ライフサイエンスコーパス: verbal

1 performance = 0.5 (95% CI, -2.7 to 3.7); and verbal = -0.5 (95% CI, -3.2 to 2.2).

2 scores: full scale = 111; performance = 108; verbal = 111) and unexposed siblings (scores: full scale

3 scores: full scale = 111; performance = 107; verbal = 111) were not statistically significantly diffe

4 The most common forms were verbal (9.1% [CI, 7.7% to 10.8%]), other (such as invasi

5 used: executive and visuospatial abilities, verbal abilities, attention and working memory abilities

6 y of variance between different EF measures (verbal abstraction, verbal initiation, motor programming

7 owed a relationship to specific EF measures (verbal abstraction; working memory/attention), whereas t

8 Most of the maltreatment (63.2%) was verbal abuse and only 6.4% was any form of sexual violen

9 res (flips/shrugs), and increasingly produce verbal acknowledgments of ignorance ("I don't know").

10 Verbal aggression which appears targeted, demeaning or h

11 e children also showed relative strengths in verbal and language abilities, including a smaller discr

12 with the immediate recall of the California verbal and learning memory test.

13 hers have developed theoretical models, both verbal and mathematical, to facilitate our understanding

14 adults, and is characterized by deficits in verbal and non-verbal communication, and social interact

15 In these verbal and non-verbal matching tasks, a small set of sem

16 lining comprehension with repetition in both verbal and non-verbal tasks.

17 Three Shapes test, a specialized measure of verbal and nonverbal episodic memory.

18 had normal (ie, near-ceiling) scores on all verbal and nonverbal test conditions.

19 (comorbid) neuropsychiatric diagnoses, lower verbal and performance intelligence, and autism severity

20 Co-primary outcomes were verbal and performance IQ scores on the Wechsler Prescho

21 159; placebo group, n=154) were analysed for verbal and performance IQ with WPPSI-III and 315 (iodine

22 Verbal and spatial memory, executive function, attention

23 and 43 (33%) of 130 patients in tests of non-verbal and verbal memory (BMIPB).

24 temporal lobe epilepsy patients across both verbal and visual domains.

25 copathological correlations with measures of verbal and visual memory supported a role for EC Lewy pa

26 powerful short cognitive test that examines verbal and visual recall and is a valuable addition to t

27 Verbal and visuospatial memory performance was assessed

28 ols in Melbourne, Australia, who underwent a verbal and visuospatial working memory screening.

29 girls, 11 557 [24%] boys) reported physical, verbal, and relational (ie, traditional) bullying only,

30 ed traditional bullying (including physical, verbal, and relational bullying) or cyberbullying 2-3 ti

31 There is evidence from the visual, verbal, and tactile memory domains that the midventrolat

32 ation-based assessments of stillbirths using verbal autopsy at the state level in India.

33 using adequate VR for low U5MR countries and verbal autopsy data for high U5MR countries.

34 timates were based on vital registration and verbal autopsy data.

35 The objective of this study was to use verbal autopsy interviews to examine factors associated

36 METHODS AND Verbal autopsy interviews were conducted for deaths incl

37 Health Metrics Research Consortium shortened verbal autopsy questionnaire was used for each interview

38 ollected household demographics, completed a verbal autopsy, and randomly selected household members

39 modelled mortality from vital registration, verbal autopsy, and surveillance data using the Cause of

40 age (12-49 years) since January, 2008, using verbal autopsy.

41 omen of reproductive age were ascertained by verbal autopsy.

42 ological outcomes scores in children: global verbal (beta = -2.49; 95% CI: -4.71, -0.27), verbal memo

43 he relationship between fish consumption and verbal, but not performance, IQ.

44 ant, on a traditional 11-point NRS, and with verbal categorizations (no, mild, moderate, or severe).

45 ce relative to PD- on Symbol-Digit Matching, Verbal Category Fluency and Delayed Recall tests.

