ライフサイエンスコーパス: transition temperature

1 xtured body-centred cubic nanograins above a transition temperature.

2 he host polymer segments and lower the glass transition temperature.

3 on is about 100 K higher than the bulk glass transition temperature.

4 r hand, preserves phase separation above the transition temperature.

5 the membranes below their miscibility phase transition temperature.

6 with lower ferrimagnetic-paramagnetic phase transition temperature.

7 rcolating cluster becomes rigid at the glass transition temperature.

8 can be enhanced by tuning the ferroelectric transition temperature.

9 at intermediate temperatures above the glass-transition temperature.

10 bit a considerable difference in martensitic transition temperature.

11 lled by Tsubstrate/Tg, where Tg is the glass transition temperature.

12 ate into viscous coacervates above a tunable transition temperature.

13 ct of the unusual anionic state of Cs on the transition temperature.

14 lymer research to yield the mechanical glass transition temperature.

15 ial and often a high nematic-isotropic phase transition temperature.

16 itical divergence approaching the structural transition temperature.

17 an amorphous solid, upon passing their glass transition temperature.

18 temperatures both above and below the glass transition temperature.

19 f these supramolecular assemblies below this transition temperature.

20 rous silica in the vicinity of the fluid-gel transition temperature.

21 nsition when they take place above the glass transition temperature.

22 s upon heating these particles through their transition temperature.

23 with heating a material above its superionic transition temperature.

24 ture, giving rise to a local increase in the transition temperature.

25 This tends to lower the transition temperature.

26 ate to temperatures below the order-disorder transition temperature.

27 pseudogaped metal above the superconducting transition temperature.

28 antiferromagnet PdCrO2 vanishes at the Neel transition temperature.

29 sharp downturn right below the ferromagnetic transition temperature.

30 ro-3-phosphocholine above and below the main transition temperature.

31 cover that higher pressure phases have lower transition temperatures.

32 the same time limiting their superconducting transition temperatures.

33 facile method for determining polymer phase transition temperatures.

34 ties and lipid vesicles with different phase transition temperatures.

35 lower of the two zero-field superconducting transition temperatures.

36 recent reports of subtly reduced fluid-fluid transition temperatures.

37 species with relatively low superconducting transition temperatures.

38 ounced effects on observables, such as phase-transition temperatures.

39 ials, particularly in the case of high phase-transition temperatures.

40 alcogenide semimetal 1T-TiSe2 Near the phase-transition temperature (190 kelvin), the energy of the e

41 eads to lowering of the nematic-to-isotropic transition temperature (58 degrees C), significantly exp

42 canning Calorimeter analysis showed that the transition temperatures (69 degrees C-74 degrees C) and

43 millikelvin, well above the superconducting transition temperature (about 300 millikelvin).

44 ctivity using two-dimensional materials with transition temperatures above 4.2 K.

45 es generates remarkably high superconducting transition temperatures above 80 K at an experimentally

46 We find that GPMV transition temperatures adjust to be 16.7 +/- 1.2 degree

47 large-scale phase separation much below the transition temperatures also serves as an argument in fa

48 of particular interest as it has the highest transition temperature among these materials.

49 GLS glass generally results in a lower glass transition temperature and an extended transmission wind

50 It sets in far above the superconducting transition temperature and competes with superconductivi

51 l behavior (including rubbery modulus, glass transition temperature and failure strain which is more

52 200+/-20 fs, uncorrelated with crystal size, transition temperature and initial insulating structural

53 One such problem is that, above the transition temperature and near optimal doping, high-tra

54 while links are drawn between the superionic transition temperature and oxygen Frenkel disorder.

55 nd a density wave energy gap forms below the transition temperature and reaches 65 meV at 7 K, indica

56 Changes in the transition temperature and the crystalline phase distrib

57 of the gelatin film, by increasing the glass transition temperature and the degradation temperature.

