コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 en inducing nerve damage to create models of urinary incontinence.
2 organ prolapse are at risk for postoperative urinary incontinence.
3 n the frequency of daily episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.
4 omboembolic events, gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence.
5 benefits of preventing postoperative stress urinary incontinence.
6 of complications of sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
7 tectomy would result in 1 additional case of urinary incontinence.
8 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence.
9 which NA reuptake inhibitors improve stress urinary incontinence.
10 instay for treating postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.
11 ls per week, multiple chronic illnesses, and urinary incontinence.
12 ve intervention for all patients with stress urinary incontinence.
13 r watery stools, poor self-rated health, and urinary incontinence.
14 of operative procedure for women with stress urinary incontinence.
15 ogen resulted in inconsistent improvement of urinary incontinence.
16 have a high success rate for treating stress urinary incontinence.
17 nue drug therapy and maintain improvement in urinary incontinence.
18 reporting on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence.
19 ice in patients with neurogenic bladders and urinary incontinence.
20 Duloxetine improved but did not resolve urinary incontinence.
21 Adrenergic drugs did not resolve or improve urinary incontinence.
22 Electrical stimulation failed to resolve urinary incontinence.
23 condary stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence.
24 e front-line therapeutic modality for stress urinary incontinence.
25 sodes per 24 hours), with or without urgency urinary incontinence.
26 n a woman's bladder and vagina, resulting in urinary incontinence.
27 ult women, include pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
28 iological slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
29 s been used to manage stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence.
30 be discussed with patients with intractable urinary incontinence.
31 er alternatives in difficult cases of stress urinary incontinence.
32 ing, or other medical conditions can lead to urinary incontinence.
33 ews the data on its use in the management of urinary incontinence.
34 involving 381 women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence.
35 atment of choice in the management of stress urinary incontinence.
36 etry) prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
37 n controlling refractory episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.
38 preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence.
39 est outcome of surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
40 much less health care economic data than for urinary incontinence.
41 hological symptoms in persons with fecal and urinary incontinence.
42 been no meaningful research on prevention of urinary incontinence.
43 dysfunction leads to overactive bladder and urinary incontinence.
44 was the greatest risk factor for developing urinary incontinence.
45 ween 12% and 55% for having ever experienced urinary incontinence.
46 drugs are effective in the treatment of urge urinary incontinence.
47 bit urinary frequency, urgency, and at times urinary incontinence.
48 e evidence regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence.
49 ogynecologic surgery, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence.
50 archical fashion which minimizes the risk of urinary incontinence.
51 in the treatment of the components of mixed urinary incontinence.
52 nd therapeutic options for women affected by urinary incontinence.
53 durethral-sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence.
54 se of medication or indwelling catheters for urinary incontinence.
55 xperienced significant reductions in urgency urinary incontinence (-0.88 vs -0.31, P=.005), urgency e
56 ation (23.3 [13.7] vs 24.6 [14.0]; P = .36), urinary incontinence (10.6 [17.7] vs 9.7 [15.8]; P = .99
57 olism (11 more cases [95% CI, 3 to 22]), and urinary incontinence (1261 more cases [95% CI, 880 to 16
58 isease (33 more per 10 000 woman-years), and urinary incontinence (1271 more per 10 000 woman-years).
59 d cortical atrophy (P = .01), nonobstructive urinary incontinence (18.5% vs 3.9%; P = .04), and synco
60 s 10 to 12 points for sexual function, 6 for urinary incontinence, 5 for urinary irritative symptoms,
62 mentia (22 more per 10 000 woman-years), and urinary incontinence (872 more per 10 000 woman-years).
63 ]), stroke (9 more cases [95% CI, 2 to 19]), urinary incontinence (876 more cases [95% CI, 606 to 116
64 of women (95% CI, 13.2%-18.2%) experiencing urinary incontinence, 9.0% of women (95% CI, 7.3%-10.7%)
66 , 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.52; P = .005), and urinary incontinence (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20 to
73 e social consequences of the surgery such as urinary incontinence, anastomotic contracture, erectile
75 re rate for patients with predominant stress urinary incontinence and can safely be placed at the tim
78 ic mortality rates, and improved recovery of urinary incontinence and erectile function after open ra
80 uestionnaires, were participants' reports of urinary incontinence and incremental cost per quality-ad
83 g-term complications from mesh use in stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse repair ar
84 aised about the safety of surgery for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse using tra
89 thral slings used in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and the management of these complic
90 main types of incontinence in women, stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence, can
92 erations have been developed to treat stress urinary incontinence and yet, at present, there is no co
93 as concerned about the potential for greater urinary incontinence and/or urinary irritation associate
94 obstruction and irritation, 9.7 to 10.5 for urinary incontinence, and 5.7 to 6.1 for bowel problems.
