ライフサイエンスコーパス: urology

1 view of reconstructive robotic procedures in urology.

2 n laparoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in urology.

3 f neurology, psychiatry, cardiology and even urology.

4 engineering and their relevance to pediatric urology.

5 re those most appropriate for sealant use in urology.

6 help individualize patient care for surgical urology.

7 be translated into the advanced practice of urology.

8 gonist therapy within the field of pediatric urology.

9 ting and controversial subjects in pediatric urology.

10 orthopaedics, otolaryngology, robotics, and urology.

11 ureteral stents and the future of stents in urology.

12 to various applications within the field of urology.

13 riety of surgical interventions in pediatric urology.

14 e advocated for clinical use in the field of urology.

15 urosurgery (7.0%), critical care (6.0%), and urology (2.8%); 1.9% did not report a departmental affil

16 aried by surgical specialty: general, 12.5%; urology, 9.0%; neurosurgery, 10.5%; orthopedic, 9.6%; ot

17 izations such as the European Association of Urology, American Urologic Association, International Co

18 e conclusions of the European Association of Urology, American Urological Association and National In

19 nt literature of biomarkers within pediatric urology and discusses future perspectives and directions

20 erative case logs from the American Board of Urology and identified urologists performing at least 1

21 rative research group from the Department of Urology and the Automation & Robotics Research Institute

22 escribes the evolution of virtual reality in urology and the milestones of its current clinical use.

23 cond most common in the other 2 specialties (urology and thoracic).

24 al surgery, 6 at obstetrics-gynecology, 2 at urology, and 1 at otolaryngology.

25 specialties were examined: general surgery, urology, and plastic surgery.

26 lopment and application of pediatric robotic urology are currently manifesting themselves with a rapi

27 h the goal of adding these techniques to the urology armamentarium.

28 Recently published American Urology Association Best Practice Guidelines identify pr

29 tract symptoms is not suggested by American Urology Association guidelines; however, European Associ

30 alized prostate cancer, in the Department of Urology at the Mayo Clinic during 1966-95; 4,288 men res

31 nd awareness is increasing in reconstructive urology but more work is required to demonstrate the eff

32 max = 0.21, P < 0.001) and American Board of Urology certification (d = 0.10, P = 0.033) but not by r

33 ndergoing radical prostatectomy and 170 male urology clinic controls with no history of cancer.

34 13 was performed at a Veterans Affairs-based urology clinic in Brooklyn, New York, among 104 adult me

35 An elderly male was seen at an outpatient urology clinic over a period of 3 years with repeat urin

36 ents from 22 community practice and academic urology clinic sites in the United States.

37 ultiple-choice questions and explanations on urology clinical guidelines.

38 nd, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 95 urology clinics in the United States involving men 40 ye

39 n in academic and community-based ambulatory urology clinics.

40 ancer (n = 35), recruited from 2 New England urology clinics.

41 es or procedures in the same specialty area (urology) could translate into better outcomes after majo

42 ed 48 ISE items (questions and answers) on 5 urology CPGs (hematuria and priapism [HP]; staghorn calc

43 an increasing use of this technique in more urology departments in the future.

44 d UTI, hospitalized at internal medicine and urology departments of 19 university and nonuniversity D

45 nstructive, obstetric fistula, neurosurgery, urology, ENT, craniofacial, burn, and general surgery) t

46 s departments (general surgery, orthopedics, urology, etc), race, or age.

47 paroscopic approaches to orthopedic surgery, urology, general surgery, and thoracic surgery, it now i

48 Some urology groups have integrated intensity-modulated radia

49 wo samples: one comprising 35 self-referring urology groups in private practice and a matched control

50 ntrol group comprising 35 non-self-referring urology groups in private practice, and the other compri

51 twork centers matched with 11 self-referring urology groups in private practice.

52 e points among the 11 matched self-referring urology groups.

53 mmendations from the European Association of Urology guideline on MIBC and metastatic bladder cancer,

54 vic reconstructive surgeons in the fields of urology, gynecology and urogynecology have continually a

55 gement strategies from multiple specialties (urology, gynecology, pain medicine, gastroenterology, co

56 The field of urology has been beset by several major trends that have

57 olution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limited by the challenge of laparoscopi

58 Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology has gained immense popularity with the daVinci s

59 Urology has recently seen a shift toward continent diver

60 Over the past 5 years, urology has witnessed the proliferation of minimally inv

61 ng and new emerging frontier in the field of urology, has tremendous potential to progress in the fut

62 sisted surgeries in both general surgery and urology have been performed with technical success to da

63 Laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology is beginning to accelerate in its application an

64 The laparoscopic approach in urology is now an accepted option for kidney, adrenal, a

65 formed with the da Vinci system in pediatric urology is pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstru

66 Minimally invasive urology is rapidly advancing, and single-site laparoscop

67 ms, particularly in the fields of radiology, urology, laboratory medicine and cardiology.

68 ience and professions - continence advisors, urology, multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury

69 y, obstetrics/gynecology, ophthalmology, and urology (n = 186).

70 d including medicine for older people (n=4), urology (n=1) and orthopaedics (n=1).

71 esents 9 surgical specialty groups: general, urology, neurosurgery, orthopedic, otolaryngology, plast

72 Within pediatric urology, numerous markers for renal obstruction [uretero

73 m nearly all pediatric specialties including urology, oncology, cardiology, gastroenterology, and ort

74 smaller programs; this was not the case for urology or plastic surgery programs.

75 imaging diagnostics has expanded to include urology, otolaryngology, and neonatal evaluation.

76 Rates could only be ascertained in 52% of urology patients and 47% of gynecology patients because

77 Studies from the field of pediatric urology, pediatric general surgery and pediatric neurosu

78 In the field of urology, positron emission tomography has been evaluated

79 sions, excluding those related to pregnancy, urology procedures, and with lengths of stay >30 days.

80 Operative volume increased in urology programs.

81 ology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology ranged from $954 to $6980, and median payments i

82 guidelines; however, European Association of Urology recommends the assessment of the upper urinary t

83 UE CARE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should consider urology referral for cystoscopy and imaging in adults wi

84 One-hundred sixty urologists and 320 urology residents were randomized to 1 of 2 cohorts.

85 Sixty-five patients referred from the urology service, in whom urinary tract abnormalities wer

86 thin a children's hospital between pediatric urology specialists and general urologist performing the

87 Neither specialized urology status nor meeting Leapfrog volume criteria for

88 ls by procedure-specific volume, specialized urology status, and Leapfrog criteria was obtained to de

89 Tissues and organs in urology, such as the bladder, clitoris, corpus cavermosu

90 ity of California, Los Angeles Department of Urology, the Jennifer Jones Simon Foundation assembled 3

91 ialty or subspecialty ranged between none in urology to 10.8% in pathology.

92 astroenterology, pediatric gastroenterology, urology, urogynecology, colorectal surgery, geriatrics,

93 2,482 adults undergoing surgery (orthopedic, urology, vascular, gastrointestinal, and gynecology) wit

94 pe (latex vs. silicone), and patient sample (urology vs. other) also predicted effect size.

95 In the near future, in urology, we believe that it holds promise for endolumina

96 tion of laparoscopic techniques in pediatric urology, which has been somewhat slow to develop compare

97 s becoming increasingly popular in pediatric urology, yet has significant issues with interpretation.