58 The transition temperature and the degree of performance sup

59 owing for substantial variation of the glass transition temperature and the fragility of glass format

60 so examined, as they underpin the superionic transition temperature and the increase in oxygen diffus

61 The sudden decrease of mobility around phase transition temperature and the presence of hysteresis lo

62 is study FeRh films with drastically reduced transition temperatures and a large magneto-thermal hyst

63 The DSC data showed lower transition temperatures and enthalpies for retrograded g

64 he strips, leading to higher metal-insulator transition temperatures and lower resistivity in narrowe

65 large-scale phase separation below the phase transition temperature, and, on the other hand, preserve

66 nductivity with one of the highest elemental transition temperatures, and a maximum followed by a min

67 ed or irregular hexagons), shift fluid-solid transition temperatures, and produce a triple-point-like

68 cuprate YBa2Cu3O6.54 at its superconducting transition temperature approximately 60 K.

69 The superconducting transition temperatures are highest for the electron-poo

70 are affected by pH, the freezing and melting transition temperatures are independent of the surface c

71 The NTB-N (TNTBN) and N-I (TNI) transition temperatures are reduced upon UV light irradi

72 The origin of such strong shifts in the transition temperatures are tied to structural parameter

73 ure and in hot-compression (e.g., near glass transition temperature) are common in nature.

74 model is that its parameters, and hence the transition temperature, are treated as stochastic variab

75 les, with different tail-lengths and melting transition temperatures, are used as a model system for

76 ms which results in an increase in the phase transition temperature as thickness is reduced.

77 e addition of thymol decreased the PLA glass transition temperature, as the result of the polymer pla

78 related electron system with insulator-metal transition temperature at 130 degrees C in bulk form.

79 Annealing at the glass transition temperature at ambient pressure reverses stru

80 This occurs well above the classical glass transition temperature at which microscopic mobility is

81 The transition temperature at which structural amorphization

82 , kinetically driven steps with the apparent transition temperatures at approximately 51 degrees C an

83 correlates with the maximum superconducting transition temperature attainable in each material class

84 issipation monitoring to determine the phase transition temperature based on the temperature-induced

85 We developed a method to estimate glass transition temperatures based on the molar mass and mole

86 Optical spectroscopy results show that the transition temperature between Form I (room temperature

87 net, we achieve unprecedented control of the transition temperature (between ferromagnetic and parama

88 The roasting process resulted with lower transition temperatures but with increased transition en

89 t only because of their high superconducting transition temperatures, but also because they represent

90 or lipid mobility but did lower its membrane transition temperature by 3 degrees C.

91 at room temperature (RT) and near the glass transition temperature by synchrotron X-ray diffraction,

92 n glassy liquids above their dynamical glass transition temperatures by introducing a scalar field ca

93 The PIL's LCST-type transition temperature can also be influenced by varying

94 n films and superlattices, the ferroelectric transition temperature can lie above the growth temperat

95 zation and the paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition temperature constitutes another current resea

96 on temperature and near optimal doping, high-transition-temperature copper-oxide superconductors exhi

97 the molecules' mobility, and thus the glass transition temperature, correlates with their structural

98 The transition temperature could be shifted by adiabatic cha

99 For high-transition temperature cuprate superconductors, stripes

100 tensile strength, Young's modulus and glass transition temperature decreased, when the moisture cont

101 The superconducting transition temperature decreases on lowering the layer t

102 iable thicknesses demonstrate that the phase transition temperature decreases with reducing microplat

103 s an increase or decrease of the miscibility transition temperature depending upon the competition of

104 Furthermore, the higher surface-phase-transition temperature driven by surface stabilization o

105 ing reached a maximum in the third band, the transition temperature finally decreases, rounding out t

106 ichroism, revealed that the reduction in the transition temperature for helical unfolding for an H223

107 ture; that is, well above the spin crossover transition temperature for the pristine powder, and well

108 producing disparate predictions of the glass transition temperature for the two types of polymeric ne

109 The measured superconducting transition temperatures for delta-MoN and cubic gamma-Mo

110 o reasonably high calculated superconducting transition temperatures for these materials.

