cancer for the cohort was 1.

58 By contrast, we estimated the relative risk of breast cancer to be 1.32 (95% CI 0.

59 We noted a rapid decrease in the relative risk of breast cancer with age and derived

60 The relative risk of cancer overall was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.

61 The relative risk of cancer was highest in the first 3 m

62 The relative risk of cardiac death or AMI (versus PTCA)

63 The relative risk of cardiotoxicity among patients who r

64 The relative risk of cardiovascular death after diagnosi

65 The relative risk of cervical cancer is increased in cur

66 The relative risk of chart-confirmed intussusception wit

67 After adjustment for matching factors, the relative risk of CHD in the highest quintile compare

68 Overall, the relative risks of CHD associated with 1-standard dev

69 cise > or =3.5 h/wk) as the reference group, the relative risks of CHD were 3.44 (95% confidence inte

70 sing modified Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk of child mortality in each cluster, we

71 l (CI), 1.02, 1.50, P for trend = 0.03], and the relative risk of cholecystectomy for men in the high

72 , and specific fats in a multivariate model, the relative risk of cholecystectomy for women in the hi

73 ion (aHR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.82-5.88) and twice the relative risks of chronic kidney disease and protein

74 e-POCT achieved a 49% reduction in the relative risk of clinical failure compared to routin

75 ity analysis, we observed a 43% reduction in the relative risk of clinical failure when using e-POCT

76 w unity (P <or= 0.008), which indicated that the relative risks of cognitive impairment and dementia

77 sis to compare the effects of aspirin use on the relative risk of colorectal cancer in relation to th

78 inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) markedly reduced the relative risk of colorectal cancer.

79 Little is known about the relative risk of common bacterial, viral, fungal, an

80 without diabetes, leading to a reduction in the relative risk of complications associated with diabe

81 The relative risk of contamination using AmB at 10 mg/ml

82 The relative risk of contamination with AmB at 30 mg/ml

83 The relative risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRC

84 The relative risk of conversion to a diagnosis of PD in

85 The relative risk of coronary artery disease, congestive

86 The relative risk of coronary heart disease between extr

87 After multivariate adjustment, the relative risk of coronary heart disease comparing hi

88 Significant differences in the relative risk of CR between taxa, anatomic, and geog

89 coffee consumption (median, 0 cups per day), the relative risk of CVD was 0.95 (95% confidence interv

90 The relative risks of CVD were highest in the younger, s

91 Later in follow-up, the relative risk of de novo DM was also higher in NASH:

92 nal Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) model, the relative risk of death after allogenic SCT vs those

93 The relative risk of death decreased by 1.8% per year ov

94 At week 52, the relative risk of death for all four mortality outcom

95 hospital volume did not substantially reduce the relative risk of death for black patients compared w

96 In each group, we compared the relative risk of death for patients who initiated th

97 rapy group and 370 in the observation group; the relative risk of death from any cause with chemother

98 When added to RT, cisplatin reduces the relative risk of death from cervical carcinoma by ap

99 s not delay the onset of ESRD but may reduce the relative risk of death in CKD.

100 for differences in baseline characteristics, the relative risk of death in intensivist-model ICUs was

101 The relative risk of death in the culprit-lesion-only PC

102 The relative risk of death on hot versus normal days dif

103 ed the efficacy of the ICD as a reduction in the relative risk of death on the basis of the hazard ra

104 gimen was also associated with reductions in the relative risk of death related to the acquired immun

105 -year mortality without chemotherapy is 20%, the relative risk of death seen here translates into an

106 The relative risk of death throughout follow-up was 4.33

107 The relative risk of death was 2.86 (95% confidence inte

108 The relative risk of death was 6.9 (95% confidence inter

109 This finding represents an 18% reduction in the relative risk of death, translating to a 5% absolute

110 00 pg/ml) was associated with an increase in the relative risk of death, whereas more modest increase

111 However, the relative risk of death-censored graft failure of a 2

112 The relative risk of death-censored graft loss was 1.58

113 In contrast, the relative risk of death-censored graft loss was not i

114 This misclassification would attenuate the relative risks of death and re-admission for adversi

115 The relative risks of death and relapse between the cord

116 We estimated the relative risks of death and severe disease among MER

117 The relative risks of death due to influenza were estima

118 as compared with women who had never smoked, the relative risks of death from lung cancer were 2.73,

119 ependent decrease in CNS apoE levels, mirror the relative risk of developing AD, and suggest that low

120 most twice that for nondiabetics and doubles the relative risk of developing cardiovascular disease c

121 tential confounding and mediating variables, the relative risk of developing carotid plaque in adulth

122 ti-inflammatory drugs, compounds that reduce the relative risk of developing colon cancer.

