ライフサイエンスコーパス: thermodilution

1 tion of cardiac output (measured by means of thermodilution).

2 heral vascular resistance) was determined by thermodilution.

3 t obtained using standard intermittent bolus thermodilution.

4 min by bioimpedance and 5.0 +/- 1.1 L/min by thermodilution.

5 + 0.89x (r2 = .94) for lithium dilution vs. thermodilution.

6 Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution.

7 dex, which can be measured by transpulmonary thermodilution.

8 delivery were assessed using transpulmonary thermodilution.

9 nt and a pulmonary artery catheter for bolus thermodilution.

10 he mixed gas equation and when determined by thermodilution.

11 ioimpedance and, subsequently, invasively by thermodilution.

12 c output was also measured using "continuous thermodilution."

13 tes with invasive measurements obtained with thermodilution?

14 0.16 cm(2), bias 0.14 +/- 0.17 cm(2)), or by thermodilution (0.85 +/- 0.19 cm(2), bias -0.03 +/- 0.19

15 measured for 7 days by PiCCO transpulmonary thermodilution; 225 measurements of EVLW indexed to actu

16 the increment in leg blood flow (measured by thermodilution) after exposure to methacholine chloride.

17 Use of the a transpulmonary thermodilution algorithm resulted in more days on mechan

18 Cardiac output by thermodilution and probe agreed equally well under all c

19 Cardiac output by thermodilution and systemic and pulmonary artery pressur

20 ance, with the cardiac output measurement by thermodilution and the volumetric data estimated from le

21 tion method is at least as accurate as bolus thermodilution and, since pulmonary artery catheterizati

22 oral blood flow (FBF, ultrasound Doppler and thermodilution) and blood pressure were evaluated during

23 c measurements, leg blood flow determined by thermodilution, and systemic and leg metabolic parameter

24 ermeability index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution are independent risk factors of day-28 mo

25 central venous pressures, cardiac output by thermodilution, arterial and venous blood gases; electro

26 flow to the index extremity was measured by thermodilution at baseline and 30 days after administrat

27 During thermodilution-based assessment of volumetric coronary b

28 and are primarily based on comparisons with thermodilution-based cardiac output measurements.

29 Transpulmonary thermodilution-based EVLWi, plasma concentrations of epi

30 Transpulmonary thermodilution before and after bronchoalveolar lavage.

31 Arterial and femoral venous blood sampling, thermodilution blood flow measurements, and needle biops

32 PetCO2 predicted thermodilution cardiac index with bias of -11+/-27 (+/-2

33 easured oxygen consumption (Cath-mVo(2)) and thermodilution cardiac output (Cath-TD).

34 g continuous cardiac output (CCO) with bolus thermodilution cardiac output (COTD) measures in human a

35 atrial pressures, ascending aortic pressure, thermodilution cardiac output and Doppler mitral flow ve

36 Calculated VO2 was determined by multiplying thermodilution cardiac output by the arterialvenous oxyg

37 mprovement in both precision and accuracy of thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

38 This did not affect the accuracy of thermodilution cardiac output measurements that were mad

39 devices (SCDs) have a significant effect on thermodilution cardiac output measurements using a pulmo

40 Thermodilution cardiac output measurements via a pulmona

41 The average of the three thermodilution cardiac output measurements was compared

42 This prospective study of 960 thermodilution cardiac output measurements was conducted

43 Thermodilution cardiac output measurements with and with

44 This study compared 2-mL bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements with standard

45 Baseline values of thermodilution cardiac output were highly correlated wit

46 e cardiac output monitoring and intermittent thermodilution cardiac output were simultaneously measur

47 Phase 2 (n = 12) found that the mean thermodilution cardiac output with 10 mL of cold (0-5 de

48 n on pericardial pressure (Pperi), Pcw, Pla, thermodilution cardiac output, and pulmonary artery flow

49 Mean arterial pressure, thermodilution cardiac output, mesenteric arteriolar dia

50 put monitoring has acceptable agreement with thermodilution cardiac output.

51 en noninvasive cardiac output monitoring and thermodilution cardiac output.

52 Measurements included: leg blood flow (LBF, thermodilution), cardiac output (Q), and oesophageal pre

53 catheterization laboratory with a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter before, during and after infusio

54 anesthesia, pigs underwent placement of a) a thermodilution catheter in the right internal jugular ve

55 dynamic were evaluated by a pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter.

56 In four patients with pulmonary artery thermodilution catheters, the mean increase in cardiac i

57 ar relationship between pressure-derived and thermodilution CFR in native (r(2) = 0.52; p < 0.001) an

58 Thermodilution CI better predicts mortality and should b

59 Femoral artery thermodilution CO ranged from 0.32 to 9.19 L/min, (media

60 Thermodilution coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) is a ne

61 nary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and SV (thermodilution derived cardiac output/heart rate).

62 ically significant coronary disease, FFR and thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRthermo) were measured sim

63 ure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary wire, thermodilution-derived CFR and IMR were measured, along

64 The index of microcirculatory resistance-a thermodilution-derived measure of the minimum achievable

65 Thermodilution devices are marginally more accurate than

66 Transpulmonary thermodilution enabled to detect small short-term change

67 the double indicator method, transpulmonary thermodilution estimation remained clinically acceptable

68 ue (EVLWref) and estimated by transpulmonary thermodilution (EVLWest).

