ライフサイエンスコーパス: venous oxygen saturation

1 should not be used as surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.

2 arterial lactate concentrations, and central venous oxygen saturation.

3 ul for predicting low cardiac index or mixed venous oxygen saturation.

4 ral venous oxygen saturation for a low mixed venous oxygen saturation.

5 ght atrial pressure cardiac index, and mixed venous oxygen saturations.

6 ht atrial pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous oxygen saturations.

7 atients, 31 catheters) and 65 pairs of mixed venous oxygen saturation (20 patients, 28 catheters) wer

8 - 0.9 to 15.7 +/- 2.4; p < .0001); and mixed venous oxygen saturation (26 +/- 5 to 36 +/- 5, p < .05)

9 olume (54 +/- 27 to 65 +/- 38 ml), and mixed-venous oxygen saturation (69 +/- 8 to 73 +/- 10%), all p

10 a significantly higher mean (+/-SD) central venous oxygen saturation (70.4+/-10.7 percent vs. 65.3+/

11 Results for changes of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

12 Correlation and agreement of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

13 ed, including the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

14 rrelation between obtained values of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

15 There is lack of agreement between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

16 We concurrently determined femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

17 ermore, we determined simultaneously femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

18 ill patients, the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen satur

19 tly increased systemic hypotension and mixed venous oxygen saturation and decreased pulmonary artery

20 ose of our study was to determine if central venous oxygen saturation and femoral venous oxygen satur

21 Six-minute walk results, mixed venous oxygen saturation and initial treatment randomiza

22 We compared the ability of central venous oxygen saturation and markers of anaerobic metabo

23 e determined correlation of baseline central venous oxygen saturation and mixed venous oxygen saturat

24 e central venous oxygen saturation and mixed venous oxygen saturation and predictive value of a low c

25 r resistance indices, and arterial and mixed venous oxygen saturation and reduced pulmonary hypertens

26 vere sepsis, the correlation between central venous oxygen saturation and tissue oxygen saturation at

27 roblems with oxygenation, ventilation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and cardiac output.

28 P = .02), improved hemodynamics and central venous oxygen saturation, and less organ dysfunction.

29 on, oxygen delivery, mixed venous PO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and PmO2 responded with simila

30 change of arterial oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and PO2.

31 and MSNA, reduced forearm velocity, lowered venous oxygen saturation, and raised venous lactate and

32 cant decrease in Pa(O2 ), arterial and mixed venous oxygen saturation, and ratio of Pa(O(2)) to fract

33 ics, as well as global cardiac output, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and systemic and cerebral oxyg

34 Perfusion, Intravascular Venous Oxygen saturation, and T2* (PIVOT), a recently de

35 ior probability that cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation are normal and physical examina

36 under the curve 0.66; 0.46-0.86) or central venous oxygen saturation (area under the curve 0.56; 0.3

37 arterial pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous oxygen saturation, as well as significantly highe

38 CBF and jugular venous oxygen saturation both increased significantly at

39 to 15% was not predicted by baseline central venous oxygen saturation but by high baseline lactate an

40 central venous oxygen saturation and femoral venous oxygen saturation can be used interchangeably dur

41 We recorded central venous oxygen saturation continuously for 0 to 6 hrs of

42 e, and low 24-hr fluid output; and low mixed venous oxygen saturation correlated with knee mottling a

43 The bias and precision of the mixed venous oxygen saturation data were -0.57% and 3.76%, res

44 etabolites would be increased during jugular venous oxygen saturation desaturations (<50%) and determ

45 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation.Despite significant correlation

46 ike markers of anaerobic metabolism, central venous oxygen saturation did not allow the prediction of

47 ration and predictive value of a low central venous oxygen saturation for a low mixed venous oxygen s

48 lism should be considered instead of central venous oxygen saturation for starting hemodynamic resusc

49 n saturation was better predictor of central venous oxygen saturation >70% than thenar tissue oxygen

50 fied patients with severe sepsis and central venous oxygen saturation >70%.

51 venous oxygen saturation <60%, but a central venous oxygen saturation >or=70% may be useful to exclud

52 HR, BP, MSNA, forearm flow velocity, forearm venous oxygen saturation, H(+), and lactate.

53 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in 30 surgical patients and in

54 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in a group of 100 stable cardia

55 of global cerebral oxygenation using jugular venous oxygen saturation in all 126 patients.

