ライフサイエンスコーパス: vaginal delivery

1 She was born at full term via spontaneous vaginal delivery.

2 pregnant multiparous women with a successful vaginal delivery.

3 of obesity than did their siblings born via vaginal delivery.

4 ence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.36] compared to vaginal delivery.

5 ery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to planned vaginal delivery.

6 ation rather than proceeding with a plan for vaginal delivery.

7 neonatal morbidity, as compared with planned vaginal delivery.

8 and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.12) for operative vaginal delivery.

9 pse is strongly associated with a history of vaginal delivery.

10 ay (>/=6 days; 3.5, 1.6-7.6) than those with vaginal delivery.

11 , 1.2-1.4) than among women with spontaneous vaginal delivery.

12 l HSV infection who gave birth to infants by vaginal delivery.

13 erved during caesarian sections or premature vaginal delivery.

14 The outcome was cesarean (versus vaginal) delivery.

15 ate of severe perineal tears in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries.

16 rineal tear rate was reduced in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries (3.3% versus 3.6%, adj. OR 0.92; 95%

17 s. 385 minutes, P<0.001), as was the time to vaginal delivery (398 minutes vs. 479 minutes, P<0.001).

18 was also strongly associated with unassisted vaginal delivery (93.8%, vs. 71.9% with planned in-hospi

19 th a slightly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (adjRR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 0.02

20 OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 2.03-2.23]) and women with vaginal deliveries (adjusted OR, 2.60 [95% CI, 2.41-2.80

21 The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decre

22 with stays that were "too short" (<24 h for vaginal deliveries and <72 h for cesarean-section delive

23 rom 1.3 to 6.6 d: 0.5 to 6.2 d for singleton vaginal deliveries and 2.5 to 9.3 d for cesarean-section

24 taying too short ranged from 0.2% to 83% for vaginal deliveries and from 1% to 75% for cesarean-secti

25 Ten percent of claims involved vaginal deliveries and minor non-body cavity procedures,

26 ht (44 male and 44 female) neonates (65 with vaginal delivery and 23 with cesarean delivery) complete

27 is, six vs 13; and jaundice, ten vs 12 after vaginal delivery and caesarean section, respectively).

28 Birth by assisted vaginal delivery and primiparity were marginally signifi

29 l for recovery of pelvic organ support after vaginal delivery and that disordered elastic fiber homeo

30 utures for perineal injury after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and many millions more worldwide.

31 er occurs in up to a third of women at first vaginal delivery, and of these a third have new bowel sy

32 ed by its association with chorioamnionitis, vaginal delivery, and pneumonia.

33 OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.22) compared with vaginal delivery, and the magnitude of the association w

34 .07; 95% CI 8.11-17.97), or had an operative vaginal delivery (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI 1.32-4.70), pre-lab

35 rematurity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.5), vaginal delivery (AOR, 2.9), low NK cell percentage (AOR

36 Parturition: Complications during vaginal delivery are rare.

37 ack of experience of the proceduralist and a vaginal delivery are two risk factors that increase the

38 retrospective analysis suggested complicated vaginal delivery as a modifying risk factor in DYT1.

39 dren delivered by acute and elective CS with vaginal delivery as the reference were calculated by usi

40 actic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at five hospitals in Burkina Faso, Egyp

41 actic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at four hospitals in Ecuador, Egypt, an

42 The direct cost of an uncomplicated vaginal delivery at HUM was US$62 and the direct cost of

43 n with a singleton fetus who were attempting vaginal delivery at more than 36 weeks of gestation and

44 reased towards term, were higher 1 day after vaginal delivery but declined towards pre-term levels by

45 007, planned cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (but not compared with unscheduled cesa

46 in neonatal acquisition of microbiota during vaginal delivery, but not Cesarean delivery.

47 Compared with vaginal delivery, caesarean delivery had a protective as

48 Compared with vaginal delivery, CD was associated with higher body mas

49 Compared with a plan for vaginal delivery, CDMR may be associated with lower rate

50 ong the risk factors examined in this study, vaginal delivery compared with cesarean section (odds ra

51 Among vaginal deliveries, early-term neonates (6.8%) had a sig

52 Compared with women having vaginal deliveries, fully adjusted multivariable analysi

53 nned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery group (2.2% and 1.9%, respectively; odd

54 ivered earlier than did those in the planned-vaginal-delivery group (mean number of days from randomi

55 rean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal-delivery group.

56 arly discharge of newborns following routine vaginal delivery has become common practice, its safety

57 seropositivity (JCPyV, HPyV7, HPyV10, CMV), vaginal delivery (HPyV10), breastfeeding (CMV), younger

58 Vaginal delivery, hysterectomy, chronic straining, norma

59 lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy.

60 with a previous caesarean section planning a vaginal delivery, it is a rare occurrence.

61 ollowing a short stay (less than 1 day after vaginal delivery, less than 2 days after cesarean birth)

62 r year of birth, lower 5-minute Apgar score, vaginal delivery, married mother, and region of the stat

63 ing during labor, we hypothesized that among vaginal deliveries, maternal body mass index is associat

64 tigated the capacity of nasal, sublingual or vaginal delivery of DNA-PEI polyplexes to prime immune r

65 ittle information is available regarding the vaginal delivery of larger and more polar molecules that

66 uscle rehabilitation (performed either after vaginal delivery or after secondary repair remote from d

67 elevated for cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.47), and, f

68 had subdural haemorrhages: three were normal vaginal deliveries (risk 6.1%), five were delivered by f

69 nfidence interval [CI], 1.6-1.9) or assisted vaginal delivery (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) than among w

70 y and the postpartum months; (4) spontaneous vaginal delivery should be the aim and actively encourag

71 Among women with assisted vaginal delivery, significant increased risks were seen

72 ilk samples from individuals giving birth by vaginal delivery, suggesting that it is not the operatio

73 Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.33 (95%

74 etric mode of delivery defined as unassisted vaginal delivery (VD), assisted VD, elective CS, and eme

75 a lower rate of breastfeeding compared with vaginal delivery (VD).

76 Complicated vaginal delivery was also a predictor of T1DM (HR, 1.93;

77 Vaginal delivery was associated with a significantly inc

78 Vaginal delivery was attempted by 17,898 women, and 15,8

79 Prior vaginal delivery was protective against adverse VBAC out

80 Cesarean delivery, as opposed to vaginal delivery, was associated with an increased risk

81 ta on 20,366 mother-infant pairs with normal vaginal deliveries, we measured changes in length of sta

82 Women with cesarean and assisted vaginal deliveries were at increased risk for rehospital

83 , gestation <25 weeks, chorioamnionitis, and vaginal delivery were all strongly associated with EOD.

84 Older age, multiparity, and preterm and vaginal delivery were associated with lack of intravenou

85 Infants born by vaginal delivery were more likely to serorevert at a you

86 ks postpartum from an uneventful spontaneous vaginal delivery who was transferred to our institution

87 1542 women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery with a second-degree perineal tear or e

88 en with prior cesarean section who attempted vaginal delivery with a singleton birth.

89 s women at 6-12 months after birth: Group 1, vaginal delivery with anal sphincter tear (n = 93); grou

90 ation to planned cesarean section or planned vaginal delivery with cesarean only if indicated.

91 .14) or in the percentage of women who had a vaginal delivery with the use of forceps or vacuum (115

92 with anal sphincter tear (n = 93); group 2, vaginal delivery without anal sphincter tear (n = 79); a