ライフサイエンスコーパス: total resection

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 .58, p=0.89 for sub-total resection vs gross total resection).

2 to gross total resection compared with near-total resection.

3 erved 111 patients age < 40 years with gross total resection.

4 ted a recurrence of disease after a previous total resection.

5 Seventy-six (78%) patients underwent gross total resection, 13 (14%) had residual disease, and 8 (8

6 rmed for the 70 patients who underwent gross total resection, 51% of whom received IP therapy.

7 should include surgery with the aim of gross-total resection and conformal, high-dose, postoperative

8 Patients with EPN_PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should

9 rvival or overall survival benefit for gross total resection compared with near-total resection (HR 1

10 ause there is no definitive benefit to gross total resection compared with near-total resection.

11 For patients with group 4 tumours, gross total resection conferred a benefit to progression-free

12 ection (<1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining), or sub-total resection (>/=1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining).

13 Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 16/27 (59.3%) pati

14 Gross total resection (GTR) was attempted for cerebellar and c

15 ere analyzed to assess mortality after gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), and bio

16 However, gross total resection had no effect on overall survival compar

17 l benefit for gross total resection over sub-total resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.9

18 for gross total resection compared with near-total resection (HR 1.05, 0.71-1.53, p=0.8158 for progre

19 progression-free survival compared with sub-total resection (HR 1.97, 1.22-3.17, p=0.0056), especial

20 effect on overall survival compared with sub-total resection in patients with group 4 tumours (HR 1.6

21 Total resection is sometmies impossible because of the r

22 s total resection (no residual tumour), near-total resection (<1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining), or sub-to

23 nderwent gross total resection, n = 74; near-total resection, n = 6; subtotal resection, n = 8), prio

24 ding to extent of resection (underwent gross total resection, n = 74; near-total resection, n = 6; su

25 the basis of postoperative imaging as gross total resection (no residual tumour), near-total resecti

26 After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231

27 hase 3 trial of patients with complete gross total resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and no prio

28 women) aged 38-75 years who underwent gross total resection of squamous cell carcinomas arising in t

29 A total resection of the pathological mass was achieved.

30 Gross total resection of the primary tumor was achieved in 11

31 progression-free survival benefit for gross total resection over sub-total resection (hazard ratio [

32 Older patients with total or near-total resections (P = .003) and localized disease at dia

33 ary event rates of deficits as well as gross total resection rate and eloquent locations.

34 9.4 Gy to 73 patients or 54.0 Gy after gross-total resection to 15 patients younger than 18 months) w

35 tumours (HR 1.03, 0.67-1.58, p=0.89 for sub-total resection vs gross total resection).

36 Gross total resection was associated with a decreased risk for

37 r survivals for patients who underwent gross total resection were 51% and 36%, respectively.

38 Younger age (</=60 years) and gross total resection were associated with increased survival.

39 ercentages of radiologically confirmed gross total resections were 75% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) with ISM

40 ter subtotal resection (SPTX), and 19% after total resection with autotransplantation (TPTX).

41 reated at recurrence following initial gross total resection with reoperation (subtotal resection in

42 proved to be insufficient in attaining gross total resection without the danger of incurring postoper

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。