戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 est in harnessing these receptors to augment tumor immunity.
2 iltrating T cells results in diminished anti-tumor immunity.
3  the mechanism by which OX40 may impact anti-tumor immunity.
4 Rs and play important roles in microbial and tumor immunity.
5 tion, tumor angiogenesis, and suppression of tumor immunity.
6  to reverse this phenomenon and promote anti-tumor immunity.
7 s prevented T-cell tolerization and restored tumor immunity.
8  responses, as well as their contribution to tumor immunity.
9 deregulate the immune response and favor pro-tumor immunity.
10 ing involvement of SOCS3 in autoimmunity and tumor immunity.
11  membrane target antigens using humoral anti-tumor immunity.
12 to the tumor microenvironment restrains anti-tumor immunity.
13  indicates that B cells are involved in anti-tumor immunity.
14 vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease and tumor immunity.
15 ating Th cell development, inflammation, and tumor immunity.
16 RCA function to disable T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity.
17 g the generation of innate and adaptive anti-tumor immunity.
18 regulating the balance between pro- and anti-tumor immunity.
19 e bottleneck, which precludes efficient anti-tumor immunity.
20 pid vessel loss, which does not support anti-tumor immunity.
21 latory T cells (Tregs) are a barrier to anti-tumor immunity.
22 ophages (TAMs) may have an important role in tumor immunity.
23 t therapeutic B cell depletion would enhance tumor immunity.
24 asthma, and allergic responses as well as in tumor immunity.
25  of immunosuppression hinder productive anti-tumor immunity.
26  in restraining PD1 expression and promoting tumor immunity.
27 t NK-DC interactions without compromising NK tumor immunity.
28 l memory phenotype associated with long-term tumor immunity.
29 cular pathway to inhibit CD8 T-cell-mediated tumor immunity.
30 and Th17 cells may play a protective role in tumor immunity.
31 in D signaling in humans could suppress anti-tumor immunity.
32 partial loss of TcR-I effector functions and tumor immunity.
33 ent to tumors and in regulation of effective tumor immunity.
34 ole for this receptor in HSP70.PC-F-mediated tumor immunity.
35 1alpha/VEGF-A axis is an essential aspect of tumor immunity.
36 se findings suggests a new interpretation of tumor immunity.
37 rstood type II NKT cell in the regulation of tumor immunity.
38 plicates in cancer cells while inducing anti-tumor immunity.
39 ory Siglecs that can potentially dampen anti-tumor immunity.
40 through the production of MDSC which inhibit tumor immunity.
41 rs in the tumor microenvironment that defeat tumor immunity.
42 hich serves a critical role in microbial and tumor immunity.
43 that Id is not a major target of the induced tumor immunity.
44  tumor growth, metastasis, and modulation of tumor immunity.
45 ntigens that can potentially elicit specific tumor immunity.
46  affinity T cells is insufficient to mediate tumor immunity.
47 nsplant rejection and toward modification of tumor immunity.
48 chronic infection and, perhaps, for improved tumor immunity.
49 heir potential relevance to autoimmunity and tumor immunity.
50  and tolerance to self and induce protective tumor immunity.
51 enuation as well as the facilitation of anti-tumor immunity.
52  subset distribution and function to subvert tumor immunity.
53 d their function, which might be critical in tumor immunity.
54  cells into tumor-bearing mice enhanced anti-tumor immunity.
55 rtoire can be exploited for the induction of tumor immunity.
56 cells and augments antigen-specific CTL anti-tumor immunity.
57  DCs strongly enhances antigen-specific anti-tumor immunity.
58 s and their ability to induce efficient anti-tumor immunity.
59 T cells (iNKTs) are potentially important in tumor immunity.
60 ironment, promote DC activation, and enhance tumor immunity.
61 grammed into indispensable mediators of anti-tumor immunity.
62 complete tumor regression along with lasting tumor immunity.
63 gen 4 (CTLA-4) further limits the potency of tumor immunity.
64  a potential role of B7-H4 in the evasion of tumor immunity.
