ライフサイエンスコーパス: tumefaciens

1 egulated in the soil bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

2 Asticcacaulis biprosthecum and Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

3 was utilized as sole source of sulphur by A. tumefaciens.

4 the tumour-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

5 n crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

6 of AiiB, an AHL lactonase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

7 nce for twitching or swarming motility in A. tumefaciens.

8 amiana plants using engineered Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

9 mation of Arabidopsis roots by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

10 Gram-negative bacteria such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

11 l for As(III) oxidation in this strain of A. tumefaciens.

12 (residues 425-789) of VirB4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

13 Bordetella bronchiseptica and Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

14 plasmid in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

15 ells from lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

16 e restored by the delivery of AvrRpt2 via A. tumefaciens.

17 on system of the phytopathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

18 so been found in the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

19 required for synthesis of this polymer in A. tumefaciens.

20 Z operon in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

21 ediction in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

22 ycophorin A blocked T-pilus biogenesis in A. tumefaciens.

23 gulate the motile to non-motile switch in A. tumefaciens.

24 Our model organism Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5A contains two distinct ars operons (ars1 a

25 udomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A.t.) as a tractable system to identify mol

26 We report that Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a soil bacterium that triggers tumorigenesi

27 d TraM2, not encoded on the Ti plasmid of A. tumefaciens A6, was identified, in addition to a copy on

28 The Gram-negative Agrobacterium tumefaciens accumulates four different glycolipids under

29 ly nothing was previously known about how A. tumefaciens acquires sulphur during colonization.

30 The A. tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase model was refined to 2.1 A with

31 Crystals of Agrobacterium tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase were obtained using lithium sul

32 The A. tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase/fructose 6-phosphate structural

33 A. tumefaciens also has two additional pleC/divJhomologue s

34 sion of a self-priming GS from Agrobacterium tumefaciens also increased the number of round granules.

35 Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes are closely rel

36 Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes are related pat

37 Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes transfer plasmi

38 e related alpha-proteobacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella abortus.

39 o the T4SS VirB8 proteins from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella suis (G-) and to the transfer p

40 ell-studied model systems from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella suis Here, we studied the struc

41 ively transported into the plant pathogen A. tumefaciens and processed into the toxin TM84.

42 zed TssM in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens and provided the first biochemical evidence

43 cterial species: the pathogens Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the model symbio

44 o heterotrophic soil bacteria (Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and a poorly cr

45 re provides an introduction to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related species, focusing on their modes

46 with the pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens and similar pathogens (e.g. Bartonella hense

47 n vitro-grown endosperms using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and standard binary vectors.

48 ive agent of crown gall tumors Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the parasitic plant Striga asiatica, are

49 expands the model for ExoR regulation in A. tumefaciens and underscores the global role that this re

50 we examine chemical interactions between A. tumefaciens and unwounded plants.

51 tobacco and Arabidopsis when colonized by A. tumefaciens and was utilized as sole source of sulphur b

52 roteins from Escherichia coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Aquifex aeolicus, as well as the ADAT2-

53 ic (6-4) photolyase, PhrB from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and propose that (6-4) photolyases are broa

54 m meliloti, the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the animal pathogen Brucella abortus.

55 ganisms, Bacillus subtilis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and two experimental systems, aromatic amin

56 everal virB genes and virD4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens are found in an intravacuolar pathogen Ehrli

57 -DivK and CckA-ChpT-CtrA phosphorelays in A. tumefaciens are vertically-integrated, as in C. crescent

58 In summary, regulation of A. tumefaciens As(III) oxidation is complex, apparently bei

59 e isopentenyl transferase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as a positive selectable marker for plastid

60 usceptibility to the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as revealed by a higher efficiency of T-DNA

61 se-related protein A (PhrA) of Agrobacterium tumefaciens at 1.67-A resolution.

62 rystal structures of HutI from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (At-HutI) and an environmental sample from t

63 wo substrates of recombinant METTL20 from A. tumefaciens (AtMETTL20), namely ETFbeta and the ribosoma

64 A. tumefaciens attaches efficiently to plant tissues and to

65 The phytochrome Agp2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens belongs to the group of bathy phytochromes t

66 orresponding target sites into Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary plasmids, allowing efficient implemen

67 As predicted the A. tumefaciens biotin protein ligase is a fully functional

68 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens BlcR is a member of the emerging isocitrate

69 Atu3266 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 and Oant2987 from Ochrobactrum anthropi

70 d and compared with homologous regions of A. tumefaciens C58 and Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm1021 genome

71 The A. tumefaciens C58 genome sequence revealed the presence of

72 nthase (CS) deletion mutant of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 is highly attenuated in virulence.

