ライフサイエンスコーパス: ventricular end-diastolic volume

1 including after adjustment for baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

2 ed as an increase of 15% or more in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

3 dysfunction by reducing the unstressed left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

4 ter mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a

5 sponse (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D impl

6 s had mildly dilated right ventricles (right ventricular end-diastolic volume=101+/-26 mL/m(2)) with

7 stroke volume (SV) without a change in left ventricular end diastolic volume (102+/-16% change from

8 There was a larger increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume (15 mL; 95% confidence

9 0.4 +/- 2 to 7.7 +/- 4 mL; p < .05) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (18.5 +/- 3 to 14.2 +/-

10 with placebo, a significant decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-18 mL; P=0.009) and e

11 shown by increased E-wave velocity and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, 2) exhibit a higher pl

12 ventricular remodeling (>20% change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume; 21.91 [2.75-174.29]; P

13 tolic pressure by 40% to 60% (p < .05), left ventricular end-diastolic volume 25 +/- 8%, and stroke v

14 a was linearly related to reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-4.1 ml; 95% confidenc

15 ificantly (P<0.05) greater reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-49+/-16% versus -35+/

16 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (72.5 to 77.4 mL/m2, P=

17 (54 +/- 10 to 87 +/-6 mL; p < .05) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (90 +/-11 to 128 +/- 18

18 Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (99.9 to 89.7 mL/m2, P<

19 with change in RV ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, although correlation c

20 On echocardiography, left ventricular end diastolic volume and deceleration time i

21 was evaluated as the change in indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume and LVEF.

22 odilation reflected by a 10% decline in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and a 30% fall in atria

23 ndary end points, including structural (left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular ej

24 on compared with placebo did not change left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular ma

25 Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mass correlated wit

26 d 10 weeks after infarction showed that left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mass increased and

27 and 24+/-5 g/m(2); P<0.001) and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and right ventricular e

28 -of-life score, 6-minute walk distance, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular e

29 s showed a borderline (16%) increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (angiography), whereas

30 The limits of agreement between the left ventricular end-diastolic volume as estimated by bioimpe

31 me unloading results in a reduction in right ventricular end-diastolic volume, as expected, but left

32 ction fraction (beta=-0.02/%; P=0.015), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (beta=0.01/mL; P<0.0001

33 right ventricular end-diastolic volume (left ventricular end-diastolic volume/body surface area, 104+

34 104+/-13 and 69+/-18 mL/m(2); P<0.001; right ventricular end-diastolic volume/body surface area, 110+

35 r end-diastolic pressure by 30% to 40%, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by 33 +/- 9%, and tran

36 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by use of echocardiogr

37 The relation between stroke volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, by the Frank-Starting

38 timates of ventricular filling pressures and ventricular end-diastolic volumes/cardiac performance va

39 interval, -4.02 to -0.23; P=0.028) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (coefficient, 7.85; 95%

40 end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), but not left ventricular end-diastolic volume, consistent with increa

41 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased (from 125.1 +

42 Cardiac index increased and left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased significantly

43 ipping led to a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume, demonstrating increase

44 The mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume differed significantly

45 sociation with an expected decrease in right ventricular end-diastolic volume during lower-body sucti

46 Patients who increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume during lower-body sucti

47 sonance imaging demonstrated increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes,

48 rior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume >/=125 mL/m(2), and lef

49 emodeling was defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume >/=20% at 6 months.

50 CMR-derived left ventricular end-diastolic volume >246 mL had good, altho

51 r pressure increase and dilatation, but left ventricular end-diastolic volume improved because of red

52 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume improved from 172 ml to

53 ts, there was a paradoxical increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume in association with an

54 mm Hg lower-body suction, on right and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes in 21 patients with ch

55 to 43+/-14 mL/m(2), P<0.0001), whereas left ventricular end diastolic volume increased (66+/-12 to 7

56 Right ventricular end diastolic volume increased by 49.4% afte

57 After 17 cycles of trastuzumab, indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume increased in patients t

58 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume increased in the rapid

59 ing without surgery at 5 years, 90% for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index <100 mL/m(2) vers

60 us-ICD group had greater improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (-26.2 versus -7.