65 0(25-33) minigene did not develop protective tumor immunity.
66 es, which together are required for effector tumor immunity.
67 erefore IL-13 deficient also have heightened tumor immunity.
68  cytokines with the capacity to augment anti-tumor immunity.
69 ical role in both afferent and efferent anti-tumor immunity.
70 vo, namely delayed-type hypersensitivity and tumor immunity.
71 ation of immune tolerance, autoimmunity, and tumor immunity.
72 ance of the immune response in favor of anti-tumor immunity.
73 a signaling leads to the enhancement of anti-tumor immunity.
74 icity and its role in the activation of anti-tumor immunity.
75  the tumor microenvironment while empowering tumor immunity.
76 xis mediates suppression of T-cell-dependent tumor immunity.
77 isease and graft rejection and promotes anti-tumor immunity.
78 riasis, but pDCs are also involved in (anti-)tumor immunity.
79 ve review of Eph receptors in the context of tumor immunity.
80 on ligands and thereby negated adaptive anti-tumor immunity.
81 f tumor antigens and thereby stimulates anti-tumor immunity.
82  play complex and poorly understood roles in tumor immunity.
83 ole of the Hippo pathway in suppressing anti-tumor immunity.
84 vating TLR4 agonist capable of inducing anti-tumor immunity.
85 ing, and impairment of T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity.
86 o reveal a role for zinc homeostasis in anti-tumor immunity.
87 cells pose a major barrier to effective anti-tumor immunity.
88 alphabeta T cell receptor (TCR) mediate anti-tumor immunity.
89 paradoxical and poorly understood effects on tumor immunity.
90 ic niche formation and the induction of anti-tumor immunity.
91 o be a major contributor to compromised anti-tumor immunity.
92 ting T cell function, autoimmunity, and anti-tumor immunity.
93  immune responses that are required for anti-tumor immunity.
94 T cell function during autoimmunity and anti-tumor immunity.
95 tant tools to investigate carcinogenesis and tumor immunity.
96  requirements to elicit and maintain durable tumor immunity.
97 ory apoptosis reduced priming efficiency and tumor immunity.
98 ing ongoing (rather than generating de novo) tumor immunity.
99 se availability to T cells, suppressing anti-tumor immunity.
100 s Treg instability locally and restores anti-tumor immunity.
101 entral roles in infection, autoimmunity, and tumor immunity.
102 mor-infiltrating dendritic cells blunts anti-tumor immunity.
103 n cancer (OvCa) progression by blunting anti-tumor immunity.
104 ant melanoma, by impeding IgG1-mediated anti-tumor immunity.
105 hophysiological context: suppression of anti-tumor immunity.
106 cancer cells, as well as in suppressing anti-tumor immunity.
107 issues function in parallel to restrict anti-tumor immunity.
108 rovide therapeutic benefit by enhancing anti-tumor immunity.
109  of autoimmunity and the suppression of anti-tumor immunity.
110 umor microenvironment that can suppress anti-tumor immunity.
111 FOXP3-specific T cell responses and enhances tumor immunity.
112 c Tregs interfere with the detection of anti-tumor immunity after immunotherapy.
113 Cs) constitute a key checkpoint that impedes tumor immunity against cancer.
114 a fundamental role for TSLP and Th2 cells in tumor immunity against early-stage cancers.
115 erful system for evaluating antigen-specific tumor immunity against spontaneous tumors arising in an
116 ells are the major regulators of concomitant tumor immunity against this weakly immunogenic tumor.
117 ar immunity and failed cytotoxic T cell anti-tumor immunity, alter cancer risk and therefore represen
118 s are important and potent mediators of anti-tumor immunity and adoptive transfer of specific CD4(+)
119 tration of agonistic anti-4-1BB Abs enhances tumor immunity and allogenic immune responses.
120  to detect endogenous DNA and play a role in tumor immunity and autoimmune disease development.
121 In this study, we tested the balance between tumor immunity and autoimmunity in neu-transgenic BALB N
122 en-specific cells increased vaccine-elicited tumor immunity and autoimmunity, but a threshold was rea
123 offer an uncommon opportunity to study human tumor immunity and autoimmunity.
