ライフサイエンスコーパス: urinary retention

1 ORT: A 50-year-old male presented with acute urinary retention.

2 dulla was responsible for the development of urinary retention.

3 showed signs of unbalanced hesitant walk and urinary retention.

4 lure, pneumonia, anastomotic leak, ileus, or urinary retention.

5 ess in the understanding of the causation of urinary retention.

6 Another patient had urinary retention.

7 was associated with asymmetric weakness and urinary retention.

8 d injury and also treat LUT symptoms such as urinary retention.

9 f concerns that they may predispose to acute urinary retention.

10 urinary flow rate, prostate volume, or acute urinary retention.

11 hyperplasia and the associated risk of acute urinary retention.

12 rly effective in the treatment of women with urinary retention.

13 or painful distention of the bladder due to urinary retention.

14 g are effective in relieving obstruction and urinary retention.

15 a feeling of incomplete bladder emptying and urinary retention.

16 d lethality correlated with severe fecal and urinary retention.

17 e, and reduces the risk of surgery and acute urinary retention.

18 resulted in a reduction in the rate of acute urinary retention (1.6% vs. 6.7%, a 77.3% relative reduc

19 Seven minor complications were urinary retention (4), transient brachial plexus injury,

20 er operation, the avulsed group demonstrated urinary retention, absence of bladder contractions and e

21 The risk of urinary tract infection and urinary retention after chemodenervation of the bladder

22 espiratory failure, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, anastomotic leak, and postoperative i

23 nstrated a milder phenotype with evidence of urinary retention and gastrointestinal dysmotility.

24 our understanding of the pathophysiology of urinary retention and incontinence where sensory feedbac

25 nary tract symptoms (LUTS) may lead to acute urinary retention and need for BPH-related surgery.

26 have all been linked to progression to acute urinary retention and need for surgery.

27 re post-MUS and pelvic organ prolapse repair urinary retention and obstruction, and urinary retention

28 has a role in the treatment of nonobstructed urinary retention and overactive bladder syndrome, espec

29 n but can cause urological disease including urinary retention and prostatitis.

30 The risks of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy were

31 de alone reduced the long-term risk of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy.

32 continence but had higher rates of transient urinary retention and urinary tract infections.

33 , one man was admitted to hospital for acute urinary retention, and another had stricture interventio

34 the risk of arterial hypotension, pruritus, urinary retention, and motor blockade.

35 adder, resulting in bladder hyperdistension, urinary retention, and overflow incontinence.

36 Rates of hematoma, infection, urinary retention, and recurrence were not different bet

37 e effects were those of pilomotor reactions, urinary retention, and supine hypertension.

38 Such outcomes include hypotension, acute urinary retention, and the neuroleptic malignant syndrom

39 se, prior history of urogynecologic surgery, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence.

40 ceration, paralytic ileus, pain, presyncope, urinary retention, and vomiting) and one patient had a g

41 Voiding difficulty and acute urinary retention are infrequently reported across all s

42 ical finding that both urge incontinence and urinary retention are responsive to this intervention.

43 taking anabolic steroids who presented with urinary retention, arthralgias, and peripheral edema, su

44 ely recruited 10 patients who presented with urinary retention as a neurological deficit that was att

45 Recognition of fever and urinary retention as prodromes of irreversible paraplegi

46 obstruction runs the risk of inducing acute urinary retention, because of the inhibitory effect of a

47 current urinary tract infections, refractory urinary retention, bladder stones, or renal insufficienc

48 tients presented with prodromes of fever and urinary retention, but were misdiagnosed by physicians o

49 or complications (such as bladder stones or urinary retention) develop.

50 Acute urinary retention developed in 99 men (7 percent) in the

51 Urinary retention developed mainly when the lesions invo

52 elop transient gastrointestinal dysmotility, urinary retention, dilated pupils, reduced heart rate va

53 of sling takedown in the management of acute urinary retention following MUS procedures.

54 emergency department with a history of acute urinary retention, gross hematuria, and left flank pain

55 rred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%.

56 The risk of urinary retention in a future pregnancy after mid-urethr

57 ostoperative bowel obstruction and 1 case of urinary retention in the LA group.

58 rved: 1 intraabdominal abscess and 1 case of urinary retention in the TVA group; 1 early postoperativ

59 address cause, diagnosis, and management of urinary retention in women.

60 This article describes a specific cause of urinary retention in young women, associated with a fail

61 s a description of the condition of isolated urinary retention in young women.

62 ces was assessed in 299 scenarios, including urinary retention, incontinence, wounds, urine volume me

63 ch as motor weakness, difficulty ambulating, urinary retention, increased nausea and vomiting, may de

64 eed for surgery and the development of acute urinary retention, is not known.

65 re not associated with a substantial risk of urinary retention nor with a substantial increase in res

66 aused by neuropathy or nerve damage, such as urinary retention or incontinence, as well as for the de

67 d flow rates, and reducing the risk of acute urinary retention or the requirement for benign prostati

68 Serious adverse events such as infection, urinary retention, or dyspareunia or other pain, excludi

69 ions, including spinal or epidural hematoma, urinary retention, or hemodynamic alterations, are advan

70 ficantly increased risk of repair breakdown, urinary retention, or residual incontinence up to 3 mont

71 epair urinary retention and obstruction, and urinary retention owing to detrusor underactivity.

72 The incidence of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization was low (tol

73 ransient difficulty falling asleep, and mild urinary retention (requiring early morning voiding).

74 contrast, the implanted group showed reduced urinary retention, return of reflexive bladder voiding c

75 tension (RR, 1.91 [CI, 1.60 to 2.28]), acute urinary retention (RR, 1.98 [CI, 1.63 to 2.40]), and all

76 re conversion), postoperative complications (urinary retention, seroma), and need for overnight stay

77 rostatic hyperplasia, the incidence of acute urinary retention, the impact of therapy on the risk of

78 1%] in the active surveillance group), acute urinary retention (three [2%] vs one [<1%]) and erectile

79 treated with HAL), two in the HAL group had urinary retention, two in the HAL group had vasovagal up

80 toms for all types of sling erosions include urinary retention, urge and mixed incontinence, but synt

81 Urological Association symptom score, acute urinary retention, urinary incontinence, renal insuffici

82 ology, dysfunctional voiding patterns, acute urinary retention, urine collection techniques, diagnosi

83 but are not limited to voiding dysfunction, urinary retention, vaginal extrusion and urinary tract e

84 Acute urinary retention was a predictor of lower IPSS after PA

85 Acute urinary retention was assessed through review of communi

86 s were not significantly affected, and acute urinary retention was rare.

87 ilateral PAE, lower baseline IPSS, and acute urinary retention were predictors of better clinical out