ライフサイエンスコーパス: vendor

1 ther selling product or directly linked to a vendor.

2 formation without a link to a distributor or vendor.

3 two of the three columns were from the same vendor.

4 rol samples were purchased from a commercial vendor.

5 iltering method often provided by instrument vendors.

6 vailable scanners from all major US/European vendors.

7 based on over 65M annotations from over 150 vendors.

8 cobacter-free production areas from two U.S. vendors.

9 5- and 3.0-T MR imagers from three different vendors.

10 ystis in 12 rat groups from three commercial vendors.

11 rchase attempts from 98 Internet e-cigarette vendors.

12 tion rate between vendor B and the other two vendors.

13 cation measures used by Internet e-cigarette vendors.

14 on dose settings for the systems of all four vendors.

15 es and even for DEGs obtained from different vendors.

16 a from instruments manufactured by different vendors.

17 d in inferior and equivalent performance for vendor 1 and equivalent and superior performance for ven

18 dose reductions resulted in inferior LCR for vendors 1 and 2 for FBP and 25% dose reductions resulted

19 and equivalent and superior performance for vendor 2 at moderate and strong IR settings, respectivel

20 innesota, Mississippi, or North Carolina) to vendor A twice over 9 months and measured repeatability

21 Repeatability of geocodes assigned by vendor A was high (kappa = 0.90; census block group disc

22 ban/suburban; 69% residential/commercial) to vendors A and B and then measured accuracy by comparing

23 ile the mean correct classification rate for vendors A and C was 68.1% and 68.3%, respectively.

24 between supply and demand, unscrupulous milk vendors add milk-like products from vegetable sources (s

25 mice from different vendors, mice from both vendors after cohousing, mice given sfb orally prior to

26 hese rabbits were obtained from a commercial vendor and had acute diarrhea following shipment.

27 comparable between MR systems from different vendors and between different field strengths.

28 reating a system that ensures that potential vendors and donors are properly informed and not exploit

29 o ate fresh Mexican-style cheese from street vendors and from cheese samples and raw milk.

30 using the digital catalogs of over a hundred vendors and other public sources and is annotated with i

31 gnetic resonance (MR) imagers from different vendors and with different field strengths.

32 astography with four MR imaging systems (two vendors) and multiple pulse sequences (two-dimensional [

33 imulated patient habitus, X-ray system type, vendor, and geographic region.

34 Patient, vendor, and institutional characteristics that could be

35 Purpose To determine patient, vendor, and institutional factors that influence compute

36 Models including patient, vendor, and institutional factors were good for predicti

37 ions have remained unheeded by manufactures, vendors, and commercial cleaning companies, it is time f

38 performed for multiple radiation exposures, vendors, and vendor iterative reconstruction algorithms.

39 nd B and then measured accuracy by comparing vendor- and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-ass

40 Vendors applied their risk-adjustment algorithms and pro

41 Although some vendors are beginning to supply multi-kilobase sequence-

42 tasets acquired with equipment from multiple vendors are needed to replicate the findings and to stud

43 lated strains obtained from three commercial vendors as well as mice bred in academic vivaria from fo

44 rmined with 16-section CT scanners from four vendors, as well as with five models from one manufactur

45 1.5- and 3.0-T MR systems from each of three vendors at two institutions.

46 in mean correct classification rate between vendor B and the other two vendors.

47 ate for EPA monitor addresses was higher for vendor B versus A (88% vs. 76%), but discordance at cens

48 Moreover, coordinates assigned by vendor B were further from those assigned by the EPA (d

49 ll exposure levels, images obtained by using vendor B's scanner outperformed the other vendors, with

50 ctively, 1.4-, 1.9-, and 5.0-fold higher for vendor B.

51 Across three vendors (blinded as A, B, and C) and across three exposu

52 ingly, ABLs did not derive from a commercial vendor but rather an academic contribution to the public

53 this mutation in induced mutant mouse lines, vendor C57BL/6 mice and in widely used embryonic stem ce

54 Consumers may be misled by vendors' claims that herbal products can treat, prevent,

55 atent extraction but also increasingly large vendor collections amassed via different selection crite

56 None of the vendors complied with North Carolina's e-cigarette age-v

57 overs, standardizing surgical practices, and vendor consignment of high unit-cost items such as impla

58 The vendor cylinders exhibiting the least loss of CO2 were t

59 0.73, RMSE of 0.61), we virtually screened a vendor database of 100910 compounds.