124 ance of CD8(+) T cell precursor frequency to tumor immunity and autoimmunity.
125              There are distinct pathways for tumor immunity and autoimmunity.
126 appreciated roles for IL-35 in limiting anti-tumor immunity and contributing to T cell dysfunction in
127 suppressive mechanisms used by MDSC to block tumor immunity and describes the mechanisms by which inf
128  data show that the anti-OX40-enhancement of tumor immunity and effector T cell numbers is decreased
129 ng pathways, can contribute to decrease anti-tumor immunity and enhance cell proliferation and oncoge
130 microenvironment lead to eradication of anti-tumor immunity and enhanced tumor cell survival.
131 ypothesized that integrin beta3 could affect tumor immunity and evaluated tumors in mice with deletio
132 sms and tumors to attenuate antimicrobial or tumor immunity and facilitate chronic infection and tumo
133 ro-inflammatory environment may curtail anti-tumor immunity and favor cancer initiation and progressi
134 ary-administered DC-AdCCL21 in regulation of tumor immunity and genetic immunotherapy for lung cancer
135 onale for further evaluation of ELC/CCL19 in tumor immunity and its use in cancer immunotherapy.
136 dditional evaluation of SLC in regulation of tumor immunity and its use in lung cancer immunotherapy.
137 onstrate a novel pathway for B7DC to promote tumor immunity and may reconcile the apparently contradi
138 thers in early development, can unleash anti-tumor immunity and mediate durable cancer regressions.
139     These results suggest a role for IL-9 in tumor immunity and offer insight into potential therapeu
140 oregulatory axis with broad implications for tumor immunity and other immunological and disease setti
141 ss the local and systemic effects of VEGF on tumor immunity and propose a potentially translatable st
142 ex-dependent, B7-H1-dependent differences in tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy in a hormon
143 intracellular checkpoint in NK cell-mediated tumor immunity and suggest possibilities for new cancer
144 h other check-point inhibitors enhances anti-tumor immunity and suppresses tumor growth in several pr
145 ed to play a critical role in the evasion of tumor immunity and the amelioration of allogeneic transp
146              Our increased knowledge in anti-tumor immunity and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvi
147                                  MDSC impair tumor immunity and thereby facilitate carcinogenesis and
148 -origin cells that are potent suppressors of tumor immunity and therefore a significant impediment to
149 d that Cu- and Zn-AMSs markedly induced anti-tumor-immunity and enhanced CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell pop
150 ide-ranging insight into basic neurobiology, tumor immunity, and autoimmune neurologic disease.
151  of surrounding wild-type Tregs, boosts anti-tumor immunity, and facilitates tumor clearance.
152 on in regulating autoimmunity and tolerance, tumor immunity, and host defense against intracellular p
153                           Understanding anti-tumor immunity, and how it becomes disabled by tumors, w
154  involved in regulation of immune tolerance, tumor immunity, and immunity to infectious pathogens.
155 r role in tumor-associated blood vessels and tumor immunity, and provide an update on mTOR inhibitors
156 hanistic insights into the role of TR-CD4 in tumor immunity, and suggest that approaches to utilize T
157 ived Ags leading to long-lived systemic anti-tumor immunity, and suggests a paradigm for clinical int
158 mmatory responses such as autoimmunity, anti-tumor immunity, and transplant rejection.
159 ar interactions involved in NK cell anti-CNS tumor immunity are even less well understood.
160 ect susceptibility to infection or graft-vs.-tumor immunity are hampered by the lack of a physiologic
161  production of antibodies to SV40 Tag and in tumor immunity as the result of recombinant SV40 Tag imm
162 like lymphocytes that modulate microbial and tumor immunity as well as autoimmune diseases.
163  of effector immune responses is pivotal for tumor immunity as well as for successful anticancer vacc
164 utes to the protection against the host anti-tumor immunity as well as to the survival of invading an
165 anoma patients has led to the elucidation of tumor immunity at a cellular and molecular level.
