ライフサイエンスコーパス: total energy expenditure

1 of food (10% addition to other components of total energy expenditure).

2 te, activity levels, and resting, active and total energy expenditure.

3 as represented by parental obesity, and low total energy expenditure.

4 ctivation was associated with an increase in total energy expenditure.

5 rmic effect of meals was estimated at 10% of total energy expenditure.

6 er in the stroke group compared to controls (total energy expenditure 1840+/-354 vs. 2220+/-489 kcal,

7 e correlations between physical activity and total energy expenditure [4] but are challenged by ecolo

8 t more active populations do not have higher total energy expenditure [5-8].

9 Differences in resting metabolic rate and total energy expenditure among premenarcheal girls were

10 Additional measures included total energy expenditure and 24-h profiles of serum lept

11 erobic pathway accounted for 8.9 +/- 5.6% of total energy expenditure and although experienced player

12 Daily total energy expenditure and macronutrient oxidation wer

13 mass in DIO mice due to marked increases in total energy expenditure and physical activity levels.

14 Within seven days of stroke, total energy expenditure and physical activity were sign

15 e doubly labeled water method for estimating total energy expenditure and physical activity-related e

16 rect calorimetry) and two annual measures of total energy expenditure and physical-activity-related e

17 vity will lead to corresponding increases in total energy expenditure and prevent or reverse energy i

18 ity (1.0) of exerting a functional effect on total energy expenditure and sleeping metabolic rate.

19 (21 girls and 23 boys) were 1.5 y old, their total energy expenditure and TBF were assessed by using

20 to better reflect the constrained nature of total energy expenditure and the complex effects of phys

21 uces the gap between total energy intake and total energy expenditure and thus is an effective strate

22 Resting energy expenditure, total energy expenditure, and body protein did not incre

23 on, sleeping energy expenditure, free-living total energy expenditure, and the energy cost of activit

24 ctivity energy expenditure was calculated as total energy expenditure (assessed over 2 weeks by using

25 2) status, maternal BMI, energy expenditure (total energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate, and slee

26 assessment of 4-day physical activity level (total energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate) by heart

27 cated that leptin treatment did not increase total energy expenditure but prevented the decrease that

28 en underreported energy intake compared with total energy expenditure by 12-14% on 24HRs and 31-36% o

29 was measured weekly by ventilated hood, and total energy expenditure by doubly labeled water prior t

30 n human urine are measured during studies of total energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water met

31 et had increased resting metabolic rates and total energy expenditure compared with WT mice, along wi

32 Reported energy intake was 85.5-95.0% of total energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled wa

33 ted with the severity of chorea, but SMR and total energy expenditure did not.

34 Here we report that total energy expenditure (doubly labeled water) measured

35 The total energy expenditure during rest and mild cold stres

36 ies in infants and children suggest that low total energy expenditure (EE) (TEE) and parental body co

37 ations result in relatively minor effects on total energy expenditure estimates (approximately 6%).

38 Physical activity measures were total energy expenditure expressed as a multiple of slee

39 ldren with CF (TER-CF) derived from measured total energy expenditure, fecal fat energy loss, and the

40 Total energy expenditure for 7 wk was the same when subj

41 Biomarker AREE, calculated as the total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water minus

42 t-free mass, fat mass, total body water, and total energy expenditure in 63 subjects.

43 measured changes in substrate oxidation and total energy expenditure in Acc2(-/-) and WT control mic

44 ed with body fatness, physical activity, and total energy expenditure in preschool children.

45 After weight loss, total energy expenditure -- in particular, energy expend

46 ned total energy expenditure model, in which total energy expenditure increases with physical activit

47 greater resting energy expenditure, but the total energy expenditure measured over a 24-h period or

48 We compared total energy expenditure, measured using doubly labeled

49 e methods (the Goldberg method and predicted total energy expenditure method).

50 Here we tested a Constrained total energy expenditure model, in which total energy ex

51 enditure plateaued, supporting a Constrained total energy expenditure model.

52 Such Additive total energy expenditure models are supported by exercis

53 d resting energy expenditure (P = 0.045) and total energy expenditure (P = 0.035).

54 usting for body weight, variants in MATK for total energy expenditure (p = 2.7E-08) and in CHRNA3 for

55 Energy intake was objectively estimated as total energy expenditure, physical activity expenditure,

56 cts in the upper range of physical activity, total energy expenditure plateaued, supporting a Constra

57 ion amplitude x number of strokes) predicted total energy expenditure (R(2) = 0.63) better than flipp

58 hydrate oxidation resulted in an increase in total energy expenditure, reductions in fat and lean bod

59 ed a relatively low Physical Activity Level (total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure </=

60 expenditure and physical activity level (ie, total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure); ba

61 eep: 1486.5 +/- 129.5 kcal/d; P = 0.136) and total energy expenditure (short sleep: 2589.2 +/- 526.5

62 In contrast, higher levels of total energy expenditure significantly predicted decreas

63 tritive sucking behavior during a test meal, total energy expenditure, sleeping energy expenditure, a

64 at primates' slow life histories reflect low total energy expenditure (TEE) (kilocalories per day) re

