ライフサイエンスコーパス: transcranial

1 timulation technology called high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS).

2 t in human auditory cortex with non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) [28-

3 determined by increased sigma activity after transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) appl

4 Previous reports argue that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can

5 transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have

6 cortical excitability.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a

7 ntrainment of gamma or beta oscillations via transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over

8 th short bursts of high frequency (>/=80 Hz) transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over

9 we measured rs-fMRI in humans while applying transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to e

10 Here we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to e

11 We here utilized brief event-related transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to s

12 Here we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to t

13 Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) uses

14 and beta-band rhythms were manipulated with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) whil

15 Here we combine transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with

16 rmed the same task while receiving occipital transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), to

17 a oscillatory activity in the human M1 using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

18 rticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

19 hermore, tremor was selectively entrained by transcranial alternating current stimulation applied ove

20 transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcranial alternating current stimulation are used in

21 Second, we found that brief application of transcranial alternating current stimulation at 10 Hz re

22 To explore this we used transcranial alternating current stimulation over the le

23 that underlie the behavioral consequences of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

24 We combined non-invasive transcranial alternating-current stimulation (tACS) [8-1

25 Here we show that transcranial application of a static magnetic field (120

26 In this context noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS) in the study of co

27 Little is known, however, how transcranial current stimulation generates such effects,

28 We investigated this using transcranial current stimulation of the rat (all males)

29 er, have measured the neural consequences of transcranial current stimulation.

30 hat brief application of 2 mA (peak-to-peak) transcranial currents alternating at 10 Hz significantly

31 modulate neural information processing using transcranial currents.

32 e activity in the target brain region during transcranial DCS (tDCS).

33 The present study used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to dem

34 We used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), which

35 vestigated the potential of slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS), appli

36 Combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and EEG,

37 We combined transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and fMRI

38 Working memory (WM) training paired with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can impro

39 Studies have reported that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modul

40 Non-invasive stimulation of the brain using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during mo

41 interface-assisted motor imagery (MI-BCI) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been

42 Investigations into the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reliev

43 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noni

44 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an att

45 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an eme

46 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates

47 ed to the aging brain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates

48 Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) of the ce

49 In the present experiment, we tested whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dl

50 interest in alternative treatments, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the do

51 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the te

52 We here address the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the se

53 stion by applying double-blind bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over both

54 An analogous intervention using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left

55 We used bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over sens

56 that honesty can be increased in humans with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the

57 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the

58 Previously, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the

59 Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) over the

60 ABSTRACT: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces

61 the non-invasive brain stimulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting

62 ntic information by applying high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to an fMR

63 the possibility of suppressing the DLPFC by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to facili

64 Anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was appli

65 We investigated whether combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with cogn

66 We observed that bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the

67 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form o

68 ts performing similar value decisions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-in

69 There has been growing interest in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-in

70 nce supports application of one type of tCS, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), for majo

71 invasive neuromodulatory techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have sho

72 invasive neuromodulatory techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have sho

73 During transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-induced a

74 modulated excitation/inhibition balance with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

75 in backward and forward adaptation by using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS).

76 Concurrently, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

77 we show that modulation of this region with transcranial direct current stimulation alters both acti

78 participants received 30 min of real or sham transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the l

79 ine working memory task performance, but the transcranial direct current stimulation group demonstrat

80 ced activation in the left cerebellum in the transcranial direct current stimulation group, with no c

81 Transcranial direct current stimulation is a novel neuro

82 Transcranial direct current stimulation modulated functi

83 Here, we tested the idea that transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolate

84 ween noise and motor cost, we used bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cor

85 Transcranial direct current stimulation offers a potenti

86 nd randomized sham controlled pilot study of transcranial direct current stimulation on a working mem

87 earchers have used brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation on human subject

88 euronal excitability with anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over right front

89 We manipulated neural processing with transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the FP

90 Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate huma

91 KEY POINTS: Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate huma

92 re, we induced neuronal excitation by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation versus sham, exa

93 Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated w

94 including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and deep brain

95 s such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcrania

96 suspect that emerging technology, including transcranial direct current stimulation, will follow a s

97 titive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.

98 cant improvement in performance at 24 h post-transcranial direct current stimulation.

99 as reliable as those brought about by PAS or transcranial direct current stimulation.

100 As studies increasingly use transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to manipu

101 We compared transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with a se

102 ty (FVsv), and methods derived from arterial transcranial Doppler (aTCD) on the middle cerebral arter

103 r children with sickle cell anaemia and high transcranial doppler (TCD) flow velocities, regular bloo

104 Early transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening of the Creteil sick

105 With transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening, we can identify ch

106 ic attack has not been compared with that of transcranial Doppler (TCD) using a comprehensive meta-an

107 sickle cell anemia (SCA), predicted by high transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities, is prevented by t

108 n with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and abnormal transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities.