60 lysis of C57BL/6 mice from common commercial vendors demonstrated the presence of the rd8 mutation in

61 bral ischemia was dependent on strain and/or vendor differences.

62 tal drug may be influenced by rat strain and vendor differences.

63 t comparisons between systems from different vendors difficult.

64 class II single-antigen bead assays from two vendors; DQA1/DQB1 typing was performed using luminex po

65 atically collected and transmitted to the CT vendor during two 6-week periods immediately before and

66 from hamsters housed in various research and vendor facilities.

67 care organizations have little recourse if a vendor fails to deliver as intended once the vendor's sy

68 of-the-art coronary CT angiography with same-vendor follow-up has good scan-rescan reproducibility, s

69 ability increased to +/-29.9% with different-vendor follow-up.

70 /-18.4% (coefficient of variation) with same-vendor follow-up.

71 er follow-up and 753 subjects with different-vendor follow-up.

72 ssions, and contracting of clinical delivery vendors for industry; contracts, budgets, and institutio

73 the regulatory hurdles, which might prevent vendors from marketing cardiac MR perfusion imaging, may

74 The European commercial vendor had mice infected with novel Helicobacter sp. str

75 from Lewis rats obtained from two different vendors, Harlan and Charles River Laboratories.

76 ettes via the Internet because many Internet vendors have weak or nonexistent age verification proced

77 pathogen-free mice, obtained from different vendors, have different intestinal microbiota.

78 ttempted to purchase tobacco from all retail vendors in each community every six months.

79 arable CAC scoring results, which suggests a vendor-independence of the method; however, none of the

80 The framework is hardware vendor independent and uses speckle tracking (endocardia

81 To better annotate the Illumina data, a vendor independent nucleotide universal identifier (nuID

82 ee, open-source, platformindependent and GPU-vendor independent.

83 Myocardial deformation was assessed using a vendor-independent 2-dimensional speckle-tracking softwa

84 Here, we present msPurity, a vendor-independent R package for liquid chromatography (

85 Furthermore, there is a paucity of vendor-independent software that deals with targeted ana

86 for approximately 170,000 compounds and the vendor information for the vast majority of compounds.

87 use of residential histories from commercial vendors is feasible.

88 r multiple radiation exposures, vendors, and vendor iterative reconstruction algorithms.

89 Tables summarizing the vendor list of various derivatized microarray surfaces,

90 urchase cigarettes via 55 Internet cigarette vendors located in 12 states.

91 Community vendors marketed and sold sachets of Sprinkles MNP in in

92 ls were compared between mice from different vendors, mice from both vendors after cohousing, mice gi

93 s spectrometer vendor-specific libraries and vendor-neutral file formats, such as mzXML and mzData it

94 s these issues, we developed Lipostar, novel vendor-neutral high-throughput software that effectively

95 acy of the transducers obtained from the two vendors nor whether the transducers had been used clinic

96 cly and freely available, and developers and vendors of CO-from-ABP algorithms are invited to test th

97 a vaired according to the sex as well as the vendor-of-origin of the mouse.

98 le, uniform interface that is independent of vendor or instrument type.

99 r results than using annotations provided by Vendors or from Bioconductor's Annotate package.

100 Swift is the first tool, outside of the vendors own software, which completes the full analysis

101 FINDINGS: Drug vendors performed poorly in all SDs of Jigawa for all in

102 Patent medicine vendors (PMV) provide antimalarial treatment and care th

103 d from personnel reimbursement data and from vendor pricing, respectively.

104 sement data, and the cost of materials, from vendor pricing.

