コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 relatively rare cause of malaria in returned travelers.
2 focus posttravel evaluation of ill returned travelers.
3 tract hundreds of thousands of international travelers.
4 ffer consistent pretravel preventive care to travelers.
5 -identified pretravel data for international travelers.
6 ics that collect data from ill international travelers.
7 o cause life-threatening illness in returned travelers.
8 amplification (LAMP) kit in febrile returned travelers.
9 C metro area to include leisure and business travelers.
10 for advice before travel or by ill returned travelers.
11 effectively boosted immunity in JE-MB-primed travelers.
12 n imported into many nonendemic countries by travelers.
13 f the overall population of US international travelers.
14 P. malariae diagnosis and clinical course in travelers.
15 rditis in regions where it is endemic and in travelers.
16 mptoms associated with NoV diarrhea in these travelers.
17 asmodium falciparum infections in short-term travelers.
18 eeded for prevention of malaria in long-term travelers.
19 of semen testing for Zika virus from 2 male travelers.
20 ave a higher risk of malaria than short-term travelers.
21 el surveillance data for 17,353 ill returned travelers.
22 children in developing countries and at-risk travelers.
23 ery of preventive travel-related care to VFR travelers.
24 influence disease risk in this population of travelers.
25 recent (1996-2003) evidence, addressing VFR travelers.
26 needed to properly address the needs of VFR travelers.
27 ted States; approximately 60% are among U.S. travelers.
28 logy and magnitude from those of traditional travelers.
29 disorders, shift workers, and transmeridian travelers.
30 n imported into many nonendemic countries by travelers.
31 a remains a common problem for international travelers.
32 ay not be representative of all ill returned travelers.
33 ber of cases distributed across the globe by travelers.
34 nd are mostly due to infections in returning travelers.
35 ing identifiable cause of fever in returning travelers.
37 rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) to only 7 of 50 travelers (14%) who sought care abroad and for whom HRIG
41 refusal was most frequent in the South (1432 travelers [63%]) and in nonacademic centers (1178 travel
42 vaccinated were evaluated in the South (2262 travelers [65%]) or at nonacademic centers (1777 travele
46 sible differential diagnoses of ill returned travelers according to destination and reason for travel
47 t travelers save money for longer trips when travelers adhere to malaria recommendations and prophyla
48 associated costs and benefits resulting from traveler adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis were calc
51 s account for a high volume of international travelers and are at markedly increased risk of travel-r
52 t other key enteric pathogens can be used by travelers and clinicians in pre- and posttravel consulta
53 is a global health problem and of concern to travelers and deploying military personnel with developm
54 , so that they can protect the health of the travelers and family members and close friends who will
55 can assist clinicians to advise prospective travelers and guide pretravel preparation, including iti
56 osinophilia is a common finding in returning travelers and immigrants from parasite-endemic areas.
59 ellents are important prophylactic tools for travelers and populations living in endemic areas of mal
60 lity of Toscana virus infection in returning travelers and provides information on how to obtain test
62 Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a common cause of travelers' and postweaning diarrhea in humans and swine,
63 Bone loss is a critical concern for space travelers, and a dietary countermeasure would be of grea
65 one metabolism remain key concerns for space travelers, and ground-based models of space flight have
66 ance System: 123 (66.5%) occurred among U.S. travelers, and of these, 114 (92.7%) were attributed to
67 revent cryptosporidiosis, particularly among travelers, animal handlers, child caregivers, and swimme
74 y currently drive clinical evaluation of ill travelers arriving from Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guine
77 consultations saved healthcare payers a per-traveler average of $14 (9-day trip) to $372 (30-day tri
79 proven P. malariae monoinfections in Israeli travelers between January 2008 and January 2017 were ret
81 Vivax malaria causes significant illness in travelers, but current first-line chemoprophylaxis agent
82 been described in hyperparasitemic nonimmune travelers, but it is unknown if African children are equ
83 Vivax malaria causes significant illness in travelers, but relapses of vivax malaria are not prevent