166 utoimmune skin depigmentation (vitiligo) and tumor immunity, because they are expressed by both benig
167 ical role not only in the down-regulation of tumor immunity but also in the promotion of the immunity
168 ry NKG2D receptor on T and NK cells mediates tumor immunity but can also promote local and systemic i
169 ppressive activity, including suppression of tumor immunity but not of autoimmune colitis.
170 regs is necessary to abrogate suppression of tumor immunity, but a third cell, the type I NKT cell, d
171 re innate immune cells that are important in tumor immunity, but also have the ability to modulate th
172 umor-specific rejection antigens for natural tumor immunity, but we know remarkably little about T-ce
173 ffector cell immunotherapy mediate long-term tumor immunity by different mechanisms that subsequently
174 ttern on malignant cells potentially affects tumor immunity by directly influencing interactions with
175 er immune evasion is the suppression of anti-tumor immunity by immunoregulatory T cells.
176 etween MDSC and macrophages further subverts tumor immunity by increasing MDSC production of IL-10, a
177 with immunogenic properties may enhance anti-tumor immunity by inducing autophagic cell death.
178 D-1/PD-L1 blockade enhanced the amplitude of tumor immunity by reprogramming suppressive and stimulat
179                       Therefore, MDSC impair tumor immunity by suppressing T cell activation and by i
180          In this report, we demonstrate that tumor immunity can be achieved via nasal administration
181 ptide ligands in order to induce strong anti-tumor immunity capable of breaking tolerance toward thes
182 ulation of the immune system to amplify anti-tumor immunity carries the risk of developing autoimmune
183 ed by a native tumor-antigen boost, improves tumor immunity compared with T cells elicited by the sam
184 data suggest the importance of Th17 cells to tumor immunity, conclusions regarding the functional rol
185 cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating tumor immunity continue to be elucidated.
186                                 The observed tumor immunity correlates with splenic antigen-specific
187 e have therefore demonstrated that effective tumor immunity correlates with the presence of endogenou
188  restoration of TTP expression enhances anti-tumor immunity dependent on degradation of PD-L1 mRNA.
189                              T cell-mediated tumor immunity depends on the migration and colocalizati
190 cted NKT cells play a role in suppression of tumor immunity, depletion of CD4+CD25+ T cells did not i
191                                  Concomitant tumor immunity describes immune responses in a host with
192              A wealth of data indicates that tumor immunity directed against a wide variety of malign
193                    A mechanistic analysis of tumor immunity directed toward the viral oncoprotein sim
194 to the general mechanisms of vaccine-induced tumor immunity directed toward tumors bearing distinct t
195 al killer (NK) cells are critical for innate tumor immunity due to their specialized ability to recog
196    In additional studies in vivo, protective tumor immunity elicited by tumor-derived gp96-peptide co
197 , unopposed type II NKT cells could suppress tumor immunity even when Tregs were blocked.
198 ) as the most potent molecule for augmenting tumor immunity following gene transfer into melanoma cel
199 ure immune system, we detect measurable anti-tumor immunity from very early stages, which is driven b
200 llular lineages, but its role in controlling tumor immunity has not been elucidated.
201 cape of a tumor shapes and is shaped by anti-tumor immunity has not been systematically explored.
202 the potential roles of these subsets in anti-tumor immunity have not been fully explored.
203      Interferon (IFN)-gamma is necessary for tumor immunity, however, its initial cellular source is
204      The contribution of Th17 cells to human tumor immunity, however, remains largely unknown.
205           The findings have implications for tumor immunity, immunotherapy biomarker discovery, and p
206  cells may not have direct effector roles in tumor immunity, impaired T cell activation, and enhanced
207 ring mice and stresses the value of studying tumor immunity in a therapeutic rather than a prophylact
208 ct biological processes of antimicrobial and tumor immunity in a unique way.
