戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 onor-derived C. auris transmission in a lung transplant recipient.
2 munological follow up of a cohort of 55 lung transplant recipients.
3 body responses to prevent organ rejection in transplant recipients.
4 the highest standardized incidence ratios in transplant recipients.
5 nvasive detection of AMR in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
6 treatment of urologic malignancies in kidney transplant recipients.
7 lant recipients and is universal among islet transplant recipients.
8 ortant in the outpatient follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.
9 d safety parameters in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.
10 redictive of subsequent mortality among lung transplant recipients.
11 s known to have suboptimal immunogenicity in transplant recipients.
12 mised individuals, especially in solid-organ transplant recipients.
13 iscontinuation of prednisone (RDP) in kidney transplant recipients.
14 bodies (dnDSA) may cause graft loss in renal transplant recipients.
15 dian age was 58 years; 9 patients (43%) were transplant recipients.
16 tial impacts for the management of cancer in transplant recipients.
17 e 10 donors using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
18 a (NPC), and lymphomas that develop in organ transplant recipients.
19 ents with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant recipients.
20 second leading cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients.
21 nd risk determinants of PTLD in Irish kidney transplant recipients.
22 loped and validated for the UK population of transplant recipients.
23 V and urothelial carcinogenesis among kidney transplant recipients.
24 ere obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
25 mmon single cause of death observed in organ transplant recipients.
26 ed but uncommon complications in solid organ transplant recipients.
27 development of malignant neoplasms in kidney transplant recipients.
28 c immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, in transplant recipients.
29 the patient with JCPyVAN and in stable renal transplant recipients.
30 ded a DBD comparison group comprising 23 609 transplant recipients.
31 ith inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients.
32 formulations of an immunosuppressive drug in transplant recipients.
33 ins the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant recipients.
34 association of NTM with mortality among lung transplant recipients.
35 nct immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplant recipients.
36 iated with adverse outcomes in stable kidney transplant recipients.
37 ut their association with outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
38 h advanced chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients.
39  antibodies (non-HLAabs) were screened in 29 transplant recipients.
40 portant causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients.
41 erall, PH was documented in 117 (39%) of 300 transplant recipients.
42 d with the waitlist including KDPI 0% to 85% transplant recipients.
43 ocompromised patients and particularly organ transplant recipients.
44 dence of rejection in HIV-to-HIV solid organ transplant recipients.
45 ascular and kidney outcomes in stable kidney transplant recipients.
46 ntially contribute to allograft damage among transplant recipients.
47 rvival in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
48 f antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplant recipients.
49 th increased risk of SCC of the skin in lung transplant recipients.
50 mpact of pretransplant sensitization on lung transplant recipients.
51 relates with delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients.
52 ssessing the risk of BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients.
53 odgkin lymphoma (NHL) in 288 029 solid organ transplant recipients.
54 ontrol in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
55  Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients.
56  and are capable of inducing AML in serially transplanted recipients.
57  nocardiosis (16.2%, 19/117) than in control transplant recipients (1.3%, 3/233, P < .001).
58 3A5, ABCB1, and PXR) were analyzed in kidney transplant recipients (1995-2005, Leiden cohort, n = 153
59 ntified all adult (>/=18 years) first kidney transplant recipients (1996-2011) with ESRD attributed t
60                   We reported 47 solid organ transplant recipients (41 kidneys) with cryptosporidiosi
61         The study cohort included 8026 organ transplant recipients, 5224 men (65.1%), with a mean age
62 ctive clinical study including healthy heart transplant recipients 6 months to 25 years of age presen
63 re 13 trials (n = 9850) that included kidney transplant recipients (6 trials), patients who had stage
64  identify the optimal DAA regimen for kidney transplant recipients, accounting for efficacy, timing r
65 diatric and adolescent deceased donor kidney transplant recipients aged 21 years or younger using Aus
66 hour everolimus (EVL) PK in 16 elderly renal transplant recipients (all whites; 10 men; mean age, 64
67  immunocompromised individuals such as organ transplant recipients, although the mechanism remains un
68 ntation, GTD requires genotyping of both the transplant recipient and donor.
69  one case of TMAT, which occurred in a liver transplant recipient and resulted in death from bleeding
70 e longitudinal study, we enrolled 168 kidney transplant recipients and 69 matched donors.