111 percooled liquids stop flowing below a glass transition temperature [Formula: see text] or whether mo

112 ess) at various temperatures below the glass transition temperature, [Formula: see text], of all film

113 Omega*cm, and a decrease in metal-insulator transition temperature from 270 K to 180 K and 172 K by

114 ion of Ag nanoparticles strongly affects the transition temperature from the initial metastable amorp

115 from a trigonal to a triclinic lattice below transition temperature, giving rise to the formation of

116 her antioxidant increased the liposome phase transition temperature (>50 degrees C).

117 oscopic origins of electronic phases in high-transition temperature (high-T(c)) superconductors is im

118 Heavily electron-doped iron-selenide high-transition-temperature (high-T c) superconductors, which

119 has recently been established that the high-transition-temperature (high-Tc) superconducting state c

120 An outstanding problem in the field of high-transition-temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity is th

121 and shows a concentration-dependent, tunable transition temperature in aqueous solution.

122 opens the path to increasing superconducting transition temperature in bulk transition-metal oxides a

123 xplanation for the different behavior of the transition temperature in GPMVs and giant unilamellar ve

124 Stable ferroelectricity with high transition temperature in nanostructures is needed for m

125 tron count dependence of the superconducting transition temperature in the high-entropy alloy falls b

126 In this work, we find that enhancement of transition temperatures in BaFe2As2-based crystals are c

127 iments identified domains of different phase transition temperatures in the mixed membranes.

128 Several superconducting transition temperatures in the range of 30-46 K were rep

129 t conditions as well as an increase in phase transition temperatures in the solid state.

130 hydrodynamic radius (in solution) and glass transition temperature (in bulk materials) were observed

131 e to > 433 K (amorphous-to-crystalline phase transition temperature) in just 0.37 ns with a low light

132 ppears around the zero-field superconducting transition temperature; in contrast, the incommensurate

133 , but the newly observed charge-density-wave transition temperature increases from 33 K in the bulk t

134 lipid mixture below its apparent miscibility transition temperature induces qualitatively different l

135 This tends to raise the transition temperature irrespective of which phase the a

136 S occurs at 258 K (-15 degrees C), and such transition temperature is 120 K lower than that of its b

137 ude that the unusual field dependence of the transition temperature is a hallmark of soft, two-dimens

138 melting of the DNA duplex, where the melting transition temperature is controllable not just by the D

139 ~0.2 wt% carbon nanotube loading, the glass transition temperature is increased by ~20 degrees C, in

140 We show that the distribution of transition temperatures is a local property, set by surf

141 Lower transition temperatures may be attributed to the partial

142 tion to the measured values that brought the transition temperatures measured by thermophoresis into

143 When heated to a temperature close to glass transition temperature, metallic glasses (MGs) begin to

144 ), adsorbed on nanoparticles and a low-glass transition temperature miscible matrix, poly(ethylene ox

145 nant dynamic annealing process at a critical transition temperature of 130 degrees C.

146 We measured the superconducting transition temperature of (6)Li between 16 and 26 GPa, a

147 A poly(ionic liquid) with a rather low glass transition temperature of -57 degrees C was synthesized

148 bulk MoTe2 exhibits superconductivity with a transition temperature of 0.10 K.

149 P4/mmm phase of Li3Ar has a superconducting transition temperature of 17.6 K at 120 GPa.

150 xhibits helimagnetism with a relatively high transition temperature of 278 K in bulk crystals.

151 d the incommensurate CDW phases, which has a transition temperature of 350 K and gives an abrupt chan

152 185 picocoulombs per newton and a high phase-transition temperature of 406 kelvin (K) (16 K above tha

153 ion in normal-state YBa2Cu3O6+x at above the transition temperature of 52 kelvin causes a simultaneou

154 orted rutile structure in both cases, with a transition temperature of 700 degrees C for the NbO2 ins

155 inside the MIM device and a slightly higher transition temperature of 750 degrees C for the referenc

156 sity wave order in single-layer TiTe2 with a transition temperature of 92 +/- 3 K.

157 teristics of an amorphous state with a glass transition temperature of ?22 degrees C.

