ライフサイエンスコーパス: transgenic plant

1 nd As ( 35%) in grains compared with the non-transgenic plant.

2 ed-specific accumulation of jasmonic acid in transgenic plants.

3 Cell wall components are altered in transgenic plants.

4 promote the expression of two transgenes in transgenic plants.

5 bitor reversed the expression changes in the transgenic plants.

6 ction in fiber lignin as compared to the non-transgenic plants.

7 e cognate amino acids in ripe fruit from the transgenic plants.

8 ional studies to improve N use efficiency in transgenic plants.

9 s 35S Promoter (CaMV35S), inserted into most transgenic plants.

10 nductance and CO2 -assimilation rates of the transgenic plants.

11 lling ABA responses and drought tolerance in transgenic plants.

12 sidual MEcDP levels detected in dark-adapted transgenic plants.

13 ical reactions to confer new capabilities on transgenic plants.

14 pCAMBIA family vector, frequently present in transgenic plants.

15 ated with the EBB1 expression changes in the transgenic plants.

16 fficient for trichome-specific expression in transgenic plants.

17 ed modification of monolignol composition in transgenic plants.

18 ene that is constitutive up-regulated in the transgenic plants.

19 leading to the production of normal, fertile transgenic plants.

20 ression becomes rapidly silenced in TCS::GFP transgenic plants.

21 , while protein content was preserved in the transgenic plants.

22 detectable morphological differences in the transgenic plants.

23 e to pushing up the crop and replanting with transgenic plants.

24 nce and stay-green trait is observed in many transgenic plants.

25 ers are based on development of new improved transgenic plants.

26 ng us to interrogate different acyl pools in transgenic plants.

27 ering target that was subsequently tested in transgenic plants.

28 encing in plant cells and null phenotypes in transgenic plants.

29 C domain gene AsNAC60 were down-regulated in transgenic plants.

30 rence analysis and its function validated in transgenic plants.

31 protein abundance at the vasculature of the transgenic plants.

32 strong root growth that characterizes these transgenic plants.

33 tic alternations remains unresolved for most transgenic plants.

34 nses within host cells, as demonstrated with transgenic plants.

35 lants and their overexpression phenotypes in transgenic plants.

36 ng the introduction of multigene traits into transgenic plants.

37 to the insertion patterns commonly found in transgenic plants.

38 AMFs are applied to the PYL2-overexpression transgenic plants.

39 the hsp93V mutant or in the atHSP93V-DeltaN transgenic plants.

40 rized through overexpression or silencing in transgenic plants.

41 conferred enhanced drought resistance in the transgenic plants.

42 quired to overexpress two (or more) genes in transgenic plants.

43 downregulated in A. suturalis feeding on the transgenic plants.

44 prene formation was significantly reduced in transgenic plants.

45 iciency at four independent sites in rice T0 transgenic plants.

46 ced pathogen infection in AvrRpt2-expressing transgenic plants.

47 duction of CHH and CHG methylation in the 2b-transgenic plants.

48 n of PIF3 are significantly reduced in these transgenic plants.

49 any plant species without having to generate transgenic plants.

50 ng pCAMBIA family vectors, highly present in transgenic plants.

51 higher grain yield compared with control non-transgenic plants.

52 In transgenic plants, a G2A mutation completely abolished A

53 OsOTS1 depleted transgenic plants accumulate more ABA and exhibit more p

54 Concomitantly, the transgenic plants accumulated de novo synthesized 4-O-me

55 In addition, the TNHXS1-IRES-TVP1 transgenic plants accumulated less Na(+) and more K(+) i

56 Transgenic plants accumulating increased amounts of ster

57 1 was expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana, the transgenic plants acquired resistance to multiple herbic

58 icient system yielding 87-100% editing in T0 transgenic plants, all with di-allelic edits.

