ライフサイエンスコーパス: unprotected sex

1 , but clients paid on average 42.9% more for unprotected sex.

2 hat are attributed to injecting drug use and unprotected sex.

3 ed having used emergency contraception after unprotected sex.

4 -3, and interleukin 8 levels decreased after unprotected sex.

5 dies containing 32 857 participants reported unprotected sex; 11 studies containing 16 138 participan

6 remained low at the visit 10-14 hours after unprotected sex (6% [range, -19% to 92%]; P = .02).

7 y from baseline at the visit 2-6 hours after unprotected sex (63% [range, -34% to 99%] vs 5% [range,

8 ty of heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 per unprotected sex act in adults.

9 duals, the risk of HIV transmission during 1 unprotected sex act with an HIV-infected person under co

10 ose-response relations between the number of unprotected sex acts and infection were stronger in the

11 as estimated based on the number and type of unprotected sex acts carried out in defined time periods

12 11, but the effect was small (average of 6.8 unprotected sex acts per year vs 6.2 acts in a predicted

13 The number of unprotected sex acts was significantly associated with i

14 riods with reported numbers of protected and unprotected sex acts.

15 transmission risk for protected relative to unprotected sex acts.

16 om men to women: 28.5 transmissions per 1000 unprotected sex acts.

17 practices (adjusted HR, 44.35; P = .004) and unprotected sex (adjusted HR, 9.91; P = .002) were signi

18 ncy virus (HIV) infection is associated with unprotected sex among multiple anonymous sex partners.

19 7) reported >or=1 occasion on which they had unprotected sex and 22 (23% of 97) reported that in the

20 t women aged 18 to 44 years who recently had unprotected sex and had 1 or more additional personal or

21 liefs about HAART and viral load may promote unprotected sex and may be amenable to change through pr

22 ated with HIV risk behaviors, such as having unprotected sex and multiple sex partners.

23 as a score based on lifetime experiences of unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.

24 (HAART) became available, the prevalence of unprotected sex and the incidence of sexually transmitte

25 tigated this hypothesis in people practising unprotected sex and those using protection.

26 29 monogamous heterosexual couples having unprotected sex; and 15 women and 10 men having condom p

27 likely to engage similarly in serodiscordant unprotected sex as other MSM.

28 ly 52% of PSA-positive participants reported unprotected sex during the previous 2 days.

29 isk-taking, available research suggests that unprotected sex is reduced among HIV-infected individual

30 reported that in the last 3 months they had unprotected sex "most of the time." No women reported ha

31 nce of transactional sex, age-disparate sex, unprotected sex, multiple partners, and sex while drunk

32 interval {CI}, 1.3-29.4]; P = .02) or having unprotected sex (OR, 75.5 [95% CI, 6.9-820.6]; P < .001)

33 isk because of high exposure to violence and unprotected sex, particularly during the early months of

34 couples reported that they continued to have unprotected sex, resulting in an incidence of HIV infect

35 Higher prices for unprotected sex threaten the high levels of condom use t

36 mmendations that male survivors refrain from unprotected sex unless their semen is confirmed to be EB

37 The prevalence of unprotected sex was elevated (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.52-2.1

38 Unprotected sex was lower in participants receiving ART

39 The prevalence of unprotected sex was not higher among persons with the hu

40 infection among men aged 20 to 44 years were unprotected sex with a commercial sex worker (odds ratio

41 ts attending STD clinics in India identified unprotected sex with a CSW and a genital ulcer as indepe

42 T, we compared proportions of risky sex (ie, unprotected sex with a partner of negative/unknown HIV s

43 Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown

44 the per-act risk of HIV transmission through unprotected sex with an HIV-infected person on cART for

45 The per-act risk of HIV transmission through unprotected sex with HIV-infected individuals on cART in

46 median value, and the number of episodes of unprotected sex with occasional partners during the prec

47 We identified a significant increase in unprotected sex with outside partners after July, 2011,

48 The average frequency of unprotected sex with the HIV-infected study partner was

49 varying measures of pregnancy, self-reported unprotected sex with the study partner, sperm present on

50 aring the infectivity in participants having unprotected sex with those practising protected sex.

51 majority of the injection drug users had had unprotected sex with women (48%) or with men (10%).

52 exposure was best quantified by frequency of unprotected sex with, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels among, and