158 erroelectricity in 2D CuInP2S6 (CIPS) with a transition temperature of approximately 320 K.

159 ct engineering facilitates the tuning of the transition temperature of BaTiO3 to >800 degrees C.

160 ability even at temperatures above the glass transition temperature of Cu-based BMGs.

161 TiO3 crystals to tune the sharp metamagnetic transition temperature of epitaxially grown FeRh films a

162 of starch at all levels increased the glass transition temperature of films.

163 Glass transition temperature of IMF powder, determined by IGC,

164 ugh the gap forms around the superconducting transition temperature of lead, we do not find evidence

165 nce spectroscopy (EIS) to estimate the glass transition temperature of planar polyelectrolyte brushes

166 ) , even at a temperature close to the glass transition temperature of polymer (i.e., 217 degrees C)

167 e affected the mechanical strength and glass transition temperature of polymeric systems.

168 e affected the mechanical strength and glass transition temperature of polymeric systems.

169 and numerical simulations, we show that the transition temperature of such a device can be controlle

170 The thermal transition temperature of swim bladder ASC (35.02 degree

171 pronounced thickness dependence of the glass transition temperature of ternary polymer/fullerene blen

172 The superconducting transition temperature of tetragonal FeS was gradually d

173 The lower transition temperature of the conjugate enables the faci

174 t show a remarkable reduction in the inverse transition temperature of the ELP domain upon formation

175 polarization emerges below the ferromagnetic transition temperature of the EuTiO3 layer (TFM = 6-8 K)

176 magnitude lower than the ferromagnetic phase transition temperature of the films.

177 On the basis of the transition temperature of the main transition in the cal

178 the coupling of lattice strain to the local transition temperature of the phase transition.

179 l particle, which, in turn, lowers the glass transition temperature of the polymer inside the particl

180 te concentration increases the stability and transition temperature of the protein, but does not chan

181 scence quantum yield upon reaching the glass transition temperature of the solvent.

182 in agreement with measurements of the glass-transition temperature of thin polymer films, and allows

183 nd C2/m-SnH14 exhibit higher superconducting transition temperatures of 81, 93 and 97 K compared to t

184 ueous solution, with a wide range of tunable transition temperatures of 88 to 28 degrees C.

185 The transition temperatures of epitaxial films of Fe(Te0:9Se

186 The gel-fluid transition temperatures of the pure compounds increase i

187 o induce solid phase can be predicted by the transition temperatures of their major metabolites.

188 The glass transition temperatures of these amorphous solids show a

189 is an amorphous material with a T(g) (glass transition temperature) of 44 degrees C, while its isota

190 behaviour, large changes in metal-insulator transition temperatures or enhanced catalytic activity.

191 y, crystalline heterogeneity, gelatinization transition temperatures, pasting temperatures, peak visc

192 e phenyl groups, their rotational rates, and transition temperatures paves the way to controlling and

193 symmetric interphases formed by a high-glass transition temperature polymer, poly(methyl methacrylate

194 transformed into a rubbery (i.e., low glass transition temperature) polymer.

195 e) Delta with a large gap-to-superconducting transition temperature ratio, 2Delta0/k(B)T(c) = 5.3(2)

196 ion of vanadium-tetracyanoethylene, magnetic transition temperatures remain well below the boiling po

197 limit is observed, while the superconducting transition temperature remains nearly constant.

198 at a temperature>the hydrated polymer glass transition temperature, respectively.

199 Therefore, below the transition temperature, ring motion is largely libration

200 nal magnetic field below the superconducting transition temperature, signifying that the superconduct

201 This increases the magnetic transition temperature substantially-from 240 kelvin for

202 Since the discovery of the high-transition-temperature superconductors (HTSs), researche

203 The ferroelectric transition temperature T(c) of 1-UC SnTe film is greatly

204 e coherence set in simultaneously at the CDW transition temperature T(cdw).

205 PLD) enables improving their superconducting transition temperature (T c) by more than 40% than thei

206 We find that the superconducting transition temperature (T c) increases from 84 K for the

207 or at atmospheric pressure with an estimated transition temperature (T c) of 10.6 K, and superconduct

208 ilized in any material that exhibits a glass-transition temperature (T g ) and a rubbery plateau.

