ライフサイエンスコーパス: unpaired t-test

1 0.49-0.86) microL/min at 4 weeks (P = .001, unpaired t test).

2 [94] mum; P = .004, determined by use of an unpaired t test).

3 (HAZ) -0.81 vs -0.51, respectively, P < .05, unpaired t test).

4 ith ANXA7 wild-type glioblastomas (P = .004; unpaired t test).

5 ncreased by plasma (p < 0.0001 vs control by unpaired t test).

6 dence interval, 1.9-15.9 minutes; p = 0.014, unpaired t test).

7 u A, SNI: 49 +/- 4 mu A; P < 0.01, Student's unpaired t test).

8 rsus -EX: -93 +/- 3 beats min(-1); P < 0.01, unpaired t test).

9 ater in +EX compared to -EX atria (P < 0.05, unpaired t test).

10 erence -3.3 [95% CI -5.3 to -1.3]; p=0.0013, unpaired t test).

11 was higher than benign specimens (p < 0.05, unpaired t test).

12 mean +/- S.E.M., n = 74; P < 0.01; Student's unpaired t test).

13 versus 90 +/- 14 mm Hg in whites (P < 0.006, unpaired t test).

14 respectively, with fold change >/=2, p<0.05, unpaired t-test).

15 the difference was significant (P < 0.0001, unpaired t-test).

16 e was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, unpaired t-test).

17 n the white matter in controls (P = 0.029 by unpaired t-test).

18 ting state, to 0.018+/-0.002 (n=3, P<0.05 by unpaired t-test).

19 y 0.29 in the placebo patients (p < .0001 by unpaired t-test).

20 rs with intestinal versus diffuse histology (unpaired t-test).

21 fication of N-myc alone (P = 0.0056, Welch's unpaired t-test).

22 001 for term [n = 6] v premature [n = 11] by unpaired t-test).

23 pective interpretation of group differences (unpaired t tests).

24 are expressed as mean +/- SEM (ANOVA, paired unpaired t tests).

25 erformed with Prism 7 software and student's unpaired t test.

26 measured and compared between groups with an unpaired t test.

27 ared between breathing protocols by using an unpaired t test.

28 sessed by using analysis of variance and the unpaired t test.

29 nces between groups was determined using the unpaired t test.

30 se ratios were measured and compared with an unpaired t test.

31 the same Gleason grade were compared with an unpaired t test.

32 C avg) were calculated and compared using an unpaired t test.

33 compared piecewise along tracks by using an unpaired t test.

34 Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test.

35 with exercise were analysed using Student's unpaired t tests.

36 Statistical analysis consisted of paired and unpaired t tests.

37 t tests; possible sex differences, by using unpaired t tests.

38 tman agreement method, kappa statistics, and unpaired t tests.

39 opy number and tested for significance using unpaired t-tests.

40 type melanoma cells; P = 0.04 by two-tailed, unpaired t-test].

41 The unpaired t test and chi(2) analysis were used to determi

42 d SRU criteria-negative cancers by using the unpaired t test and the chi(2) test.

43 The data were compared by using unpaired t tests and analysis of variance with Tukey pos

44 Unpaired t tests and chi(2) tests were used for group co

45 image noise and SSDE were compared by using unpaired t tests and F tests.

46 CRL, namely 24+/-19 mmHg (P=0.014, Student's unpaired t test), and correlated negatively with the deg

47 e two-tailed Fisher's exact test, two-sample unpaired t test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

48 en the male and female patients by using the unpaired t test, and the correlation between FDG uptake

49 The Fisher 2-tailed exact test, unpaired t tests, and age- and sex-adjusted standardized

50 expressed as mean +/- SEM (ANOVA, paired and unpaired t tests, and chi 2 test).

51 Repeated measures analysis of variance, unpaired t tests, and correlation analysis were used.

52 s were performed with the Fisher exact test, unpaired t tests, and multiple logistic regression.

53 Univariate analyses (chi(2) test; 2-tailed, unpaired t test; and analysis of variance) as well as mu

54 Paired and unpaired t tests, as well as parametric Pearson tests, w

55 5% CI, 3.19-5.95] microL/min) GDDs (P = .28, unpaired t test) at 4 weeks without aqueous exposure.

56 re compared by analysis of variance or by an unpaired t test before and after adjustment for confound

57 Statistical analysis was performed with an unpaired t test by using unequal variance.

58 Data were analyzed with unpaired t-tests, Chi-square test and Receiver Operating

59 Unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons wit

60 /-1.7%, respectively [mean+/-SEM]; Student's unpaired t-test df=10, t=-1.357, p=0.453); this was conf

61 ough decreased in 12 regions at P<0.01 by an unpaired t test, did not survive the false-discovery-rat

62 ntly higher in women than in men (P = 0.007, unpaired t test; female, 22.0 +/- 16.8 blinks/minute; ma

63 exact test for categorical variables and an unpaired t test for continuous variables.

64 6 versus 360 +/- 7 beats min(-1); P < 0.05, unpaired t test) However, in +EX atria, HR responses to

65 anges in SNR were assessed with a two-tailed unpaired t test in three regions of the Achilles tendon:

66 r cells from the fourth ventricle (P<0.01 by unpaired t-test), indicating that cells from the lateral

67 nces between groups was determined using the unpaired t test or the Mann-Whitney test.

68 ifferences between groups were calculated by unpaired t test (or Mann-Whitney U test in nonparametric

69 Group differences were assessed with the unpaired t test (P < 0.05).

70 n doses, and serologic liver function tests (unpaired t test, P = 0.05) and 2) assessed tumor respons

71 n = 6) and was not significantly different (unpaired t test; P > 0.10) from that measured in the con

72 SD, n = 6), which was significantly higher (unpaired t test; P < 0.01) than that measured in the con

73 peatability, inter-observer reproducibility, unpaired t-test, paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analyse

74 Student's unpaired t-test performed on the eye inflammation freque

75 ified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, with a 5% level of signif

76 Using a variant of the unpaired t-test, selected genes were ordered according t

77 o calculate the whole brain, voxel-by-voxel, unpaired t-tests Statistical non-Parametric Maps.

78 is of continuous data with use of paired and unpaired t tests, the Bonferroni correction, and multiva

79 Unpaired t test was used for comparison of patient age w

80 etermined and pathologic tumor size, and the unpaired t test was used to compare MR imaging-pathologi

81 Unpaired t-test was carried out in the analysis to deter

82 Also, an unpaired t-test was used to obtain concordance between t

83 Paired and unpaired t tests were performed between various tissue t

84 Likelihood ratio tests and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analyses as a

85 Unpaired t tests were used to compare data in patients w

86 the cardiac cycle for each patient, and then unpaired t tests were used to determine which parameters

87 known and synchronous nodules via paired and unpaired t tests, when appropriate.

88 esponses were compared utilising a two-sided unpaired t test with Bonferroni correction.

89 n a priori power analysis was performed, and unpaired t tests with Welch correction were used to comp

90 Unpaired t tests, with Bonferroni correction, were used