46 2,500 g (low) and 2,500-4,500 g (normal) and verbal cognitive ability was measured at the age of 10 o

47 (74%) received positive feedback (written or verbal commendation) in quarter 4 through the accountabi

48 Sensorimotor integration is central to verbal communication and provides a link between auditor

49 acid for 12 weeks resulted in improvement in verbal communication as compared with placebo, particula

50 as between-group difference in the change in verbal communication effectiveness in everyday life scen

51 s between-brain correlation disappeared when verbal communication failed.

52 mine whether high-dose folinic acid improves verbal communication in children with non-syndromic auti

53 y under routine clinical conditions improved verbal communication in daily-life situations in people

54 investigating brain-to-brain coupling during verbal communication in natural settings.

55 Verbal communication in noisy backgrounds is challenging

56 and language therapy significantly enhanced verbal communication in people aged 70 years or younger

57 r FRAA-positive participants, improvement in verbal communication was significantly greater in those

58 Verbal communication was significantly improved from bas

59 common computational demand (e.g., numeracy, verbal communication) required by many tasks.

60 characterized by deficits in verbal and non-verbal communication, and social interactions, as well a

61 Improvement in verbal communication, as measured by a ability-appropria

62 repetitive behaviors and impaired verbal/non-verbal communication.

63 in the hemodynamic response, during natural verbal communication.

64 both tasks, albeit to a lesser extent in the verbal compared with the visuospatial working memory tas

65 n of pretransplant MRI severity and baseline verbal comprehension (r = -0.340; P = .008), perceptual

66 childhood blood lead level with deficits in verbal comprehension and processing speed were not stati

67 le IQ and 2.9 points (95% CI: -4.4, -1.3) in Verbal Comprehension for each standard deviation increas

68 ing speed, memory, perceptual reasoning, and verbal comprehension in adolescence and adulthood.

69 driven by decrements in processing speed and verbal comprehension index.

70 eurocognitive test performance in 4 domains (verbal comprehension, perceptual [visual] reasoning, wor

71 The IQ (primary outcome) and indexes of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memo

72 andardized scores for both Full Scale IQ and Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memo

73 ivation related to cognitive processing (non-verbal decision making).

74 9.9 [4.6] and 14.2 [2.0], respectively) and verbal delayed retrieval (mean [SD] number of errors, 6.

75 Intervention participants received a verbal description for goals of care (life-prolonging ca

76 and advance care planning checklist versus a verbal description in 246 patients >/=64 years of age wi

77 Control subjects received only the verbal description.

78 lar consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure and written form provide a way to sati

79 the consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure is preferable to waiving consent, prov

80 head box P2 gene, FOXP2, cause developmental verbal dyspraxia with profound speech and language defic

81 Studying an individual with developmental verbal dyspraxia, we identify a deletion 3 Mb away from

82 the PPA-AD and AMN-AD groups had deficits in verbal effortless learning (mean [SD] number of errors,

83 ants (N = 200; age range, 45-55) performed a verbal encoding task during fMRI scanning.

84 verbal episodic memory (p = 0.010), delayed verbal episodic memory (p = 0.007), selective attention

85 s a significant improvement in the immediate verbal episodic memory (p = 0.010), delayed verbal episo

86 ovement in immediate (p = 0.045) and delayed verbal episodic memory (p = 0.040) compared to baseline.

87 e function score 15.4 versus 15.2, p = 0.68; verbal episodic memory score 4.4 versus 4.3, p = 0.79; s

88 ypothesis in 34 participants who performed a verbal episodic memory task while we recorded high gamma

89 luded measures of global cognitive function, verbal episodic memory, semantic fluency, and calculatio

90 h implanted electrodes performed spatial and verbal-episodic memory tasks.

