戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 esions (phospho-AKT staining was technically uninterpretable).
2 idation and/or other infiltrate), normal, or uninterpretable.
3 , were low in each group, making comparisons uninterpretable.
4  by susceptibility artifacts were considered uninterpretable.
5  some cases, this renders isolated FRET data uninterpretable.
6 nsolidation and other infiltrate, normal, or uninterpretable.
7 r localized infection, rendering the results uninterpretable.
8 lity rendering the available NOE information uninterpretable.
9 ta points were not reported or the data were uninterpretable.
10 f locally calibrated transferred models were uninterpretable.
11 ntial portion of the literature on cisplatin uninterpretable.
12 osis (P < .001) and found fewer images to be uninterpretable (0.5% vs 11.0%).
13 gG levels of >2,000 mg/dl had higher odds of uninterpretable (1-->3)-beta-d-glucan results.
14 say, which is now widely used, are sometimes uninterpretable and irreproducible for some currently un
15                     Most children had low or uninterpretable baseline middle cerebral artery TCD velo
16  Two additional patients had scans that were uninterpretable because of intense myocardial activity t
17               The remaining 20 patterns were uninterpretable because they occurred with such infreque
18 entation pattern is thus generated, which is uninterpretable by standard peptide sequencing software.
19 s were acquired, of which 12 were considered uninterpretable due to missing time frames, radiopharmac
20 alvular disease, pacemaker implantation, and uninterpretable electrocardiograms.
21  conventional LGE technique produced severe, uninterpretable hyperintensity artifacts in the anterior
22                     The odds of obtaining an uninterpretable image due to metallic artifacts were cal
23                        Ejection fraction was uninterpretable in 23% on SE, 13% on HE (p = 0.14), and
24     (1-->3)-beta-d-glucan assay results were uninterpretable in 24% of patients.
25 spillover rendered coronary [(18)F]FDG scans uninterpretable in 27 patients (64%).
26 ted short tau inversion recovery images were uninterpretable in 7 patients because of artifact and un
27 d, with greater percentages in isolates with uninterpretable MICs.
28 using current approaches can be biologically uninterpretable or present only one of many equally pred
29                    Percentages of missing or uninterpretable responses were similar between instrumen
30 Thirty-eight (33%) had either conflicting or uninterpretable results (multiple skip wells, i.e., well
31 ined in 48/56 (86%), with conflicting and/or uninterpretable results in 8/56 (14%).
32 se to address issues of false positivity and uninterpretable results previously reported among patien
33 ptimize the method to decrease the number of uninterpretable results, direct MGIT DST could be the ne
34  presence of multiple skip wells, leading to uninterpretable results.
35 sensitivity increased to 83% after excluding uninterpretable segments and evaluating the ability to d
36 rrectly timed, paired sera frequently led to uninterpretable serology results at our laboratory, we d
37         After exclusion of six patients with uninterpretable studies (1%) and 35 (6%) lost to follow-
38                     After CE, the percent of uninterpretable studies decreased from 11.7% to 0.3% and
39                     Patients with unknown or uninterpretable vital status or graft survival time (n=2
40                                              Uninterpretable wall motion was present in 5.4 segments/

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。