戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                                             To compare and test its scalability, the model was also run w
2                                                             To compare the circulating plasma levels of peptide YY and gh
3                                                             To compare the effects of both variants with known inactive G
4                                                             To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 sclerosants used to t
5                                                             To compare the vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratio (VCD
6                                                             To compare usage patterns and outcomes of a nurse practitione
7 tics (HES) data collected between April 2009 and March 2014 to compare perinatal mortality between induction of labour at
8                                                    We aimed to compare 5-year outcomes of adolescent surgical patients af
9                                                    We aimed to compare in-hospital outcomes of patients with CKD or ESRD
10                                We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO3(-) concentration and load in NT and CT systems
11                 We used multiple linear regression analysis to compare SMC with GES, adjusting for baseline and stratific
12  of 6-hydroxy-1-indanone with substituted benzaldehydes and to compare the reaction acceleration relative to the bulk.
13 usion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging parameters
14 is using a metabolite-corrected arterial input function and to compare parameters derived from kinetic analysis with SUV
15 ies before and after training and up to 18 months later and to compare resident performance with the performance of exper
16 mittent exotropia when fusion loss occurs spontaneously and to compare them with those induced by covering 1 eye and with
17                       Mass spectrometry imaging was applied to compare NIMS sensitivity of these various surfaces toward
18       We combined computational and experimental approaches to compare energy metabolism in the causative agent of sleepi
19   We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to compare patients listed with HCC who received exception po
20 g multiple, independent data sources.The study was designed to compare relevant data published by the Food and Agricultur
21     The ART (Arterial Revascularization Trial) was designed to compare survival after bilateral internal thoracic artery
22                Moreover, a unified system is also desirable to compare the indel calling results produced by different to
23       Linear regression models and the t-test were employed to compare significant differences in GQL-15 scores and to ge
24             The results appear reasonable but no data exist to compare with except those from dynamical mean-field theory
25                      The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular
26   We used internal transcribed spacer 1-based metabarcoding to compare fecal mycobiomes of 18 healthy volunteers with tho
27                         This tool uses a model-based method to compare allele read fractions at known single-nucleotide p
28                    We used an HDM-driven asthma mouse model to compare the capacity of Jagged 1 and Jagged 2 single- and
29 nd mammal abundances, and use structural equation modelling to compare competing trophic cascade hypotheses to explain ho
30 ated the so-called pungency in Scoville heat units in order to compare with previous studies from other climatical zones.
31 e in lifetime costs/difference in lifetime health outcomes) to compare the cost-effectiveness of CXL versus conventional
32 e probability of treatment-weighted analyses were performed to compare patients undergoing TAVR with general anesthesia w
33                                   The study was not powered to compare sublingual immunotherapy with subcutaneous immunot
34 n ILs vs those in classical molecular solvents is presented to compare these two classes of compounds.
35                                                     Purpose To compare the diagnostic utility of an investigational optoa
36                                                     Purpose To compare the involuntary head motion, frequency and B0 shim
37                                                     Purpose To compare the performance of a deep-learning bone age assess
38 al using software tools within the electronic health record to compare saline to balanced crystalloids.
39                                                   We sought to compare potential suspicion criteria using antibiotic and
40 se geometric morphometrics and phenotypic matrix statistics to compare rates of craniofacial evolution and estimate evolv
41 m diverse photosynthetic organisms in a heterologous system to compare their intrinsic assembly and dynamic properties.
42             Statistical analysis included a 2-sample t test to compare continuous variables, chi-square testing for categ
43 analysis and create a network of randomized clinical trials to compare outcomes after specific treatment durations.
44                                              This allows us to compare conservation over different evolutionary timescale
45                   The Akaike information criterion was used to compare 2 univariate models.
46                            The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of grades at each station between
47                   Mixed-effects regression models were used to compare PRO scores across procedure types.
48                                           Our study aim was to compare iron absorption from oral iron supplements given o
49                                     Secondary objective was to compare cost analyses using hospital accounting system dat
50                              The objective of the study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of FS and FV in prevent

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。