71 er (PTLD) is a serious complication in organ transplant recipients and is most often associated with
72      Diabetes is prevalent among solid organ transplant recipients and is universal among islet trans
73  transplant centers to maintain contact with transplant recipients and obtain necessary follow-up inf
74                                              Transplant recipients and other immunocompromised hosts
75 but their effects on fractures and safety in transplant recipients and others with CKD are unclear.
76 obtained from a new cohort of tolerant renal transplant recipients and those from age- and sex-matche
77 ents (renal transplant recipients, stem cell transplant recipients, and congenitally infected childre
78 g-term hematopoietic stem cells in secondary transplant recipients, and enhanced survival of mice aft
79  in healthy, immunocompetent individuals, in transplant recipients, and in PTLD patients.
80 clusion, PCNSL risk is highly elevated among transplant recipients, and it carries a poor prognosis.
81 is reactivated in approximately 20% of renal transplant recipients, and it may rarely cause JCPyV-ass
82 ome, the current literature on the virome in transplant recipients, and near-future applications of s
83 in both allografts and urine of human kidney transplant recipients, and unilateral IRI in mice induce
84      This study provides novel evidence that transplant recipients are able to mount significant cros
85              Approximately only 50% of renal transplant recipients are alive at 10 years due to the t
86                                  Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for developi
87  of chronic hepatitis C virus in solid organ transplant recipients are limited.
88                 Approximately 200 000 kidney transplant recipients are living in the United States; t
89                     Thirty percent of kidney transplant recipients are readmitted in the first month
90                                              Transplant recipients are treated with immunosuppressive
91 traded so that sicker patients, that is, SLK transplant recipients, are afforded access to the organ.
92                              Pediatric liver transplant recipients arguably have the most to gain and
93 to differentiate between these 2 entities in transplant recipients as well.
94 NETs in 103 consecutive pediatric allogeneic transplant recipients at day 0, +14, +30, +60, and +100.
95 ximately 800 patients in the cohort of renal transplant recipients at our institution, 15 subjects we
96 rom 4 isolated intestine and 3 multivisceral transplant recipients at the time of any operative resec
97  performed between 1998 and 2014 from kidney transplant recipients at the University of Maryland Medi
98 servational study of 1996 adult first kidney transplant recipients between 1991 and 2010 in the Repub
99 a were collected from 1799 consecutive liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2002, and Decem
100  healthy volunteers may not reflect those in transplant recipients, bioequivalence between generic an
101 increased risk of graft loss in adult kidney transplant recipients but the association remains incons
102 ft survival between obese and nonobese liver transplant recipients, but obesity presents important me
103 al population and in HCV-monoinfected kidney transplant recipients, but there are no data to guide it
104 ent of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in lung transplant recipients, by attempting to account for impo
105 ctivation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in transplant recipients can cause life-threatening disease
106 Melanoma risk factors and incidence in renal transplant recipients can inform decision making for bot
107 uld significantly advance personalized liver transplant recipient care and management of immunosuppre
108 nd analysis of alloreactive T and B cells in transplant recipients critical for understanding mechani
109 e integrated national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (1987-2015) with records from
110                 Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from June 2013 to June 2015,
111 re analyzed using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data set.
112               We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to compare patients listed wi
113 ys, we used 2010-2014 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to identify 104 998 adult tra
114 ohort study using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from 2003 to 2015.
115 ients recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database who received a first dece
116  of PTTB and may show delayed onset in renal transplant recipients due to the use of lower doses of i
117 s isolates and airway samples from a CF-lung transplant recipient during two years, and followed the
118                              In young kidney transplant recipients, elevated ABP is frequently unreco
119 profiling in 318 serum samples from 69 liver transplant recipients enrolled in the Immune Tolerance N
120 transplant history from 977 prevalent kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the Malnutrition-Infla
121  donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in kidney transplant recipients, especially in those with stable g
122                                        Organ-transplant-recipients exhibit cancerization of the skin
123                    Non-Hispanic black kidney transplant recipients experience a substantial disparity
124                                 Black kidney transplant recipients experience disproportionately high
125 contains a rich set of data on United States transplant recipients, follow-up data may be incomplete.
