戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                 Maximum standardized uptake values were calculated.
2  for the target ISO and GDC components, into theoretical EO values were calculated.
3   Area under the curve and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
4 l nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) values were calculated.
5 tion pattern during processing, rate constant and half-life values were calculated.
6 ulated, and from these concentrations, the DeltaE12 degrees values were calculated.
7                                    Liver-specific mortality values were calculated.
8 M trials was assessed, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
9 is over a period of 18 weeks, and half-life and destruction values were calculated.
10       Spearman correlation coefficients and corresponding p-values were calculated.
11                               For guaiacol, the Km and Vmax values were calculated as 24.88mM and 3.23EU/mL, respectively
12                                   For H2O2, the Km and Vmax values were calculated as 3.247mM and 0.799EU/mL, respectivel
13  sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated as 98.1, 94.4, 94.5, and 98.1 %, respe
14                        Cortical (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B values were calculated as a standard uptake value ratio norma
15                        Half-life (t1/2) and destruction (D) values were calculated based on first-order kinetics.
16                                      Laboratory test cutoff values were calculated based on receiver operating characteri
17 Additionally, corrected pore-water-concentration-based EC50 values were calculated by equilibrium partitioning using soil
18 ce intervals were obtained by using bootstrap resampling; P values were calculated by using a t test.
19 se and insulin were monitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curv
20 for 2 h, and measured meal GI and GL and insulin index (II) values were calculated by using the incremental area under th
21                                         Central field index values were calculated for 176 eyes of 142 patients.
22 on rates, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging.
23                                                CT perfusion values were calculated for both series by using the maximum s
24 the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of malignancy and kappa values were calculated for each criterion.
25                                                         ADC values were calculated for each organ on each sequence using
26                            IC50 values were measured and Ki values were calculated for inhibitors.
27                                                       kappa Values were calculated for inter-observer agreement.
28                                                         HEI values were calculated for participants in the 1999-2002 NHAN
29 weighted multigradient-echo sequences were acquired and R2* values were calculated for specific regions of interest.
30 sitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for subject-reported PRP and FP.
31                                                        Mean values were calculated for the cohort.
32                                       The Ki-, G-, H- and F values were calculated for the estimation of the level of fis
33                                                Strain index values were calculated for the head, body, and tail of the pa
34                                                  Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, an
35                                                  Mean T1rho values were calculated from liver regions of interest.
36                                                     Similar values were calculated from the two-proton P(+)-Fe(III)(OH2)2
37                                                  Tumor MATH values were calculated from WES results.
38 . fractional anisotropy, mean, axial and radial diffusivity values were calculated in both grey and white matter of spina
39                                                          T2 values were calculated over the nucleus, with a pixelwise, mo
40 a under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values were calculated per group (Sens, Spec, AUROC): frozen
41                        Odds ratios (ORs) and Fisher exact P values were calculated to assess risk factors associated with
42                                         The K(m) and V(max) values were calculated to be 5.46 mM and 0.98 U/ml/min, respe
43                            Activity-to-exposure ratio (AER) values were calculated to compare relative risks of activatin
44  muscle twitches were measured for each group and chronaxie values were calculated to determine innervation status.
45                                                       kappa values were calculated to determine reliability.
46                                                           P values were calculated using the chi(2) test.
47                                                         ULN values were calculated using the cutoff levels suggested by t
48 sitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated using urine culture as the gold standa
49 r the known-volume group, average lesion-absorbed dose (AD) values were calculated, whereas for the small-volume group a
50                              GI, GL, and insulin index (II) values were calculated with the use of the incremental area u

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
コーパス検索結果について
ご利用ガイド
ご利用規定
新規対訳・お問い合わせ
Copyright 1993 - ライフサイエンス辞書プロジェクト