ライフサイエンスコーパス: tonometer

1 Goldmann applanation tonometry and a rebound tonometer.

2 ter (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonometer.

3 traocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a tonometer.

4 sing the Ocular Response Analyzer noncontact tonometer.

5 were killed, IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer.

6 ressure was measured using a TonoLab rebound tonometer.

7 ere examined for changes in IOP by a TonoLab tonometer.

8 ice were measured using a commercial rebound tonometer.

9 ads and measured twice weekly with a rebound tonometer.

10 was calculated with the help of an arterial tonometer.

11 d IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer.

12 IOP was monitored with an applanation tonometer.

13 rown Norway rats was measured with a rebound tonometer.

14 traocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a tonometer.

15 IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer.

16 intraocular pressure (IOP) using the rebound tonometer.

17 rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer.

18 oelasticity, were measured with a noncontact tonometer.

19 e were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer.

20 metry was performed with a modified Goldmann tonometer.

21 d DBA/2NNia mice was measured with a rebound tonometer.

22 H were determined with saline-filled balloon tonometers.

23 dynamic and can be influenced by the use of tonometers.

24 esult in significant differences among the 3 tonometers.

25 raobserver variability were observed for all tonometers.

26 agreement (95% limits) seemed to vary across tonometers: 0.2 mmHg (-3.8 to 4.3 mmHg) for the NCT to 2

27 IOP was recorded with a handheld tonometer 1 hour, 4 hours, and 23 hours following daily

28 The Perkins tonometer, although slightly less accurate than the Tono

29 (IOP) was measured with the Dynamic Contour tonometer and central corneal thickness (CCT) was also e

30 a can perform self-tonometry using a rebound tonometer and examine patient acceptability.

31 l PCO2 was measured with an air-equilibrated tonometer and pHi and PCO2 gap were calculated.

32 New tonometers such as the dynamic contour tonometer and the Proview tonometer do not appear to be

33 IOP and CCT were measured with a hand-held tonometer and ultrasound pachymetry on the first, third,

34 IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer, and optic nerve (ON) damage was determined by

35 IOP was monitored daily by handheld tonometer, and retinas were collected 8 days and 5 weeks

36 IOP was measured with a hand-held tonometer, and semiautomated optic nerve axon counts wer

37 ter (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

38 Use of the Proview phosphene tonometer appears to decrease patient anxiety regarding

39 baseline, both with an applanation resonance tonometer (ART) and an ocular response analyzer (ORA), a

40 The IOP measurements were conducted with a tonometer at 2 to 4 hours after onset of the nocturnal a

41 th the Tono-Pen (TP), a handheld applanation tonometer based on the Mackay-Marg principle.

42 ts were obtained over a 4-week study using a tonometer before and after pump implantation.

43 applanating tips and reduced weights in the tonometer body from those used in humans and species wit

44 (CCT) and IOP values obtained with all three tonometers but only the IOP values detected with the ICa

45 The I/I tonometer can be used for noninvasive, in vivo IOP measu

46 A gastric tonometer catheter was placed in the stomach lumen.

47 rwell, MA), the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer (Clement Clarke, Harlow, UK), and the Ocular B

48 The IOP readings generated by the rebound tonometer correlated very well with the actual pressure

49 rmined using 86Rb+ as a tracer for K+; glass tonometers coupled to a gas mixing pump were used to equ

50 ore, single-use tonometer tips or disposable tonometer covers should be considered when treating pati

51 he dynamic contour tonometer and the Proview tonometer do not appear to be influenced by central corn

52 d comparisons, were included, representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonome

53 The Goldmann-type tonometer error measured on live human eyes was 5.2 +/-1

54 e pressures were monitored with a TonoPen XL tonometer for 17 days before the rats were killed.

55 The availability of an easy-to-use, reliable tonometer for IOP measurements in mice will allow more e

56 mpared the accuracy and variability of three tonometers for measuring IOP in rabbits.

57 upright position with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonom

58 as measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by ART (ART1, ART2), in random

59 In this study, the gold standard Goldmann tonometer (GAT) was compared to ICP and Tono-Pen AVIA (T

60 lar pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was measured at baseline and at 4 and 8

61 traocular pressure with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT-IOP), and endothelial cell density (ECD),

62 smaller variance; the hand-held applanation tonometer had lower accuracy and higher variability.

63 nse analyzer, Ocuton S, handheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonom

64 ressure measurements using the ICare rebound tonometer (ICare, Helsinki, Finland) were obtained.

65 IOP was measured by two scales of Schiotz tonometer in both eyes, and the mean was calculated.

66 udy evaluated the applicability of a rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in rat

67 Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by a tonometer in rats under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia.