209 glass-forming systems implies a lower glass transition temperature (T g ), is considered a universal

210 mobility as described by viscosity and glass transition temperature (T'g) was also studied.

211 ains an impediment to understanding the high transition temperature (T(c)) superconducting mechanism.

212 The physical modification of glass transition temperature (T(g)) and properties of material

213 polymers exhibit an enhancement of the glass-transition temperature (T(g)) of 15 degrees C compared t

214 ansion upon illumination far below the glass transition temperature (T(g)).

215 In the quest for superconductors with higher transition temperatures (T(c)), one emerging motif is th

216 Both the glass transition temperatures (T(g)) and onset of degradation

217 niaxial pressure derivatives of the HO/LMAFM transition temperature T0 change dramatically when cross

218 The spin-transition temperature T1/2 is lowered by 20 K in the ho

219 they host superconductivity with the highest transition temperature Tc approximately 55K.

220 sults for HgBa2CuO(4+delta) (superconducting transition temperature Tc approximately 71 K, pseudogap

221 In particular, the superconducting transition temperature Tc calculated for LaH10 is 274-28

222 lcogenide compound, i.e. Nb2Pd0.81S5, with a transition temperature Tc is approximately equal to 6.6

223 ydride superconductor with a superconducting transition temperature Tc of 203 kelvin at 155 gigapasca

224 aled dome-like dependence of superconducting transition temperature Tc upon K content with a maximum

225 of the dynamical mean-field superconducting transition temperature Tc(d), the maximum of the condens

226 temperature usually sets the superconducting transition temperature Tc, as the gap signals the format

227 mpetes with superconductivity (SC) below the transition temperature Tc, suggesting that these two ord

228 y, the superconducting semimetal FeSe with a transition temperature Tc=8.5 K has been found to be dee

229 Below the superconducting transition temperature (Tc = 50 K) inter-bilayer coheren

230 and Mn compounds, which display very low SC transition temperature (Tc) and no SC, respectively.

231 As sample thus leading to an increase of the transition temperature (Tc) and of the superfluid densit

232 this work, the relationship between magnetic transition temperature (TC) and the substrate induced (p

233 e pressure dependence of the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) and unit cell metrics of tet

234 A superconducting transition temperature (Tc) as high as 100 K was recentl

235 The superconducting transition temperature (TC) in a FeSe monolayer on SrTiO

236 The superconducting transition temperature (TC) increased to around 8.0 K wi

237 axis) of the crystal lattice results in the transition temperature (Tc) increasing from 1.5 kelvin i

238 Phenolic compounds also increased phase transition temperature (Tc) of nanoliposomes (2.01-7.24

239 al) exhibit the highest bulk superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) up to 55 K and thus hold th

240 c states such as anomalous and possibly high-transition-temperature (Tc) superconductivity.

241 ity waves, have been a central issue in high transition-temperature (Tc) superconductors.

242 the Cr concentration where the ferromagnetic transition temperature, Tc, goes to 0.

243 tions in the vicinity of the superconducting transition temperature, Tc, is to round off all of the s

244 ctric response engineering for enhancing the transition temperature, Tc, of a superconductor.

245 ratures far greater than the superconducting transition temperature, Tc.

246 The transition temperature (TCDW) of the CDW is approximatel

247 t in the structural relaxation and the glass transition temperature Tg of water.

248 temperature' T(*) located between the glass transition temperature Tg, and the crystal melting tempe

249 ssess good thermal stability and a low glass-transition temperature (Tg approximately -67 degrees C).

250 by TOF-SIMS is related to the surface glass transition temperature (Tg(S)) measured by other techniq

251 increase upon both compression at the glass transition temperature (Tg) and ambient pressure sub-Tg

252 rption, deliquescence point (RH0), and glass transition temperature (Tg) behaviours were investigated

253 metry (DSC) analysis revealed a single glass transition temperature (Tg) between 16 and 31 degrees C.