61 a brain natriuretic peptide (79 pg/mL), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (110 mL/m2), and

62 not correlate with six-month changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (p = 0.26), LVESV

63 phy showed a small, stable reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P<0.001), with a

64 ncomitant small stable increase in the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P<0.001).

65 RV stroke volume index (P<0.0001), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P=0.0015).

66 3.2 +/- 2.9 years, LVEF 0.21 +/- 0.07, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 180 +/- 64 ml/m2.

67 Patients with a right ventricular end-diastolic volume index above 150 ml/m(2)

68 Patients with a right ventricular end-diastolic volume index above 150 ml/m(2)

69 .001) increase in change from baseline right ventricular end-diastolic volume index and a 429 ml (P <

70 The relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and stroke volume

71 The left ventricular end-diastolic volume index decreased (90.1 +

72 ulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index failed to correla

73 Resting left ventricular end-diastolic volume index increased (P=0.00

74 Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index measured by means

75 ry outcome was change from baseline in right ventricular end-diastolic volume index versus placebo.

76 f SCA were PET sympathetic denervation, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, creatinine, and

77 tion, initial central venous pressure, right ventricular end-diastolic volume index, pulmonary artery

78 B-type natriuretic peptide, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.

79 er left atrial volume index, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.

80 t ventricular end-diastolic volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (left ventricular end-d

81 zone and its percentage of myocardium, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-s

82 rdial scar volume by CMR is superior to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-s

83 cant improvements in ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-s

84 entricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) on cardiac magn

85 onist tolvaptan (30 mg/day) on reducing left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) compared with p

86 Gated SPECT measurements for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index, left ven

87 ry capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), SV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventr

88 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricul

89 with CRT, defined as percent change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), was analyzed i

90 eft ventricular end-systolic volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).

91 ratio, 1.16; P=0.002), exercise indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (odds ratio, 1.04; P=0.

92 ) was the only predictor of increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p < 0.001).

93 end-diastolic volume, as expected, but left ventricular end-diastolic volume paradoxically increases

94 ular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (preload) in CHF rats,

95 thod (n=53, r=0.85, P<0.0001), and with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.81, P<0.0001).

96 -beam computed tomography for measuring left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.96; standard error

97 splayed an additional decline in the RV/left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio (P=0.05) and tren

98 Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) was reduced in

99 ange or change of 15 to 30 mL in 3DTTE right ventricular end-diastolic volume; sample sizes were 2x t

100 ow obstruction are inversely related to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, and car

101 earts increased relaxation velocity and left ventricular end diastolic volume to produce higher left

102 aval occlusion (VCO) was used to reduce left ventricular end-diastolic volume to 70 +/- 5% of baselin

103 s minor, and a decrease in the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume to body weight reflecte

104 ume (angiography), whereas the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume to body weight was redu

105 The mean left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 108 +/- 47 mL, as e

106 regurgitant fraction was 34+/-17%, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume was 114+/-39 cc/m(2).

107 genic right ventricular dysplasia, but right ventricular end-diastolic volume was decreased in RyR2(R

108 However, the change in right ventricular end-diastolic volume was similar in the two

109 By CMR, right ventricular end-diastolic volumes were 118 +/- 31 cc/m(2

110 At 6 months follow-up, left atrial and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes were significantly mor

111 eat stress did not significantly change left ventricular end-diastolic volume, while ventricular end-

112 most recent echocardiogram, the median left ventricular end-diastolic volume z score was +1.7 (range

113 with published normal values, left and right ventricular end-diastolic volume z scores were mildly en

114 nsion z-score (OR=2.2, P=0.02) or lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume z-score (OR=1.9, P=0.03