ライフサイエンスコーパス: tonometry

1 rrelated with endothelial function (arterial tonometry).

2 ve reflections, measured via radial arterial tonometry).

3 sure was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry.

4 using both rebound tonometry and cannulation tonometry.

5 r pressure (IOP) was measured by applanation tonometry.

6 patients who could successfully perform self-tonometry.

7 corneal properties than Goldmann applanation tonometry.

8 techniques, especially Goldmann applanation tonometry.

9 hymeter, and IOP was measured by applanation tonometry.

10 ence interval, 7.15-8.6 mins) for the saline tonometry.

11 ously by using capnometric recirculating gas tonometry.

12 ated gas system than with traditional saline tonometry.

13 uscle and the stomach as assessed by gastric tonometry.

14 on value for the CO2 measurement with saline tonometry.

15 to a change in CO2 than conventional saline tonometry.

16 l artery pressure waveforms were recorded by tonometry.

17 l pH of the sigmoid colon was measured using tonometry.

18 those obtained by conventional intermittent tonometry.

19 on (n = 6397), included Goldmann applanation tonometry.

20 nsthoracic echocardiography, and applanation tonometry.

21 ate [AI@75]) were obtained using applanation tonometry.

22 eal biomicroscopy, fluorescein test, digital tonometry.

23 using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry.

24 (FMD), and arterial stiffness by applanation tonometry.

25 r pressure (IOP) was measured by noninvasive tonometry.

26 lanation tonometry was compared with rebound tonometry.

27 IOP was measured by rebound tonometry.

28 measured OPA on both eyes by dynamic contour tonometry.

29 s 2.66 mm Hg lower than Goldmann applanation tonometry (95% limits of agreement, -3.48 to 8.80 mm Hg)

30 This study gives strong support to ball tonometry, a new method of measuring cell turgor pressur

31 IOP was measured by Goldmann tonometry, AHF and corneal endothelium transfer coeffici

32 Radial artery applanation tonometry allows completely noninvasive continuous cardi

33 Capnometric recirculating gas tonometry allows continuous and automated assessment of

34 Dynamic contour tonometry also appears to give pressure readings that ar

35 aire was used to examine perceptions of self-tonometry among patients.

36 /- 1.3 kPa) by capnometric recirculating gas tonometry and 45.8 +/- 3.4 torr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) by con

37 g MAR visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry and a dilated fundus examination.

38 and central pressures (estimated via radial tonometry and a generalized transfer function) were asse

39 IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and a rebound tonometer.

40 Pulse-wave velocity was assessed from tonometry and body surface measurements.

41 O2 values were obtained by recirculating gas tonometry and by the conventional method.

42 etry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry and can be used without topical anesthesia.

43 9SvJ) and hevin-null mice using both rebound tonometry and cannulation tonometry.

44 tricular geometry were measured with carotid tonometry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, respec

45 ssure waveforms were recorded by applanation tonometry and central aortic pressure waveforms generate

46 ure (IOP) measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and DCT in the study and control groups was no

47 icroscopy, conjunctival impression cytology, tonometry and fundus exam.

48 hat is known about CCT and its relation with tonometry and glaucoma risk.

49 f glaucoma, thereby complicating the role of tonometry and measurement of intraocular pressure as scr

50 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive ce

51 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive ce

52 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse-wave analysis were used to derive ce

53 By use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, arterial stiffness and pul

54 With the use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, pulsatile hemodynamics wer

55 ve correlated well with Goldmann applanation tonometry and seem to be independent of corneal thicknes

56 Most patients could perform self-tonometry and the method was acceptable to patients.

57 analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer.

58 central blood pressure (via radial arterial tonometry) and cardiovascular function with echocardiogr

59 , carotid artery pulse waves (by applanation tonometry) and the arrival time of reflected waves.

60 ascular function (by using peripheral artery tonometry), and numbers of circulating EPCs and EMPs (by

61 ssed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry.

62 2 stages of the Bruce protocol), applanation tonometry, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation te

63 Intraocular pressure was measured by tonometry, and central corneal thickness was measured by

64 oppler echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry, and gas exchange.

65 s using dual-wavelength oximetry, noncontact tonometry, and manual sphygmomanometry.

66 phy, magnetic resonance angiography, gastric tonometry, and mesenteric arteriography.