59 Transgenic plants (alpha-NADP-ME) exhibited a 34% to 75%

60 Transgenic plants also show symptoms of a reduced capaci

61 expression in mesophyll cell protoplasts and transgenic plants and binds directly to the DREB2A promo

62 PLP promoter-beta-glucuronidase construct in transgenic plants and in situ hybridization.

63 This cyclization step is inefficient in transgenic plants and our work aims to shed light on the

64 activity in the leaf primordia of LFYasEMF1 transgenic plants and propose a combined effect of multi

65 We show that delayed senescence of transgenic plants and the corresponding longer stay-gree

66 Low phytate transgenic plants and transgenic animals increased P ava

67 e levels were increased in ripe fruit of the transgenic plants, and as a consequence, total carboxyli

68 rrent limitations to accumulation of HFAs in transgenic plants, and may provide improved strategies f

69 ect report of Ag NP detoxification by GSH in transgenic plants, and these results will be highly usef

70 Indeed, Avr2 transgenic plants are attenuated in immunity-related rea

71 ies to deliver useful bio-based products via transgenic plants are described, some of which represent

72 Transgenic plants are more susceptible to digestion than

73 related with levels of the Bs2 expression in transgenic plants, as assessed by real-time qPCR, and ac

74 Transgenic plant assays have been used frequently for co

75 son with the nematode challenged control non-transgenic plants based on larger bunches and diminished

76 KEW lead to failure of phosphorylation, and transgenic plants bearing the mutant proteins display de

77 Analysis of transgenic plants bearing these mutations by quantitativ

78 significantly increased Al resistance of the transgenic plants, but also enhanced carbon-use efficien

79 not essential for repressing ABA response in transgenic plants, but does contribute to stronger ABA r

80 used widely for insect control in sprays and transgenic plants, but their efficacy is reduced when pe

81 easibility of using metabolic engineering in transgenic plants (Camelina sativa) to modify the seed o

82 All transgenic plants carried highly expressed active Asperg

83 n BIK1-mediated plant innate immunity as the transgenic plants carrying BIK1Y150F, Y243F, or Y250F (t

84 An examination of microtubers induced from transgenic plants carrying GUS reporter constructs of th

85 proteins results in an enhanced phenotype in transgenic plants compared to expression of the TF alone

86 parameters, and lower electrolyte leakage in transgenic plants compared to the WT or hsfa2 mutant.

87 Expression of the functional ACT1A-1 cDNA in transgenic plants complemented the natural YellowA mutat

88 filing combined with 5'-RLM-RACE analysis in transgenic plants confirmed that amiRNAs were highly spe

89 In transgenic plants constitutively coexpressing WRINKLED1

90 ounts of myristic acid were also detected in transgenic plants constitutively expressing ShMKS2 with

91 Moreover, transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing SbMyb60

92 ules and erupted pustules than leaves of non-transgenic plants containing normal levels of the enzyme

93 Estradiol induction of HSFA4A in transgenic plants decreases, while the knockout hsfa4a m

94 Rapamycin inhibition is relieved in transgenic plants deficient in Arabidopsis FK506-binding

95 Microarray analysis of transgenic plants demonstrated that down-regulated targe

96 lian type O-glycosylation was established in transgenic plants, demonstrating that plants may serve a

97 sion level of a transgene-derived protein in transgenic plants depends on transcriptional and post-tr

98 regulation of OsDREB1A was transient and the transgenic plants did not show increased cold tolerance.

99 Morphologically, miR528-overexpressing transgenic plants display shortened internodes, increase

100 These transgenic plants displayed a WT phenotype, however, sup

101 Transgenic plants displayed an enhanced rhizosphere acid

102 EBB1-overexpressing transgenic plants displayed enlarged shoot meristems, op

103 The T1 generation transgenic plants displayed improved tolerance to variou

104 The transgenic plants displayed more resistance to nematode

105 In all cases, transgenic plants displayed the predicted phenotypes ind

106 tubes, but its suppression in Nicotiana spp. transgenic plants disrupts S-specific pollen rejection;

107 We demonstrate its use in transgenic plant, Drosophila and mammalian cells in vivo

108 ation of complex insertions in the genome of transgenic plants during A. tumefaciens-mediated transfo

