ライフサイエンスコーパス: upper extremity

1 ents with mild motor impairment of the right upper extremity.

2 ion) innervating the contralateral (resting) upper extremity.

3 s which worsened to involve the entire right upper extremity.

4 carrying information from the contralateral upper extremity.

5 on should preferentially affect the head and upper extremity.

6 d local pain or functional impairment of the upper extremity.

7 e implications for the rehabilitation of the upper extremity.

8 ations of PNBs for outpatient surgery of the upper extremity.

9 ble with regards to procedures of the distal upper extremity.

10 by vigorous activity or extensive use of the upper extremity.

11 movements with the proximal sections of the upper extremity.

12 t of musculoskeletal disorders of the distal upper extremity.

13 reduced arterial reactivity in lower but not upper extremities.

14 ed by a phenotype that is more severe in the upper extremities.

15 rized by congenital defects in the heart and upper extremities.

16 ions for a permanent vascular access in both upper extremities.

17 thrombosis associated with a catheter in the upper extremities.

18 ifference in systolic blood pressure between upper extremities.

19 inly by a postural and kinetic tremor of the upper extremities.

20 llowing the appearance of new macules on her upper extremities.

21 ial reactivity differs between the lower and upper extremities.

22 mity (58%) than visceral-mesenteric (31%) or upper extremity (10%).

23 % occurring on the head and neck, 32% on the upper extremities, 16% on the trunk, 9% at unknown sites

24 ied as carotid (53%), lower extremity (41%), upper extremity (3%), and aortic disease (33%).

25 r times (face, 41.0 vs 61.0 days [P = .001]; upper extremities, 46.0 vs 69.0 days [P = .003]).

26 For the face and upper extremities, a significantly higher percentage of

27 o mediating movements in the face, neck, and upper extremity accompanying medial temporal lobe seizur

28 c compensation to functional recovery of the upper extremity after a unilateral brain lesion.

29 n robot-assisted neurorehabilitation for the upper extremity aimed primarily at training, reaching mo

30 pha arm, and one disease progression-related upper extremity amputation in the melphalan-alone arm.

31 he plasticity of the primary motor cortex in upper-extremities amputees and to determine if the acqui

32 Deep tendon reflexes were absent in the upper extremities and decreased in the lower extremities

33 racterized by a stellate ulceration over the upper extremities and reported association with neuromus

34 Those are the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity and Lower Extremity scales, Wolf Motor F

35 aim to improve motor function for use of the upper extremity and walking are traditionally separated

36 ents who sustained penetrating trauma to the upper extremity and who underwent CT angiography based o

37 ty, cervical nodes draining both the ear and upper extremity, and sentinel lymph nodes draining diffe

38 Evaluation of the technical quality of the upper extremity angiograms demonstrated mean attenuation

39 er extremity (AOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7) and upper extremity (AOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0) mobility dif

40 probe monitoring of comparable sites in both upper extremities appears to be an effective preventive

41 US assessment of the upper extremity arterial and venous anatomy was performe

42 e arterial lumen of multiple segments of the upper extremity arteries.

43 giography were performed in 10 patients with upper extremity autogenous fistulas.

44 es (40 ml) of local with ultrasound-directed upper extremity blockade.

45 ill training and robotic devices and for the upper extremity by constraint-induced therapy, robotics,

46 Evaluation of the upper extremities can be more challenging and requires a

47 surgery reduces overall OR time by 4 min per upper extremity case.

48 axillary nodes draining both the breast and upper extremity, cervical nodes draining both the ear an

49 were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baselin

50 termination of the side of the body on which upper extremity contrast material injection was performe

51 Upper extremity CT angiograms obtained with 64-section C

52 ccurrence, the characterization of pediatric upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) and of UE

53 ography has not been evaluated for suspected upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT).

54 Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) occurs spon

55 a wide spectrum of ipsilateral thoracic and upper extremity deformities.

56 udies are needed in the area of work-related upper extremity disorders.

57 Forty-one patients with acute upper extremity DVT and contraindications to or unsucces

58 d for preventing symptomatic PE due to acute upper extremity DVT in patients in whom therapeutic anti

59 Upper-extremity dysfunction was not associated with SPA

60 al effusion (5.5%), facial edema (2.2%), and upper extremity edema (1.3%).

61 of unknown etiology of the head and neck or upper extremity, even in the absence of focal neurologic

62 trasonography of their lower extremities and upper extremities every 7 days.

63 Upper extremity exercise is associated with a significan

64 ed to active motor tasks, contributing to an upper extremity flexion bias following stroke.

