コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
2 e treated with re-DES (58.1%), 132 underwent vascular brachytherapy (23.4%), and 104 were treated wit
3 uting stents, -19.2% (-28.2 to -10.4) versus vascular brachytherapy, -23.4% (-36.2 to -10.8) versus b
4 arget vessel failure was 21.6% (27/125) with vascular brachytherapy and 12.4% (32/259) with the sirol
6 een reported to be an abnormal finding after vascular brachytherapy and, possibly, implantation of dr
7 ar follow-up was 14.1% for re-DES, 17.5% for vascular brachytherapy, and 18.0% for conventional ballo
8 sions and a higher prevalence of prior stent/vascular brachytherapy failure than did the rest of the
9 gned to determine the safety and efficacy of vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of diffuse in-s
10 ical and angiographic outcomes compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of restenosis w
11 analysis segment was 29.5% (31/105) for the vascular brachytherapy group and 19.8% (45/227) for the
12 zation was required in 19.2% (24/125) of the vascular brachytherapy group and 8.5% (22/259) of the si
13 rocedural success was 99.2% (124/125) in the vascular brachytherapy group and 97.3% (250/257) in the
16 after treatment of in-stent restenosis with vascular brachytherapy in the Washington Radiation for I
21 g the 3 groups; however, patients undergoing vascular brachytherapy presented with more complex lesio
24 h subsequent recurrence rates are high, with vascular brachytherapy (VBT) affording the best results.
25 the introduction of two major advances, the vascular brachytherapy (VBT) and the drug-eluting stents
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。