126                                       Kidney transplant recipients, for example, have a 7-fold risk o
127                                 Ninety-three transplant recipients from 2 Australian transplant units
128 076 adult Medicare-primary first-time kidney transplant recipients from December 1999 to October 2011
129 t survival was significantly worse for liver transplant recipients from donors with ITP compared with
130 nts from donors with ITP compared with liver transplant recipients from donors without ITP (64% vs. 8
131 transplant (KT), and dual liver kidney (DLK) transplant recipients from the Hepatitis C Therapeutic R
132 . hominis infections were identified in lung transplant recipients from the same thoracic intensive c
133 ational data registry used a cohort of renal transplant recipients from the United States Renal Data
134                                              Transplant recipients had elevated incidence for PCNSL c
135                                        Renal transplant recipients had greater risk of developing mel
136    The risk of graft failure in young kidney transplant recipients has been found to increase during
137 e proportion of elderly patients among renal transplant recipients has increased, pharmacokinetic (PK
138                                         Lung transplant recipients have an increased risk for infecti
139 rrow therapeutic index immunosuppressants in transplant recipients have been lacking.
140                                  Solid organ transplant recipients have increased risk for developing
141    We analyzed a prospective cohort of renal transplant recipients having routine EBV PCR surveillanc
142             Centers with >30% of their liver transplant recipients hospitalized >/=30 days in the fir
143 rovecii pneumonia (PCP) occurred among heart transplant recipients (HTR) at the outpatient clinic of
144       A previous GWAS performed in 300 renal transplant recipients identified two SNPs (rs3811321 and
145              In 2014, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients implemented new Bayesian methodolo
146                                      A renal transplant recipient in her 60s presented with a history
147 ta System records of Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000 to 2011 to determine clini
148 cribe the results of 11 ABOi pediatric renal transplant recipients in the 2 largest centers in the Un
149 ecome clinically useful surrogates in kidney transplant recipients, including functional T cell assay
150 mbolic events across a wide variety of liver transplant recipients, including those at low risk of bl
151                           The care of kidney transplant recipients involves a balance between maximiz
152 f IL-2RAb in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients is associated with at least a 40%
153  current immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is effective, dosing is convention
154  hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in kidney transplant recipients is limited because of the risk for
155 f hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients is possible, but limited data exis
156 al maintenance dose of tacrolimus for kidney transplant recipients is unknown.
157 but the optimal vaccination schedule in lung transplant recipients is unknown.
158  the risk of acute rejection in adult kidney transplant recipients is well established, a similar ben
159  kidney injury (AKI) occurred in four kidney transplant recipients (KDIGO grade 1: n = 3, grade 3: n
160                            Consequently, for transplant recipients, killing latently infected cells c
161 hemodialysis treatment (CKD 5D) and 8 kidney transplant recipients (KT) with severe aortic valve sten
162 (PVAN) after BK virus reactivation in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) can compromise graft surviva
163 ted with baseline viral serostatus in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) on sirolimus have not been w
164 etry is used to assess bone health in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).
165                      CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has been associated with an
166 -specific T cells in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been attributed to an
167 ection and improves graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).
168 knockout mice, we demonstrate that stem cell transplant recipients lacking the ability to generate or
169 icularly within African American (AA) kidney transplant recipients; little is known about intrapatien
170                                      In lung transplant recipients (LTRs), human cytomegalovirus (HCM
171  development of AR and BOS in pediatric lung transplant recipients (LTxR).
172       Operationally tolerant pediatric liver transplant recipients maintain generally stable allograf
173 en reported in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant recipients managed solely with antibody remov
174 and the common occurrence of GI disorders in transplant recipients may delay diagnosis of GITB.
175                         Overall, 10649 organ transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 51 [12] years; 387
176  the results in a cohort of 10 stable kidney transplant recipients (median of 4.3 years posttransplan
177  in the peripheral blood and AMR, 715 kidney transplant recipients (median, 6.3 years posttransplanta
178 t bisphosphonates may slow loss of BMD among transplant recipients (moderate SOE), but their effects
179    Pre- and postvaccination sera from kidney transplant recipients (n = 60) immunized with the 2012-2
180 risk factors from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 74,859) and tested whether (1
181  Thus, immunosuppressive strategies for lung transplant recipients need to be tailored based on the u
182 re survival case of isolated GITB in a renal transplant recipient, occurring seven years after transp
183 t appear to adversely affect the outcomes of transplant recipients of concomitantly recovered solid o
184                                       Kidney transplant recipients often receive antibody induction.
185 l population, it is possible that either the transplant recipient or donor may act as the source of v
186                                        Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) have a 100-fold increased r
187 increased risk of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs), no study has estimated the
188 r has been well characterized in white organ transplant recipients (OTRs); however, most patients on
189 r on organ donation and utilization, as well transplant recipient outcomes.