91 In Experiment 2, participants made verbal estimates of the absolute distance between a sing

92 e in line with previous studies showing that verbal fear instructions have a strong impact on both br

93 3 [3.16]; P = .03), lower scores on tests of verbal fluency (adjusted z scores, 0.50 vs -2.02; P = .0

94 Completion (SSC), category naming (CAT) and verbal fluency (FAS), in localizing the Wernicke's area

95 substitution (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04), verbal fluency (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.08), and invert

96 1, 95% CI -2.0 to 1.0), phonemic or category verbal fluency (phonemic fluency test 0.90, -1.3 to 3.1;

97 ar Ataxia Functional Index (SCAFI), phonemic verbal fluency (PVF), and the quality of life measures a

98 rmal walking, simple dual task with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words beginning wit

99 nd complex dual task switching with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words, alternating

100 e: CR1 was associated with rate of change in verbal fluency and BIN1 was associated with rate of chan

101 rs1076560(T) was associated with impaired verbal fluency and comprehension in schizophrenia but im

102 A composite cognition measure of verbal fluency and memory and attention constructed from

103 We found that the [oxy-Hb] change during the verbal fluency task (VFT) was reduced in patients with E

104 bserved over time in the mean DSST, TMT, and verbal fluency test scores.

105 functioning, the Trail Making Test, and the Verbal Fluency Test.

106 n test (DSST), Trail Making Tests (TMT), and verbal fluency tests at the same time points.

107 tal cortex was proportional to the change in verbal fluency, a simple index of executive function.

108 sis, preinjury intelligence, motor strength, verbal fluency, and neurobehavioral symptom severity at

109 ponse inhibition or selection, set shifting, verbal fluency, and recognition or working memory were i

110 color word test, letter-digit substitution, verbal fluency, and word learning) and a global cognitio

111 nsity HCT recipients for executive function, verbal fluency, and working memory.

112 ssment with the Color Trail Making Test, FAS verbal fluency, Digit Span, Hooper Visual Organization T

113 , cognitive (P < .05 for all measures except Verbal Fluency, P = .52), and behavioral domain scores (

114 was positively associated with the semantic verbal fluency.

115 ded a general factor and the four domains of verbal, fluid, memory, and perceptual speed.

116 izophrenic patients with or without auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) to that of normal controls

117 Auditory verbal hallucinations (hearing voices) are typically ass

118 he primary outcome was reduction in auditory verbal hallucinations at 12 weeks, measured by total sco

119 ychotic symptoms), and had enduring auditory verbal hallucinations during the previous 12 months, des

120 ate the effect of AVATAR therapy on auditory verbal hallucinations, compared with a supportive counse

121 ic conditions experience persistent auditory verbal hallucinations, despite treatment.

122 reducing the severity of persistent auditory verbal hallucinations, with a large effect size.

123 n in the psychological treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations.

124 and randomly selected household members for verbal head-to-toe examinations for surgical conditions.

125 related set of aggressive behaviours, mostly verbal in nature, which seemed personally derogatory, ta

126 /intubation compared with patients receiving verbal information only.

127 effortless learning and delayed retrieval of verbal information, whereas FTLD-tau pathology did not.

128 that can be separated from fear learning via verbal information.

129 After verbal informed consent was obtained, SOSAS collected ho

130 questionnaire was used to collect data after verbal informed consent.

131 n different EF measures (verbal abstraction, verbal initiation, motor programming, sensitivity to int

132 ies there was no specific frontal effect for verbal initiation.

133 =6 x 10(-7), r(2)=0.003), logical memory and verbal intelligence in GS:SFHS.

134 body size (height), but shared with those of verbal intelligence scores.

135 ively correlated with behavioral measures of verbal intelligence.

136 ers were randomly selected for a head-to-toe verbal interview to determine existing untreated and tre

137 a smaller discrepancy between nonverbal and verbal IQ and a greater likelihood of having achieved fl

138 was associated with decreased full-scale and verbal IQ scores compared with duplication carriers with

139 Mean WPPSI-III scores for verbal IQ were 89.5 (SD 9.8) in the iodine group and 90.

140 tion) and was associated with impairments in verbal IQ, attention, executive function, language and v

141 cts could not be explained by differences in verbal IQ, intracranial volume, anxiety/depression, or a

142 nguage laterality positively correlated with verbal IQ.