209 0 Tag protein immunization mounted effective tumor immunity in an established experimental pulmonary
210 ontrol of TH9 differentiation regulated anti-tumor immunity in an experimental melanoma-bearing model
211 nt study, we investigated the development of tumor immunity in an HLA-A0201(+) MM patient who achieve
212 ers T cell glycolytic metabolism and affects tumor immunity in cancer patients remains a question.
213 latory T cells (Tregs) in the suppression of tumor immunity in cancer patients.
214 represent novel strategies to enhance T cell tumor immunity in cancer.
215                     CD4(+) T cells influence tumor immunity in complex ways that are not fully unders
216 poietic 5-lipoxygenase (5LO) that may impact tumor immunity in development of colon cancer has not be
217 etion of CD8(+) T lymphocytes did not impair tumor immunity in either immune phase and resulted in th
218  integral in the cell-mediated repression of tumor immunity in experimental models.
219  have demonstrated augmented T cell-mediated tumor immunity in genetically B cell-deficient mice, sug
220 ecessary and sufficient to induce protective tumor immunity in H-2(b) mice with melanoma.
221 e remarkable examples of naturally occurring tumor immunity in humans.
222 1BB Abs has been previously shown to enhance tumor immunity in mice.
223 inhibit CTLA-4 function in vitro and enhance tumor immunity in mice.
224 KT cells have been reported to down-regulate tumor immunity in mouse tumor models.
225 TLA-4) blockade, an approach that can induce tumor immunity in other tumor models, did not result in
226                          Our data imply that tumor immunity in patients receiving adjuvant IMQ and/or
227 gest that CTLA-4 antibody blockade increases tumor immunity in some previously vaccinated cancer pati
228 smid DNA encoding altered Tyrp1 both mediate tumor immunity in the B16 murine melanoma model.
229 ion was not as effective in the induction of tumor immunity in therapeutic modalities when compared w
230 egs exerted suppression in vitro and blocked tumor immunity in vivo.
231 1d-restricted NKT cells in the regulation of tumor immunity, in that type II NKT cells may be suffici
232 filtrating myeloid cells (TIM) that suppress tumor immunity, including M2 macrophages and myeloid-der
233 ion of CD8, but not CD4 T cells reduced anti-tumor immunity, indicating CTL as the effector cells.
234 evaluate the role of T lymphocyte subsets in tumor immunity induced by recombinant SV40 large tumor a
235 the immune components necessary for systemic tumor immunity induced upon immunization with plasmid DN
236 owever, the role of B7 molecules in inducing tumor immunity is controversial because of conflicting r
237                                Although anti-tumor immunity is inducible by dendritic cell (DC)-based
238 tion of suppressor cells which down-regulate tumor immunity is one of the mechanisms linking inflamma
239 natural killer (NK) cell-mediated control of tumor immunity is poorly understood.
240 nd reject autologous cells, a consequence of tumor immunity is potential autoimmunity.
241  in vivo role of B7-H3 in the stimulation of tumor immunity is unclear.
242 immune response, but the role of IL-9/Th9 in tumor immunity is unknown.
243       The role of plasmacytoid DCs (DC2s) in tumor immunity is unknown.
244         However, the impact of IL-36gamma on tumor immunity is unknown.
245  tumor, our findings suggest that productive tumor immunity may be undermined from the start.
246 nce of CD4 T cells, development of long-term tumor immunity (memory) was severely compromised as refl
247 c cells (DCs) have long been known to affect tumor immunity, our data also implicate DCs in regulatio
248 s immunomodulatory activities to induce anti-tumor immunity predict the suppression of tumor growth.
249                           However, long-term tumor immunity prolonged survival times indefinitely and
250             The PRKCI-YAP1 regulation of the tumor immunity provides a therapeutic strategy for highl
251 h melanoma and other cancer cells evade anti-tumor immunity remain incompletely understood.
252 ure and regulation of Th17 in the context of tumor immunity remain unknown.
253 the best source for eliciting broad-spectrum tumor immunity remains each patient's own tumor.
254 ing lymphocytes (TILs) and function in human tumor immunity remains largely unknown.
