ライフサイエンスコーパス: trace conditioning

1 ed by food 15 seconds after its termination (trace conditioning).

2 terize neuronal responses mediating aversive trace conditioning.

3 of the US to enable associative learning in trace conditioning.

4 tate (NMDA) receptor antagonists also impair trace conditioning.

5 als with hippocampal lesions fail to acquire trace conditioning.

6 of learning-related hippocampal activity for trace conditioning.

7 oning at a normal rate but failed to acquire trace conditioning.

8 ioning but was a prerequisite for successful trace conditioning.

9 acquisition or retention of either delay or trace conditioning.

10 simultaneous conditioning, is dispensable in trace conditioning.

11 llar regions and mechanisms coding delay and trace conditioning.

12 red in delay conditioning and MWM but not in trace conditioning.

13 developed into a decrease in firing later in trace conditioning.

14 l gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule during trace conditioning.

15 ctivity in the hippocampus-dependent task of trace conditioning.

16 osure to 200 trials of paired stimuli during trace conditioning.

17 role of the learning mechanism in classical trace conditioning.

18 ntingency facilitates but does not guarantee trace conditioning.

19 s, which is required for mnemonic aspects of trace conditioning.

20 terference similar in slope to that found in trace conditioning.

21 timing of conditioned responses in classical trace conditioning.

22 n the hippocampal-dependent learning task of trace conditioning.

23 the training conditions include reversal or trace conditioning.

24 ormance on the hippocampal-dependent task of trace conditioning.

25 ed with pretesting levels for both delay and trace conditioning.

26 Trace conditioning, a form of classical conditioning in

27 ss is known about brain regions that support trace conditioning, a procedure in which an interval of

28 In trace conditioning, a short interval is interposed betwe

29 the adult rat impairs hippocampal-dependent trace conditioning, a task in which an animal must assoc

30 This study examined the effects of stress on trace conditioning, a task in which the CS and US were s

31 In trace conditioning, a variant of the standard paradigm,

32 ellar cortex and deep nuclei in delay versus trace conditioning add perspective on brain substrates o

33 because the hippocampus is not necessary for trace conditioning after a period of consolidation has e

34 ex in processing temporal information during trace conditioning and delayed matching- or nonmatching-

35 vent persistently facilitates acquisition of trace conditioning and enhances a bias toward acquiring

36 digm, but this impairment was greater during trace conditioning and in rabbits with mPFC lesions.

37 ppocampus (DHPC) in acquisition of Pavlovian trace conditioning and interval timing was examined in a

38 rtance of cholinergic modulation in mPFC for trace conditioning and show that the observed effects ca

39 training alcohol disrupted the expression of trace conditioning and that supplemental choline on PD 1

40 ns of delay conditioning and two versions of trace conditioning and then assessed for the extent to w

41 Trace conditioning appears to provide a simple model of

42 prefrontal cortex (mPFC) impaired appetitive trace conditioning at a 2 s trace interval.

43 ch from our laboratory and others shows that trace conditioning begins to emerge during the third pos

44 training has a dramatic facilitory effect on trace conditioning but also implicate theta activity in

45 roved to be more resilient than differential trace conditioning but does show a reduction due to task

46 Scopolamine infusions profoundly impaired trace conditioning but had no effect on delay conditioni

47 e memory, significantly enhances learning of trace conditioning, but leaves simultaneous conditioning

48 DHPC lesions did not disrupt acquisition of trace conditioning, but they selectively affected the di

49 onditioning can be hippocampal-dependent and trace conditioning can be spared following hippocampal l

50 e showed significantly poorer contextual and trace conditioning compared with young-adult mice.

51 ocampal dependent, we designed a "contiguous trace conditioning" (CTC) paradigm in which CS-US contig

52 However, mPFC lesion-induced trace conditioning deficits were obtained only in the gr

53 Pavlovian trace conditioning depends on the temporal gap between t

54 In this case, trace conditioning did not enhance the survival of new n

55 Aspects of such learning can be probed with trace conditioning, during which an animal learns to ass

56 Trace conditioning experiments can reveal the time over

57 conditioning and awareness for differential trace conditioning extinction.

58 infusion profoundly reduced freezing in the trace conditioning group but had no significant effect o

59 rmine whether the lack of contiguity renders trace conditioning hippocampal dependent, we designed a

60 delay conditioning, a procedure that renders trace conditioning hippocampal-independent.

61 shock makes consolidation of the memory for trace conditioning hippocampus dependent.

62 clarative memory since humans do not acquire trace conditioning if they are unable to become cognitiv

63 essions 2, 4, and 6) in the acquisition of a trace conditioning in behaving rabbits.

64 showed that humans can learn both delay and trace conditioning in parallel.

