ライフサイエンスコーパス: two-tailed

1 egatively correlated (rs = -0.72, P < 0.002, two-tailed).

2 ost severe impairment (rs = -0.57; P < 0.01, two-tailed).

3 orrelation coefficient rs = 0.59; P = 0.002, two-tailed).

4 on was statistically significant (P = 0.022, two-tailed).

5 ty (grade > or = 3) during cycle 1 (P = .51, two-tailed).

6 statistical analysis, and all P-values were two-tailed.

7 ening of the lyotropic liquid crystal by the two-tailed 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate is attrib

8 volves PCR amplification of genomic DNA with two tailed allele-specific primers that introduce primin

9 le subjects per arm to detect (80% power and two-tailed alpha of 0.05) an EBA at least 50% as large a

10 l by 25% (P<0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test, two-tailed) and of progesterone by 45% (P<0.0001) compar

11 The probabilities were two-tailed, and the alpha level was set at P < 0.05.

12 This result was not significant (p = 0.09, two-tailed), but the trend was toward a greater number o

13 ty 78%, predictive value 93%, P = .0001 with two-tailed chi square analysis).

14 ch block were 8%, 12% and 20%, respectively (two-tailed chi-square test for trend 5.61, p = 0.02, OR

15 ompared with ovariectomized controls using a two-tailed Dunnets test.

16 us CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed; P < 0.16 two-tailed; ENU-induced CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed,

17 r section width were also evaluated with the two-tailed Fisher exact probability test to determine if

18 II (2 LVOT, 8 RVOT) (I vs. II NS; p = 0.11, two-tailed Fisher exact test).

19 nalyzed by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-tailed Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic

20 The two-tailed Fisher exact test, the Breslow-Day test, and

21 terval were measured and compared by using a two-tailed Fisher exact test.

22 f seven; 14%; P = 0.02; relative risk = 5.4, two-tailed Fisher test), as well as a significant surviv

23 ive patients (P = 0.02, relative risk = 1.8, two-tailed Fisher test).

24 in our combined analysis (p = 2.68 x 10(-4), two-tailed Fisher's exact test), indicating that the SLC

25 Ds and 1 subject without (p = 3.12 x 10(-3), two-tailed Fisher's exact test).

26 ed in subjects with CHDs (p = 3.30 x 10(-2), two-tailed Fisher's exact test).

27 s but negative for enterovirus D68 using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test, two-sample unpaired t te

28 r change from baseline, Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) for categorical comparisons, and Kaplan-Meie

29 A two-tailed Friedman test was used to evaluate difference

30 ptan significantly (Students t-test, P<0.05, two tailed hypothesis, P<0.05) modulated this increase i

31 significant (P < 0.015 one-tailed, P < 0.03, two-tailed) in rats that received ENU and died prior to

32 that of control subjects (0.36 +/- 0.11 AU; two-tailed, independent Student's t-test, P = 0.005).

33 ognostic variables (Kaplan-Meier method with two-tailed log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards mo

34 We used two-tailed Mann Whitney U exact tests, chi(2), and Fishe

35 Differences among groups were tested with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test.

36 as compared with that in control mice with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test.

37 lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by using the two-tailed McNemar test.

38 stant; this unusual positive curvature for a two-tailed neutral lipid is likely associated with hydro

39 Comparisons were evaluated by using two-tailed nonpaired and paired t tests.

40 rence was significant for stage IV patients (two-tailed P = .0002).

41 stage III, and 82% for 50 stage IV patients (two-tailed P = .0075, chi 2 test).

42 tes (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI: 1.001, 3.695; two-tailed P = .064, one-tailed P = .038).

43 o-tailed p = 0.004) and IL-10/IL-6 (U = 6.0; two-tailed p = 0.003), whereas IL-6 levels were more ele

44 ymphoma had higher levels of IL-10 (U = 7.0; two-tailed p = 0.004) and IL-10/IL-6 (U = 6.0; two-taile

45 nts with uveitis than in lymphoma (U = 15.0; two-tailed p = ns).

46 A two-tailed P value of .008 or less, which accounts for m

47 A two-tailed P value of less than .05 indicated a signific

48 Mann-Whitney test, where appropriate, with a two-tailed P value of less than .05 used as the criterio

49 for conventional urography examination, and two-tailed P value significance test was used to evaluat

50 A two-tailed P value was used.

51 Two-tailed P values were calculated for the Student t te

52 rpin loops contain both 5'GC and 5'CG steps (two-tailed p-value <0.0001).