68 g mechanical ventilation, with a nasogastric tonometer in situ, in whom enteral feeding was initiated

69 IOP was measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright

70 erformed using a modified electronic Schiotz tonometer in two positions: seated position, 70 degrees

71 eyes were monitored by slit lamp, a handheld tonometer, indirect ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography

72 Hourly awakening during noncontact tonometer IOP measurements did not seem to alter the mea

73 uation, when measuring IOP with the Goldmann tonometer, it is likely that IOP is underestimated in ey

74 ith calibrated tonometer (rats) and Goldmann tonometer (monkeys).

75 eters: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer, Ocuton S, han

76 [SD] 11.3+/-3.0 years) using three different tonometers: non-contact (NCT), the ICare and Goldmann ap

77 , representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response a

78 The Tono-pen XL is the tonometer of choice for measuring IOP in rabbits within

79 ke a comparative analysis of three different tonometers on a group of healthy children to see whether

80 asurement of IOP was performed with a Shiotz tonometer once weekly for 4 weeks.

81 thickness was assessed using an applanation tonometer or high-resolution MRI (23.4 microm2 in-plane)

82 he supine (TonoPen XL) and sitting (Goldmann tonometer) positions.

83 anipulated by changing reservoir height, and tonometer pressure readings were recorded by an independ

84 Nine of the 10 studies used tonometer prisms and 1 used steel discs.

85 Damage to tonometer prisms can be caused by sodium hypochlorite, 7

86 of various disinfection methods for reusable tonometer prisms in eye care and to highlight how disinf

87 Tonometer prisms should be examined regularly for signs

88 The ICare tonometer provided statistically higher IOP values (16.9

89 pressure (IOP) was measured with calibrated tonometer (rats) and Goldmann tonometer (monkeys).

90 Participants' tonometer readings were similar to those of the ophthalm

91 measured hourly using a portable noncontact tonometer (session with nocturnal hourly awakening).

92 only the IOP values detected with the ICare tonometer showed a statistically significant correlation

93 Tonometer skills were assessed by comparing participants

94 New tonometers such as the dynamic contour tonometer and the

95 Icare PRO (ICP) is a new Rebound tonometer that is able to measure intraocular pressure (

96 The Goldmann tonometer, the standard for measuring the IOP in the hum

97 these instruments: the hand-held applanation tonometer, the Tono-pen XL, and the pneumatonometer.

98 Tonometers, thus modified, were then used in conscious,

99 The tonometer tip cracks can irritate the cornea, harbor mic

100 w disinfectants to enter the interior of the tonometer tip.

101 nd to highlight how disinfectants can damage tonometer tips and cause subsequent patient harm.

102 Therefore, single-use tonometer tips or disposable tonometer covers should be

103 Disinfectants can cause tonometer tips to swell and crack by dissolving the glue

104 Venous blood from healthy volunteers was tonometered to create different oxygen tensions simulati

105 d on many cohorts of children with different tonometers to determine how the values correlate between

106 IOP was measured with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen; Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL)

107 andheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

108 All tonometers underestimate IOP, with increasing inaccuracy

109 he Tono-pen XL and the hand-held applanation tonometer underestimated the IOP, whereas the pneumatono

110 All three tonometers underestimated the true IOP, especially at hi

111 On average, IOP by the rebound tonometer was 2.66 mm Hg lower than Goldmann applanation

112 The I/I tonometer was also used to measure IOP in vivo in anesth

113 This tonometer was calibrated in mice against manometrically

114 The accuracy of the TonoLab rebound tonometer was determined in cannulated mouse and rat eye

115 The rebound tonometer was easy to use and accurately measured IOP in

116 the superior mesenteric artery and an ileal tonometer was inserted.

117 The Goldmann applanation tonometer was modified to measure IOP in the conscious,

118 A 7-French recirculating gas tonometer was placed in the stomach via the orogastric r

119 The Perkins applanation tonometer was the most reliable for measuring IOP in the

120 e agreement between Icare HOME and reference tonometers was used to assess precision.

121 The IOPs with the rebound tonometer were similar whether obtained by self-tonometr

122 TonoLab and Tono-Pen tonometers were calibrated in cannulated rat eyes connec

123 All tonometers were less accurate when the IOP was elevated

124 In anesthetized rats Goldmann tonometers were tested that had reduced biprism angles i

125 An induction-impact (I/I) tonometer, which operates on the rebound principle, was

126 The IOP was measured using an applanation tonometer with a fiber-optic pressure sensor.

127 Then a tonometer with the appropriate configuration of tip and

128 Tonometers with reduction of the biprism angles in the a

129 Tonometers with tips with biprism angles of 48 degrees a