ライフサイエンスコーパス: toothbrush

1 l toothbrush) and 0.190 (experimental manual toothbrush).

2 ing three single brushing episodes with each toothbrush.

3 oothbrush and 2.99 prior to using the manual toothbrush.

4 3 minutes of brushing compared to the manual toothbrush.

5 y of a manual toothbrush to this new powered toothbrush.

6 e randomly assigned either a sonic or manual toothbrush.

7 g-rotating toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush.

8 ed to augment plaque removal achieved with a toothbrush.

9 pared with the use of a manual soft-bristled toothbrush.

10 ed toothbrush relative to the control manual toothbrushes.

11 h as injection drug use or shared razors and toothbrushes.

12 view of RCTs comparing powered versus manual toothbrushes.

13 tion would enhance the evaluation of powered toothbrushes.

14 rechargeable power toothbrush and two manual toothbrushes.

15 ubjects brushed three times with each of the toothbrushes.

16 .4% and 28.2% compared to the control manual toothbrushes.

17 divorced from the indeterminate variable of toothbrushing.

18 All patients received CBT of the basics of toothbrushing.

19 and is associated with the uptake of nursery toothbrushing.

20 and WF scores was associated with infrequent toothbrushing.

21 d one of which compared electric with manual toothbrushing.

22 ) in patients receiving toothbrushing vs. no toothbrushing.

23 the V-shaped lesion was excessive horizontal toothbrushing.

24 d study, 290 subjects were randomized to (1) toothbrushing, (2) single-tooth extraction with amoxicil

25 e intervention (22,600-ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste,

26 o intervention (22,600 ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, a 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpast

27 ciated with gingival recession stemming from toothbrush abrasion.

28 Plaque removal scores for each toothbrush after 3 minutes of brushing were about 50% hi

29 a clinical evaluation of the safety of these toothbrushes after surgical root coverage procedures has

30 American Dental Association reference manual toothbrush alone and in combination with four floss prod

31 eater (P <0.05) mean plaque removal than the toothbrush alone.

32 removed plaque significantly better than the toothbrush alone.

33 ontact areas were as follows: 0.181 with the toothbrush alone; 0.228, 0.217, and 0.210 for the toothb

34 brush-on 0.4% SnF2 gel would be better than toothbrushing alone in maintaining periodontal health in

35 and placed into a control group, which used toothbrushing alone, and two treatment groups, which use

36 scores were 2.98 prior to using the powered toothbrush and 2.99 prior to using the manual toothbrush

37 -week study compared the efficacy of a sonic toothbrush and a manual brush in 40 patients with adult

38 removal scores than the experimental manual toothbrush and ADA reference manual toothbrush groups, r

39 ned plaque removal with a rechargeable power toothbrush and two manual toothbrushes.

40 d trials (RCTs) comparing manual and powered toothbrushes and provide advice on how future trials mig

41 Toothbrushing and dental service use were associated wit

42 lth-related beliefs, which in turn predicted toothbrushing and dental service use.

43 udies have explored the relationship between toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR)

44 e group allocation, patients were advised on toothbrushing and instructed in two customized methods o

45 bacteremia from single-tooth extraction and toothbrushing and to determine the impact of amoxicillin

46 ean differences of 0.211 (control ADA manual toothbrush) and 0.190 (experimental manual toothbrush).

47 kind of oral care or control with or without toothbrushing, and examined ventilator-associated pneumo

48 powered toothbrush compared with the manual toothbrush at 6 months (control, 66.67%; test, 96.67%; P

49 ed split-mouth designs that may have changed toothbrushing behavior.

50 lity with the use of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush.