109 The resulting transgenic plants (E8-SDB123) showed an increased biomas

110 In addition, transgenic plants exhibit growth promotion, higher bioma

111 These transgenic plants exhibit photosynthetic characteristics

112 1 into the soybean cultivar Williams 82, the transgenic plants exhibited enhanced resistance to F. vi

113 of this study was to overexpress GmEu4, the transgenic plants exhibited GmEu4 co-suppression and dec

114 Transgenic plants exhibited GUS activity in tapetal cell

115 Transgenic plants exhibiting both overexpression of miR1

116 However, SDE5 over-expressing transgenic plant exhibits reduced defense responsive phe

117 Transgenic plant experiments show that rice TAL is speci

118 Transgenic plants expressing a cleavage-resistant form o

119 n in cassava root mitochondria, we generated transgenic plants expressing a codon-optimized Arabidops

120 Phenotypes of transgenic plants expressing a deletion in a rate motif

121 Here, we show that K. daigremontiana transgenic plants expressing a functional, chimeric KdLE

122 Finally, transgenic plants expressing ABI4 under the control of t

123 Transgenic plants expressing an artificial target mimic

124 Transgenic plants expressing AtPDCD5 fused to GREEN FLUO

125 Transgenic plants expressing BlMGL and emitting DMS had

126 importance of redox regulation, we generated transgenic plants expressing constitutively active GWD.

127 We did this by generating transgenic plants expressing degradation rate variants o

128 Transgenic plants expressing dsRNA targeting dvssj1 show

129 direct application of dsRNA or by producing transgenic plants expressing dsRNA-awd.

130 eaction in plants.Previous studies have used transgenic plants expressing ectopic PEPC forms with dim

131 glauca using both phylogenetic analysis and transgenic plants expressing either ProCgNIN::reporter g

132 Chloroplasts from transgenic plants expressing engineered Toc159 with a cy

133 Transgenic plants expressing fluorescent fusion proteins

134 Here we demonstrate that transgenic plants expressing Hvt alone or in combination

135 ins (HSP genes) is reduced in heat-sensitive transgenic plants expressing miR398-resistant forms of C

136 Transgenic plants expressing miR398-resistant forms of C

137 Moreover, we demonstrate that transgenic plants expressing mutant versions of AsphyA,

138 t the whole-plant level and to flowers) than transgenic plants expressing normal coding sequences of

139 Stable transgenic plants expressing one of these versions of Rx

140 the glutamate residue of the HXE motif, and transgenic plants expressing OTP84-E824A and CREF7-E554A

141 Analysis of phyB-9 transgenic plants expressing phospho-mimic and nonphosph

142 In this work, transgenic plants expressing ProRPL10:beta-glucuronidase

143 secondary wall biosynthesis were observed in transgenic plants expressing PtrMYB152.

144 In contrast, transgenic plants expressing SAUR63:GFP or SAUR63:GUS fu

145 Transgenic plants expressing the BRI1(S891A)-Flag-direct

146 Transgenic plants expressing the chimera under control o

147 Conversely, transgenic plants expressing the F-box domain deletion m

148 Our data demonstrate that (i) transgenic plants expressing the mutant phyB(Lys996Arg)-

149 thylesterified HG labeling in pmei6, whereas transgenic plants expressing the PMEI6 coding sequence u

150 eaves, and flowers and this was confirmed in transgenic plants expressing the ss-glucuronidase report

151 Markets for Bt products and transgenic plants expressing their toxins are driven by

152 We generated transgenic plants expressing UVR8 with a single amino ac

153 eased lateral root development compared with transgenic plants expressing wild-type IAR3.

154 great challenges of transgene silencing for transgenic plants facing climate change.

155 ralist herbivore Spodoptera exigua reared on transgenic plants gained more weight.

