戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  in the anophthalmic group (P = .003), while urological abnormalities were particularly seen in the O
2 ancy-related factors, gynecological factors, urological and gastrointestinal tract factors, comorbid
3 ly neurological, musculoskeletal and facial, urological and genital, or cardiac.
4                  The disorder is a dangerous urological and hematological emergency since it is assoc
5 Vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) is the commonest urological anomaly in children.
6 rehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for surv
7  tract symptom questionnaire of the American Urological Association (n = 1934); non-cases were men wh
8 he European Association of Urology, American Urological Association and National Institute of Clinica
9 he 2003 and 2004 proceedings of the American Urological Association as well as published literature f
10     The guidelines presented by the American Urological Association give a formal framework for the m
11 we suggest modifications to the new American Urological Association guidelines based on the authors'
12 Francisco Matching Program, and the American Urological Association Matching Program from 1996 to 200
13 ancer Prevention Committee, and the American Urological Association Practice Guidelines Committee joi
14                   Subsequently, the American Urological Association recommended beginning screening a
15    Patients were grouped by age per American Urological Association screening guidelines: group 1, pa
16              Twenty-eight tumors of American Urological Association stages B and C were selected for
17 s were changes in the scores on the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) and the max
18 ry flow rate of at least 4 mL/s, an American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) score of be
19 ymptom severity was assessed by the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI), and peak u
20 t questionnaires they completed the American Urological Association symptom index (AUASI).
21 symptom questions modified from the American Urological Association symptom index in 1992 and 1994 (n
22 te and who scored 0-7 points on the American Urological Association symptom index on all questionnair
23 f moderate/severe urinary symptoms (American Urological Association Symptom Index score >7), low maxi
24                            The mean American Urological Association Symptom Index score was well belo
25        Components of BPH, including American Urological Association Symptom Index scores, peak urinar
26 r progression of BPH as measured by American Urological Association Symptom Index scores, peak urinar
27 evere LUTS (> or = 15 points on the American Urological Association symptom index) on any study quest
28 se line of at least 4 points in the American Urological Association symptom score, acute urinary rete
29                                     American Urological Association symptom scores and peak urinary-f
30 rved clinical examination data, the American Urological Association Symptoms Score showed a surprisin
31  Medicine, American Cancer Society, American Urological Association, and U.S. Preventive Services Tas
32 astroenterological Association, and American Urological Association.
33 of T1 renal masses put forth by the American Urological Association.
34 ional Cancer Center Network and the European Urological Association.
35 ll carcinoma (RCC), the third most prevalent urological cancer, claims more than 100,000 lives/year w
36 Immunotherapies have long been used to treat urological cancers but rarely lead to cure.
37 implications between tissue-oriented domains.Urological cancers have disparate tissues and cells of o
38 nsive molecular characterization to classify urological cancers into nine major genomic subtypes, hig
39                Despite major advances in the urological care of spinal cord injury patients, the inci
40  recent years, although it is plain that the urological community is still divided regarding their us
41 outcomes and increased popularity within the urological community.
42 semination over the past few years in the US urological community.
43 evere irritative symptoms or the presence of urological comorbidity, such as bladder stones, increase
44 he same organism associated with significant urological comorbidity.
45 led for the potential confounders sex, age, (urological) comorbidity, febrile UTI, and intensive care
46        Ureteric stricture is the most common urological complication following renal transplantation.
47 abetic bladder dysfunction (DBD) is a common urological complication of diabetes.
48 ent placement in children in this era of low urological complication rates and BKVAN needs reevaluati
49 sed, but associated with a high incidence of urological complications (acidosis, dehydration, pancrea
50                                        Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplanta
51 .39-0.80; p = 0.001) for the total number of urological complications 0.56 (CI 0.41-0.76; p < 0.001)
52                                              Urological complications and polyoma infection were the
53                                              Urological complications are still a major problem posto
54 neocystostomy for having a smaller amount of urological complications in kidney transplantation.