51 higher in participants who used the powered toothbrush compared with the manual toothbrush at 6 mont

52 The uptake of toothbrushing correlated with the decline in d(3)mft (co

53 The powered toothbrush delivered a covariance-adjusted mean plaque s

54 The power toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covari

55 The powered toothbrush delivered statistically significantly superio

56 g plaque scores of 0.270, whereas the manual toothbrushes delivered adjusted mean differences of 0.21

57 The power toothbrush demonstrated a statistically significantly gr

58 s-sectional and longitudinal self-reports of toothbrushing, dental floss use, annual prophylaxis, and

59 Toothbrushing did not impact on length of ICU stay, or I

60 anically ventilated critically ill patients, toothbrushing did not significantly reduce the risk of v

61 Toothbrushing exposes epithelia and other tissues of the

62 6 blood draws was 23%, 33%, and 60% for the toothbrushing, extraction-amoxicillin, and extraction-pl

63 Participants reported that the toothbrush felt more pleasant and less rough when either

64 ions, and preventive dental behaviors--i.e., toothbrushing, flossing, using interdental devices, seek

65 r study examined plaque removal with the two toothbrushes following a single use in 40 subjects.

66 21 days, followed by treatment with a sonic toothbrush for 21 days.

67 and distribution of fluoride toothpaste and toothbrushes for home use, measured as the percentage of

68 here were no data on the benefits of powered toothbrushes for periodontal attachment.

69 Thirteen subjects abstained from toothbrushing for 48 hrs and rinsed for 1 min with a 12

70 There was no association between toothbrushing frequency and the self-consciousness subsc

71 cket, bleeding, or calculus; number of DMFT; toothbrushing frequency; blood pressure; sex; and income

72 The powered toothbrush group had, on average, 42.4% and 28.2% greate

73 l manual toothbrush and ADA reference manual toothbrush groups, respectively.

74 Diabetes control was associated with toothbrushing (>/=1 time daily [odds ratio (OR) = 3.10;

75 onfidence interval (CI) 1.08-4.69) and early toothbrushing habits (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.34-4.88).

76 use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 2.98-21.33) and early toothbrushing habits (OR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.72-10.41).

77 n of gutka placement in the mouth, and daily toothbrushing habits were collected using a questionnair

78 ion, regularity of dental visit, and child's toothbrushing habits.

79 uch as age, sex, educational attainment, and toothbrushing habits.

80 The powered toothbrush had, on average, 42.1% and 49.6% greater plaq

81 Both toothbrushes had statistically significantly greater pla

82 The new toothbrush has a powered oscillating round head and a se

83 mentally different design than other powered toothbrushes has recently been introduced.

84 Toothbrushing has no effect on mortality or length of st

85 Oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes have been proven to be clinically efficacio

86 dings of numerous other studies that powered toothbrushes have great potential to remove plaque and i

87 toothbrushes in the U.S. showed that common toothbrush head components can accumulate substantial am

88 brush alone; 0.228, 0.217, and 0.210 for the toothbrush in combination with the three traditional flo

89 Our studies on 22 popular manual toothbrushes in the U.S. showed that common toothbrush h

90 The intervention was supervised toothbrushing in nurseries and distribution of fluoride

91 rimental groups, provided written and verbal toothbrushing instructions, and had their teeth polished

92 e is some evidence to suggest that the sonic toothbrush is more beneficial in resolving inflammation

93 preparing to clean our teeth, we know that a toothbrush is useful, but not a screwdriver.

94 Although toothbrushing is generally performed, interdental cleani

95 iven the greater frequency for oral hygiene, toothbrushing may be a greater threat for individuals at

96 es of bacteremia from dental procedures, but toothbrushing may pose a greater threat.

97 Reports suggest powered toothbrushing may provide some clinical benefit over man

98 igated whether the perception of an electric toothbrush might also be affected by the sound that it m

99 ciency of a recently developed smart digital toothbrush monitoring and training system (DTS) in terms

100 American Dental Association reference manual toothbrush (MT) on mid-buccal preexisting GR (PreGR) dur

101 ling and root planing and the use of a sonic toothbrush on the rate of preterm delivery (<37 weeks ge

102 antisepsis seems to attenuate the effect of toothbrushing on ventilator-associated pneumonia (p for

103 the effect of oral care strategies involving toothbrushing on ventilator-associated pneumonia.