67 Glaucoma is diagnosed using ophthalmoscopy, tonometry, and perimetry.

68 eated IOP measurements with pneumotonometry, tonometry, and the WIT resulted in SDs of 2.70 mm Hg, 3.

69 easy to learn to use." CONCLUSION: Icare ONE tonometry appears accurate and well-tolerated compared t

70 Rebound tonometry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonome

71 ial function testing using peripheral artery tonometry are being performed at enrolment, defervescenc

72 are rebound tonometry, Tonopen, and Goldmann tonometry are in excellent agreement following vitreoret

73 try; however, pressure readings from rebound tonometry are not independent of corneal properties.

74 Vascular ultrasonography and tonometry are promising test modalities for assessment o

75 ontrolled Bioresonator Applanation Resonance Tonometry (ART) and to evaluate possible influential fac

76 e measured gastric-arterial PCO2 gradient by tonometry as an index of gastric mucosal perfusion.

77 itative imaging, optic disc photography, and tonometry at 11 visits.

78 measured in both eyes by masked applanation tonometry at 8 am, 11 am, and 4 pm for 7 consecutive wee

79 re unlikely to replace, Goldmann applanation tonometry at the present time.

80 utput measurements obtained with applanation tonometry (AT-CO) using the T-Line system (Tensys Medica

81 sel function measured by peripheral arterial tonometry between 2003 and 2008 in the Framingham Heart

82 w-mediated dilation, digital pulse amplitude tonometry, blood pressure, and carotid-radial pulse wave

83 re HOME device is safe and reliable for self-tonometry, but nearly 1 in 6 individuals may fail to cer

84 sure was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry by the same observer before and 1 hour after p

85 d pressure pulsatility derived from arterial tonometry (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [CFPWV],

86 Tonometry catheters were placed in a test chamber design

87 Two balloon-tip tonometry catheters, one conventional and one modified f

88 mittent PCO2 values obtained by conventional tonometry catheters.

89 ressure was 2 to 3 mmHg higher using rebound tonometry compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry i

90 ren 3 years of age and younger using rebound tonometry compared with noncontact tonometry in 1 level

91 Digital tonometry confirmed acceptable levels of ocular tonus in

92 In children, Icare PRO tonometry correlates well with GAT in the sitting positi

93 ormance of the capnometric recirculating gas tonometry (CRGT) system was tested in vitro using an equ

94 In 204 families with tonometry data, a genome-wide scan was performed with mi

95 ssure (IOP) measurement with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)

96 ateral OPA was measured with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and was compared between the study and c

97 conventional GAT and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) measurements, as well as the correlation

98 OPA was measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), PPAA, RNFL, GCL and macular thickness w

99 ty (Doppler) and augmentation index (carotid tonometry) declined with verapamil (-5.9 +/- 2.1% and -3

100 cosal pH, as determined by recirculating gas tonometry, decreased significantly at 5 mins after start

101 rotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and radial tonometry-derived central augmentation index and subendo

102 rough digital tonometry (peripheral arterial tonometry) detected by reactive hyperemia index (RHI) an

103 , and LV geometry were measured with carotid tonometry, Doppler, and speckle-tracking echocardiograph

104 ility, was evaluated using peripheral artery tonometry (EndoPAT), and plasma levels of l-arginine, ar

105 flow-mediated dilation, peripheral arterial tonometry/EndoPAT (Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel)

106 ach visit by using radial artery applanation tonometry for pulse wave analysis and modeled in a mixed

107 ally injected and intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry, fundus photography, and electroretinography w

108 ncluding slit-lamp biomicroscopy, noncontact tonometry, fundus photography, central corneal thickness

109 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) error relative to intracameral intraocul

110 Goldmann-applanation tonometry (GAT) in the untreated state was recorded and

111 orrection equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is lacking.

112 Though Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT) is the "gold standard" for IOP measureme

113 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was then performed by a clinician masked

114 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was used for all IOP measurements which

115 as measured using PDCT, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA;

116 rement within 5 mmHg of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

117 our tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

118 nterval [CrI] 0-62) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT; 45, 95% CrI 17-68), whereas threshold st

119 ess (CCT; P = 0.63) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT; P = 0.32).

120 d examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy and fundus photography.

121 amination that included Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and CECC measurements.

