ライフサイエンスコーパス: tube feeding

1 emergency room visit, parenteral therapy, or tube feeding).

2 ) tolerated an oral diet and did not require tube feeding.

3 om parenteral nutrition to exclusive enteral tube feeding.

4 was slowly tapered while increasing enteral tube feeding.

5 liation or more aggressive measures, such as tube feeding.

6 are used to regulate the delivery of enteral tube feeding.

7 out mechanical ventilation, and in 43% about tube feeding.

8 f ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with tube feeding.

9 alysis, blood transfusion, vasopressors, and tube feeding.

10 er, 54% were noted to lose weight on enteral tube feeding.

11 nothing by mouth and were placed on enteral tube feeding.

12 dialysis and the use of food supplements and tube feeding.

13 and long-term consequences of a trial of PEG tube feeding.

14 analysis after 0, 2, 7, 14, 21, and 32 d of tube-feeding.

15 wo patients (6%) had long-term dependence on tube feedings.

16 ion criteria were mechanical ventilation and tube feedings.

17 randomized to receive gastric or small-bowel tube feedings.

18 Eight were converted to tube feedings.

19 d a significantly lower RR of infection with tube feeding (0.64; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.76) and standard car

20 onal supplements (ONS; 11 RCTs), and enteral tube feeding (1 RCT)] with a control comparison were ide

21 s: 98.5% [range 61.1% to 119.7%]; continuous tube feeding: 109.0% [range 86.2% to 142.1%]; p =.42).

22 Of the women allocated to enteral tube feeding, 28 (47%) were treated according to protoco

23 lish whether the timing and route of enteral tube feeding after stroke affected patients' outcomes at

24 16 we randomly allocated 59 women to enteral tube feeding and 57 women to standard care.

25 HEN included tube feeding and complex monitoring by a nutrition suppo

26 clear when 2 types of enteral nutrition, ie, tube feeding and conventional oral diets with intravenou

27 organ dysfunction that included small-bowel tube feeding and propofol sedation.

28 Tube feeding and standard care are associated with a low

29 ese findings suggest that glutamine-enriched tube feeding and TPN can result in similar profiles for

30 he patients with agenesis were discharged on tube feedings and 22% on oxygen therapy.

31 ystic fibrosis, patients receiving long-term tube-feeding and those with perceived or real food aller

32 , she was fed an elemental diet with enteral tube feeding, and her condition gradually improved.

33 f 9 patients no longer relied on jejunostomy tube feeding, and no adverse events were noted related t

34 ssium administered via parenteral nutrition, tube feeding, and replacement infusions were calculated

35 ents, especially those receiving postpyloric tube feeding, are at greater risk for the acquisition of

36 ot show the superiority of early nasoenteric tube feeding, as compared with an oral diet after 72 hou

37 Women were encouraged to continue tube feeding at home.

38 Many women discontinued tube feeding because of discomfort, suggesting that it i

39 educing hospitalization, and reducing use of tube feeding, but it is rarely used.

40 Sixty-six percent of the enteral tube feeding cessations was judged to be attributable to

41 patients (52.3%) for a mean 38.2% of enteral tube feeding days.

42 Four patients (14.8%) had long-term tube feeding-dependency because of severe dysphagia (2 p

43 Concomitant gastric tube feeding did not affect gatifloxacin bioavailability

44 Although concomitant tube feeding did not affect gatifloxacin bioavailability

45 ffects (34%).In women with HG, early enteral tube feeding does not improve birth weight or secondary

46 t risk for unusual pigmentation effects from tube feeding dyes.

47 Given the widespread use of tube feedings, even a small percentage of such problems

48 gestation were randomly allocated to enteral tube feeding for >/=7 d in addition to standard care wit

49 , patients received a mean volume of enteral tube feeding for all 339 days of infusion that was 51.6%

50 llocated to early enteral tube feeding or no tube feeding for more than 7 days (early versus avoid).

51 ed on management of RV: cessation of enteral tube feeding for RV >400 mL in study patients or for RV

52 g the designated RV for cessation of enteral tube feeding from 200 mL to 400 mL did not increase the

53 rth weight was 3160 +/- 770 g in the enteral tube feeding group compared with 3200 +/- 680 g in the s

54 ea, but its role in diarrhea associated with tube feeding has not been rigorously investigated.