190  VEC proliferation than those from syngeneic transplant recipients (P = 0.03).
191 ded all adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients placed on the heart transplant act
192                                   Three lung transplant recipients presented with invasive M. hominis
193         PRM is a novel imaging tool for lung transplant recipients presenting with spirometric declin
194 In the Spare-the-Nephron (STN) Study, kidney transplant recipients randomized about 115 days posttran
195      In the United States, 5% of adult liver transplant recipients receive a graft donation after cir
196             In this cohort of de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and prednison
197 pective randomized study in which 288 kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and prednison
198         We prospectively monitored 617 heart transplant recipients referred from 4 French transplant
199                                              Transplant recipients regarded graft loss as worse than
200              Still, the risk of SCC in organ transplant recipients remains much higher than in the ge
201                       Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients report cards of US organ transplan
202 r Pneumocystis pneumonia prevention in renal transplant recipients, reported adverse drug reactions m
203 6.6%, 94.5%, and 90.9% among LT, KT, and DLK transplant recipients, respectively.
204  m(2) among deceased and living donor kidney transplant recipients, respectively.
205  was efficacious and safe in LT, KT, and DLK transplant recipients; ribavirin did not influence SVR,
206 doxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) are common in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and confer increased risk o
207 tions of pyridoxal-5-phospate (PLP) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs).
208 ted with an increased risk of death in renal transplant recipients (RTRs).
209 ght the need to tailor interventions to each transplant recipient's unique needs, motivations, and ba
210                          In prevalent kidney transplant recipients, serum TNF-alpha and IL6 were inde
211 nical trial, we randomized 90 de novo kidney transplant recipients shortly after transplantation to e
212  of voriconazole use when prescribed to lung transplant recipients should be carefully weighed versus
213 domized phase III study of 719 de novo liver transplant recipients showed that early everolimus plus
214                          De novo solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have a steep learning curve
215                                  Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) with a pretransplant malign
216  effectiveness is not optimal in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR).
217 DNA-positive plasma samples from solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) were tested.
218 or to morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs).
219  time period from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR; n=13 717).
220         Our data indicate that elderly renal transplant recipients starting EVL 1 month after transpl
221 tments from 20 HCMV-infected patients (renal transplant recipients, stem cell transplant recipients,
222            Our study included 86 DSA+ kidney transplant recipients subjected to protocol biopsy, who
223 rus (BKV) in urinary tract cancers in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting that BKV could contrib
224 icantly prolonged survival compared with MAC-transplanted recipients (TBI of 850 cGy plus cyclophosph
225 tial group of donors are those who have been transplant recipients themselves, or Organ Donation Afte
226 sted on >1000 samples from a cohort of renal transplant recipients to assess its performance in a cli
227 teriaceae and CRE carriage among solid organ transplant recipients to inform management of this vulne
228 y score matched cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between May 1, 2001,
229 e cohort study of 2749 adult Norwegian renal transplant recipients, transplanted between 1999 and 201
230 of 265 consecutive chronic hepatitis B liver transplant recipients treated with entecavir monotherapy
231 se, we describe the largest series of kidney transplant recipients treated with prophylactic eculizum
232 tial for loss of stability of these cells in transplant recipients treated with TAC based immunosuppr
233     In this retrospective study of US kidney transplant recipients undergoing PCI, DES was associated
234          Longitudinal cohort study of kidney transplant recipients using a data set created by linkin
235 assessed among 118,440 Caucasian solid organ transplant recipients using multivariate Cox regression
236    Whether outcomes of MI differ among renal transplant recipients vs patients with stage 5D CKD or t
237  of ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) in renal transplant recipients vs the stage 5D CKD group or the n
238 ab to prevent bone loss in first-year kidney transplant recipients was associated with more frequent
239   Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we compared outcomes for all SLK
240 s organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 15 125 hemodialysis
241                                 Forty kidney transplant recipients were 1:1 randomized to belatacept
242      In the phase II IM103-100 study, kidney transplant recipients were first randomized to belatacep
243                        A total of 5983 renal transplant recipients were included.
244                            Nine hundred lung transplant recipients were included.
245         Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were linked to IMS pharmacy fills
246    Medical records of the donor and infected transplant recipients were reviewed for clinical charact
247                        A total of 2050 liver transplant recipients were studied, of these 960 (46.8%)
248 trols receiving corticosteroids in pediatric transplant recipients which reported growth as change in
249 n by linking the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, which includes data on keratinocy
250 e-center retrospective analysis of 207 liver transplant recipients who achieved MELD score of 40 or h
251 art, 34 liver, 79 kidney, and 5 liver-kidney transplant recipients who completed treatment for an epi
252 ne risk factors and characteristics of renal transplant recipients who develop melanoma.
