ライフサイエンスコーパス: urologist

1 nical management challenges to the pediatric urologist.

2 s of a very experienced endoscopic pediatric urologist.

3 tients can be a challenge for the practising urologist.

4 cant number of visits to a medical doctor or urologist.

5 still presents a challenging problem for the urologist.

6 cancer varies by the characteristics of the urologist.

7 imilar which may be attractive to practising urologists.

8 nvestigated the billing practices of several urologists.

9 identified from referral-based practices of urologists.

10 has become the treatment of choice for most urologists.

11 re and bring it within the grasp of ordinary urologists.

12 anning of surgery and the training of future urologists.

13 cele continue to be a management dilemma for urologists.

14 urinary tract and was practiced primarily by urologists.

15 are numerous datasets available to pediatric urologists.

16 creasing urologist density) relative to zero urologists.

17 nasteride as a chemopreventive agent by most urologists.

18 syndrome is within the scope and training of urologists.

19 rection is a topic of relevance to pediatric urologists.

20 ciated with counties that had more than zero urologists (16% to 22% reduction for prostate cancer, 17

21 These new surgical enhancements will give urologists a greater choice in the surgical management o

22 he study included a representative sample of urologists across practice settings and nationally repre

23 34-week randomized trial enrolled practicing urologists across the globe.

24 effective therapies that would persuade most urologists actively to screen for and treat patients who

25 Practicing, experienced urologists, after the US Food and Drug Administration ap

26 Change in median biopsy and RP volume per urologist and national procedural volume.

27 etail the different options available to the urologist and we highlight a treatment algorithm that we

28 One-hundred sixty urologists and 320 urology residents were randomized to

29 The ISE program was completed by 71% urologists and 83% residents.

30 ikingly variable use of observation among US urologists and establishes a framework for the use of ur

31 hat is rapidly gaining popularity among both urologists and gynecologists.

32 tigations resulted in guilty pleas from both urologists and industry employees relative to the Prescr

33 nt of bladder cancer remains a challenge for urologists and oncologists.

34 le manner, is attracting more attention from urologists and parents alike.

35 Based on this study, while urologists and radiation oncologists do agree on a varie

36 s of renal masses is now more commonplace as urologists and radiologists become familiar with its ind

37 which is gathering a growing interest among urologists and radiologists.

38 sexual function in men is important to both urologists and their patients, and is the focus of this

39 Participants were enrolled by urologists and urogynecologists at academic medical cent

40 ts, endocrinologists, nurse practitioners, a urologist, and a radiation oncologist, is responsible fo

41 disease pose a significant challenge to the urologist, and possibly as a consequence, the literature

42 mary care physicians to medical oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists.

43 wo of the most common problems presenting to urologists are benign prostatic hyperplasia and sexual d

44 Urologists are faced with difficult management decisions

45 Urologists are increasingly managing urinary incontinenc

46 This has led to the belief that urologists are overdetecting and overtreating clinically

47 rded if they do not add significantly to the urologists' armamentarium.

48 e condition is predominantly assessed by the urologist as a consequence of incontinence surgery.

49 We used urologists as a test case because they are the first car

50 Urologists aspiring to best clinical practice should enc

51 fect, and severe postoperative dysuria, many urologists became disinterested in this procedure.

52 rtunity for the involvement of the pediatric urologist because of the high incidence of associated ur

53 Two urologists blinded to the clinical outcome in these pati

54 Urologists can play an integral role in affecting the pa

55 characteristics, tumor characteristics, and urologist characteristics (eg, board certification, acad

56 linked database, we examined how individual urologist characteristics influenced the use of androgen

57 a more than 10-year life expectancy, 93% of urologists chose radical prostatectomy as the preferred

58 Urologists continue to strive towards improved kidney fu

59 Urologists currently have multiple tools to aid in the m

60 STF recommendation, median biopsy volume per urologist decreased from 29 to 21 (interquartile range [

61 USPSTF recommendation, median RP volume per urologist decreased from 7 (IQR, 3-15) to 6 (IQR, 2-12)

62 logic cancers in that county, but increasing urologist density does not yield further improvements.