65 bias of diet records against the referent of total energy expenditure (TEE) and 2) to compare the met

66 of the study was to examine the relation of total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity [physical ac

67 Three-month reliability was substantial for total energy expenditure (TEE) and AEE (intraclass corre

68 Changes in total energy expenditure (TEE) and its components were m

69 ffect of an aerobic exercise program on 24-h total energy expenditure (TEE) and its components-basal

70 people in developing countries have a higher total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity lev

71 sed by isotopic water dilution (18O) whereas total energy expenditure (TEE) and resting metabolic rat

72 timated from doubly labeled water studies of total energy expenditure (TEE) and the energy cost of gr

73 We assessed the relation between total energy expenditure (TEE) as well as substrate oxid

74 cy Questionnaire (YAQ) against the criterion total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water (

75 olic rate (RMR) by indirect calorimetry, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water i

76 olic rate (BMR) was measured by calorimetry, total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water,

77 assessed by using respiratory gas exchange, total energy expenditure (TEE) by using doubly labeled w

78 y comparing reported energy intake (EI) with total energy expenditure (TEE) by using the doubly label

79 resting metabolic rate (RMR) and suppressed total energy expenditure (TEE) drive these relations.

80 Increases in total energy expenditure (TEE) during overfeeding have b

81 ergy requirements with the measured value of total energy expenditure (TEE) from DLW, which is consid

82 tudies have provided an objective measure of total energy expenditure (TEE) in free-living men and wo

83 e systematically reviewed studies of FEA and total energy expenditure (TEE) in obese patients undergo

84 We quantified total energy expenditure (TEE) in patients with SBS by u

85 DRIs were derived from total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by using the dou

86 s reduced in participants with high baseline total energy expenditure (TEE) or whether it varied by B

87 ll-mice fed FF exhibited consistently higher total energy expenditure (TEE) than their corresponding

88 Twenty-four-hour total energy expenditure (TEE) was assessed by precise t

89 ed by using 3 dietary assessment methods and total energy expenditure (TEE) was determined by using d

90 Total energy expenditure (TEE) was determined during bot

91 Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured by the doubl

92 Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured by the doubl

93 : 17.6 +/- 1.5 y) in which body movement and total energy expenditure (TEE) were simultaneously measu

94 We compared objectively assessed total energy expenditure (TEE) with estimates of energy

95 ate (RMR), diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), total energy expenditure (TEE), activity energy expendit

96 nown which effect predominates in regulating total energy expenditure (TEE), and thus whether the die

97 Total energy expenditure (TEE), basal metabolic rate (BM

98 We quantified total energy expenditure (TEE), food intake, and changes

99 al approach and is now possible with data on total energy expenditure (TEE), growth, and body composi

100 xpenditure (REE), with secondary outcomes of total energy expenditure (TEE), hormone levels, and meta

101 objective was to examine the determinants of total energy expenditure (TEE), resting energy expenditu

102 led water method to determine each subject's total energy expenditure (TEE), which is equal to usual

103 The objectives of the study were to measure total energy expenditure (TEE)-derived energy requiremen

104 umans because of the difficulty of measuring total energy expenditure (TEE).

105 obesity has been attributed to a decline in total energy expenditure (TEE).

106 f the "Multi-point" technique for estimating total energy expenditure (TEE).

107 roup) by using indirect calorimetry and from total energy expenditure (TEE, n = 32 SQCP; n = 32 contr

108 e used doubly labelled water measurements of total energy expenditure (TEE; kcal day(-1)) in humans,

109 sis is generally a much greater component of total energy expenditure than exercise or because any ty

110 t uses physical activity level (the ratio of total energy expenditure to basal energy expenditure) to

111 efficient between reported energy intake and total energy expenditure was 0.24; correlations were hig

112 s, the 24-h fat oxidation as a percentage of total energy expenditure was 17.7 +/- 6.9% compared with

113 Total energy expenditure was also higher among girls wit

114 Total energy expenditure was assessed over 2 weeks using

115 Total energy expenditure was measured during 7 days in f

116 ter adjusting for body size and composition, total energy expenditure was positively correlated with

117 g the doubly labeled water method to measure total energy expenditure, we considered numerous psychos

118 vity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 and total energy expenditure were absent in both CB1(-/-) an

119 lic rate, nonresting energy expenditure, and total energy expenditure were all significantly lower am

120 Valid estimates of participants' total energy expenditure were also available from doubly

121 Metabolic risk factors and total energy expenditure were associated with PC6, PC9 (

122 Correlations for total energy expenditure were high (0.62-0.77).

123 REE and other components of total energy expenditure were measured in adolescents wi

124 Data on weight, length and total energy expenditure were selected from the literatu

125 In contrast, SMR and total energy expenditure were similar in patients and co

126 tivity levels as the body adapts to maintain total energy expenditure within a narrow range.

127 panied by increased basal metabolic rate and total energy expenditure, without marked alteration of u

128 We hypothesized that both resting and total energy expenditure would be lower in spinal cord-i

129 ivity energy expenditure was calculated as: (total energy expenditure x 0.90) - resting metabolic rat