253       We retrospectively identified 59 renal transplant recipients who developed dnDSA and had serum
254                                  Adult renal transplant recipients who had symptomatic chronic norovi
255 skin cancer after retransplantation in organ-transplant recipients who have already developed posttra
256 crossmatch positive living donor HLAi kidney transplant recipients who received their transplant betw
257 uantified the circulating ApoL1 in two liver transplant recipients whose native APOL1 genotype differ
258 tcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 y
259 oven regression of liver fibrosis in a liver transplant recipient with cirrhosis after chronic HEV in
260   We report our experience treating 43 renal transplant recipients with 4 different DAA regimens.
261                        A cohort of 596 renal transplant recipients with 50,011 serial tacrolimus trou
262                                       Kidney transplant recipients with a pretransplant cancer had a
263                    In a cohort of 242 kidney transplant recipients with acute allograft dysfunction,
264                                 Twelve renal transplant recipients with aHUS-related end-stage renal
265 y was reviewed for adult living donor kidney transplant recipients with BMI of 40 kg/m or greater per
266                                        Organ transplant recipients with CF should initiate CRC screen
267               Forty-four DSA-positive kidney transplant recipients with characteristic ABMR morpholog
268 free regimen ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in kidney transplant recipients with chronic genotype 1 or 4 HCV i
269       Treatment-naive or -experienced kidney transplant recipients with chronic genotype 1 or 4 HCV i
270      Additionally, among 109 heart or kidney transplant recipients with CKD, those with higher serum
271                              Thirteen kidney transplant recipients with complicated UTIs underwent bo
272                     Our results suggest that transplant recipients with cutaneous SCC, but not BCC, h
273                      We identified 45 kidney transplant recipients with dnDSA detected between Januar
274                                 In 42 kidney transplant recipients with functioning grafts who had re
275              Eighteen percent (3/17) of lung transplant recipients with ganR-CMV had received <6 week
276 hort course (in hospital only) HBIG in liver transplant recipients with HBV DNA less than 100 IU/mL p
277 ve an acceptable safety profile among kidney transplant recipients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection
278 ined percentages of new waitlist members and transplant recipients with HCV infection, stratified by
279                           The outcome of 149 transplant recipients with HEHE recorded in the European
280 RM(PD)) were compared between bilateral lung transplant recipients with irreversible spirometric decl
281 m 1 patient with JCPyVAN and 20 stable renal transplant recipients with JCPyV viruria was attempted.
282 immunodeficiency virus/HCV coinfected kidney transplant recipients with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir at our
283 k in healthy pediatric and young adult heart transplant recipients with minimal risk when low initial
284 s on average 11-fold (P = 0.002) higher than transplant recipients with no AMR and 24-fold (P = 0.008
285                                        Renal transplant recipients with otherwise unexplainable chron
286                  However, in pediatric heart transplant recipients with PRA greater than 50% or conge
287 not death-censored renal graft loss in renal transplant recipients with PTDM.
288 s reaffirm the need for careful selection of transplant recipients with PTM.
289 gs in the current study indicate that kidney transplant recipients with PV replication and smoking ar
290 he incidence of such complications among HPC transplant recipients with sickle cell disease.
291         In-hospital mortality rates in renal transplant recipients with STEMI are more favorable comp
292                                  Among renal transplant recipients with STEMI, the use of reperfusion
293                                       Kidney transplant recipients with urinary angiogenin amounts in
294 trial, 152 treatment-naive adult solid organ transplant recipients, with CD20(+) PTLD unresponsive to
295  found in urine samples from 19 stable renal transplant recipients, with JCPyV quasispecies detected
296 tored normal physiological functions in this transplant recipient without major complications in the
297 athymic interleukin-22 (IL-22) compared with transplant recipients without GVHD, thereby inhibiting I
298 rm treatment with ribavirin is safe in liver transplant recipients, without achieving HEV sustained v
299 ion suggest that routine cancer screening in transplant recipients would allow for earlier diagnosis
300                           Among first kidney transplant recipients younger than 30 years in France, t

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top