ライフサイエンスコーパス: to compare

1 To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond

2 This study aimed to compare echocardiographic findings in low-risk patients wi

3 The study aimed to compare three methods for determining total (TF) and total

4 We aimed to compare protection provided by different pertussis vaccine

5 We aimed to compare the influence of population density in state of Fl

6 alyses, source localization and measure projection analyses to compare neural oscillations between individuals with cLBP

7 to characterize the nanoemulsion of anise seed extract and to compare its efficacy with the bulk extract against pathoge

8 y or followed by sorafenib, is noninferior to sorafenib and to compare safety profiles for patients with advanced HCC.

9 -based population with acute loss of smell and/or taste and to compare the frequency of COVID-19 associated symptoms in p

10 er the receiver operating characteristic curve was assessed to compare prognostic accuracy between models with and withou

11 tool along with other indicators of nutrient availability, to compare the background nutrient status across temperate an

12 This study was conducted to compare mothbean, tepary bean and guar for their vegetativ

13 Elastic network models were constructed to compare the dynamics of tropoelastin and fibrillin individ

14 This pharmacoepidemiology study uses US pharmacy data to compare prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine a

15 A Markov model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of cabozantinib with b

16 aureus bacteremia (SAB) and gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) to compare the characteristics, outcomes, and chemokine and c

17 We used HiCorr to compare the high-resolution maps of chromatin interactions

18 The goal of this paper is to compare and contrast enrichment and classification methods

19 The objective of this study is to compare HCR and conventional coronary artery bypass graft

20 Here, we use single-molecule optical tweezers measurements to compare translocation of phage, plasmid, and synthetic A-p

21 We used amplicon targeted metagenomics to compare microbial communities from EDC and sputum samples

22 ports future TBI development by providing a rational method to compare different candidates.

23 nd secondary end points were assessed in a hierarchic model to compare the regimens and pick the winner.

24 ched control hospitals and difference in differences models to compare the 2 groups.

25 We used fixed-effects models to compare the observed volume as well as calorie and sugar c

26 ifies risk with explicit uncertainty estimates, enables one to compare risks over large geographic areas, and produces in

27 , along with subgroup analyses of >=75% compliant patients, to compare the incidence of acute mucositis (Radiation Therap

28 Purpose To compare DBT outcomes over multiple years and rounds to out

29 ow-exacerbation groups and then used statistical regression to compare this VDP threshold against conventional clinical m

30 This study sought to compare the postoperative visual outcomes of toric implant

31 the range of peptide studies done with VCD and extends them to compare with example protein and ROA applications.

32 ing on FUS mutants in parallel to FUS knockout, allowing us to compare mutation-induced changes to genuine loss of functi

33 odelled within the Bass diffusion framework that enables us to compare the differential equation version with an agent-ba

34 errupted Time Series and Difference-in-Difference) are used to compare staff sickness rates before and after the implemen

35 The Bland-Altman plot, used to compare the 2 measurement methods, showed a mean value of

36 Diffusion-weighted imaging was used to compare atypical haemangiomas and metastatic lesions.

37 The McNemar test was used to compare differences in performance between Lung-RADS and V

38 ranslating ribosome affinity purification and qPCR was used to compare mRNA expression of nrg1,2,3,4 and erbB1,2,3,4 in P

39 Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare outcomes including death, all-cause stroke, ischem

40 Fisher exact tests were used to compare patients who tested positive for COVID-19 with pat

41 n of clinically meaningful specificity (85%-100%) were used to compare the ability of each output to discriminate eyes wi

42 representative of mono- and disulfated peptides, were used to compare the enrichment capabilities of five sorbent materi

43 from symptom onset [DSO], >=18 years of age) were utilized to compare Veritor with the Lyra SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay (Lyra).

44 The aim of this project was to compare the prognosis of patients with ISM with that of pa

45 The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of conservative surgery wi

46 The main objective of this study was to compare bioactive compounds and other important quality pa

47 The purpose of this study was to compare downstream and upstream oral P2Y(12) inhibitors ad

48 The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 16 weeks of ID exercise versus a HB

49 The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a single XEN-mi

50 The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of renal oxygen availability (RO(2)) to