53 NN (two-tailed p-value = 0.0010) and ANNNCN (two-tailed p-value <0.0001).

54 otides from a cytosine, for example, ANNCNN (two-tailed p-value = 0.0010) and ANNNCN (two-tailed p-va

55 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.95 [two-tailed P=0.04 for superiority]).

56 g 0-90% Robusta), no significant difference (two-tailed P=0.817) was registered between the claimed a

57 tly methylated tumors (Fischer's exact test, two-tailed; P = 0.008).

58 tion mutations at p53 (Fischer's exact test, two-tailed; P = 0.01).

59 ol cohorts, were identified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, wit

60 st for comparison of CT fluoroscopy times, a two-tailed paired t test for comparison of age and tumor

61 the two modalities were determined with the two-tailed paired t test.

62 as estimated with the DBM method and Student two-tailed paired t test.

63 Two-tailed paired t tests were used for statistical anal

64 Two-tailed paired t tests were used to compare change in

65 mphysema, and mean values were compared with two-tailed paired t tests.

66 hose determined at 40 degrees contralateral (two-tailed paired t-test, P<0.0001).

67 ning of frequency tuning (i. e. Q(n) values, two-tailed paired t-test, P<0.01).

68 c stimulation in essential tremor, P=0.0137; two-tailed paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests).

69 A two-tailed, paired Student t test was used to determine

70 Two-tailed Pearson correlation analysis was performed to

71 This first reported crystal structure of a two-tailed peptidic bilayer reveals similarities in thic

72 E. coli expressing only the two-tailed SSB recovers faster from exposure to DNA dama

73 ified analysis was performed with the paired two-tailed Student t test to compare opacification score

74 Two-tailed Student t test was used for statistical analy

75 The two-tailed Student t test was used to compare the mean d

76 A two-tailed Student t test was used to compare the T1 and

77 Two-tailed Student t test was used to compare values bet

78 The two-tailed Student t test was used to determine differen

79 A two-tailed Student t test was used to determine if signi

80 A paired two-tailed Student t test was used to evaluate significa

81 For pairwise group comparisons, an unequal two-tailed Student t test was used.

82 microg . g(-1) +/- 0.95) (P < .001, unpaired two-tailed Student t test).

83 e level was significantly elevated (unpaired two-tailed Student t test, P <.002) in those biopsy samp

84 essures at failure were compared by means of two-tailed Student t test, with differences considered s

85 ders and nonresponders was calculated with a two-tailed Student t test.

86 uni- and bipediculate approaches by using a two-tailed Student t test.

87 ablation at 1 month after therapy by using a two-tailed Student t test.

88 e compared with analysis of variance and the two-tailed Student t test.

89 cs, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and a paired two-tailed Student t test.

90 Two-tailed Student t testing was used to determine diffe

91 Two-tailed Student t tests and repeated-measures analysi

92 Two-tailed Student t tests were used to evaluate the dat

93 the pre-occlusion value (P < 0.05, ANOVA and two-tailed Student's t test) indicating localised reacti

94 SEM (P < .05 versus baseline, ANOVA, paired two-tailed Student's t test).

95 ference between groups was assessed with the two-tailed Student's t test.

96 tween different groups was evaluated using a two-tailed Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

97 ntrol subjects (24%; P = 0.001; independent, two-tailed Student's t-test).

98 LOH (ovarian, P = 0.0004; breast P < 0.0001, two-tailed Student's t-test).

99 and number of vascular risk factors using a two-tailed Student's t-test.

100 Paired, two-tailed Student's t-tests were used for statistical a

101 We then demonstrate a two-tailed swimmer swimming at 81 mum s(-1).

102 and qualitative data were analyzed with the two-tailed t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respective

103 A two-tailed t test comparison revealed significantly grea

104 istically analyzed by performing an unpaired two-tailed t test for labeled versus unlabeled cells by

105 h the computer aid was determined by using a two-tailed t test for paired data.