65 or impairment (total and proximal Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, FMUE, scores) were analyzed.

66 Motor impairment as indexed by the Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer assessment was significantly

67 irst-ever ischemic stroke patients using the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UE-FM) Scale to measure moto

68 replacement have advanced and provide better upper extremity function after scapula resection than re

69 red putative non-linear interactions between upper extremity function and use by developing a first-o

70 ain some hand and wrist movement can improve upper extremity function that persists for at least 1 ye

71 specific rehabilitation therapy can improve upper extremity function.

72 of the SPA is not associated with a loss of upper-extremity function after transradial catheterizati

73 Upper-extremity function was assessed at baseline and 2-

74 worse scores on patient-reported measures of upper extremity functional limitation and mental health

75 multivariate analyses, greater preoperative upper extremity functional limitation was predictive of

76 the 3 principal outcomes (symptom severity, upper extremity functional limitations, and satisfaction

77 he questionnaires assessed symptom severity, upper extremity functional limitations, mental health, g

78 ot associated independently with measures of upper extremity functioning.

79 ended to be higher for thigh grafts than for upper extremity grafts (11.1 versus 5.2%; P = 0.07).

80 e as high for thigh grafts, as compared with upper extremity grafts (12.7 versus 5.8%; P = 0.046).

81 permanent failure) was similar for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 14.8 versus 20.8 mo; P =

82 tion-free survival was similar for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 3.9 versus 3.5 mo; P = 0

83 e survival was also comparable for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 5.7 versus 5.5 mo; P = 0

84 was 27.6 mo for thigh grafts and 22.5 mo for upper extremity grafts (P = 0.72).

85 1.70 per year) was similar between thigh and upper extremity grafts.

86 with the transplantation of face, bilateral upper extremities, heart, 1 lung, liver (split for 2 rec

87 Upper extremity hemiplegia is a common consequence of un

88 ing impairment (OR,1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.87); upper extremity impairment (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.05-2.05)

89 spheric FC was significantly correlated with upper extremity impairment (Pearson r with contralesiona

90 nts with motor stroke and primarily moderate upper extremity impairment, use of a structured, task-or

91 nts with motor stroke and primarily moderate upper extremity impairment.

92 Using a rat model of upper extremity impairments after ischemic stroke, we ex

93 ity and cortical lesions had the most severe upper extremity impairments, particularly somatosensory

94 upling in proximal and distal muscles of the upper extremities in nine patients with multifocal high

95 ro- and macrocirculation of the nonexercised upper extremity in type 1 diabetic patients.

96 head and neck injuries, 1.48 (1.38-1.58) for upper extremity injuries, 1.11 (1.01-1.21) for back inju

97 for orthopedic intervention in patients with upper extremity involvement and recent methods to contro

98 manifest angina elicited by exercise of the upper extremity ipsilateral to the graft and stenosis (s

99 nger, closer to the time of surgery, or have upper extremity lymphedema may be less likely to undergo

100 ter period of time since surgery, and having upper extremity lymphedema were associated with lower ma

101 disorder characterized by facial dysmorphia, upper-extremity malformations, hirsutism, cardiac defect

102 In this study, upper extremity moles, a higher ability to achieve a tan

103 nical practice for patients with stroke with upper extremity motor deficits.

104 fects of unilateral and bilateral STN DBS on upper extremity motor function and cognitive performance

105 Upper extremity motor function improved significantly in

106 ry outcome measure was the rate of change in upper extremity motor function measured by the maximum v

107 hs before enrolment and had mild-to-moderate upper extremity motor impairment, non-immersive virtual

108 The primary outcome was upper extremity motor performance measured by total time

109 slowly progresses to involve other lower and upper extremities' muscles, with marked sparing of the q

110 ies and conservative treatments for selected upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions for evidence

111 l modalities and conservative treatments for upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions, there is a s

112 The prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders, such as tendi

113 to relieve neurologic (n = 85) and/or right upper extremity (n = 26) symptoms or asymptomatic critic

114 n = 1), orbitofacial (n = 33), neck (n = 8), upper extremity (n = 7), lower extremity (n = 4), intrat

115 s with end-stage renal disease and ischemia, upper extremity (n = 8) or lower extremity (n = 3) arter

116 er, given that the method was only tested on upper extremities of a veteran population, further testi

117 geyella species from acute cellulitis in the upper extremity of a 60-year-old woman.

118 ility of physical examination for diagnosing upper extremity or neck venous thrombosis.

119 t it is unknown whether people with profound upper extremity paralysis or limb loss could use cortica

120 Eighty-five adults with upper extremity paresis >/=6 months poststroke were rand

121 iddle cerebral artery infarction, leading to upper extremity paresis, paresthesia, and sensory loss.

