ライフサイエンスコーパス: transcranial magnetic stimulation

1 rticomotor excitability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

2 sed therapeutics, with a particular focus on transcranial magnetic stimulation.

3 n (DBS), and noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.

4 ognitive remediation therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

5 ctural brain MRI, magnetoencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

6 d by transiently inactivating the DLPFC with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

7 ed via motor-evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

8 measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation.

9 deep brain electrodes or noninvasively using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

10 Transcranial magnetic stimulation also induced anticorre

11 motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and (2) spontaneous ve

12 A new study using transcranial magnetic stimulation and a virtual reality

13 rupted normal neural function via repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and assessed, using fM

14 Transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimula

15 In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and demonstrated that

16 man electrophysiology (EEG) and simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG that the trans

17 We used concurrent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

18 s to perturbations, as can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

19 Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and fMRI in healthy pa

20 al drug availability conditions by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magneti

21 on can be blocked in vivo using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and further highlight

22 dress these issues, we combined single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked poten

23 Motor physiology was performed with transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory phys

24 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation and tasks designed to

25 ulation, and non-invasive such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direc

26 intracortical inhibition using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, and (2) how well the

27 recorded from extensor carpi radialis using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and fractional anisot

28 ese responses by testing if a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the prima

29 e limitations but existing devices (that is, transcranial magnetic stimulation) are large, reducing t

30 d around sites that had been identified with transcranial magnetic stimulation-based functional local

31 studies on treatment including medications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, biofeedback, target-s

32 nistered post-cortical spreading depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation blocked the propagatio

33 Inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation can reduce the hyperac

34 data, a robotic arm positioned a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coil over a subject-sp

35 peripheral nerve electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with electro

36 en preparing to stop selectively (indexed by transcranial magnetic stimulation) corresponds to striat

37 Transcranial magnetic stimulation cortical excitability

38 Here, we use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) to test this mo

39 ar inhibition (CBI): a conditioning pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the cereb

40 eral nerve in close temporal contiguity with transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the contr

41 Although transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupted neural activ

42 Double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (dpTMS) was used to ex

43 Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has highlighte

44 Dual site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has revealed i

45 ly stimulated the left dlPFC with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during the same task,

46 sity electroencephalographic measurements of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked activity in 4 c

47 Several transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephal

48 A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed d

49 Further support was obtained by a transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment, where subj

50 This is further supported by our transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment: subjects w

51 Transcranial magnetic stimulation focused on either the

52 Here, we use 180 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimulation for approximately 30 m

53 In humans, we applied theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, guided by subject-spe

54 More generally, our novel transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided lesion-deficit

55 lthy participants, we show how damage to our transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions affecte

56 lly compensate for the contribution that the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions make to

57 The classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions was val

58 ween those with and without damage to these 'transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided' regions remain

59 A single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation has been shown to be e

60 nical neurophysiology of the brain employing transcranial magnetic stimulation has convincingly demon

61 ich may offer advantages over electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation, has proven effective

62 Electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulations have proven to be the

63 lp electroencephalography (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 22 participants dur

64 h prior findings from functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy participant

65 of short-term motor cortex plasticity using transcranial magnetic stimulation, in 38 elderly subject

66 e we found that disrupting its function with transcranial magnetic stimulation increased susceptibili

67 ng functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation indicated the involvem

68 In a second experiment, transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced disruption was

69 l excitability alterations were monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked p

70 Plasticity was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked p

71 Corticospinal excitability was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked p

72 ubjects, as indicated by specific markers of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle and bra

73 maging paradigms, we report that noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation interference with a re

74 Neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation is one of the most pro

75 ured corticospinal excitability at rest with transcranial magnetic stimulation, local concentrations

76 in stimulation (STN-DBS) with motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-TMS) at specific t

77 Further evidence for this idea stems from transcranial magnetic stimulation measuring corticospina

78 ysiological biomarkers were assessed using a transcranial magnetic stimulation multiparadigm approach

79 Transcranial magnetic stimulation normalized depression-

80 male human participants, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of a frontal midline n