73 A search of the genome of A. tumefaciens C58 revealed four proteins, encoded on diffe

74 t protein G (VgrG) paralogs in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 specifically control the secretion and i

75 Adherence of A. tumefaciens C58 was significantly enhanced under phospha

76 The genome of a biovar I strain, A. tumefaciens C58, has been previously sequenced.

77 ions encoded on the two large plasmids of A. tumefaciens C58, pTiC58 and pAtC58, were not required fo

78 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, the pathogenic bacteria that causes cro

79 50 constructs are infected with oncogenic A. tumefaciens C58, transgenic lines harbouring the 2S2D::p

80 e previously published genome sequence of A. tumefaciens C58.

81 r d-altritol and galactitol in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58.

82 Agrobacterium tumefaciens can adhere to plant tissues and abiotic surf

83 R sites of Brucella plus the BioR site of A. tumefaciens can all interact with the Brucella BioR prot

84 in the extracellular milieu of Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be transported into the cytoplasm, or vi

85 Agrobacterium tumefaciens can grow anaerobically via denitrification.

86 Unlike TraR from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, CarR(Ecc) is not directly protected from ce

87 Overexpression of RepC in A. tumefaciens caused large increases in copy number in cis

88 Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall disease.

89 The bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall tumor formation in plants.

90 Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall tumors on various plants b

91 quired for T-DNA translocation across the A. tumefaciens cell envelope.

92 D4, and Osa-GFP colocalizes with VirD4 at A. tumefaciens cell poles.

93 pression, as determined by infection with A. tumefaciens cells carrying the beta-glucuronidase intron

94 by co-infiltrating plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells harboring engineered RNA3 with cells c

95 nsformed using a short cocultivation with A. tumefaciens cells.

96 ynamic localization of several Agrobacterium tumefaciens components during the cell cycle.

97 iate stage of growth, are inoculated with A. tumefaciens containing the binary vector.

98 ved orthologues appear to be essential in A. tumefaciens, deletions in pleC or divK were isolated and

99 Agrobacterium tumefaciens delivers its single-stranded transferred DNA

100 motile, or flagellated but nonchemotactic A. tumefaciens derivatives were examined for biofilm format

101 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-derived crown galls of Arabidopsis (Arabidop

102 hizobia and the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens differed in their ability to facilitate long

103 biofilm-forming plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens drives swimming motility by utilizing a smal

104 A. tumefaciens efficiently transferred this T-DNA into cell

105 ansformation rates were obtained with the A. tumefaciens EHA101 strain and the pTF101.1 binary vector

106 Agrobacterium tumefaciens elongates by addition of peptidoglycan (PG)

107 plementation in a bioR isogenic mutant of A. tumefaciens elucidated that Brucella BioR is a functiona

108 strate that two Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens encode robust entry exclusion functions.

109 Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes a single NAD+-dependent DNA ligase a

110 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes predicted iron-responsive regulators

111 The A. tumefaciens enzyme was found to have the highest rate co

112 based on the severe biofilm deficiency of A. tumefaciens exoR mutants.

113 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens expresses virulence (vir) genes in response

114 be blocked by infiltrating the leaf with A. tumefaciens expressing RPS2 in the presence of RIN4, rec

115 of N. benthamiana leaves with Agrobacterium tumefaciens expressing RPS2, a rapid hypersensitive resp

116 on (MR) reporter cassettes for Agrobacterium tumefaciens expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.

117 FnrN, a second A. tumefaciens FNR-like regulator, is required for inductio

118 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens forms architecturally complex biofilms on in

119 with a 249-residue linker from Agrobacterium tumefaciens FtsZ interfered with cell division.