105 ate-of the-art CT scanners made by different vendors produced substantially different Agatston scores

106 Third-party software vendors provide the mainstay for integration of individu

107 s study, we evaluated the quality of current vendor-provided thoracic MR-AC maps and further investig

108 ies were present in 90% of gerbils from each vendor, ranging from 19 microm to 125 microm in diameter

109 There is substantial variability across vendor reconstruction algorithms.

110 s, governmental oversight organizations, and vendors) regarding how any given administrative requirem

111 Differences between coronary CT angiography vendors resulted in lower scan-rescan reproducibility.

112 elicobacter spp. were found in mice from one vendor's acknowledged Helicobacter-infected production a

113 nuation ranged from -15.7 to 23.9 HU and one vendor's equipment showed significantly lower mean atten

114 SNA lectin, SNA-I and SNA-II, in one of the vendor's formulations.

115 vendor fails to deliver as intended once the vendor's system becomes embedded into the organization.

116 peatability of commercial geocoding to guide vendor selection in the Life Course Socioeconomic Status

117 bility, and accuracy should be used to guide vendor selection.

118 ined age verification among Internet tobacco vendors selling e-cigarettes.

119 Internet vendors sent a total of 1650 packs of cigarettes to the

120 mples of each amino acid from four different vendors showed natural variability between sources, espe

121 lly active within range of the corresponding vendor (Sigma Co.) affinity chromatography-purified lect

122 F-MS data processing is currently limited to vendor software and typically requires several preproces

123 r than those from PepList, msInspect and the vendor software BioAnalyst.

124 ated using commercially available instrument vendor software.

125 At base line, 68 percent of 487 vendors sold tobacco to minors.

126 unds as well as a search for compound names, vendors, specific physical properties or any substructur

127 Even with mass spectrometer vendor-specific libraries and vendor-neutral file format

128 rmats and proprietary formats that require a vendor-specific library in order to operate.

129 By using vendor-specific software, two imaging protocols-140 kVp

130 of clinical samples; (c) use of two or more vendor-standardized anti-Pgp antibody reagents that reco

131 pment Toolkit and allows for efficient cross-vendor structural cheminformatics.

132 niversity of North Carolina Internet Tobacco Vendors Study project offices using credit cards.

133 ative to, and independent validation of, the vendor supplied tool.

134 anner and iteratively reconstructed with the vendor-supplied reconstruction algorithm.

135 Conclusion Compared with vendor-supplied respiratory-gating hardware methods, sof

136 alse positives and false negatives) than the vendor-supplied software package.

137 Proportion of Internet cigarette vendors that sold cigarettes to minors.

138 External reviews by industry vendors, the VA Central Office, and the Office for Const

139 re randomly assigned (2:3) by an independent vendor to open-label chemoradiotherapy (three cycles of

140 re randomly assigned (2:3) by an independent vendor to open-label chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of ci

141 columns have prompted process licensors and vendors to investigate alternative mass-transfer devices

142 probes across seven platforms from different vendors: U95A, U133A and U133 Plus 2.0 from Affymetrix,

143 was acquired on 3T MR systems from a single vendor under adenosine stress and at rest.

144 y of six platforms, provided by four leading vendors, using a spike-in experiment.

145 ds, including BrdU antibodies from different vendors (Vector, BD, Roche, Dako, Novocastra, and Accura

146 the hit compound provided by the commercial vendor was reassigned as [3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-5

147 iate risk when a CT scanner from a different vendor was used.

148 ICCs according to vendor were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.91) (n = 4) and 0.65 (

149 t use, Sprinkles MNP sales through community vendors were associated with decreased rates of anemia a

150 btained with CT scanners from four different vendors were compared.

151 Five PET/CT scanners from 3 vendors were included.

152 and mice received from specified commercial vendors were screened for Helicobacter spp. by culture o

153 Cylinders from three specialty gas vendors were tested to find the appropriate cylinder in

154 al education events organized by third-party vendors were used to deliver promotional messages.

155 ubstantially when CT scanners from different vendors were used, with median Agatston scores ranging f

156 cally similar mice from different commercial vendors, which exhibited differences in their gut bacter

157 required vetting and approval from industry vendors, who provided training and expertise.

158 as generated by Ionis Biometrics or external vendor with a permuted-block randomisation method.

159 Health Care Finance and Policy provided four vendors with identical information on 2,528,624 discharg

160 ce purchased from two independent commercial vendors with two different immune backgrounds as a model

161 domisation schedule generated by an external vendor, with no stratification.

162 or differences related to field strength and vendor, with repeated-measures analysis of variance; coe

163 ng vendor B's scanner outperformed the other vendors, with a mean correct classification rate of 74.4