95 unction, urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems-each scored fro
96 imately three times the rate of diagnosis of urinary incontinence, and more than four times the rate
98 d proportion of fistula recurrence, residual urinary incontinence, and pregnancy after successful fis
99 d basic sociodemographics, cognitive status, urinary incontinence, and self-reported ability to do ac
104 Importance: Women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence are treated with sacral neuromodula
105 ures, which required a negative pad test, no urinary incontinence (as recorded in a 3-day diary), a n
106 In trial 2, the difference in the rate of urinary incontinence at 12 months (126 [65%] of 194) fro
107 e intervention group in trial 1, the rate of urinary incontinence at 12 months (148 [76%] of 196) was
109 prolapse surgery resulted in a lower rate of urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates
111 it is less clear that the severity of stress urinary incontinence, based on either abdominal leak poi
113 ntinence in men compared with women, despite urinary incontinence being relatively common and burdens
114 aged >/=65 years), gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence; benefits included decreased hip fr
115 our domains (urinary irritative-obstructive, urinary incontinence, bowel, and sexual), significant HR
116 ikely to have complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence but had higher rates of transient u
117 n established and modifiable risk factor for urinary incontinence, but conclusive evidence for a bene
118 onabotulinumtoxinA are used to treat urgency urinary incontinence, but data directly comparing the tw
119 nce exists concerning its efficacy in stress urinary incontinence, but its benefit to women with mixe
120 increased public awareness of the problem of urinary incontinence, but many new products are being in
121 ine exerts only modest relief of male stress urinary incontinence, but may be recommended in some pat
122 performed in women before surgery for stress urinary incontinence, but there is no good evidence that
123 inence with weight loss, for treating stress urinary incontinence by performing anti-incontinence pro
124 at patients with more severe forms of stress urinary incontinence by urodynamic testing fare more poo
127 been identified, and studies have shown that urinary incontinence can have substantial negative impac
128 women, stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence, can be evaluated by history and si
129 re the organizational factors that influence urinary incontinence care quality controlling for patien
130 mine the impact of organizational factors on urinary incontinence care quality defined as the improve
131 emorrhage (p=0.014), dysphagia (p=0.003) and urinary incontinence/catheterisation (p=0.000) were at h
132 ms such as mood changes, sleep disturbances, urinary incontinence, cognitive changes, somatic complai
134 al hormone administration increased rates of urinary incontinence compared with placebo in most RCTs
135 r muscle training alone resolved or improved urinary incontinence compared with regular care, althoug
136 the pharmacological treatment of male stress urinary incontinence, confirming that duloxetine had a m
137 al tape is the foremost technique for stress urinary incontinence correction, many of the newer modal
141 e from baseline mean number of daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months, was measure
142 loss reduced the frequency of self-reported urinary-incontinence episodes among overweight and obese
143 overweight and obese women with at least 10 urinary-incontinence episodes per week to an intensive 6
144 we recorded 24 cases of post-repair residual urinary incontinence, equivalent to a cumulative inciden
145 ics in the preoperative assessment of stress urinary incontinence, especially at this time of rapid c
146 cantly higher prevalence of hearing trouble, urinary incontinence, falls, depression, and osteoporosi
148 systemic or pulmonary arterial hypertension, urinary incontinence, gastrointestinal and neuropsychiat
149 he recommendations made by the Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Guidelines Panel summary report.
152 The use of slings to treat female stress urinary incontinence has had resurgence with new surgica
154 re known to be effective in stress and mixed urinary incontinence, has demonstrated that this therapy
156 new drug treatments and surgical devices for urinary incontinence have had mixed results; direct-to-c
157 < .0001) domains among BT patients, whereas urinary incontinence HRQOL worsened for both the BT (P =
158 s outcomes in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence illustrate many of the current prob
160 n 96%, falls in 76%, pyramidal signs in 54%, urinary incontinence in 50% and dementia in 39%.Visual h
161 ctors associated with prevalent and incident urinary incontinence in a diverse cohort of midlife wome
165 sed successfully for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in both male and female patients.
169 re are excellent options for managing stress urinary incontinence in men, and recent data have allowe
172 studies demonstrate that surgery for stress urinary incontinence in older women improves symptoms, a
175 often describe the impact of both fecal and urinary incontinence in terms of shame and embarrassment
176 -years at risk (95% confidence interval) for urinary incontinence in the dementia cohort, among men a
177 lation has been approved for use in treating urinary incontinence in the United States since 1997, an
178 pproach to the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women and marked a resurgence in
179 dence base for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women between July 2006 and Dece
182 rgan prolapse decreases postoperative stress urinary incontinence in women without preoperative sympt
186 ave also examined risk factors and impact of urinary incontinence, including lifestyle, comorbidities
198 y evidence for treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence is lacking, as are clear diagnostic
203 exciting area in pharmacologic treatment of urinary incontinence is the method of drug delivery.