120 that the rod-shaped bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens grows unidirectionally from the new pole gen

121 fusion of the N-terminal region of SS4 to A. tumefaciens GS restored the development of wild-type-lik

122 he As(III)-oxidizing bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens GW4 displays positive chemotaxis towards 0.5

123 We propose that A. tumefaciens has appropriated a progenitor ParA/MinD-like

124 The alpha-Proteobacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens has proteins homologous to known regulators

125 n microscopy to image the localization of A. tumefaciens homologs of proteins involved in cell divisi

126 factor of plasmid RP1 (IncPalpha), render A. tumefaciens host cells nearly avirulent.

127 our study, we utilize the components from A. tumefaciens (i.e. 3-oxooctanyl-l-homoserine lactone [OOH

128 Transposon mutagenesis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens identified genes essential for As(III) oxida

129 by the VirA/VirG two-component system in A. tumefaciens in response to various levels of phenolic in

130 Agrobacterium tumefaciens incites plant tumours that produce nutrients

131 that successful colonization of plants by A. tumefaciens, including T-DNA transfer and opine producti

132 Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces crown gall tumors by transferring a

133 extrachromosomal T-DNA structures form in A. tumefaciens-infected plants immediately after infection.

134 reporter gene expression in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection assay in Nicotiana benthamiana.

135 During E. faecalis and A. tumefaciens infection, increased bacterial loads were ob

136 n and induce local necrotic lesions in an A. tumefaciens infiltration assay.

137 ons on NN tobacco plants in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration assay.

138 ng and combined the assay with Agrobacterium tumefaciens insertional mutagenesis to screen for hyphal

139 DNA transfer from A. tumefaciens into plant cells resembles plasmid conjugati

140 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a broad host range plant pathogen that co

141 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a facultative plant pathogen and the caus

142 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a LuxR-type quorum-sensing transcription

143 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a LuxR-type transcription factor that reg

144 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a member of the LuxR family of quorum-sen

145 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a member of the LuxR family of transcript

146 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a phytopathogenic bacterium that induces

147 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen that transfers a segment

148 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogen that causes crown ga

149 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a unique plant pathogenic bacterium renow

150 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring and integrating a

151 transfer of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is controlled by a quorum-sensing system com

152 and the exopolysaccharide cellulose, when A. tumefaciens is incubated with the polysaccharide stain C

153 LiCl, indicating that the Mrp complex in A. tumefaciens is involved in Na+ circulation across the me

154 , an LpxE homologue present in Agrobacterium tumefaciens is selective for phosphatidylglycerol phosph

155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is well known to cause crown gall tumours at

156 ansgenic plants expressing the Agrobacterium tumefaciens isopentenyltransferase (ipt) gene that encod

157 strate that this biocontrol agent targets A. tumefaciens leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS), an essential

158 plasmid constructs, transformation of the A. tumefaciens line, and ELISA and Bradford assays to asses

159 ant transformants generated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation.

160 tabacum) NT1 cell lines, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated DNA delivery of a binary vector con

161 e independent groups described Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation at the Miami

162 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation is an effici

163 We used transient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated in planta expression, transformatio

164 cellular survival, we utilized Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated mutagenesis, and screened for H. ca

165 ispensable component of modern Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant genetic transformation system

166 histone H2A-1 is important for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation.

167 We have now used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated protein expression in Nicotiana ben

168 in the genome of transgenic plants during A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation are still poorly und

169 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation conditions were esta

170 lopment of various methods for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thali

171 a protocol for high-throughput Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Penium margaritac

172 capsulatum by optimization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

173 um (tobacco) cell line NT-1 by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

174 ed into the tobacco genome via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

175 sformed into soybean plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

176 We used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient assays to test the abilit

177 usion in this process, we used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient coexpression in Nicotiana

178 We took advantage of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression assays (agroin

179 iverse organisms, we performed Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression assays in Nico

180 a as a model host plant to use Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression in con

181 istance protein, we adopted an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression system

182 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient transformation has been a

183 A/VirG two-component system in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, mediates the expression of virulence genes

184 A genetic screen for A. tumefaciens mutants deficient for surface interactions i

185 visR, activators of flagellar motility in A. tumefaciens, now found to inhibit UPP and cellulose prod

186 ity of flies inoculated with E. faecalis, A. tumefaciens, or S. aureus.

