ライフサイエンスコーパス: tribal

1 terial and data-sharing agreement that meets tribal and university requirements.

2 the conflict-affected Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and in security-compromised Khyber P

3 during 2006-11 in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Balochistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

4 ct areas of Pakistan (Federally Administered Tribal Areas [FATA], 30%) and Nigeria (Borno, 33%) were

5 ithin the Balochistan/Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa regions, as well as

6 proximately the same amount of iAs as a mean Tribal, Asian, and Pacific consumer is exposed to from r

7 proximately the same amount of iAs as a mean Tribal, Asian, and Pacific consumer is exposed to from r

8 The Tribal, Asian, and Pacific population exhibited the high

9 The Tribal, Asian, and Pacific population exhibited the high

10 s related to community collaboration, venue, tribal authority, preferential hiring of American Indian

11 ecting cultural differences, and maintaining tribal autonomy through prereview of all study publicati

12 A historical comparison of tribal classifications and the most up-to-date classific

13 lation that includes geographically distinct tribal communities, many with high rates of ESRD.

14 programs for youths across 46 states and 12 tribal communities.

15 he Oligocene, followed by subsequent Miocene tribal diversifications in central/southwestern Asia.

16 The term was first shared by tribal elders in the 1980s to help raise awareness of th

17 of the DAT cases are members of one hamula (tribal group) within Wadi Ara.

18 8 mtDNAs representative of variation in four tribal groups (Ami, Atayal, Bunun, and Paiwan) were sequ

19 ains = 1638) members, aged 15-54 years, of 2 tribal groups living on or near their home reservations

20 Tribal groups shared considerable mtDNA sequence identit

21 sample of 3084 members of 2 American Indian tribal groups, who were between the ages of 15 and 54 ye

22 dentified 5 guiding criteria for aggregating tribal health data: geographic proximity, community type

23 0%) and Type 2D (35%), were prevalent in the tribal hill groups.

24 alia included populations with affinities to tribal Indians.

25 from these two states form another, and the tribal Irula samples form a third.

26 febrile or potentially septic patients from tribal lands in Arizona, even if an alternative diagnosi

27 use of morbidity and mortality since 2002 on tribal lands in Arizona.

28 ) from 117 school districts that encompassed tribal lands in California between 2001 and 2012.

29 ere compared with children in districts with tribal lands that did not gain or expand a casino.

30 chool districts encompassing American Indian tribal lands that either gained or expanded a casino wer

31 to -0.20%) among American Indians living on tribal lands.

32 Thus, Zuni Tribal leaders formed a research partnership with the Un

33 At project inception, tribal leaders should be consulted regarding the validit

34 tions and study designs by investigators and tribal leaders to determine when aggregation or stratifi

35 Resource managers at the state, federal, and tribal levels make decisions on a weekly to quarterly ba

36 The study cohort (4,228 resident tribal members 45-74 years old) underwent a personal int

37 Booklet were administered to a subset of 247 tribal members from an overall study population of 582.

38 e EARTH Study has been the partnerships with tribal members.

39 Only tribal nations themselves can identify potential adverse

40 to ensure equity and self-determination for Tribal nations who participate in research.

41 conducting culturally relevant research with Tribal nations.

42 n born during 1995-2001 in 9 US states and 2 tribal nations.

43 Participating tribal organizations named the study EARTH (Education an

44 Older age and tribal origin were identified as predictors of these con

45 male, having less education, having Kalenjin tribal origin, and being >/=80 years old were associated

46 response to community concerns, we used the Tribal Participatory Research framework in collaboration

47 We recommend developing an agreement with tribal partners that reflects both health-related IRB an

48 efreshing drink by the vast number of Indian tribal people.

49 onal studies of the health of Indigenous and tribal peoples provide important public health insights.

50 e health and social status of Indigenous and tribal peoples relative to benchmark populations from a

51 India, Asia, and Australia, he photographed tribal peoples.

52 of genetic variation among Indian caste and tribal populations and between highland and lowland Dagh

53 A similar replacement observed among tribal populations was temporally less uniform.

54 Academic researchers engaged in tribal projects should become familiar with all three ar

55 irths, and was higher in the rural areas and tribal regions, such as the Nagarkurnool division of Mah

56 n Indian teens(N=322) from four southwestern tribal reservation communities were randomlyassigned in

57 ach by classifying 49 incorporated cities, 7 tribal reservations, and 17 counties from northern Calif

58 ition, alliance building (a prerequisite for tribal revenge raids), and so forth.

59 reservations, were randomly sampled from the tribal rolls and participated in structured psychiatric

60 reservations were randomly sampled from the tribal rolls.

61 enetic variation, we have included caste and tribal samples from two states in South India, Daghestan

62 cluded traditional circumcision, home birth, tribal scarring, and hepatitis B virus coinfection.

63 Across tribal sites, 10 key informant interviews and 10 focus g

64 arnataka (Lingayat and Vokkaliga castes) and tribal Soligas, sharing of the two most common haplotype

65 ified by travel time to the nearest NPHC and tribal status, and randomised (1:1) within strata.

66 the United States and another in an isolated tribal village in Cambodia.