63 dy was to determine the effect of increasing urologist density on local prostate, bladder, and kidney

64 reduction for kidney cancer with increasing urologist density) relative to zero urologists.

65 ancer mortality, controlling for categorized urologist density, county demographics, socioeconomic fa

66 clinic staffed by a pediatric nephrologist, urologist, dietitian, and clinical nurse.

67 and the other comprising non-self-referring urologists employed at 11 National Comprehensive Cancer

68 a PSA above 4 ng/ml should be referred to a urologist for further discussion of the risks and benefi

69 techniques have been increasingly adopted by urologists for reconstruction of the upper urinary tract

70 This has been recognized by urologists for years; it is a new concept in the gynecol

71 on the urinary tract and worked closely with urologists forged major advances in urinary tract imagin

72 dural volumes of certifying and recertifying urologists from 2009 through 2016 were evaluated for var

73 ical techniques and materials will allow the urologist greater treatment options.

74 ected; therefore many specialists, including urologists, gynaecologists, geriatricians, paediatrician

75 e evaluation and treatment of such patients, urologists have applied a system of staging paradigms an

76 Urologists have requested more imaging studies than expe

77 iation oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, urologists, hematologists, pediatric oncologists, and su

78 my; procurement by transplant surgeon versus urologist; history of previous renal transplantations; t

79 ciated with more complications compared with urologists (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.83-1.08]; P = .38).

80 f renal cell carcinoma and should assist the urologist in educating affected patients as well as prov

81 s paper reviews the options available to the urologist in the treatment of ureteric colic as well as

82 s in different types of stones may guide the urologist in treating stones and may lead to further res

83 iterature provides information that will aid urologists in (1) minimizing the need for disfiguring tr

84 The rate of IMRT use by self-referring urologists in private practice increased from 13.1 to 32

85 with Klinefelter syndrome seen by practicing urologists in the near future.

86 Ureteral stents have assisted urologists in the performance of surgery of the urinary

87 At the dawn of the 20th century, urologists in the United States and around the world qui

88 treatment options as confirmed by surveys of urologists in the USA and the Netherlands.

89 eviously have reported wide variations among urologists in the use of androgen deprivation for prosta

90 The urologist involved in the management of genitourinary tr

91 evidence to suggest the favorable effect of urologist involvement in tobacco cessation.

92 Finally, initial access obtained by the urologist is associated with less bleeding and higher st

93 The presence of a urologist is associated with lower mortality for urologi

94 It is important, therefore, that urologists keep abreast of the new technologies, their l

95 and high-risk disease were correlated at the urologist level (Spearman rho = 0.17; P < .001).

96 e variation in the use of observation at the urologist level by disease risk strata and to evaluate t

97 ts with prostate cancer is correlated at the urologist level.

98 27.8%; range, 5.1%-71.2%) at the individual urologist level.

99 and to evaluate the association between the urologist-level rates of observation for men with low-ri

100 s and establishes a framework for the use of urologist-level treatment signatures as a quality measur

101 However, few studies have examined the urologist-level variation in the use of observation acro

102 Considerable urologist-level variation is seen in the use of observat

103 Considerably less urologist-level variation was seen in the use of observa

104 ement in endourologic skills among pediatric urologists make endoscopic treatment of pediatric urolit

105 guidelines from the European Association of Urologists make no mention of the possible therapeutic r

106 Follow-up consisted of a visit to the urologist, measurement of prostate-specific antigen leve

107 As such, the urologist must be actively involved in tract placement.

108 Urologists must provide patients with up-to-date informa

109 fessionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], coordinators [n = 7], social worker

110 Urologists need to be cognizant of these associations as

111 hat an exciting tool this represents for the urologist not only in terms of qualitative and quantitat

112 sion for having at least one board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR], 9.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 45.0), a

113 ontrolled trials conducted by secondary care urologists on selected populations of patients, who are

114 n the work-up of renal masses, an area where urologists once held forth.

115 alyses answered the 3IQ questionnaire, and a urologist or urogynecologist who was blinded to the resp

116 Ts often are treated by medical oncologists, urologists, or gynecologic oncologists.

117 pment of KTP laser technology and its use by urologists over the years and describe why its physical

118 'reconstructive ladder' has served to guide urologists over the years.