85 ance of NoV infection in three international traveler cohorts with diarrhea acquired in three develop
88 er skin infections and nasal colonization in travelers contribute to the global spread of such strain
89 se in MMR vaccination of eligible U.S. adult travelers could reduce the likelihood of importation and
93 imin provided 72% and 77% protection against travelers' diarrhea and antibiotic-treated travelers' di
94 appears promising as a chemoprophylaxis for travelers' diarrhea and as a treatment of portal systemi
95 Rifaximin is effective for the treatment of travelers' diarrhea and can be considered as the treatme
96 uals susceptible to Escherichia coli-induced travelers' diarrhea and in tear fluid derived from viral
97 NoVs were identified in 10.2% of cases of travelers' diarrhea and, overall, was the second most co
98 ed in the United States for the treatment of travelers' diarrhea caused by noninvasive diarrheagenic
104 tile diarrhea in the developing world and of travelers' diarrhea in visitors to these areas from indu
108 i (ETEC) is a leading cause of childhood and travelers' diarrhea, for which an effective vaccine is n
109 is responsible for causing severe infant and travelers' diarrhea, gastroenteritis and hemolytic uremi
110 t travelers' diarrhea and antibiotic-treated travelers' diarrhea, respectively (P < 0.001 for both),
112 onducted for the treatment and prevention of travelers' diarrhea, the treatment of portal systemic en
115 cognized as an important cause of infant and travelers' diarrhoea, exhibits an aggregative, stacked-b
116 nations and itineraries of Global TravEpiNet travelers differed from those of the overall population
121 ed patients represent an increasing group of travelers, for business, tourism, and visiting friends a
124 among travelers from every region, although travelers from every region except sub-Saharan Africa an
125 ent causes of systemic febrile illness among travelers from every region, although travelers from eve
127 the recognition of Ebola virus disease among travelers from West Africa, cases of Middle East respira
128 veillance of human movement patterns and key traveler groups, it is hoped that interventions can be i
130 e of NoVs as a cause of diarrhea acquired by travelers in developing countries is not well known.
133 d measles should target all vaccine-eligible travelers, including catch-up vaccination of susceptible
134 adverse outcomes of Zika virus disease among travelers infected in the Americas and show a need for g
135 adverse outcomes of Zika virus disease among travelers infected in the Americas and show a need for g
140 avel health consultations help international travelers manage travel-related illness risks through ed
146 tious HIV-1 in semen becomes an adventitious traveler on the pathway leading to normal human reproduc
148 to be men (73% vs. 54% of low-infection risk travelers, P=0.018) or born outside the United Stated or
149 and pretravel healthcare of US international travelers, particularly those at higher risk of travel-a
152 ions can be implemented to protect and treat travelers, prevent onward transmission in low transmissi
154 monly prescribed antimalarial drug, and most travelers received an antibiotic for self-treatment of t
156 e, 1689 (48%) were not vaccinated because of traveler refusal, 966 (28%) because of provider decision
157 series of JE-VC has been recommended to all travelers regardless of previous vaccination history.
162 ase, preventing illness in U.S. resident VFR travelers requires focused efforts to remove barriers to
166 ctious to humans by describing the case of a traveler returning from the Central African Republic inf
169 only a few cases have been reported in U.S. travelers returning from Europe, most cases are likely u
170 ost travel-associated infections occurred in travelers returning from Latin America and the Caribbean
171 1 October 2009-30 November 2009, 37 Israeli travelers returning from Nepal were diagnosed with S. Pa
173 rickettsiosis, occurring in as many as 5% of travelers returning from rural subequatorial Africa.
174 quency of occurrence of each diagnosis among travelers returning from six developing regions of the w
176 ca and compare it to parasites isolated from travelers returning from these regions of Africa, as wel
177 ause of illness in West Africa and among the travelers returning from this region with an acute febri
180 ater, food and environmental samples as well traveler's baggage is a great challenge of the time for
181 encoding OPG (TNFRSF11B) are associated with traveler's diarrhea (TD) among North American travelers
183 herichia coli (ETEC) is the leading cause of traveler's diarrhea and children's diarrhea worldwide.
