ライフサイエンスコーパス: tooth extraction

1 ew bone growth in alveolar sockets following tooth extraction.

2 ne loss and the rate of bone formation after tooth extraction.

3 ficant and rapid bone loss that occurs after tooth extraction.

4 les in explaining dental pain recalled after tooth extraction.

5 have been used for ridge preservation after tooth extraction.

6 loss of ridge volume that typically follows tooth extraction.

7 in the unligated teeth and reduced BH after tooth extraction.

8 for use in alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.

9 ation and tissue injury, including that from tooth extraction.

10 ma following acute injury or surgery such as tooth extraction.

11 rapy to prevent severe bone resorption after tooth extraction.

12 limited use in assessing implant risk before tooth extraction.

13 d a normal course of wound healing following tooth extraction.

14 xillary premolar, canine, or central incisor tooth extraction.

15 impact of amoxicillin prophylaxis on single-tooth extraction.

16 ontinue aspirin for persons requiring single-tooth extraction.

17 ons of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth extraction.

18 cause increased bleeding following a single tooth extraction.

19 absolute bony dimensional changes following tooth extraction.

20 n a human buccal wall defect model following tooth extraction.

21 ival biopsies were obtained prior to routine tooth extraction.

22 ne loss and/or accelerate bone healing after tooth extraction.

23 n increased risk for complications following tooth extraction.

24 sthesia, 10 beagle dogs underwent atraumatic tooth extractions.

25 s, with 16 sites per group: 1) ESC-1, single tooth extraction; 2) ESC-2, two contiguous teeth extract

26 Following tooth extraction, a total of 30 sockets in 19 patients w

27 We addressed the hypothesis that tooth extraction activates the expression of a unique se

28 alveolar ridge volume loss as compared with tooth extraction alone in nonmolar teeth.

29 physiologic ridge reduction as compared with tooth extraction alone.

30 f ridge dimensions were taken at the time of tooth extraction and again at implant placement.

31 Tooth extraction and dental disease have been strongly a

32 ked at the effect of NICE guidance on wisdom tooth extraction and primary total hip replacement in th

33 useful in immediate implant placement after tooth extraction and resulted in greater stability and a

34 st that waiting approximately 6 months after tooth extraction and ridge preservation using mineralize

35 in histologic and clinical healing following tooth extraction and ridge preservation using two differ

36 Molar tooth extraction and ridge preservation were performed i

37 Forty-four patients had tooth extraction and ridge preservation with DFDBA that

38 reater new vital bone formation occurs after tooth extraction and ridge preservation with DFDBA when

39 re histologic and clinical healing following tooth extraction and ridge preservation with either cort

40 tomographic (CT) scans are often taken after tooth extraction and socket healing to assess the healed

41 treatments and reduction of the time between tooth extraction and the placement of the definitive pro

42 l species in blood cultures following single-tooth extraction and tooth brushing.

43 endocarditis-related bacteremia from single-tooth extraction and toothbrushing and to determine the

44 The implants were placed at the time of tooth extraction and were not augmented with barrier mem

45 the rat face-M1 and face-S1 occurs following tooth extraction, and if subsequent dental implant place

46 Tooth extractions are followed by significant dimensiona

47 Patients with osteoporosis who receive tooth extractions are typically on either oral bisphosph

48 xamination, and data on number and timing of tooth extractions as well as pre-extraction diagnoses an

49 As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in

50 e posterior mandible, a CT scan taken before tooth extraction can be of value in assessing the availa

51 > 0.05), but in comparison with naive rats, tooth extraction caused a significant (P < 0.05) and sus

52 17 adults were evaluated retrospectively for tooth extraction events.

53 mice, but not control non-drug-treated mice, tooth extraction followed by oral infection with Fusobac

54 impact on bacteremia resulting from a single-tooth extraction, given the greater frequency for oral h

55 Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many s

56 Alveolar bone changes following tooth extraction have been well documented and have give

57 dies assessed bone remodeling after a single tooth extraction; however, the effect of multiple contig

58 When implants are placed immediately after tooth extraction, I-BP may represent a useful diagnostic

59 Both groups received a periodontal flap, tooth extraction, implant placement, allograft bone, and

60 phasize the importance of dental disease and tooth extraction in ONJ pathogenesis and help delineate

61 mize the loss of alveolar bone subsequent to tooth extraction in preparation for implant therapy.

62 at dental caries was the principal cause for tooth extraction in the IAL and the control groups.

63 Based on these findings, we believe that tooth extraction is a low-risk procedure in HIV-positive

64 Tooth extraction is commonly performed for patients infe

65 Preservation of the alveolar crest after tooth extraction is essential to enhance the surgical si

66 This may represent a challenge and sometimes tooth extraction is inevitable.

67 Tooth extraction is the most commonly prescribed ablatio

68 oss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction is well documented, but models to evalu

69 sults seem to indicate that the decision for tooth extraction made by dental health professionals at

70 ry of state anxiety and pain reported during tooth extraction, not depression or state anxiety at the

71 e, timing of DI placement (immediately after tooth extraction or after socket healing), and treatment

72 scussing regenerative therapy at the time of tooth extraction or immediate implant placement with or

73 Because of bone resorption following tooth extraction, preservation of adequate bony dimensio

74 Patients presenting for tooth extraction, prior to extraction, rated their curre

75 Analysis of wisdom tooth extraction showed that NICE guidance was not the p

76 BMP-2/ACS (0.43 mg/ml) can be safely used in tooth extraction sites and in local ridge augmentation p

77 Second, osteotomies were produced in healed tooth extraction sites and therefore represented the pla

78 ed to bisphosphonate, bacterial infection at tooth extraction sites caused diminished KGF expression

79 diate implants placed in multiple contiguous tooth extraction sites compared to immediate implants pl

80 ver, the effect of PTH therapy on healing of tooth extraction sites is unknown.

81 one grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extraction sites were recruited.

82 pared to immediate implants placed in single tooth extraction sites.

83 e findings suggest that PTH therapy promotes tooth extraction socket healing and that intra-oral inje

84 re to determine the effect of PTH therapy on tooth extraction socket healing and to examine whether P

85 ctive as subcutaneous injection in promoting tooth extraction socket healing.

86 n tissue before trabecular bone formation in tooth extraction socket.

87 terials have been used immediately following tooth extraction to fill and/or cover the socket in an a

88 search for procedures to decrease time from tooth extraction to restoration.

89 e was composed of patients who presented for tooth extraction to the outpatient oral/maxillofacial su

90 Tooth extraction typically leads to loss of ridge width

91 l healing changes of alveolar bone following tooth extraction using cone-beam volumetric tomography (

92 th (bicuspids forward) immediately following tooth extraction were enrolled.

93 Thirty-six healthy persons requiring a tooth extraction were randomized to receive 325 mg/day a

94 Molar tooth extractions were performed in mice.

95 randomized to (1) toothbrushing, (2) single-tooth extraction with amoxicillin prophylaxis, or (3) si

96 with amoxicillin prophylaxis, or (3) single-tooth extraction with identical placebo.

97 ric, and radiographic healing 4 months after tooth extraction with or without placement of a putty-fo

98 to compare the histologic changes following tooth extraction with ridge preservation in humans using

99 fect of short-term ALN on bone formation and tooth extraction wound healing.

100 expressed by the fibroblasts associated with tooth extraction wound-healing.

101 the differences in the therapeutic effect on tooth-extraction wound healing between bisphosphonate an