122 almologic examination, including applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, biometry, stereoscopic fundus exa

123 lit-lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, dilated fundus examination, centr

124 ution visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, Lens Opacities Classification Sys

125 ophthalmic examination included applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, pachymetry, optic disc evaluation

126 adings were obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland) before pupil

127 hage, intramucosal PCO2 by recirculating gas tonometry had increased significantly (49.3 +/- 9.7 torr

128 Effects of tonometry, handling, water drinking, and instillation of

129 Rebound tonometry has been used in animal models of glaucoma, bu

130 Self-tonometry has the potential to improve patient engagemen

131 and appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry; however, pressure readings from rebound tonom

132 IOP was measured by applanation tonometry immediately prior to measuring LP opening pres

133 g rebound tonometry compared with noncontact tonometry in 1 level III study.

134 IOP was measured by applanation tonometry in 14 untreated marmosets ranging in age from

135 -radial pulse wave velocity were assessed by tonometry in 1962 participants (mean age, 61 years; 56%

136 nction by carotid ultrasound and applanation tonometry in 271 unmedicated hypertensive patients class

137 ntraocular pressure (IOP) was evaluated with tonometry in a colony of glaucomatous dogs at 8, 15, 18,

138 Subjects underwent tonometry in both eyes while upright (sitting), after in

139 ation, and holds promise for clinic and home tonometry in children.

140 cently been compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry in humans.

141 Tonometry in mice required a biprism angle of 36 degrees

142 IOP was measured by rebound tonometry in mice, and pressure versus flow data were me

143 e (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry in monkeys under ketamine anesthesia.

144 tonometry compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry in the 2 level II studies performed in a clini

145 , and a similar number happy to perform self-tonometry in the future.

146 loci linked to IOP (measured by applanation tonometry) in 244 affected sibling pairs with T2D using

147 tomileusis surgery make Goldmann applanation tonometry inaccurate, the advent of new diagnostic modal

148 IOP for rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry increased as the IOP increased.

149 Using arterial tonometry, iohexol clearance, and magnetic resonance ima

150 Gastric tonometry is an important clinical tool that can provide

151 Rebound tonometry is convenient, can be used without topical ane

152 Goldmann applanation tonometry is the most widely used method of measuring in

153 r calculated by Doppler echocardiography and tonometry: left ventricular volumes and end-systolic ela

154 rneal thickness (CCT), IOP (using noncontact tonometry), manifest refraction, average keratometry, ag

155 Gastric tonometry may aid in the rapid assessment of pharmacolog

156 Newer technology such as rebound tonometry may decrease the frequency of examination unde

157 Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were modified with 5 correction e

158 (in models that included blood pressure and tonometry measures collected during examination cycle 7)

159 Tonometry measures were obtained on average 3 years afte

160 anges, and agreement were evaluated in the 3 tonometry methods.

161 l artery blood pressure waveform obtained by tonometry (n = 6,336); carotid distensibility and Young'

162 Perhaps the combination of gastric tonometry, near-infrared spectroscopy, urinary PO2 and c

163 d pressure waveforms obtained by applanation tonometry of the contralateral carotid artery.

164 scopy, nonmydriatic digital photography, and tonometry on 429 participants.

165 All parents accomplished Icare ONE tonometry on at least 1 eye; 98% reported it was "easy t

166 s B-mode ultrasound and arterial applanation tonometry on the common carotid artery) was lower (P:<0.

167 cally significant adverse effects on gastric tonometry or global indexes of tissue oxygenation.

168 ometer were similar whether obtained by self-tonometry or investigator, with excellent reproducibilit

169 seconds to study transient changes in IOP to tonometry, or for 15 seconds every 2.5 minutes to study

170 1) and to 6.89 +/- 0.10 by recirculating gas tonometry (p < .001 vs. baseline).

171 ncrease at 1 month with Goldmann applanation tonometry (P = .005).

172 orr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) by conventional saline tonometry (p = NS).

173 ress were measured using peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) at baseline and following 3 acute mental

174 Using a fingertip peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) device, we measured digital pulse amplit

175 noninvasive technique of peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT).