122 descending axons often causes contralateral upper extremity paresis.

123 presentation (which began with vomiting and upper extremity paresthesias and progressed to fever, se

124 e deep vein thrombosis in both the lower and upper extremities, pulmonary embolism, and mortality.

125 tes in the lower extremity and 1 site in the upper extremity (radial head) were evaluated and compare

126 s for patients without hemorrhage were 0.74 (upper extremities; range, 0-1) and 0.55 (lower extremiti

127 d predominantly to the location to which the upper extremity reached, and the second related to the o

128 r (M1) and lateral premotor (LPMC) cortices, upper extremity recovery is accompanied by terminal axon

129 entifically warrant changing the practice of upper extremity regional?

130 ilateral training as a potential therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation in hemiparetic stroke.

131 either an equivalent or a lower dose of UCC upper extremity rehabilitation.

132 y, spanning both the proximal and the distal upper extremity representation in caudal M1.

133 -grasp movements in the primary motor cortex upper extremity representation, we implanted four microe

134 manifested muscle weakness in the lower and upper extremities, resembling mice lacking the farnesyla

135 nts before receiving 3 weeks of standardized upper extremity robotic therapy.

136 ischaemic stroke and a motor deficit of the upper extremity score of 3 or more (measured with the Ch

137 ter after visceral-mesenteric than lower- or upper-extremity SEE (55%, 17%, and 9%, respectively, P</

138 ve a programme of structured, task-oriented, upper extremity sessions (ten sessions, 60 min each) of

139 hemodialysis patients who have exhausted all upper extremity sites for permanent vascular access.

140 selective medium to culture both lower- and upper-extremity skin from a study group of podiatry pati

141 Upper extremity strength on admission inversely correlat

142 maging studies are crucial steps to identify upper extremity stress injuries in the pediatric populat

143 strategies to evaluate and manage pediatric upper extremity stress injuries related to overuse with

144 shops on topics relevant to older adults and upper extremity stretching exercises.

145 ogram (n = 817) of educational workshops and upper-extremity stretching.

146 ts undergoing brachial plexus anesthesia for upper extremity surgery reduces overall OR time by 4 min

147 egional anesthesia has numerous benefits for upper extremity surgery such as improved analgesia, opio

148 e of even a low repetition, negligible force upper extremity task for 3 months can induce mild periph

149 rsus 0.58%), infection (1.34% versus 3.07%), upper extremity thrombosis (0.77% versus 0.96%), pulmona

150 nts developed clinical evidence of PE due to upper extremity thrombosis or superior vena cava syndrom

151 red in one patient, and two others developed upper-extremity thrombosis associated with venous infusi

152 Structured, task-oriented upper extremity training (Accelerated Skill Acquisition

153 the psychosocial evaluation and outcomes of upper extremity transplant recipients: required domains

154 We present our experience with upper-extremity transplantation under a novel, donor bon

155 tocol is safe, is well tolerated, and allows upper-extremity transplantation using low-dose tacrolimu

156 Psychiatric complications in upper extremity transplanted patients have been reported

157 qualified anatomical sites (face, scalp, and upper extremities) twice daily for 4 consecutive days.

158 ance imaging (MRI) and its relationship with upper-extremity (UE) motor function in patients post str

159 tion for clinical application of concomitant upper extremity (UExt) and face transplantation, we aime

160 Upper extremity vascular access surgery using polytetraf

161 Upper extremity vascular insufficiency dominated the cli

162 However, the relationship of lower versus upper extremity vasoreactivity to increasing cardiovascu

163 ate rating scale, kinematic analyses of peak upper extremity velocity, positron emission tomography i

164 All patients underwent bilateral upper-extremity venography.

165 ral automatisms and dystonic posturing of an upper extremity was analysed separately.

166 slope of EIM phase ratio trajectories in the upper extremity was observed by 6 months of -0.074/month

167 with dysarthria, gait ataxia, and bilateral upper extremity weakness.

168 Ten upper extremities were harvested from the nonembalmed ca

169 Upper extremities were imaged separately with at least t

170 th >2% body surface area involvement of both upper extremities were recruited from the Albuquerque, N

171 tasks in promoting the flexed posture of the upper extremity were assessed.

172 trast medium through a plastic cannula in an upper extremity were retrospectively reviewed.

173 Early motor involvement of the contralateral upper extremity without oral automatisms occurred in thr

174 were not identified at multidetector CT (six upper extremity wounds and four thigh wounds).