56 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in both stable and unstable med

57 measures continuous cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation in the clinical setting.

58 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation including its range of variatio

59 to 90 mmHg +/- 32 after thrombectomy, mixed venous oxygen saturation increased from 48% +/- 19% to 6

60 The systolic blood pressure and mixed venous oxygen saturation increased from 75 (IQR:15) mm H

61 res, pulmonary vascular pressures, and mixed venous oxygen saturation is a unique feature; c) additio

62 Jugular venous oxygen saturation is monitored after traumatic br

63 " is based on continuing resuscitation until venous oxygen saturation is normalized.

64 ous oxygen saturation <70% predicted a mixed venous oxygen saturation <60% with a sensitivity 84%,spe

65 ation <70% does not accurately predict mixed venous oxygen saturation <60%, but a central venous oxyg

66 3% and 86%) for cardiac index <2.5 and mixed venous oxygen saturation <60%, respectively.

67 ation >or=70% may be useful to exclude mixed venous oxygen saturation <60%.

68 Central venous oxygen saturation <70% does not accurately predic

69 Central venous oxygen saturation <70% predicted a mixed venous o

70 culated the area under the curve for central venous oxygen saturation <70%.

71 ntricular systolic dysfunction had a central venous oxygen saturation<70%.

72 system was calibrated every 24 hrs for mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring.

73 tolic blood pressure of 50-70 mm Hg, a mixed venous oxygen saturation of 25% to 40%, and a UO <10% of

74 sue oxygen saturation, brain tissue PO2, and venous oxygen saturation of the superior sagittal sinus

75 ffect of mannitol on brain tissue PO2 and on venous oxygen saturation of the superior sagittal sinus

76 , mean arterial pressure, and either central venous oxygen saturation or lactate clearance.

77 oid tissue oxygen saturation but not central venous oxygen saturation or thenar tissue oxygen saturat

78 ue hypoxia (reflected by lactate and central venous oxygen saturation), organ dysfunction, and mortal

79 s physiologic monitoring (arterial and mixed venous oxygen saturation, oxygen consumption, etc.) may

80 cardiac output (r(s) =.52, p<.05) and mixed venous oxygen saturation (r(s) =.61, p<.05).

81 oxygen transport (r=-.68, P=.005), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (r=-.79, P<.0001).

82 x, and PVRI, whereas cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation remained unchanged.

83 When central venous oxygen saturation remains low, despite achieving

84 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation (rs = 0.55; p < .001), the limi

85 (P(SL)CO2), lactate concentration, and mixed venous oxygen saturation (S(MV)O2) in hemodynamically un

86 dissociation curves, we plotted arterial and venous oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SvO2 ) against oxygen

87 Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) in the superior vena ca

88 e (or lactate >4 mM), and continuous central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring for quantita

89 itiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs

90 Thus, femoral venous oxygen saturation should not be used as surrogate

91 sure, urine output, central venous (or mixed venous) oxygen saturation should be targeted.

92 an arbitrary choice of Sat(Thresh), systemic venous oxygen saturation (SsvO(2)) may be a useful param

93 simultaneous reflectance spectrophotometry (venous oxygen saturation StO2 and relative tissue hemogl

94 w), continuous cardiac output (Q), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (Sv(O(2))) were measured by flo

95 Perfusion, venous oxygen saturation SvO2, and T2* were each quantif

96 termining weaning outcome, we recorded mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) continuously in eight ve

97 Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SVO2) was also compared with P

98 nts were transfused on bypass solely for low venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), ie, <55%, without regar

99 -1.5 mmol/L, respectively, and minimum mixed venous oxygen saturation, systemic oxygen delivery, and

100 ectrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, mixed venous oxygen saturation, temperature (core and blood),

101 patients at H0 and H6, whereas mean central venous oxygen saturation was preserved but significantly

102 A low jugular venous oxygen saturation was treated in both groups, min

103 nuous monitoring of cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation was used with either an 8.5-Fr

104 tissue hypoxia (as quantified by low central venous oxygen saturation) was not associated with major

105 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were assessed, including the di

106 femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were similar.

107 onary artery pressure, heart rate, and mixed venous oxygen saturation, were obtained at baseline, aft

108 l venous pressure, fluid output, and central venous oxygen saturation with parameters from a pulmonar