104 nt regimen consisting of tongue brushing and toothbrushing or tongue brushing and toothbrushing plus

105 000 ppm F-) for 30 or 120 sec (equivalent to toothbrushing) or for 30 min.

106 chanical scaling, followed by rigorous daily toothbrushing over a 4-week washout period.

107 tion in plaque than the ADA reference manual toothbrush (P < 0.001), which in turn had a statisticall

108 ction in plaque than the experimental manual toothbrush (P < 0.001).

109 check-up within last year (p=0.18), owning a toothbrush (p=0.99), cleaning teeth twice a day (p=0.68)

110 he modified Bass technique (MBT) after their toothbrushing performance was monitored and they receive

111 e was modestly associated with less frequent toothbrushing, plaque deposit, and greater odds of edent

112 d-resistant, respectively; and 0.252 for the toothbrush plus powered flosser.

113 In a well-matched twin cohort, tongue and toothbrushing plus flossing significantly decreased ging

114 ing and toothbrushing or tongue brushing and toothbrushing plus flossing.

115 between the roll-out of the national nursery toothbrushing program and a reduction in dental decay in

116 evant GR data for the multidirectional power toothbrush (PT) are lacking.

117 .001) greater plaque removal for the powered toothbrush relative to the control manual toothbrushes.

118 floss products in combination with a manual toothbrush removed plaque significantly better than the

119 Use of a powered toothbrush resulted in a significantly greater reduction

120 The oscillating-rotating toothbrush safely provides clinical benefits in plaque a

121 Electric and manual toothbrushing seem to have similar effects.

122 elling TCS-TP, over one third of the adults' toothbrushes showed a cumulative TCS uptake of 21-37.5 m

123 Both toothbrushes showed statistically significantly greater

124 One trial comparing electric vs. manual toothbrushing showed no difference in ventilator-associa

125 y trial with low risk of bias suggested that toothbrushing significantly reduced ventilator-associate

126 a treatment of proximal hygiene (study 1) or toothbrushing (study 2), respectively.

127 alone, and two treatment groups, which used toothbrushing supplemented with daily use of a SnF2 gel.

128 regimen consisting of 1) tongue brushing and toothbrushing (TB) and 2) TB + flossing (TB + Fl).

129 r 6-month continuous use of different manual toothbrushes (TBs) influences plaque removal and the deg

130 ontal maintenance consisted of thrice-weekly toothbrushing the treated sites.

131 study was to compare the effect of 2 powered toothbrushes, the Rowenta MH700 and the Braun Plak Contr

132 ared the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush to this new powered toothbrush.

133 This study measured the ability of three toothbrushes to remove plaque following three single bru

134 lling 1,408 patients, five of which compared toothbrushing to usual oral care and one of which compar

135 Authors of toothbrush trials should consider the Consolidated Stand

136 written instructions but no demonstration on toothbrush use at baseline.

137 ception of the sensations experienced during toothbrush use were systematically altered by variations

138 n of short duration with subjects trained in toothbrush use.

139 8 vs. 25.89; p = 0.53) in patients receiving toothbrushing vs. no toothbrushing.

140 The powered toothbrush was found to deliver greater plaque removal b

141 of brushing, and the difference between the toothbrushes was greater following 3 minutes of brushing

142 The slope of the uptake in toothbrushing was correlated with the slope in the reduc

143 The adjusted mean changes for the manual toothbrush were 0.43 and 0.62, respectively.

144 Soft-bristle manual and powered toothbrushes were given to participants randomly assigne

145 brushing movements with a standard electric toothbrush while they rated either the pleasantness or t

146 A new battery-powered toothbrush with a fundamentally different design than ot

147 Use of an oscillating-rotating powered toothbrush with a soft-bristle head resulted in higher G

148 Similar results were observed on children's toothbrushes with small pea-size heads.

149 ts, compared any kind of oral care involving toothbrushing with any other kind of oral care or contro

150 imen, consisting of manual scaling and daily toothbrushing with plain pumice.