109 oke prevention in children with SCA and high transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities; after at least a

110 uantitative analyses of angiograms and daily transcranial Doppler (TCD) were performed.

111 ng, white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and transcranial doppler (TCD) were used as control conventi

112 g optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), venous transcranial Doppler (vTCD) of straight sinus systolic f

113 lateralization was measured with functional transcranial Doppler during language production.

114 han 24-hour time frame provides a window for transcranial Doppler examinations and therapeutic interv

115 study, which has substantial advantages over transcranial Doppler for the assessment of CBF.

116 dren with sickle cell anemia, routine use of transcranial Doppler screening, coupled with regular blo

117 ess contraindicated, and 82% underwent daily transcranial Doppler ultrasonography with embolic monito

118 li burden, assessed noninvasively by bedside transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, correlates with ri

119 Blood flow was determined by transcranial Doppler ultrasound (cerebral blood flow) an

120 Transcranial Doppler ultrasound data were available in 2

121 All patients then underwent Transcranial Doppler ultrasound measurements of OAF para

122 Bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasound monitoring of the middle

123 Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was performed to identif

124 nd 2 patients showed microembolic signals in transcranial Doppler ultrasound.

125 splant indications included stroke (n = 12), transcranial Doppler velocity >200 cm/s (n = 2), >/=3 va

126 With the advent of transcranial Doppler, measurement of cerebral blood flow

127 n injury were the pressure reactivity index, transcranial Doppler-derived mean velocity index based o

128 d significant right-to-left shunt defined by transcranial Doppler.

129 ive of nine with delayed stroke had positive transcranial Dopplers (at least one microembolus detecte

130 lated vertebral artery injuries had positive transcranial Dopplers before stroke, and positive transc

131 I, 1.01-1.05) and with persistently positive transcranial Dopplers over multiple days (risk ratio, 16

132 without additional vessel injuries, positive transcranial Dopplers predicted stroke after adjusting f

133 cranial Dopplers before stroke, and positive transcranial Dopplers were not associated with delayed s

134 ers (at least one microembolus detected with transcranial Dopplers) before stroke, compared with 46 o

135 l properties of electric fields arising from transcranial electric stimulation (TES) in a nonhuman pr

136 Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) is an emerging t

137 the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time cour

138 Computer models can make transcranial electric stimulation a better tool for rese

139 Transcranial electric stimulation aims to stimulate the

140 Widespread enthusiasm for low-intensity transcranial electrical current stimulation (tCS) is ref

141 In contrast to optogenetic interventions, transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) does not requi

142 Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a neuromodu

143 Transcranial electrical stimulation has widespread clini

144 A multiscale model of transcranial electrical stimulation including a finite e

145 Transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) is making progress

146 Transcranial focused ultrasound (US) has been demonstrat

147 above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS)

148 ENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS)

149 tments currently under investigation include transcranial magnetic or electrical brain stimulation, a

150 Here, we use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) to test this mo

151 Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has highlighte

152 Dual site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has revealed i

153 in stimulation (STN-DBS) with motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-TMS) at specific t

154 Here, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and fMRI to det

155 rally patterned waveforms such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcrania

156 nciple trials suggest efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatme

157 Although several strategies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been inves

158 inical and cognitive responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bipolar II d

159 n-invasive brain stimulation like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasin

160 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used as a th

161 ate the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right do

162 rtex for treating depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains unknown

163 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the

164 essed this question by combining theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) with fMRI to tes

165 estingly, disrupting cerebellar activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) abolished the ad

166 ral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

167 To assess this, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to visua

168 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at beta frequenc

169 exposure group (N=17) underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with

170 tested whether high-frequency, non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered twice

171 Previous studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans to dem

172 ous, causal test by combining the FCM with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention tha

173 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used

174 We demonstrate that paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) near ventral pre

175 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human occipit

176 rformed the sequential task while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the RLPFC ver

177 s studies have shown asymmetrical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on task performa

178 Along this scheme, we tested the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

179 ere we explored this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

180 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipit

181 We found that applying theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the PPC, bu

182 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in human

183 tional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study.