187 The A. tumefaciens pathogen hijacks the conserved host infrastr

188 Agrobacterium tumefaciens pathogens genetically modify their host plan

189 us, although the core architecture of the A. tumefaciens pathway resembles that of C. crescentus ther

190 nsistent with this prediction, Agrobacterium tumefaciens PecS specifically binds urate, and urate att

191 The A. tumefaciens phoB and phoR orthologues could only be disr

192 Strains A6 and C58 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens produce a lactonase, BlcC (AttM), that can d

193 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens produces a unipolar polysaccharide (UPP) adh

194 In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, quorum sensing regulates the replication an

195 n reported for homologues from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rajashankar et al., unpublished results) an

196 component regulatory system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens regulates expression of the virulence (vir)

197 arge integral membrane HK from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, regulates the expression of virulence genes

198 Plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens replicate using the products of the repABC o

199 mour-inducing (Ti) plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens replicate via the products of the repABC gen

200 To the best of our knowledge, A. tumefaciens represents the first example of profligate b

201 Plant tumorigenesis by Agrobacterium tumefaciens requires approximately 20 Vir proteins, tran

202 ul transformation of plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens requires that the bacterial T-complex active

203 ic transformation of plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens requires the import of bacterial T-DNA and v

204 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens responds to three main signals at the plant-

205 lifestyle, such as divisome components in A. tumefaciens resulting from that organism's different gro

206 ansformation of plant cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens results from the transfer of DNA and protein

207 Transmission electron microscopy of A. tumefaciens revealed the presence of filaments, signific

208 es of two Alphaproteobacteria, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobiales) and Brevundimonas subvibrioide

209 ynthase (CelA) minus mutant of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, showing that the predicted protein has cell

210 nite [As(III)] oxidation in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens soil isolate, strain 5A.

211 A. tumefaciens specific pole-organizing protein (Pop) PopZA

212 Agrobacterium tumefaciens stands as one of biotechnology's greatest su

213 The Ti plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 15955 carries two alleles of traR tha

214 were dipped into a solution of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1 harboring the beta-glucuronidase

215 We have shown recently that Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58 contains an uronate dehydrogenase

216 rons PCR cloned from the genome-sequenced A. tumefaciens strain C58 resulted in complementation back

217 on infection with the virulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58, highly expressed AtLTPI-4 Crown

218 Pseudomonas putida KT2440, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58.

219 s of vir gene inducers, we constructed an A. tumefaciens strain carrying a PvirB-gfp fusion.

220 the multi-chromosome genome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404.

221 Expression of a cloned avsI gene in A. tumefaciens strain NT1 resulted in synthesis of long-cha

222 ification of a novel enzyme from the same A. tumefaciens strain, which we named Galactarolactone cycl

223 quantify metabolic changes in Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain 5A) upon exposure to sub-lethal conc

224 vestigated the effect of three Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and five transferred (T)-DNA origins

225 Engineering universal Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and recruiting other microbes, such

226 e set of TraR-regulated genes in isogenic A. tumefaciens strains containing an octopine-type or nopal

227 is specifically imported into tumorgenic A. tumefaciens strains to cause cell death.

228 na benthamiana leaves with two Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains: one contains the target sequence em

229 sed in the related denitrifier Agrobacterium tumefaciens, suggesting that the lack of expression in B

230 e biotin synthesis is tightly controlled, A. tumefaciens synthesizes much more biotin than needed for

231 suggested that integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA into the plant genome occurs preferent

232 of magnitude over conventional Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA.

233 fter proteins of the canonical Agrobacterium tumefaciens T4SS.

234 In vitro, A. tumefaciens T6SS could kill Escherichia coli but trigger

235 stallization of a proteolytically cleaved A. tumefaciens tadA (missing the last eight amino acids at

236 tated by pathogenic strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens that cause crown gall tumors.

237 a more fundamental cellular asymmetry in A. tumefaciens that influences and is congruent with its at

238 romosomally encoded protein in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that mediates a sugar-induced increase in vi

239 e transcriptional regulator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens that positively regulates the octopine catab

240 sing transcription factor from Agrobacterium tumefaciens that regulates replication and conjugation g

241 In Agrobacterium tumefaciens the ispD and ispF genes are fused to encode

242 eloped on the basis of a double mutant of A. tumefaciens (the DeltabioR DeltabioBFDA mutant), the bet

243 Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the causative agent for crown gall disease

244 er K84 that targets pathogenic strains of A. tumefaciens, the causative agent of plant tumours.