184 n emerging diarrheal pathogen, implicated in traveler's diarrhea and endemic diarrhea in developing a
185 herichia coli (ETEC) is a prevalent cause of traveler's diarrhea and infant mortality in third-world
188 is the standard treatment in self-therapy of traveler's diarrhea except when patients are in South or
189 Improved hygiene has reduced the risk of traveler's diarrhea from 20% or more (for a 2-week stay)
190 ugh improved hygiene has reduced the risk of traveler's diarrhea in many destinations, the risk remai
193 acterial enterotoxins, including cholera and traveler's diarrhea, remain a major global health proble
201 hat the cooperative behavior observed in the Traveler's Dilemma can be explained in an evolutionary f
203 der behavior in one such social dilemma, the Traveler's Dilemma, that has received considerable atten
206 y for short- and longer-term trips, and that travelers save money for longer trips when travelers adh
208 sles immunity status of departing U.S. adult travelers seeking pretravel consultation and to assess r
210 ed in sequential blood samples from returned travelers sent for pathogen testing to a specialist para
211 seling for those visiting high-risk regions, travelers should be advised against taking antibiotics f
212 Geographic variation in the risk of SSTIs in travelers supports a globally heterogeneous distribution
216 ective live vaccine (17D) is widely used for travelers to and residents of areas in which yellow feve
220 h generally SOTR were able to travel safely, travelers to destinations at high-risk for infection had
222 ia in pregnant women who are residents of or travelers to epidemic or endemic regions is needed to av
223 he geographic region, with 17 of 100 (17.0%) travelers to Guatemala, 23 of 194 (11.9%) travelers to I
224 ng hemodialysis patients), or HIV infection; travelers to HBV-endemic regions; and adults seeking pro
225 se of illness; illness was more likely among travelers to high-infection risk (18%) than low-risk (6%
226 accine that can rapidly protect short-notice travelers to high-risk areas and help control explosive
228 %) travelers to Guatemala, 23 of 194 (11.9%) travelers to India, and 3 of 79 (3.8%) travelers to Mexi
232 NoV infection is a frequent occurrence among travelers to Mexico and Guatemala who experience episode
233 1.9%) travelers to India, and 3 of 79 (3.8%) travelers to Mexico testing positive for NoVs from 2002
236 of concern due to the potential for infected travelers to spread the virus to countries where vectors
239 undifferentiated febrile illness (UFI) among travelers to the developing world, and these pathogens a
240 rhea in children of developing countries and travelers to these countries, is to protect against heat
241 ions at higher risk for infectious diseases; travelers to these destinations were more likely to be m
242 n or expatriates of developing countries and travelers to these regions where follow-up studies have
250 s where the disease burden is low (so-called travelers vaccines), they have demonstrated a lower prot
252 avel destination and reason for travel, with travelers visiting friends and relatives in their countr
254 xcluded, the pooled relative risk for VTE in travelers was 2.8 (CI, 2.2 to 3.7), without significant
256 a and in the predominant genogroup infecting travelers was demonstrated, dependent upon the specific
257 on specific diagnosis among 770 nonimmigrant travelers was malaria (n = 310 [40.3%]), with Plasmodium
258 Compared with matched control patients, travelers were 74% more likely to be transplanted (aHR [
259 The pathogens identified most commonly in travelers were Campylobacter (42%), nontyphoidal Salmone
267 stance to common antimicrobials in returning travelers, where severe disease requires empirical treat
269 and pretravel healthcare of US international travelers who are at increased risk of travel-associated
270 Chemoprophylaxis should be restricted to travelers who are at risk of severe complications of dia
271 ation is highly recommended for all overseas travelers who are without documented proof of adequate i
276 retravel healthcare from 13235 international travelers who sought pretravel consultation at these sit
277 OPG+1181G>C) was associated with TD in white travelers who stayed in Mexico for >1 week during the su
278 ts were (1) late initiation of rabies PEP in travelers who waited to seek medical care until returnin
283 nger in travelers returning from Asia and in travelers with a high relative abundance of MRE at retur
285 es fragilis (ETBF), in 201 U.S. and European travelers with acute diarrhea acquired in Mexico, Guatem
288 solates (as defined by HEp-2 adherence) from travelers with diarrhea and in 18 EAEC isolates from tra
289 (EAEC) infection can be identified in 26% of travelers with diarrhea and is associated with fecal int
292 phenomenon among EAEC isolates derived from travelers with or without diarrhea and that multiple gen
295 uent in the lesional and nasal isolates from travelers with SSTIs but could not be found in the nares
297 cal, and exposure-related characteristics of travelers with those of nontravelers and estimate the ri
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。