123 The relative risk of developing Crohn disease is estimat

124 The relative risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell

125 This study attempted to estimate the relative risk of developing hyperlipidemia after tre

126 The relative risk of developing measles among persons va

127 In addition, the relative risk of developing symptomatic coccidioidom

128 the gastric mucosa, a condition that affects the relative risk of developing various clinical disorde

129 The relative risks of developing pancreatic cancer were

130 After adjustment for risk factors, the relative risks of diabetes among women in the highes

131 The holiday period was marked by a shift in the relative risk of disease from children toward adults

132 The relative risk of districts reaching the epidemic thr

133 er very late stent thrombosis incidence, but the relative risks of drug-eluting stents versus bare me

134 y HIV on the basis of a systematic review of the relative risk of dying during pregnancy for HIV-posi

135 We calculated the relative risk of dying of brain cancers for each mun

136 skeletal remains, it can be inferred through the relative risks of dying.

137 with the exclusive use of lysine analogues, the relative risk of early postoperative outcomes such a

138 EES compared with other DES reduced the relative risk of early ST (within 30 days), late ST

139 The relative risk of EG or EGS in each cohort was estima

140 We estimated the relative risk of end points among current users, as

141 The relative risk of exposed to unexposed was 3.68 (95%

142 sons in the vicinity of infected goat farms; the relative risk of exposure through inhalation of drin

143 ique and Cox regression was used to estimate the relative risk of failure.

144 th bipolar disorder should consider not only the relative risks of fetal exposure to mood stabilizers

145 In those people with more severe disease, the relative risks of fracture were similar (any fractur

146 nt for age and other potential risk factors, the relative risk of gallstone disease for men in the hi

147 The relative risk of grade 4 neutropenia was 9.3 (95% CI

148 grades, which were determined by calculating the relative risk of graft failure associated with donor

149 The relative risk of graft loss and patient death were d

150 Regardless of the diagnosis time, the relative risk of graft loss was higher in the first

151 The relative risk of GWs among girls who had received at

152 ad received macrolides in the previous year, the relative risk of harboring a resistant strain was 2.

153 women assigned to CEE compared with placebo, the relative risk of having a 10-unit decrease in 3MSE s

154 recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence.

155 Study findings suggest that the relative risks of head and neck cancer for beer and

156 of these declines with existing estimates of the relative risk of heart attack in individuals attribu

157 m smoking restriction laws with estimates of the relative risk of heart disease in individuals expose

158 This study sought to investigate the relative risk of HF overall and by subtype (ischemic

159 The relative risk of HFpEF increases with increasing car

160 The relative risk of HH associated with the first heatwa

161 The relative risk of hip OA associated with each feature

162 % (3.0-5.4) in the control group (p=0.0065); the relative risk of HIV infection in circumcised men wa

163 The relative risk of hospice claims within 180 d of a Na

164 3.80 days (95% CI 3.65-3.94; p < .001), and the relative risk of hospital mortality decreased to 0.7

165 The relative risk of hospitalization in HIV-infected and

166 Cox regression models were used to estimate the relative risk of hypertension.

167 t advance care planning interventions reduce the relative risk of ICU admission for patients at high

168 rate drinkers, as compared with nondrinkers, the relative risk of impairment was 0.77 on our test of

169 Dysglycemia severity was assessed by the relative risk of in-hospital mortality associated wi

170 The relative risk of in-situ disease in current users co

171 The relative risk of incident coronary events was 91% hi

172 ge-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, the relative risk of incident CVD events decreased with

173 Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the relative risk of incident HF associated with fasting

174 ted model including baseline blood pressure, the relative risks of incident hypertension from the low

175 For the same categories of intake, the relative risks of incident obesity per increment of

176 evidenced by the fact that the estimates of the relative risk of infection for the 23 types of surge

177 We calculated the relative risk of infectious complication for patient

178 The relative risk of inpatient care for alcohol abuse wa

179 mans and swine IAV is important in assessing the relative risk of interspecies transmission of viruse