65 re did not affect retention or extinction of trace conditioning in rats that were stressed after acqu

66 ed previous findings of facilitated acoustic trace conditioning in the 17-day-old rat in a sensory-en

67 enhanced later recall of delay compared with trace conditioning in the MR-available groups as indexed

68 independent of the hippocampal system, while trace conditioning (in which the CS terminates before US

69 Classical conditioning paradigms, such as trace conditioning, in which a silent period elapses bet

70 osure to 800 trials of paired stimuli during trace conditioning increased the number of BrdU-labeled

71 Trace conditioning is a form of classical conditioning i

72 This is especially important, as trace conditioning is an experimentally tractable model

73 Trace conditioning is associated with increased neuronal

74 However, why trace conditioning is dependent on the hippocampus is un

75 Trace conditioning is hippocampus dependent because, as

76 aining DH lesions, hippocampus dependency of trace conditioning is not related to a bridging function

77 experiment supports a view that its role in trace conditioning is to maintain a memory trace between

78 Trace conditioning is valued as a simple experimental mo

79 mpal- and forebrain-dependent learning task (trace conditioning) is associative rather than activity

80 Moreover, the absence of trace conditioning learning in D1 dopamine receptor muta

81 During trace conditioning, lesioned rabbits did, however, exhib

82 These data suggest that trace conditioning may be useful for studying neural sub

83 Trace conditioning may provide a means for studying awar

84 TOR) signaling and impaired performance on a trace-conditioning memory task.

85 is a general tendency for animals to acquire trace conditioning more slowly than delay conditioning.

86 ning occurs for ISIs of up to 4 sec, whereas trace conditioning occurs only at shorter ISIs; mixed tr

87 Rabbits were given trace conditioning of the nictitating membrane response

88 s) fed 2% cholesterol for 8 weeks were given trace conditioning of the nictitating membrane response

89 eptor-glycine site) treatment were tested on trace conditioning of young or aging rabbits using a con

90 onkeys and report behavioral results using a trace conditioning paradigm that is sensitive to hippoca

91 In the trace conditioning paradigm, significant conditioning de

92 rformance or learning in either a delay or a trace conditioning paradigm.

93 ed with an aversive air-puff to the eye in a trace-conditioning paradigm.

94 onditioned responses (CRs) in both delay and trace conditioning paradigms in the rabbit (Oryctolagus

95 After trace conditioning, percent freezing to the CS was posit

96 Here, we adapted an olfactory trace conditioning procedure in Drosophila melanogaster

97 test this, mice were trained on a Pavlovian trace conditioning procedure in which the presentation o

98 copolamine was without effect in an aversive trace conditioning procedure, but impaired appetitive co

99 oned eyeblink (EB) response was studied with trace conditioning procedures in rabbits (Oryctolagus cu

100 Aversive and appetitive trace conditioning procedures were used to examine the e

101 parated in time are associatively learned in trace conditioning, recruiting more neuronal circuits an

102 delay and trace fear conditioning, although trace conditioning requires recruitment of additional br

103 Trace conditioning requires that a transient representat

104 The distinct molecular signature of trace conditioning revealed here shall contribute to the

105 ade of muscarinic receptors in mPFC impaired trace conditioning shows that these receptors are critic

106 d on a moment-by-moment basis as in eyeblink trace conditioning studies.

107 Monkeys performed a trace conditioning task in which different novel abstrac

108 the ability of rabbits to learn a difficult trace conditioning task.

109 y during learning, animals were trained on a trace-conditioning task in which a visual conditioned st

110 torhinal neurons during the acquisition of a trace-conditioning task in which a visual conditioned st

111 la neural activity while monkeys performed a trace-conditioning task requiring fixation.

112 and entorhinal neurons during an appetitive trace-conditioning task.

113 y the discontiguity between the CS and US in trace conditioning that critically engages the hippocamp

114 ulus (US) contributes to the facilitation of trace conditioning that occurs when preweanling rats are

115 al ethanol produced a profound impairment in trace conditioning that was reversed by choline.

116 ere exposed to eight tone-shock pairings (in Trace conditioning the shock came 30 s after the tone),

117 necessary to condition their association in "trace conditioning." The present study used conditioning

118 olesterol showed significant facilitation of trace conditioning to airpuff and conditioning-specific

119 Young and aged rats received 10 trace conditioning trials.

120 period, all animals were retested for 3 d on trace conditioning, using the same parameters used durin

121 Trace conditioning was associated with an increase in th

122 gh the involvement of the DHPC in appetitive trace conditioning was not found when a gross measure of

123 Trace conditioning was similarly impaired at the 2 s tra

124 ippocampus codes temporal information during trace conditioning, whereas brain regions supporting wor

125 he MB as a crucial neuroanatomical locus for trace conditioning, which may harbor a Rac activity-sens

126 then blocking amygdalar mAChRs should impair trace conditioning, while sparing delay and context cond