81 res of primary and secondary dystonia, using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and ey

82 tioning motor evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, w

83 rapies, including deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, offer yet another dir

84 so used functional MRI-guided, single-pulse, transcranial magnetic stimulation on human subjects to t

85 ifferent M1 neuronal populations by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over M1 with different

86 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cor

87 We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cor

88 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm represent

89 n motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilateral m

90 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left primary

91 In the second study, using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the occipital lob

92 odel of stroke, created with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the pharyngeal co

93 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used t

94 y changes in corticospinal excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor

95 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation, paired-pulse intracor

96 Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm, we examined

97 We discuss how recent methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, positron emission tom

98 A targeted pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation produced a brief reeme

99 eta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol that can inhi

100 usical duet task with a real-time repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, we provide e

101 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols to evaluate

102 prefrontal cortex target, and 50 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were delivered

103 temporary disruption of rSMG with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation resulted in a substant

104 For Go trials, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a rapid incre

105 A causal intervention with transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed clear special

106 Here, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and fMRI to det

107 rally patterned waveforms such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcrania

108 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over th

109 movement observation by means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the

110 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can noninvasive

111 nciple trials suggest efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatme

112 f the number of studies exploring repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatme

113 st stimulation (TBS) protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have after-effe

114 Although several strategies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been inves

115 inical and cognitive responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bipolar II d

116 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasiv

117 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasiv

118 n-invasive brain stimulation like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasin

119 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly

120 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used as a th

121 A 20-minute session of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of Brodmann Are

122 ate the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right do

123 Previously, we demonstrated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right su

124 in stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial

125 modify these memories, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right late

126 rtex for treating depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains unknown

127 Adopting a dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) strategy, we fi

128 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeted over t

129 dicted response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to dorsomedial

130 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the

131 Here we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to infer the fu

132 magnetic resonance imaging-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the dorsomed

133 rventions, such as high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and can be stu

134 ion (TBS), a specific protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), induces change

135 Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recent

136 e go/no-go task and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

137 ition (pre-conditioning with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS) and unilateral

138 Transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively modulates

139 directly tested this hypothesis by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation separately over either

140 Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

141 Additionally transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

142 aging studies of phonological processing, or transcranial magnetic stimulation sites that did not use

143 ted by redefining the borders of each of the transcranial magnetic stimulation sites to include areas

144 are in agreement with functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in human Parki

145 inical and functional assessments along with transcranial magnetic stimulation studies were taken on

146 tia), functional neuroimaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

147 atched control subjects (n = 36) completed a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in which cortico

148 Outcomes in studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suggest the possibilit

149 g two face-selective regions with thetaburst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) and measuring th

150 essed this question by combining theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) with fMRI to tes

151 We finally confirm, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, that the fMRI-identif

152 They also predict responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (n = 154).

153 (but not right) inferior frontal gyrus using transcranial magnetic stimulation, thereby eliminating t

154 estingly, disrupting cerebellar activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) abolished the ad

155 By using double-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

156 Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

157 ral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

158 on, we examined their functional roles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and two differen

159 To assess this, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to visua

160 This fMRI study used concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a causal pert

161 nt advances emerging from the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research an

162 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at beta frequenc

163 ency afferent inhibition (LAI) measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to m

164 exposure group (N=17) underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with

165 tested whether high-frequency, non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered twice

166 Here, we used neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) directed to a tr

167 ation (VA) of elbow flexors was assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during maximum v

168 Here we employed EEG-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during non-rapid

169 This motivated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to e

170 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for several week

171 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown t

172 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a

173 hibition (SICI) of motor cortex, measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a passive (re

174 By combining single-pulse and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy human

175 Previous studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans to dem

176 left first dorsal interosseous muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in young and old

177 We combine transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference, EE

178 ous, causal test by combining the FCM with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention tha

179 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a novel thera

180 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used

181 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used

182 lesioned, visual qualia can be induced when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is applied over

183 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used i

184 We demonstrate that paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) near ventral pre

185 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of cerebral cort

186 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human occipit

187 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the dorsolate

188 f electrical stimuli to the median nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cor