204 tinence, a condition of both stress and urge urinary incontinence, is prevalent in 20% to 36% of wome
205 , or both (LR range, 2.2-2.8), and new-onset urinary incontinence (LR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.8-7.6) increase
209 ry outcomes were success in terms of overall urinary-incontinence measures, which required a negative
210 advocated as first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence; midurethral-sling surgery is gener
211 fter vaginal surgery for prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, neither ULS nor SSLF was significa
215 tocele (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.3-19), and stress urinary incontinence (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-6.5), but not
216 ailure (symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, urinary incontinence, or both) at diagnosis (n=62) had a
217 bstantial number of epidemiologic studies of urinary incontinence over the past two decades, relative
219 generation has shown promise in adult stress urinary incontinence patients, but its applicability to
220 nce who had five or more episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per 3-day period, as recorded in a
221 on from baseline in mean episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the 6-month period, as
222 The mean reduction in episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the course of 6 months
224 omen with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence, preoperative office evaluation alo
225 t, are less dramatic than those reported for urinary incontinence, primarily because of constipation.
227 nence due to overactive bladder or to stress urinary incontinence published in peer-reviewed journals
228 omes included complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence, quality of life, use of catheters,
229 Proper diagnosis and evaluation of stress urinary incontinence remains paramount in preventing sur
232 anded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary incontinence scores were similar at baseline as
233 ders such as overactive bladder syndrome and urinary incontinence significantly increase with age.
234 factors in the pathophysiology of fecal and urinary incontinence so as to identify modifiable risk f
235 actors have been found to be associated with urinary incontinence, some of which are amenable to modi
236 appropriate interventions, since a change in urinary incontinence status can reflect care quality in
237 eviation (0.19) in the RN ratio, the odds of urinary incontinence status improvement or maintenance o
238 e care quality defined as the improvement of urinary incontinence status or maintenance of continent
240 ctive parameters in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence, such as questionnaires, pad test,
241 logy in a preclinical canine model of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and no measurable functional
242 etic slings for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has increased over the last d
243 elvic organ prolapse (POP) repair and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) to augment and strengthen wea
245 ncluding pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (U
249 ts from randomized trials focusing on stress urinary incontinence surgery in older women are needed.
250 review recently published studies on stress urinary incontinence surgery outcomes in older women.
251 ical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence than EBRT (-18.0 points; 95% CI, -2
252 th a greater decrease in sexual function and urinary incontinence than either EBRT or active surveill
253 going prostatectomy were more likely to have urinary incontinence than were those undergoing radiothe
254 table urinary incontinence can be applied to urinary incontinence that cannot be managed using conven
255 n, a significant portion of whom report urge urinary incontinence that is inadequately treated with f
256 serious neurologic disease) associated with urinary incontinence, the clinician should initiate unsu
260 s of care have not changed significantly for urinary incontinence, there have been recent advances wi
261 erence "Advancing the Treatment of Fecal and Urinary Incontinence Through Research" had as one of its
262 omen with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence to compare outcomes after preoperat
264 is lacking regarding the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence, treatment generally begins with co
265 levance: Among women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence, treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA
266 testing enhances surgical outcome of stress urinary incontinence treatments by improving case select
269 aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of stroke; urinary incontinence (UI) as defined by the Internationa
271 ht loss involving diet modification improves urinary incontinence (UI) in women, but little is known
273 Although pregnancy is a risk factor for urinary incontinence (UI), the extent of UI in nulligrav
276 OP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and hernias, are not well un
277 Common issues for these patients include urinary incontinence, vaginal stenosis, clitoral pain, a
278 rate ratio for pharmacological treatment of urinary incontinence was 2.2 (1.4-3.7) for both genders,
279 e adjusted rate ratio for first diagnosis of urinary incontinence was 3.2 (2.7-3.7) in men and 2.7 (2
280 th active surveillance at 3 months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostat
281 reat both apical vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence was conducted between 2008 and 2013
286 heart failure, coronary artery disease, and urinary incontinence were associated with an increased r
289 e-control study, urinary catheterization and urinary incontinence were the only factors associated wi
290 nce abuse, pain (spinal and peripheral), and urinary incontinence, whereas NOP antagonists have been
291 rial involving women with idiopathic urgency urinary incontinence who had five or more episodes of ur
292 ine the prevalence and etiology of fecal and urinary incontinence will need to first define these con
293 ropubic urethropexies, and for managing urge urinary incontinence with anticholinergic medications.
294 level 1 evidence in the management of stress urinary incontinence with multicentric randomized contro
295 high-quality (level 1) evidence for treating urinary incontinence with weight loss, for treating stre
296 0.11 [CI, 0.07 to 0.14]) but did not resolve urinary incontinence, with no significant dose-response
298 role of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence, with particular reference to the c
300 77% of women residing in nursing homes have urinary incontinence, yet only 25% seek or receive treat
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。