156 rial Rubisco expression was enhanced and the transgenic plants grew at near wild-type growth rates, a

157 Transgenic plants grew at the same rate as the wild type

158 PsGA3ox1 transgenic plants had longer internodes, tendrils, and f

159 Unexpectedly, the transgenic plants had purple-colored leaves and pink flo

160 Etiolated seedlings of these transgenic plants had shorter hypocotyls.

161 f CML38 from the roots of hypoxia-challenged transgenic plants harboring CML38pro::CML38:YFP followed

162 Transgenic plants harboring P(At5g63560)::YFP fusions sh

163 t direct manipulation of cytokinin levels in transgenic plants has dramatic effect on drought phenoty

164 al fatty acids through beta-oxidation within transgenic plants has long been hypothesized as a major

165 herbicides and antibiotics for selection of transgenic plants has not been very successful with rega

166 Our results suggest that the transgenic plants have an advantage for the production o

167 Inconsistent phenotypes of transgenic plants have been attributed to variable level

168 terpenoid biosynthesis, and show that these transgenic plants have the potential to yield high produ

169 of the 18 targeted genes, with some primary transgenic plants having as many as five mutated genes.

170 expression and/or protein activity, we made transgenic plants in which a genomic copy of AIL6 was ex

171 ion to starch levels in wild-type plants, in transgenic plants in which GWD transcripts were strongly

172 ng flower development, we have characterized transgenic plants in which the coding region of AIL6 was

173 o mitigate the spread of exotic, hybrid, and transgenic plants in wild and feral populations.

174 assembly of a cyanobacterial Rubisco, prior transgenic plants included the cyanobacterial chaperone

175 for manipulating miRNAs and their targets in transgenic plants including constitutive, stress-induced

176 It is important for the regeneration of transgenic plants, including for soybean (Glycine max).

177 ance energy transfer analyses in Arabidopsis transgenic plants indicate that the AtAtg8 synthetic sub

178 that the increased greenness observed in the transgenic plants is due to more chlorophyll synthesis b

179 The enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic plants is related to significant down-regulat

180 Analysis of transgenic plants lacking or overexpressing ESV1 or LESV

181 Here, we show that transgenic plant lines expressing artificial microRNA co

182 To that end, Hevea transgenic plant lines over-expressing a Hevea brasilien

183 ssion, preventing the generation of relevant transgenic plant lines.

184 This strategy may allow for transgenic plant-mediated suppression of other hemiptera

185 Rice transgenic plants (named mOsARF18) expressing an OsmiR16

186 These cDNAs were expressed in transgenic plants of a PORB-deficient knock-out mutant (

187 In order to design transgenic plants of Artemisia annua with enhanced biosy

188 on citrus canker resistance was evaluated in transgenic plants of Citrus sinensis cv.

189 In the present study, we developed transgenic plants of V. mungo using Agrobacterium mediat

190 by MPK3/MPK6 in either the gain-of-function transgenic plants or in response to B. cinerea infection

191 nt functions that could be produced later in transgenic plants or potentially applied exogenously to

192 ce-associated marker genes PR1, PR2 and PR5, transgenic plants over-expressing CRT2 displayed reduced

193 Transgenic plants overexpressing AOX exhibited over a 10

194 In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), transgenic plants overexpressing CrDOF show floral delay

195 ced by induction of RNA interference, and in transgenic plants overexpressing GWD.

196 s of miR398 in mutants lacking the miRNA, or transgenic plants overexpressing it.

197 ent with a role in regulating FDH abundance, transgenic plants overexpressing KEG were more sensitive

198 KEY MESSAGE: Carrizo transgenic plants overexpressing methionine-gamma-lyase

199 have higher AtSVP accumulation, whereas the transgenic plants overexpressing MIR396 display lower At

200 Further study using transgenic plants overexpressing one of the ABA receptor

201 We found that transgenic plants overexpressing Osa-miR319a displayed m

202 al opening are reduced in ost1 mutants while transgenic plants overexpressing OST1 show ABA hypersens

203 Transgenic plants overexpressing SBD123 in the cell wall

204 monstrated that elevated IAA biosynthesis in transgenic plants overexpressing the YUCCA 1 (YUC1) auxi