189 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cor

190 that disruption of these circuitries by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the PFC and i

191 rformed the sequential task while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the RLPFC ver

192 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers a safe, n

193 s studies have shown asymmetrical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on task performa

194 or-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the primary m

195 We tested this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary mot

196 ucceeds bdif succeeds lbif) while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cortica

197 ere we explored this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

198 Along this scheme, we tested the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

199 e, we investigated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human p

200 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipit

201 The application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipit

202 We found that applying theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the PPC, bu

203 By applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary

204 o forms of inhibition by using an innovative transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol combini

205 To this end, we exploited a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol over fr

206 Delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shortly after th

207 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have pro

208 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in human

209 tional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study.

210 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy can modu

211 In the current study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

212 f spatial bias, and fMRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to causally test

213 s subjects underwent MRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to co-localise p

214 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the p

215 ed the virtual lesion methodology offered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to explore the i

216 Here we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to human left PM

217 e and female participants using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere wit

218 To test this idea, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interrupt pro

219 functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate t

220 sed peripheral nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor

221 ale and female) brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the exc

222 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to shed light on

223 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test the effe

224 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the left dors

225 It has been shown that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the left LO d

226 al role of OPA in human adults, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the right OPA

227 causal entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using concurrent

228 The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending o

229 Here, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to esta

230 We delivered double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while moving a s

231 erior AC areas using MRI-guided paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while subjects l

232 ronometry of the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computation

233 Here, by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with EEG we aime

234 a direct test of this mechanism by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with functional

235 We employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneou

236 ntal eye field (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent

237 motivation, we hypothesized that inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) would reduce app

238 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked

239 Here, using fMRI, psychophysics, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), all within the

240 Next we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), guided spatiall

241 The most common are transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial el

242 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we applied a no

243 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we assessed the

244 Here, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide caus

245 d the complexity of the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)--an approach tha

246 died the visuomotor interaction using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

247 ally drive ("entrain") these oscillations by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

248 The present study addressed this issue using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

249 was transiently disrupted using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

250 ptual and response selection conflicts using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

251 ese two sites in the same participants using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

252 ssed in MS patients by means of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

253 Here we addressed this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

254 he neural basis for contagious yawning using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

255 city-limited topographic visual memory using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

256 ity (phosphene perception) through occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

257 s affect cortical excitability measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

258 he hand area of the human motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

259 ns with magnetic resonance imaging-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

260 rain activity was investigated with fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

261 sively treat a variety of brain disorders is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

262 applying excitatory or inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to a subject-specific

263 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter brain functio

264 pairing of peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter functional re

265 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess whether appl

266 Here, we use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to briefly interfere w

267 al magnetic resonance imaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to demonstrate the rep

268 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine menstrual

269 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate whether ne

270 rent study, we used low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine whether the

271 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right f

272 Applying rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation to interfere with earl

273 We used fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the neu

274 We tested this idea using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure corticospin

275 Further, using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure corticospin

276 This was achieved by applying a transcranial magnetic stimulation to the medial prefront

277 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation tools to investigate t

278 noninvasive techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

279 ng brain stimulation in addiction, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

280 ectromagnetic stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

281 g changes in motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimul

282 tion-matched healthy young females underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation using an excitatory PA

283 tigate the potential mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation, using a transcortical

284 los with a videoed partner, and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied around the

285 Inhibitory theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was applied to the lef

286 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at 80, 2

287 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to the l

288 ohort of 57 participants, threshold-tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess cor

289 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to measure co

290 By using combined EEG-TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation), we here address thes

291 Third, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we demonstrate that t

292 Using theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, we disrupted PFC func

293 Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, we show that stimulat

294 nterfering with rTPJ activity through online transcranial magnetic stimulation, we showed that partic

295 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we sought direct phys

296 o supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation were obtained to asses

297 Diffusion and perfusion MRI, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were used to study str

298 al motor-evoked potentials as assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation, whereas these were si

299 trol site by means of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, while measuring effor

300 combining inhibitory continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation with model-based funct