245 vision cycle of C. crescentus and that of A. tumefaciens, the functional conservation for this presum

246 These studies suggest that in A. tumefaciens, the Irr protein is most active under low-ir

247 homologues of T4SS genes from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the majority have no known function or homo

248 studied archetypal vir T4SS of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the Rickettsiales vir homolog (rvh) T4SS is

249 of Vibrio fischeri and TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, there is no endogenous autoinducer for SdiA

250 d for conjugal transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid are regulated by the quorum sensi

251 t the replication origin of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid resides fully within its repC gen

252 depend on disarmed strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to deliver the created gene construction int

253 involved in the attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to its plant host.

254 sed gene delivery system using Agrobacterium tumefaciens to transiently express BMV RNAs in Nicotiana

255 signals based on the use of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens traG-lacZ biosensor.

256 Agrobacterium tumefaciens transferred DNA (T-DNA) transfer requires th

257 The VirB/D4 apparatus of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers DNA and proteins to plant cells.

258 This project utilized Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and the transposon-tagging co

259 Agrobacterium tumefaciens translocates DNA and protein substrates betw

260 A. tumefaciens translocates single-stranded DNA-binding pro

261 Agrobacterium tumefaciens translocates T-DNA through a polar VirB/D4 t

262 A. tumefaciens translocates the ssDNA-binding protein VirE2

263 The vir genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmids direct the tran

264 cell pole is the site of assembly of the A. tumefaciens type IV apparatus.

265 g homologous components of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV secretion system.

266 wever, in an in planta coinfection assay, A. tumefaciens used Tde effectors to attack both siblings c

267 imental analyses indicate that Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses a pathway involving nonphosphorylated i

268 Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses a type IV secretion (T4S) system compos

269 Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses a type IV secretion system (T4SS) to tr

270 lpha-proteobacteria, including Agrobacterium tumefaciens Using an activity-based approach, we identif

271 Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB proteins assemble a type IV secretion a

272 Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB proteins assemble a type IV secretion a

273 el conjugation systems and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 T4S system.

274 sferred to plant cells] of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 T4SS in terms of a series of tempora

275 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 type IV secretion system (T4SS) tran

276 Using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 type IV secretion system (T4SS), a r

277 The A. tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 OMCC, solved by transmission elec

278 scherichia coli pKM101 Tra and Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 systems are completely dispensabl

279 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system is compo

280 of the IMCpKM101 joined to OMCCs from the A. tumefaciens VirB/VirD4, E. coli R388 Trw, and Bordetella

281 Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB10 couples inner membrane (IM) ATP energ

282 nd -4) that are 3- to 10-fold larger than A. tumefaciens virB6.

283 cent protein- or nVenus-tagged Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirE2 and VirD2 proteins and the C-terminal

284 The GALLS protein can complement an A. tumefaciens virE2 mutant for tumor formation, indicating

285 e to the GALLS gene, which complements an A. tumefaciens virE2 mutant for tumor formation.

286 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirG response regulator of the VirA/VirG two

287 e cellular abundance of these proteins in A. tumefaciens was measured using Western immunoblots and O

288 The cell cycle of A. tumefaciens was monitored by time-lapse and superresolut

289 s and also confirmed that no plasmid from A. tumefaciens was present in the sporophyte tissues.

290 thologues of these proteins in Agrobacterium tumefaciens was shown to be regulated by two sRNAs, call

291 Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used for delivery of genes encoding Cas9

292 Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used to induce tumours in potato disks.

293 n system homologous to that in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, was required for restoration of entry and i

294 nate dehydrogenase cloned from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, we developed an assay for D-glucuronate wit

295 Homologous enzymes in P. putida and A. tumefaciens were identified based on a similarity search

296 re difficult to transform with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, whereas other transgenesis methods, such as

297 nscriptional activator TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which controls the replication and conjugal

298 fusion and IspE proteins from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which covert MEP to the corresponding eight

299 Agrobacterium tumefaciens wild-type strain (GW4) was studied to determ

300 es) were stably transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens with constructs containing the P. vittata ac