184 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy can modu

185 In the current study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

186 s subjects underwent MRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to co-localise p

187 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the p

188 ed the virtual lesion methodology offered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to explore the i

189 e and female participants using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere wit

190 To test this idea, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interrupt pro

191 sed peripheral nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor

192 ale and female) brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the exc

193 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to shed light on

194 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test the effe

195 Here, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to esta

196 We delivered double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while moving a s

197 ronometry of the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computation

198 We employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneou

199 ntal eye field (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent

200 motivation, we hypothesized that inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) would reduce app

201 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked

202 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we applied a no

203 d the complexity of the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)--an approach tha

204 ns with magnetic resonance imaging-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

205 rain activity was investigated with fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

206 sively treat a variety of brain disorders is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

207 died the visuomotor interaction using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

208 he neural basis for contagious yawning using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

209 A new study using transcranial magnetic stimulation and a virtual reality

210 In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and demonstrated that

211 s to perturbations, as can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

212 Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and fMRI in healthy pa

213 on can be blocked in vivo using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and further highlight

214 dress these issues, we combined single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked poten

215 Motor physiology was performed with transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory phys

216 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation and tasks designed to

217 ulation, and non-invasive such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direc

218 nistered post-cortical spreading depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation blocked the propagatio

219 data, a robotic arm positioned a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coil over a subject-sp

220 ar inhibition (CBI): a conditioning pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the cereb

221 eral nerve in close temporal contiguity with transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the contr

222 A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed d

223 Further support was obtained by a transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment, where subj

224 This is further supported by our transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment: subjects w

225 Transcranial magnetic stimulation focused on either the

226 Here, we use 180 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimulation for approximately 30 m

227 A single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation has been shown to be e

228 nical neurophysiology of the brain employing transcranial magnetic stimulation has convincingly demon

229 lp electroencephalography (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 22 participants dur

230 h prior findings from functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy participant

231 ng functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation indicated the involvem

232 ysiological biomarkers were assessed using a transcranial magnetic stimulation multiparadigm approach

233 male human participants, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of a frontal midline n

234 We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cor

235 n motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilateral m

236 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used t

237 Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm, we examined

238 A targeted pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation produced a brief reeme

239 prefrontal cortex target, and 50 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were delivered

240 A causal intervention with transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed clear special

241 Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

242 Additionally transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

243 aging studies of phonological processing, or transcranial magnetic stimulation sites that did not use

244 ted by redefining the borders of each of the transcranial magnetic stimulation sites to include areas

245 are in agreement with functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in human Parki

246 inical and functional assessments along with transcranial magnetic stimulation studies were taken on

247 They also predict responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (n = 154).

248 applying excitatory or inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to a subject-specific

249 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter brain functio

250 al magnetic resonance imaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to demonstrate the rep

251 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right f

252 Applying rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation to interfere with earl

253 We used fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the neu

254 This was achieved by applying a transcranial magnetic stimulation to the medial prefront

255 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation tools to investigate t

256 g changes in motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimul

257 los with a videoed partner, and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied around the

258 Inhibitory theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was applied to the lef

259 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at 80, 2

260 ohort of 57 participants, threshold-tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess cor

261 Diffusion and perfusion MRI, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were used to study str

262 combining inhibitory continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation with model-based funct

263 peripheral nerve electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with electro

264 recorded from extensor carpi radialis using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and fractional anisot

265 studies on treatment including medications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, biofeedback, target-s

266 ured corticospinal excitability at rest with transcranial magnetic stimulation, local concentrations

267 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation, paired-pulse intracor

268 ng brain stimulation in addiction, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

269 ectromagnetic stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

270 tigate the potential mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation, using a transcortical

271 Third, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we demonstrate that t

272 nterfering with rTPJ activity through online transcranial magnetic stimulation, we showed that partic

273 trol site by means of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, while measuring effor

274 d around sites that had been identified with transcranial magnetic stimulation-based functional local

275 More generally, our novel transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided lesion-deficit

276 lthy participants, we show how damage to our transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions affecte

277 lly compensate for the contribution that the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions make to

278 The classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions was val

279 ween those with and without damage to these 'transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided' regions remain

280 ubjects, as indicated by specific markers of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle and bra

281 deep brain electrodes or noninvasively using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

282 rticomotor excitability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

283 ctural brain MRI, magnetoencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

284 measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation.

285 We recorded myogenic MEPs after transcranial motor cortex stimulation in 6 lambs aged 1-

286 Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound is a rapidly

287 ral activity in the IFC using high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) could enhan

288 ol conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same

289 Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is a recent

290 tigated these conflicting biases by applying transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) while subje

291 Meanwhile, transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a painless

292 Here we administered transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS; 100-640 Hz

293 upled training with parietal, motor, or sham transcranial random noise stimulation, known for modulat

294 We demonstrate that transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) ov

295 Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) wa

296 de first time evidence that slow oscillatory transcranial stimulation amplifies the functional cross-

297 es sensory adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial stimulation has been claimed to improve per

298 Transcranial stimulation has been shown to improve perce

299 eveloping an animal model to help understand transcranial stimulation, this study will aid the ration

300 Using transcranial two-photon microscopy, we examined the effe