254 The glass transition temperature (Tg) for all of the powders signi

255 % head-to-tail regioselectivity, and a glass-transition temperature (Tg) of 37 degrees C.

256 ately 30 degrees C lower than the bulk glass transition temperature (Tg) of that PS.

257 t temperatures, up to 60 K below their glass transition temperature (Tg), by subjecting them to activ

258 vity (aw), solubility, hygroscopicity, glass transition temperature (Tg), particle size, and microstr

259 a rubbery film when heated above their glass transition temperature (Tg).

260 sible upon annealing below the ambient glass transition temperature (Tg).

261 were applied to analyse microcapsules glass transition temperature (Tg).

262 s in amorphous polyesters that exhibit glass transition temperatures (Tg ) of up to 109 degrees C.

263 fibers - digital SMPs - with different glass transition temperatures (Tg) to control the transformati

264 nite temperature (etao) to that at the glass transition temperature, Tg.

265 e at different stress levels below the glass transition temperature, Tg.

266 hanges little with cooling towards the glass transition temperature, Tg.

267 anostructure has a different insulator-metal transition temperature that depends on the VO2 domain si

268 that the 3R polytype shows a superconducting transition temperature that is between 6 and 17 times hi

269 arises because of the lowering of the phase transition temperature that occurs due to the perdeutera

270 We find s+/- pairing with a transition temperature that peaks beyond the Lifshitz po

271 ion of the calorimetric and mechanical glass transition temperatures that demarcate the passage from

272 ely Gi(1/2)(T/Tc) (Tc is the superconducting transition temperature) that has been achieved in our fi

273 effect is the smallest, and the decrease in transition temperature the largest, when the alcohol par

274 densities, magnetic susceptibilities, glass transition temperatures, thermal decomposition temperatu

275 In the vicinity of the transition temperature, these quantities change sign wit

276 olipid membranes displaying a range of phase transition temperatures (Tm).

277 mains disappear above a distinct miscibility transition temperature (Tmix) and reappear below Tmix, o

278 large decrease in liquid-liquid miscibility transition temperatures (Tmix) observed when short-chain

279 Zn2Fe(3+)Ta(5+)O6 has a lower magnetic transition temperature (TN approximately 22 K) than the

280 rch in the glassy state and shifts the glass transition temperature to a higher value.

281 ddition of 25 muM blebbistatin decreased the transition temperature to approximately 14 degrees C.

282 t is in contrast to the insensitivity of the transition temperature to magnetic fields in the three-d

283 ure boundary and, simultaneously reduces the transition temperature to promote rutile structure at lo

284 1T-TaS2 and 1T-TiSe2 exhibit unusually high transition temperatures to different CDW symmetry-reduci

285 Both this and low transition temperatures to other phases enable the study

286 rapid cooling from above the order-disorder transition temperature (TODT = 66 degrees C) using small

287 Between TODT and the order-order transition temperature TOOT = 42 degrees C, an equilibri

288 ation whereby samples remain soluble below a transition temperature (Tt) but form amorphous coacervat

289 tration of 12.0% (w/w) reduced the chromatic transition temperature (Ttr) to as low as 24 degrees C.

290 external pressure dramatically enhances the transition temperature up to maximum value of 8.2 K at 1

291 onducting to a greater increase in the phase transition temperatures up to 4.14 degrees C, while the

292 all-electric control of the superconducting transition temperature using a device comprised of a con

293 solubility, dispersibility and higher glass-transition temperature values.

294 ane vesicles (GPMVs) to explore how membrane transition temperature varies with growth temperature in

295 more physiological lipids with a lower phase transition temperature, we achieved efficient fusion wit

296 ross-linked polymer networks below the glass transition temperature, we propose that collagen I fibri

297 small-chain alcohols reduce the miscibility transition temperature when added to giant plasma membra

298 ization exhibits a higher ductile-to-brittle transition temperature which increases with the grain si

299 account for the observed change in magnetic transition temperature with size of the ligands or anion

300 ores and the variation of the spin-crossover transition temperature, with the high-spin state of the