205 ts of the subfamily I, StPP2Ac2b, to develop transgenic plants overexpressing this gene (StPP2Ac2b-OE

206 Stable transgenic plants overproducing a 14-3-3 protein also di

207 These transgenic plants performed better than the wild type un

208 In the transgenic plants, photosynthesis was maintained at cont

209 he stress-induced cytokinin synthesis in the transgenic plants played a role in maintaining nitrate a

210 essing an exogenous protein: the creation of transgenic plants possessing a stably integrated gene co

211 o these changes remain to be identified, the transgenic plants presented here provide novel tools to

212 The resulting transgenic plants produced 2% to 3% more TAG as a compon

213 The leaves of transgenic plants produced approximately 4% arteannuin B

214 Further, transgenic plants produced higher degree of pectin methy

215 Transgenic plants producing insecticidal proteins from t

216 he stress-induced cytokinin synthesis in the transgenic plants promoted sink strengthening through a

217 To delay or counter resistance, transgenic plant "pyramids" producing two or more Bt pro

218 This resulted in transgene expression in all transgenic plants regenerated from microspores transfect

219 tion of CO2 responses showed that stomata of transgenic plants respond to [CO2 ] shifts.

220 and decreased PhCAT2 expression in PAL-RNAi transgenic plants resulted in 1.6-fold increase in pheny

221 The lower lignin levels of transgenic plants resulted in higher saccharification yi

222 PsASGR-BBML expression in apomictic F1 RNAi transgenic plants results in fewer visible parthenogenet

223 Global gene-expression analysis of the transgenic plants revealed an array of responding genes

224 MYB134-overexpressing transgenic plants show a strong high-PA phenotype.

225 The transgenic plants show better tissue compartmentalizatio

226 AtNUDT7 promoter-GUS transgenic plants show rapid inducibility in response to

227 cal experiments, and studies with mutants in transgenic plants show that the Arabidopsis protein CORY

228 The transgenic plants showed a block in Cys protease activit

229 In addition, transgenic plants showed an increase in artemisinic acid

230 Pot-grown transgenic plants showed better growth than WT after 9 d

231 ls of flavonoids measured in extracts of the transgenic plants showed changes in the composition of f

232 CtHsfA2b transgenic plants showed elevated transcriptional regula

233 iated with systemic acquired resistance, and transgenic plants showed enhanced resistance toward a vi

234 Tonoplast vesicles isolated from transgenic plants showed higher rates of Glu and GABA tr

235 Under well-watered conditions, transgenic plants showed higher stomatal conductance, ga

236 Sscp1-expressing transgenic plants showed increased concentrations of sal

237 Transgenic plants showed increased resistance to the fun

238 vity tests on seeds from pmei6 and 35S:PMEI6 transgenic plants showed that PMEI6 inhibits endogenous

239 riments along with BdPTAL1-downregulation in transgenic plants showed that the TAL activity of BdPTAL

240 pocotyl, it exhibited increased stability in transgenic plants silenced for Sl-MMP activity, and it w

241 Generating alternative transgenic plant sources of omega-3 LC-PUFAs, i.e. eicos

242 Transgenic plants subjected to drought showed a decrease

243 detected some key amino acids from leaves of transgenic plants such as aspartate, lysine, glycine, le

244 Analysis of these transgenic plants suggested the involvement of additiona

245 , thebaine) was significantly reduced in the transgenic plants suggesting that 4'OMT2 was efficiently

246 Consistent with this finding, transgenic plants suppressed for accumulation of an FtsH

247 fusion proteins expressed in chloroplasts of transgenic plants suppressed inhibitor formation directe

248 e or more endogenous genes were validated in transgenic plants that (1) exhibited the expected phenot

249 thway into glycosylation-destructed mutants, transgenic plants that sialylate glycoproteins in alpha2

250 Whereas seed yield decreases in transgenic plants that ubiquitously overexpress pPLAIIId

251 hes used to achieve stay-green phenotypes in transgenic plants, the expression of the IPT gene under

252 In OsHAC4pro-GUS transgenic plants, the gene was expressed exclusively in

253 Following the production of transgenic plants, the selectable marker gene(s) used in

254 re significantly increased in the needles of transgenic plants, there was no increase in the major mo

255 (42.6 mumol g(-1) seed) in seeds of B. napus transgenic plants through silencing of the GSL-ALK gene

256 can further boost root TAG content in these transgenic plants to 17% of dry weight.