69 (cerebral blood flow) and constant infusion thermodilution (femoral blood flow) with net exchange ca

70 Cardiac output (thermodilution), forearm vascular conductance (FVC, veno

71 lume index (<850 mL/m) in the transpulmonary thermodilution group and pulmonary artery occlusion pres

72 Prior studies using single indicator thermodilution have reported that 21% to 35% of patients

73 measured by single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution in a large cohort of patients without car

74 ive fluid balance with use of transpulmonary thermodilution in nonseptic shock.

75 dynamic and hepatic function (transpulmonary thermodilution, indocyanine green plasma disappearance r

76 re through a dedicated catheter for coronary thermodilution induces steady-state maximal hyperemia at

77 rately derive cardiac output from 2-mL bolus thermodilution injections, allowing cardiac output to be

78 Because intermittent bolus thermodilution is not a true "gold standard" for cardiac

79 Thermodilution is relatively accurate for cardiac output

80 LBF was determined by thermodilution: LGU = arteriovenous glucose difference (

81 mination, new techniques compared with bolus thermodilution may fail to achieve accuracy expectations

82 en uptake while leg blood flow (femoral vein thermodilution), mean arterial blood pressure (radial ar

83 Three independent sets of three consecutive thermodilution measurements (i.e., PAC-CO) each were per

84 compared with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution measurements in a clinical study setting

85 us noninvasive cardiac output monitoring and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output were compa

86 The variability of the thermodilution measurements was greater than that of the

87 For each measurement, the values of three thermodilution measurements were averaged at the followi

88 ght heart catheterization and transpulmonary thermodilution measurements were recorded 1 hour, 1 day,

89 e made concurrently with five femoral artery thermodilution measurements, and the concurrent measurem

90 segments and contemporaneous reference CO by thermodilution measurements, collected in an intensive c

91 Cardiac output was measured by the thermodilution method and the ejection fraction and left

92 of that estimated by the repetitive, single thermodilution method.

93 stimations closely approximated those of the thermodilution method; r2 = .74, p < .001; the precision

94 ry artery catheter and aortic transpulmonary thermodilution on 92 occasions; agreement was good, with

95 y arteries and a cardiac output measurement (thermodilution or Fick method) during coronary angiograp

96 acceptable agreement with intermittent bolus thermodilution over a wide range of cardiac output in an

97 show good correlation with pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) CO.

98 int was extravascular lung water measured by thermodilution (PiCCO) at Day 7.

99 lloid resuscitation guided by transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO) in an intensive care setting.

100 blood flow was also measured using cortical thermodilution probes in 33 patients, and regional cereb

101 isk elective surgery patients using both the thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and multi

102 A quadrilumen thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter was placed in m

103 were instrumented with femoral arterial and thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

104 echniques appear to have similar accuracy as thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

105 Cardiac output by PISA agreed closely with thermodilution (r=0.91, Delta=-0.05+/-0.55 L/min), but S

106 15 cm(2) (oxymetry) and 0.68 +/- 0.21 cm(2) (thermodilution), respectively, and mean systolic gradien

107 hium dilution (single measurement) and bolus thermodilution (series of three to six measurements acco

108 Thermodilution (Td) and estimated oxygen uptake Fick (eF

109 stroke volume (SV) were measured by MRI and thermodilution (TD) in 15 mice (3 L1, 4 L2, 8 LC).

110 in the lower extremity was determined using thermodilution (TD) techniques.

111 Stroke volume from ACOM was compared with thermodilution (TD), aortic valve pulsed-wave Doppler (P

112 and cardiac output by the intermittent bolus thermodilution (TDCO) method and continuous cardiac outp

113 CO was also measured using thermodilution (TDCO) when a pulmonary artery catheter w

114 ronary artery (R(micro app)) or with a novel thermodilution technique (apparent index of microcircula

115 e were measured by the renal vein retrograde thermodilution technique and by renal extraction of Cr-E

116 2-mL bolus technique and the 10-mL standard thermodilution technique in a perspective series.

117 erived CFR values with those obtained by the thermodilution technique using the intracoronary pressur

118 the Doppler wire and, more recently, using a thermodilution technique with the coronary pressure wire

119 Cardiac output, measured with bolus thermodilution technique, and arterial and venous oxygen

120 ssure wire, with the use of a novel coronary thermodilution technique, is feasible and adds informati

121 pressure measurements against an established thermodilution technique.

122 olic volume was derived, was measured by the thermodilution technique.

123 Ultrasound Doppler and thermodilution techniques provided direct measurements o

124 easured intermittently by using conventional thermodilution techniques.

125 Comparing lithium dilution with bolus thermodilution, the mean of the differences (lithium dil

126 he response of cardiac index (transpulmonary thermodilution) to fluid administration (500 mL saline).

127 catheter after calibration by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD).

128 ut measured by intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC-CO

129 ctive cardiac output (difference between the thermodilution value and the AV-ECMO flow rate) and mean

130 odynamic management guided by transpulmonary thermodilution vs. pulmonary artery catheter in shock di

131 Transpulmonary thermodilution (vs. pulmonary artery catheter) monitorin

132 sure criteria at baseline and transpulmonary thermodilution (vs. pulmonary artery catheter) monitorin

133 on, the estimation of EVLW by transpulmonary thermodilution was influenced by the amount of EVLW, the

134 after bronchoalveolar lavage, transpulmonary thermodilution was performed to record the value of inde

135 he mean of the differences (lithium dilution-thermodilution) was -0.25 +/- 0.46 [SD] L/min.

136 (PCWP), central venous pressure and SV (via thermodilution) were obtained while central blood volume