1 a small but significant loss of -5.0% in the trochanteric and -4.9% in the neck region (P<0.05) over

2 becular BMD is strongly associated with both trochanteric and vertebral fractures.

3  using total BMD (r(2) = 0.73, P < .001) and trochanteric BMD (r(2) = 0.80, P < .001).

4                  Three bursae comprising the trochanteric bursa complex were injected, and convention

5                                          The trochanteric bursa covered the posterior facet and the l

6                                          The trochanteric bursa is delineated with fat on both sides

7  frequently about the hip, especially in the trochanteric bursa.

8                                              Trochanteric entry-locked intramedullary nailing and sub

9 re (RR, 1.7-1.8; P < .05) but more weakly to trochanteric fracture (RR, 2.3-3.2; P < .01).

10 rvical fracture (RR, 2.7-5.3; P < .001), and trochanteric fracture (RR, 2.9-7.2; P < .001).

11 4-1.7; P < .05) and strongly associated with trochanteric fracture (RR, 4.2-4.5; P < .005).

12 RR) factors for overall hip fracture and for trochanteric fracture and cervical fracture separately.

13 rrelation had HO in the anatomic area of the trochanteric or iliopsoas bursa (55 [60%] of 91 sites).

14  mineral density at the femoral neck and the trochanteric region (13% and 15%, respectively, both P=0

15 e rates of fractures of the femoral neck and trochanteric region of the proximal femur using a 5 perc

16 ortion of hip fractures that occurred in the trochanteric region rose steeply with age among white wo

17 on femoral failure load, particularly in the trochanteric region, of a densitometric parameter combin

18 eflect the different developmental 'fields' (trochanteric vs. neck/head) that formed these regions, o