255              The role of endogenous IL-17 in tumor immunity remains undefined.
256 ction of the immune system but their role in tumor immunity remains underappreciated.
257 CLTA-4(-/-) T-cell-mediated autoimmunity and tumor immunity required CD4(+) T cells in which the func
258                                      Durable tumor immunity required programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1
259                                 Long-lasting tumor immunity requires functional mobilization of CD8+
260 ntigens to induce a state of autoimmunity or tumor immunity, respectively.
261 nant spreading and the induction of systemic tumor immunity resulting in indigenous tumor rejection.
262           Our data suggest that the improved tumor immunity results from the expansion of mimotope-el
263  its antiangiogenic activity, but effects on tumor immunity should also be considered.
264                                              Tumor immunity specific for ovalbumin-expressing tumors
265 e cytotoxic effector response away from anti-tumor immunity ('sword') and towards proinflammatory and
266 challenge resulted in greater attenuation of tumor immunity than observed with selective depletion of
267 ide of the eye Ad5E1 tumors elicit a form of tumor immunity that is IFN-gamma independent.
268  argue against previous proposals to augment tumor immunity through B cell depletion.
269 d DNA induce autoimmune hypopigmentation and tumor immunity through cross-recognition of nonmutated g
270 h17 cells may contribute to protective human tumor immunity through inducing Th1-type chemokines and
271 madelta T cells can play a necessary role in tumor immunity through provision of an early source of I
272                 Many tumor cells escape anti-tumor immunity through their expression of programmed de
273 t instead impede development of desired anti-tumor immunity, thus providing synergistic effects betwe
274 y responses, play a role in the induction of tumor immunity to a viral-encoded tumor antigen.
275 for tumor-derived HSP70 in facilitating anti-tumor immunity to limit tumor growth and highlight the p
276 ocytes within a model of DNA vaccine-induced tumor immunity to Tag-expressing tumor cells.
277 he regulation of processes ranging from anti-tumor immunity to the adjuvant action of aluminum hydrox
278 m and split tolerance, with implications for tumor immunity, transplantation, autoimmunity, and repro
279                                     Thus, in tumor immunity type I and type II NKT cells have opposit
280 inguish the genetic and immune regulation of tumor immunity versus autoimmunity, immune responses to
281                                This improved tumor immunity was associated with a modest increase in
282                                     Enhanced tumor immunity was associated with improved CD8(+) T cel
283 -WM induced minimal T-cell responses, and no tumor immunity was detected.
284                    In this work, concomitant tumor immunity was investigated in mice bearing poorly i
285 ell regulation in the control of spontaneous tumor immunity, we analyzed NY-ESO-1-specific Th1 cell i
286  of tumor-derived IL-35 in tumorigenesis and tumor immunity, we generated IL-35-producing plasmacytom
287 y a vital role in developing and maintaining tumor immunity, we investigated the presence of a CD4(+)
288                    Using an in vivo model of tumor immunity, we show here that CD11b(hi)CD27(low) NK
289   To investigate the role of IL-13Ralpha2 in tumor immunity, we used D5 melanoma cells stably transfe
290 , complete tumor regression and long-lasting tumor immunity were observed, still without adverse effe
291 NA expression for genes associated with anti-tumor immunity were obtained from the invasive breast ca
292 4(+) T cells and may therefore contribute to tumor immunity, whereas a peptide overlapping the juncti
293 cific cytotoxicity and how 4-1BB can promote tumor immunity while repressing autoimmunity.
294  B11-OVA to hMR Tg mice induced OVA-specific tumor immunity while WT mice remained unprotected.
295 d CD4(+) T cells, promotes and enhances anti-tumor immunity with limited success on large tumors in m
296                                     Complete tumor immunity within a murine model of pulmonary metast
297 immune cell components that lead to systemic tumor immunity within an experimental pulmonary metastat
298 e results demonstrate that the mechanisms of tumor immunity within the brain are different from those
299  relapse, underscoring the need to intensify tumor immunity within this cohort.
300     Therefore, cytE2A appears to induce anti-tumor immunity without an Ab response.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top