176 IOP was determined by Goldmann applanation tonometry, PD with vernier calipers in room light, Rfx b

177 helial response to hyperemia through digital tonometry (peripheral arterial tonometry) detected by re

178 Dynamic contour tonometry provides intraocular pressure readings that ar

179 3.1%, P = 0.01) and digital pulse amplitude tonometry ratio (0.10 +/- 0.12 to 0.23 +/- 0.16, P = 0.0

180 ine tonometry samples, and recirculating gas tonometry readings were obtained immediately before and

181 he ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene t

182 nts 6 months apart with Goldmann applanation tonometry recorded in the sitting position at 9 am, 10 a

183 ence interferometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, respectively.

184 hest and breast x-rays, visual acuity tests, tonometry, retinal photography, audiometry, vital capaci

185 using reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) and assessed associations with argini

186 ue of reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) as a noninvasive tool to identify ind

187 Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), a noninvasive method to assess perip

188 erial and mixed venous blood samples, saline tonometry samples, and recirculating gas tonometry readi

189 ripheral (Finapres) and central (applanation tonometry) SBP values.

190 Rebound tonometry seems to be a reasonably accurate instrument t

191 g gonioscopy by a masked grader, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, optic nerve evaluati

192 dy best-corrected visual acuity, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscop

193 e ratio, and arterial elasticity measured by tonometry substantially reduced the magnitudes of these

194 The automated gas tonometry system has a significantly faster response to

195 a slightly faster time constant for the gas tonometry system with a 5% change in the gas environment

196 om 7.10 +/- 0.10) by the conventional saline tonometry technique (p < .01) and to 6.89 +/- 0.10 by re

197 ickness (CCT) is a potent confounder of most tonometry techniques, especially Goldmann applanation to

198 easurement using the noninvasive applanation tonometry technology is basically feasible in ICU patien

199 The applanation tonometry technology provides cardiac output values with

200 ontinuously by capnometric recirculating gas tonometry throughout the experiment.

201 was easy, with 73 of 79 (92%) reporting self-tonometry to be comfortable, and a similar number happy

202 othelial function by using peripheral artery tonometry to determine the reactive hyperemia index (RHI

203 sease characteristics and radial applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness were evaluated i

204 herosclerosis, and radial artery applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

205 ography, carotid ultrasonography, and radial tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

206 is (discrete plaque), and radial applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

207 The authors used tonometry to measure microbead-induced IOP elevations.

208 Applanation tonometry (TONO) and in-plane PCMR was performed in 24 v

209 IOP measurements using Icare rebound tonometry, Tonopen, and Goldmann tonometry are in excell

210 part in the study received standardized self-tonometry training and were then instructed to measure t

211 IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry under ketamine anesthesia after single or twic

212 ther patients with glaucoma can perform self-tonometry using a rebound tonometer and examine patient

213 ed in the supine position for 5 minutes, and tonometry using the Icare PRO and the Tono-Pen was obtai

214 ; p = NS vs. corresponding recirculating gas tonometry values).

215 ce, mean IOP +/- SD as determined by rebound tonometry was 9.8 +/- 3.9 mm Hg when the animals were an

216 el III study in which noncontact applanation tonometry was compared with rebound tonometry.

217 artially successful patients (71%) felt self-tonometry was easy, with 73 of 79 (92%) reporting self-t

218 Gastric tonometry was performed after completion of the surgical

219 Radial applanation tonometry was performed in the third Strong Heart Study

220 Tonometry was performed only in the first study.

221 To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP), tonometry was performed with a modified Goldmann tonomet

222 Gastric tonometry was used as an index of gastric mucosal oxygen

223 Radial tonometry was used to calculate central blood pressure.

224 he 6-hour IOP response (Goldmann applanation tonometry) was determined before the drug application an

225 Using arterial tonometry, we evaluated 3 measures of aortic stiffness:

226 Using arterial tonometry, we evaluated heritability and linkage of forw

227 romanometer and radial pressure by automated tonometry were measured in 20 patients at steady state a

228 Echocardiography and arterial tonometry were performed to quantify arterial and ventri

229 ne modified for continuous recirculating gas tonometry, were inserted into each animal's stomach by t

230 red at various intervals by pneumotonometry, tonometry, WIT, and manometry.

231 Measurement of AS by applanation tonometry with pulse-wave velocity has been the gold-sta

232 ures can be accurately estimated from radial tonometry with the use of a generalized TF.