257 ading to hypersusceptibility of the ERF6-EAR transgenic plants to B. cinerea.

258 esis inhibitors reversed the response of the transgenic plants to B. cinerea.

259 ents analyze the phenotypes and genotypes of transgenic plants to determine the requirements for tran

260 volvement of ROS scavenging machinery in the transgenic plants to provide salt tolerance.

261 ter significantly increased the tolerance of transgenic plants to salt stress treatment; under sub-le

262 ls to difficulties in preparing and handling transgenic plants to silence homologous sequences in fun

263 hat facilitates an enhanced tolerance of the transgenic plants to water deficit.

264 Reduced tillering allowed testing the transgenic plants under high density which resulted in s

265 d upregulation of stress-responsive genes in transgenic plants under salinity stress conditions could

266 The delay in PPD in transgenic plants was also observed under field conditio

267 ssay that the higher amount of OsICE1 in the transgenic plants was correlated with a lower amount of

268 rapid efflux of (10)B from the roots of the transgenic plants was observed within 1 h of (10)B treat

269 N in grape 'Brachetto', and in the resulting transgenic plants we analyzed (1) the expression of endo

270 rate of R. similis isolated from the Rs-cps transgenic plants were also significantly reduced.

271 BvSTI-transgenic plants were bioassayed for resistance to five

272 nalysis revealed that 41.7 % of the analysed transgenic plants were completely marker free, results t

273 yB null mutant background, singly and doubly transgenic plants were generated that express fusion pro

274 Transgenic plants were generated with yeast invertase in

275 of these effectors in wild-type Arabidopsis transgenic plants were largely alleviated in bak1 mutant

276 Transgenic plants were more resistant to Botrytis cinere

277 hotosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic tissues, transgenic plants were obtained with redox homeostasis r

278 When the transgenic plants were pretreated with DEX prior to infe

279 rough pollination with magnetofected pollen, transgenic plants were successfully generated from trans

280 Transgenic plants were taller than wild type, possibly o

281 production in different cells, we generated transgenic plants where ABA biosynthesis was rescued in

282 rP1 did not affect the flavin profile of the transgenic plants, whereas silencing of AtPyrP2 decrease

283 volved in the accumulation of HFA in oils of transgenic plants, which include metabolic bottlenecks a

284 We generated DYT1-SRDX transgenic plants whose fertility was dramatically reduc

285 Pretreating leaves of the transgenic plants with a PG resulted in increased resist

286 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana produced transgenic plants with a significantly increased threoni

287 of protoxin is a critical step in toxicity, transgenic plants with activated toxins rather than prot

288 itation assays and expression analysis using transgenic plants with altered levels of different E2F t

289 abidopsis lines and challenged the resulting transgenic plants with an Arabidopsis-adapted PM pathoge

290 tic enzymes have permitted the generation of transgenic plants with desirable traits, such as improve

291 Analysis of transgenic plants with genetic dysfunction in CaM KMT re

292 sion system is a valuable tool for obtaining transgenic plants with improved salt tolerance.

293 tinguish between one- and two-copy events in transgenic plants with large genomes.

294 Here, we employed transgenic plants with manipulated levels of BiP to asse

295 f the athb25-1D mutant were recapitulated in transgenic plants with moderate (4- to 6-fold) overexpre

296 Using transgenic plants with PaFTL2 driven by an inducible pro

297 We found that CK signaling mutants and transgenic plants with reduced endogenous CK levels show

298 gation of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) transgenic plants with sense silencing of Arabidopsis RE

299 Transgenic plants with the lowest levels of pCA had decr

300 Transgenic plants with the SlAT2 promoter driving GFP ex