55 We found no data to suggest that tube feeding improves any of these clinically important

56 hesized that in women with HG, early enteral tube feeding in addition to standard care improves birth

57 h March 1999, to identify data about whether tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia can prev

58 - 0.27 kPa) (p = .003) after the addition of tube feedings in the samples from those patients who wer

59 resusitation [CPR], mechanical ventilation, tube feeding) in their current condition (all P >.12).

60 e day) within 72 hrs of the start of enteral tube feeding infusion.

61 Early enteral tube feeding (initiated within 48 hrs of intensive care

62 The current manner in which enteral tube feeding is delivered in the ICU results in grossly

63 Nasogastric/nasoenteral tube feeding is often complicated by diarrhea but the co

64 Tube-feeding is of questionable benefit for nursing home

65 Early tube feeding might reduce case fatality, but at the expe

66 Despite this, cessation of enteral tube feeding occurred in 83.7% of patients for a mean 19

67 Postpyloric tube feeding (odds ratio, 3.14 [CI, 1.008 to 9.77]) and

68 These data indicate that in rats, tube feedings of diets containing sesamin exerted antiin

69 of critical illness and concomitant gastric tube feeding on gatifloxacin bioavailability.

70 ion were randomly allocated to early enteral tube feeding or no tube feeding for more than 7 days (ea

71 randomly assigned to receive for > or = 5 d tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) that ha

72 Tube feeding or TPN began on postoperative day 1 and adv

73 nd 3.69 mumol/L in subjects receiving 5 d of tube feeding or TPN, respectively.

74 centrations were restored with 5 d of either tube feeding or TPN.

75 ve gatifloxacin concurrently with continuous tube feeding or with interrupted tube feeds.

76 tritional rehabilitation with either jejunal tube feedings or parenteral nutrition until weight gain

77 regarding preferences for initiation of CPR, tube feeding, or mechanical ventilation in the patient's

78 , alvimopan usage, and judicious jejunostomy tube feeding, or total parenteral nutrition usage may re

79 Any use of oxygen therapy, nasogastric-tube feeding, or ventilatory support was recorded.

80 Rate of enteral tube feeding ordered, actual volume delivered, patient p

81 e last hour of life (p = .01), withdrawal of tube feeding (p = .04), family presence at time of death

82 Declining albumin levels through the enteral tube feeding period correlated significantly with decrea

83 s after presentation (on-demand group), with tube feeding provided if the oral diet was not tolerated

84 nts based a priori on the ability to reach a tube feeding rate of 40 mL/hour.

85 s not a major contributor to the etiology of tube feeding-related diarrhea.

86 number of ventilator days, and discharged on tube feedings remained significant predictors of mortali

87 The widespread practice of tube feeding should be carefully reconsidered, and we be

88 Our data suggest that tube feedings should be temporarily discontinued for at

89 Previous investigations suggest continuous tube feeding (TF) schedules do not suppress appetite and

90 potheses showed a lower RR of infection with tube feeding than with parenteral nutrition, regardless

91 cians ordered a daily mean volume of enteral tube feeding that was 65.6% of goal requirements, but an

92 are hospital, placed on intragastric enteral tube feeding through nasogastric or percutaneous endosco

93 , use of oxygen supplementation, nasogastric-tube feeding, ventilatory support, and relative improvem

94 In the multivariable model, the need for tube feeding was a risk factor for having an abnormal de

95 Early tube feeding was associated with an absolute reduction i

96 Supplemental nasogastric or gastrostomy tube feeding was carried out during the blood flow study

97 Enteral tube feeding was discontinued within 7 d of placement in

98 ger hospital stay, poorer linear growth, and tube feeding were associated with worse outcomes in all

99 Duration and reason for cessation of enteral tube feeding were documented.

100 Finally, tube feedings were retarded and the data set was repeate

101 Tube feedings were supplemented with arginine, RNA, and

102 The tube feedings were then withheld for 2 hrs.

103 itional support in the form of early enteral tube feedings, will decrease the hypermetabolic response

104 randomized trial comparing early nasoenteric tube feeding with an oral diet at 72 hours after present

105 no published randomized trials that compare tube feeding with oral feeding.

106 tients were randomly assigned to nasoenteric tube feeding within 24 hours after randomization (early