55 ons, including events such as lymphocele and urological complications that affect wound healing, are
56 ncidence of posttransplantation vascular and urological complications, long-term graft survival after
57                                              Urological complications, namely ureteral leak and obstr
58 nting in renal transplantation reduces major urological complications; however, morbidity is related
59  infrequently seen and challenging pediatric urological condition that in addition to causing obstruc
60 lthy volunteers, and 13 patients with benign urological conditions).
61 tions in DSTYK were implicated in congenital urological developmental disorders, but our study identi
62                                       Recent urological developments focus on modification of techniq
63 -jet flows, and apply this to the problem of urological diagnosis in this first ever study of the bio
64 d forms of CA, are less common but can cause urological disease including urinary retention and prost
65  intraoperative imaging in the management of urological diseases.
66 ma in a large group of patients with various urological disorders could be used in the diagnosis of o
67 in the surgical management of six paediatric urological disorders.
68 iosis, developmental delay and pulmonary and urological dysfunctions.
69 ificial sweeteners in bladder sensations and urological function.
70 ciprocal communication between the brain and urological, gastrointestinal, and immune systems.
71 ee groups (1:1:1; stratified by tumour site [urological, gynaecological, or gastrointestinal], and de
72 we recommend that only patients with a prior urological history should undergo this costly and often
73  VCUG studies to those patients with a prior urological history would have resulted in a significant
74 nly 56 of 517 patients evaluated had a prior urological history.
75 ast 10 years, we have seen major advances in urological imaging including developments in digital ima
76               Management often involves endo-urological interventions and open surgery.
77 herapeutic gain, are well exemplified by the urological malignancies of renal, bladder, prostate, and
78 vestigating autologous cellular therapies in urological malignancies.
79 l cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most deadly of urological malignancies.
80 emission tomography scanning with regards to urological malignancy.
81 highlighting recent advances with respect to urological minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
82                                   In current urological oncology, HIFU is used clinically in the trea
83 ymptoms or complications need referral for a urological opinion to determine the need for further inv
84 ars who underwent elective general surgical, urological, or orthopedic procedures (N = 211,202).
85 ews the different approaches used by leading urological organizations to the development of prostate
86  of patients with prostate cancer by leading urological organizations.
87 by tumor cells were blindly evaluated by two urological pathologists, and outcome analyses were condu
88 published based on a consensus conference of urological pathologists.
89                 The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has recently adopted a progn
90                      The risk of significant urological pathology increases with the severity of pren
91 nificantly enhanced at later stages when the urological phenotype is severe, and the mutant bladders
92 g the potential application of proteomics in urological practice, and the future direction of proteom
93 trials cannot always be generalized to daily urological practice, it is important to complement them
94           Although well described in general urological practice, there is comparatively little resea
95 logy that is shifting from the laboratory to urological practice.
96 scribed adjuncts to many aspects of clinical urological practice.
97                  Despite variation in common urological practices between spinal cord injury units an
98                     Urolithiasis is a common urological problem, often requiring efficient workup, ac
99 nction was noted in 3 of 14 patients, but no urological problems occurred.
100   The samples associated with drug toxicity, urological problems, or recurrence of primary disease we
101 pen surgery for commonly performed pediatric urological procedures such as pyeloplasty, ureteral reim
102 iotic treatment only for patients undergoing urological procedures that lead to mucosal bleeding, cat
103 tial number of reports on performing complex urological procedures with robotic assistance in humans
104 ergoing a variety of thoracic, abdominal and urological procedures.
105 tolerated and advantageous in reconstructive urological procedures.
106 o the armamentarium for performing different urological procedures.
107                                              Urological prostheses have been available and widely use
108 e sites (Carcinoma of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor, Center for Prostate Diseas
109 , and their true efficacy and utility in the urological setting has not been determined.
110 stems such as the gastrointestinal tract and urological structures.
111                                         Many urological studies rely on models of animals, such as ra
112                                   Paediatric urological surgery is often required for managing congen
113 aroscopy and robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery on the lower urinary tract.
114 ng the use of PROMs following reconstructive urological surgery.
115 pread in the diagnostic evaluation of common urological symptoms, the planning of surgery and the tra
116 , is a commonly diagnosed and poorly treated urological syndrome.
117 omography scanning is capable of visualizing urological tumours and associated lymph nodes and distal

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top