106 to compare values between groups, and paired two-tailed t test was used to assess changes within subj

107 Two-tailed t test was used to compare the three experime

108 A paired two-tailed t test was used to compare wall thickening fr

109 The independent samples t test, and a two-tailed t test with equal variance were utilized to d

110 tatistically highly significant (P = 0.0001; two-tailed t test), whereas the difference in FDHM is no

111 For statistical analyses, an unpaired two-tailed t test, analysis of variance, and linear regr

112 The comparative study, carried using a two-tailed T test, demonstrated that virtual screening w

113 ly higher than that with conventional grids (two-tailed t test, P < .05).

114 ysis, using the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected two-tailed t test, was used to identify differentially e

115 n the volunteers with an independent samples two-tailed t test.

116 of both tumor types were compared by using a two-tailed t test.

117 Statistics included univariate analysis, two-tailed t testing to evaluate statistical significanc

118 hree subject groups were calculated by using two-tailed t tests (with P < .05 indicating significance

119 Data were compared by using two-tailed t tests after normal distributions were confi

120 andard deviations and were compared by using two-tailed t tests and analysis of variance for selected

121 Two-tailed t tests and Pearson chi(2) tests were used to

122 Two-tailed t tests were used for statistical analysis.

123 Two-tailed t tests were used to compare price measures b

124 d-measures analysis of variance and unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to evaluate differences in

125 e were compared with control values by using two-tailed t tests, and transit time was correlated with

126 ompared with analysis of variance and paired two-tailed t tests.

127 Results were averaged and evaluated by using two-tailed t tests.

128 Means were compared by use of independent two-tailed t tests.

129 atistical significance was assessed by using two-tailed t tests.

130 es penetrated through the Matrigel (P<0.001, two-tailed t-test), although both RB+ and RB- cells migr

131 nce was statistically significant (P < 0.02, two-tailed t-test).

132 e counts were 19% higher in adults (P < .01, two-tailed t-test); and data obtained by using the physi

133 by morphometric techniques and evaluated by two-tailed t-test.

134 Results were compared using unpaired, two-tailed t-test.

135 whole retinas at 1 week, but not at 2 weeks (two-tailed t-test; P = 0.04, P = 0.36, respectively).

136 fMRI data were compared using group-level two-tailed t-tests in the BioImage Suite.

137 Repeated-measures ANOVAs and Student's two-tailed t-tests were used for statistical comparisons

138 analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA or two-tailed t-tests.

139 nd subsequent pairwise t tests (alpha = .05, two-tailed test) were performed.

140 ciency of nonheme-iron absorption (P = 0.06, two-tailed test), but not of heme-iron absorption, tende

141 f human complement (r(2) = 0.994, P = 0.003, two-tailed test).

142 compared with those without (P = .04, exact two-tailed test).

143 Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed test.

144 ignificant differences were determine with a two-tailed test.

145 cted controls by log-rank or Fisher's exact (two-tailed) test and logistic regression analyses.

146 using chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact two-tailed tests.

147 ed CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed, P < 0.16 two-tailed), the trend was significant (P < 0.015 one-ta

148 The exact two-tailed trend test showed a significant association o

149 ontinuous variables were compared by using a two-tailed two-sample t test or a Wilcoxon two-sample te

150 e for normal tissue were assessed by using a two-tailed two-sample t test.

151 y significant differences (student's t-test, two-tailed unequal variance p-value < 0.05) between spec

152 analysis, including geometric fold analysis, two-tailed unequal variance t test, hierarchical cluster

153 Results were compared by using a two-tailed unpaired Student t test.

154 The changes in SNR were assessed with a two-tailed unpaired t test in three regions of the Achil

155 or the wild-type melanoma cells; P = 0.04 by two-tailed, unpaired t-test].

156 ORF145 from the temperate Acidianus two-tailed virus (ATV) forms a high-affinity complex wit

157 The chi(2) or Fisher exact test (each two-tailed) was used to compare nominal and ordinal vari

158 elated samples; p<0.0001) and Nurick scores (two-tailed Wilcoxon p<0.0001) postoperatively.

159 cle (e.g. P=0.0002 for tremor amplification, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test).

160 d 3He and 129Xe imaging were compared with a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test and analysis of var

161 The two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect

162 in the whole brain and were compared (with a two-tailed Wilcoxon test) as a function of clinical outc

163 e was also a significant improvement in MDI (two-tailed Wilcoxon, related samples; p<0.0001) and Nuri

164 and control groups were analyzed by using a two-tailed Z test to compare proportions with a threshol

165 Two-tailed z tests of percentages and means and multiple