180 ins in humans is also important in assessing the relative risk of interspecies transmission of viruse

181 In random-effects models, the relative risk of intracranial pressure control was 1

182 The relative risks of invasive breast cancer in current

183 The relative risk of ischemic stroke mortality for black

184 However, less variation was noted in the relative risk of late events (100-270) by the TAME m

185 ents who received a dose of less than 5 mGy, the relative risk of leukaemia for patients who received

186 We noted a reduction of 61% in the relative risk of local recurrence for patients recei

187 The relative risk of LRTI and local candidiasis is very

188 S exposure is associated with an increase in the relative risk of LTBI and active TB after controllin

189 In univariate analyses, the relative risk of lung cancer for the highest versus

190 For example, the relative risks of lung cancer among men in the highe

191 orvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 mg reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular events by 32%

192 We determined the relative risk of malignancy in patients with CD who

193 disease risk factors, and dietary variables, the relative risk of MI associated with drinking >/=5 cu

194 Compared with that for 0-4 cups/week, the relative risks of MI were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.38)

195 ral development intervention had three times the relative risk of migrating to urban centres compared

196 The relative risk of moderate or severe bleeding was sim

197 ne therapy is associated with a reduction in the relative risk of mortality compared with placebo ove

198 ne therapy is associated with a reduction in the relative risk of mortality compared with placebo ove

199 The relative risk of mortality for the lowest glucose va

200 ctions for each cause of death, we estimated the relative risk of mortality from ischaemic heart dise

201 The relative risk of mortality from suicide according to

202 The relative risk of mortality increased with greater du

203 disease prevalence, baseline mortality, and the relative risk of mortality resulting from stimulant

204 nd PJ reported conflicting results regarding the relative risks of mortality and pancreatic fistula a

205 The relative risk of MRI-detected joint damage with epis

206 The relative risk of MS was lower among women born to mo

207 Overall, simvastatin allocation reduced the relative risk of MVE by 24% (95% confidence interval

208 However, the relative risk of neonatal death following a preeclam

209 Compared with nondrinkers, the relative risk of NHL associated with former drinking

210 patients irradiated at ages under 30 years, the relative risk of non-SCC was 9 times that of nonirra

211 The effect of mean non-HDL-C reduction on the relative risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction and

212 We estimated the relative risk of NPFCs, PFCs, and breast cancer with

213 The relative risk of opportunistic infection was greates

214 robust error estimates were used to estimate the relative risk of outcomes.

215 The relative risks of outcomes were estimated by Poisson

216 less than 1 mg of total isoflavones per day, the relative risk of ovarian cancer associated with cons

217 The relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51D mutation

218 The relative risk of ovarian cancer in relation to oral

219 lthough the absolute arrhythmia rate is low, the relative risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and

220 The relative risk of patient death was lower when older

221 For (18)F-FDG-avid metastases, the relative risk of PET/CT revealing unsuspected (18)F-

222 The relative risk of PET/CT revealing unsuspected distan

223 h-volume centers, an almost 70% reduction in the relative risk of POM was systematically observed, in

224 c recipient status was associated with twice the relative risk of postdonation diabetes (aHR, 2.14; 9

225 The relative risk of postimmunization fever was signific

226 The relative risk of postOLT mortality increased by appr

227 The relative risk of PRD was 4.23.

228 idemiologic factors of occurrence of RD from the relative risk of PRD.

229 -year landmark analysis was used to evaluate the relative risk of primary outcome in patients with or

230 an efficacious maintenance therapy reducing the relative risk of progression in first-line patients

231 The relative risk of progression of disease or death was

232 The relative risk of prostate cancer was estimated by co

233 ned associated with the highest QALE even if the relative risk of prostate cancer-specific death for

234 In the base case, the relative risk of prostate cancer-specific death for

235 This effect of cataract surgery on the relative risk of RD (the PRD risk ratio) was not sta

236 Generalized estimating equations determined the relative risk of receiving a bioprosthetic valve in

237 adjustment for the effect of psychotherapy, the relative risk of recurrence among those receiving pl

238 ve tumors, chemotherapy improvements reduced the relative risk of recurrence by 21%, 25%, and 23% in

239 rapy group and 359 in the observation group; the relative risk of recurrence with chemotherapy versus

240 ional hazards analysis was used to determine the relative risk of rejection episodes between the 3 gr