119 However, increasing density greater than two urologists per 100,000 people had no statistically signi

120 One experienced urologist performed all US examinations that were then d

121 en pediatric urology specialists and general urologist performing the same operation; within a health

122 the American Board of Urology and identified urologists performing at least 1 prostate biopsy (n = 51

123 the frequency of imaging is dictated by the urologist preference.

124 agnosis and management of prostate cancer by urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologis

125 pite this growing evidence on effectiveness, urologists rarely recommend conservative treatment to pa

126 The reporting of individual urologist rates of observation for localized prostate ca

127 ans in the United States, who were listed as urologists (response rate 64%, n=504) and radiation onco

128 ician-patient visits in the practices of 339 urologists, rheumatologists, and general internists.

129 h focal therapy as an important asset in the urologist's armamentarium against prostate cancer.

130 zable segments are a substantial part of the urologist's armamentarium for providing bladder drainage

131 omy continues to be an important part of the urologist's armamentarium.

132 me being it remains an essential part of the urologist's armamentarium.

133 Urologists serve as the primary and most influential phy

134 Urologists should be familiar with currently available i

135 All urologists should have a working knowledge of these adju

136 Practicing urologists should seek to become involved in the evidenc

137 A case review by a board-certified urologist suggested they could be IC.

138 Among non-self-referring urologists, the rate of IMRT use increased from 14.3 to

139 This will aid the ability of the urologist to tailor the therapy necessary for each indiv

140 These interventions have enabled the urologist to treat a problem whose management was once l

141 aphy, it has become a logical choice for the urologist to use the technique as a diagnostic tool for

142 pair and is now considered by many pediatric urologists to be the best approach for midshaft and dist

143 r urinary tract dysfunction is important for urologists to diagnose these conditions or initiate an a

144 In order for urologists to optimize their care of patients, there is

145 Fusion of MRI with ultrasound allows urologists to progress from blind, systematic biopsies t

146 ient populations have allowed reconstructive urologists to remain committed to rehabilitating the low

147 Allowing urologists to self-refer for IMRT may contribute to incr

148 One uncooperative urologist was found guilty of violating the Federal Fals

149 as a risk factor for bladder cancer when the urologist was the source of their understanding.

150 adder cancer diagnosis and the advice of the urologist were the reasons cited most often for cessatio

151 en with prostate cancer with 1884 diagnosing urologists were identified.

152 ar procedures performed by gynecologists and urologists were partially corrected in 1997; however, se

153 Patients of non-academically affiliated urologists were significantly more likely to receive pri

154 Urologists who acquired ownership of IMRT services incre

155 fines and restitution to the government for urologists who cooperated with federal investigations.

156 ed their use of IMRT substantially more than urologists who did not own such services.

157 92, through December 31, 2002, and the 2,080 urologists who provided care to them.

158 Urologists who use radiographic imaging in the care of t

159 As urologists will continue to rely on percutaneous nephrol

160 In light of these findings, pediatric urologists will need to reexamine treatment modalities f

161 is review is aimed to provide the practicing urologist with an important source of clinically relevan

162 opic and laparoscopic techniques provide the urologist with the best opportunity to individualize tre

163 g affected patients as well as providing the urologist with the current evidenced-based data regardin

164 able correlation was likewise observed among urologists with high-volume prostate cancer practices (S

165 a substantial number of men still present to urologists with locally advanced or metastatic disease.

166 iliation and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.85) for urologists with minor versus major academic affiliations

167 context were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.16) for urologists with no academic affiliation and 1.45 (95% CI

168 urve, reported to be less than five cases in urologists, with previous transurethral resection experi

169 ility of observation was calculated for each urologist within each risk stratum, and the association

170 s significantly greater for patients who saw urologists without an academic affiliation.

171 , an ear, nose, and throat specialist, and a urologist; women were systematically seen by a gynecolog

172 The rate of IMRT use by urologists working at National Comprehensive Cancer Netw

173 first or second-line therapy for practicing urologists would be well accepted.

174 e percent of radiation oncologists vs 16% of urologists would recommend routine prostate-specific ant

175 ed whether or not knowledgeable in the field urologists would use gene transfer in their patients onc