241 The relative risk of relapse of quiescent inflammatory b

242 e analysis demonstrated a 30% improvement in the relative risk of relapse-free survival with B/x dono

243 For individual patients, the relative risks of relapse versus late effects of IFR

244 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98; P=0.03), and the relative risk of renal-replacement therapy was 0.71

245 The relative risk of reoperation for glaucoma in the AGV

246 for postoperative complications and analyze the relative risk of reoperation for recurrence for resp

247 for postoperative complications and analyze the relative risk of reoperation for recurrence for resp

248 The relative risk of resolution increased in those cases

249 The relative risk of respiratory cancer was 1.23-fold (9

250 e sole causal variant in the region and that the relative risk of rs2476601/Trp(620) is greater in lo

251 The relative risk of S/SE with HDER versus warfarin in p

252 or confounders and potential intermediaries, the relative risk of SCD was significantly lower in wome

253 ultivariable Cox proportional hazards model, the relative risk of self-reported ultrasound- or hyster

254 fluoroquinolones share various indications, the relative risks of serious arrhythmia could inform th

255 Preventive use of acetazolamide reduced the relative risk of SHAI by 44%.

256 Compared with women given FA, the relative risks of SPB for those using MMN and IFA we

257 ratios (SIRs) were computed as estimates of the relative risk of specific cancers or sites.

258 easing body mass index and male sex increase the relative risk of specific CVD risk factors.

259 The relative risk of SSI/infectious death was determined

260 (DES) compared with bare metal stents (BMS), the relative risk of stent thrombosis and adverse cardio

261 The relative risk of stroke comparing neighborhoods in t

262 c regression was performed as an estimate of the relative risk of stroke in RA patients compared with

263 centile of neighborhood score with the 10th, the relative risk of stroke was 0.49 (95% confidence int

264 The relative risk of stroke was increased in all carotid

265 and the extent of coronary artery disease on the relative risk of stroke.

266 radiation dose estimates and how to compare the relative risks of studies.

267 .34) were associated with two to three times the relative risk of subsequent depression diagnosis amo

268 For people with obstructive sleep apnea, the relative risk of sudden death from cardiac causes fr

269 pnea-hypopnea index correlated directly with the relative risk of sudden death from cardiac causes fr

270 assessed the median apnea-hypopnea index and the relative risk of sudden death from cardiac causes.

271 As compared with cancer-free persons, the relative risk of suicide among patients receiving a

272 The purpose of this study was to assess the relative risk of suicide attempt and suicide in user

273 Compared with CPC 1, the relative risk of survival was 0.61 (0.47-0.80) for C

274 tinomial generalized logit models to compare the relative risk of survival without neurodevelopmental

275 herapy resulted in a 24 percent reduction in the relative risk of sustained disability progression (h

276 The relative risk of T2D per 5-IU/L increase in ALT leve

277 who consumed fish less than once per month, the relative risk of T2DM was 1.22 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.39)

278 es and performed a meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of TB incidence and its 95% confidence

279 during the summer months and an increase in the relative risk of these infections in the coming deca

280 The relative risk of these patients causing accidents is

281 The relative risk of these poor outcomes below these pea

282 er risks for mortality and ESRD in diabetes, the relative risks of these outcomes by eGFR and ACR are

283 nimals and humans, it was critical to assess the relative risk of this novel virus to public health.

284 The relative risk of thrombosis in factor V heterozygote

285 rtional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk of total (n = 2,041) and aggressive (n

286 including C-reactive protein, HDL, and LDL, the relative risk of total CHD comparing extreme tertile

287 The relative risk of treated SAR associated with an inte

288 The relative risk of tuberculosis among subjects with po

289 Here, we estimated the relative risk of tuberculosis transmission from coin

290 The relative risk of tuberculosis was not significantly

291 We assessed the relative risk of type 2 diabetes prospectively for e

292 The relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 0.72 (95% confi

293 We estimated the relative risk of UGIB associated with the use of low

294 The relative risk of UGIB in patients taking low-dose as

295 l surgical procedures, little is known about the relative risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after

296 The relative risk of viral shedding with pritelivir, as

297 ted for recent treatment adherence estimated the relative risk of virologic failure in the presence o

298 With the relative risk of wound infection used as the measure

299 idence supporting the second hypothesis that the relative risk of wound infection would substantially

300 t 90 posttransplantation days, and 3.5 times the relative risk of wound infections in days 91 to 365