143 the Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ), Nonverbal IQ, and Verbal IQ; the presence of ASD or other DSM-IV diagnoses

144 2 [15.97] vs 91.28 [14.31]; Cohen d, -0.70), verbal knowledge (28.31 [13.83] vs 38.51 [11.50]; Cohen

145 hose aged 35 to 49 years and on a measure of verbal knowledge (30.81 [14.17] vs 37.60 [10.48]; Cohen

146 3; P = .73) but were impaired on measures of verbal knowledge (31.36 [15.78] vs 38.83 [12.64]; Cohen

147 es showed a small impairment on a measure of verbal knowledge (34.71 [12.10] vs 38.63 [10.97]; Cohen

148 l functioning measured using tests assessing verbal knowledge (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading), worki

149 ith placebo occurred at final assessment for verbal learning (least squares mean difference=5.5, SE=1

150 as poorer in RIRP than controls on a test of verbal learning (p=0.022) and of fine co-ordination of t

151 he tau pathology, the greater the decline in verbal learning (Spearman correlation, r = -0.63), recal

152 related with improvements in both design and verbal learning 12 months postoperatively.

153 Verbal learning and memory and attention are most consis

154 would attenuate ketamine-induced deficits in verbal learning and memory in humans.

155 greater decline in social functioning, lower verbal learning and memory performance, slower speed of

156 ren with OSAS, which correlates with a lower verbal learning and memory score.

157 n = 42) performed a dual-task paradigm and a verbal learning and memory test during and out of sympto

158 elated with cognitive functioning, including verbal learning and memory.

159 ssed on ketamine-induced: (1) impairments in verbal learning and recall measured by the Hopkins Verba

160 males on social cognition, processing speed, verbal learning and visual learning.

161 cognition, processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and visual learning.

162 AQP4 variant, which was also associated with verbal learning capacity change.

163 n diffusivity mediates the impact of OSAS on verbal learning capacity.

164 n was also present when examining decline in verbal learning from 3 months to 1 year post-resection (

165 ively correlated significantly with improved verbal learning in patients with left temporal lobe epil

166 avioral paradigm to test memory performance [verbal learning memory test (VLMT)] with state of the ar

167 l measures (p values >0.5); however, a lower verbal learning score correlated with lower dentate gyru

168 we assessed memory tasks with low (Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) discriminability), moderate

169 +/- 4 y) through the use of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) for verbal memory, the Digi

170 ; worse forgetting score on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) over time [p = 0.02, beta +

171 nd persisting verbal (mean [SE] Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test [RAVLT], delayed recall: patients,

172 85, 95% CI=0.76 to 0.96) and higher auditory verbal learning test delay score (RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.77 t

173 al Memory Test-Revised (BVMT) and California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT).

174 g adults (18-32 years old) on the California Verbal Learning Test Long Delay Free Recall test.

175 piciousness, symbol coding test performance, verbal learning test performance, decline in social func

176 , 1.56 (1.13-2.14), but not the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, adjusted for age, race, sex, educa

177 ask, Word Fluency Test, Stroop test, 15-word Verbal Learning Test, and Purdue Pegboard Test) and comp

178 ognitive function (verbal memory [California Verbal Learning Test, second edition] and IQ [Wechsler A

179 We analysed the primary outcome, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed verbal recall (HVLT

180 ber Span test and scales from the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition, the Wechsler Memory

181 essment Battery for Children and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test.

182 n Test (DSST), Stroop test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

183 learning and recall measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; (2) impairments in working memory

184 e flexibility, immediate and delayed recall, verbal learning, and visuomotor coordination were variab

185 ction, language, executive function, memory, verbal learning, perceptual organization and visuomotor

186 gher sCD14 levels were associated with worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, and

187 ted with worse overall performance and worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, psyc

188 fect in nonsmoking subjects, particularly in verbal learning, working memory, and attention.

189 term memory, cognitive processing speed, and verbal learning.

190 In these verbal and non-verbal matching tasks, a small set of semantically-relat

191 sence of communicative and social context of verbal material related to such processes as theory of m

192 We propose that studying memory of verbal material within context gives a better understand

193 al or detrimental effect can be studied with verbal material, yet in this case a broad term of contex

194 ete recovery with significant and persisting verbal (mean [SE] Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test [RAV

195 verbal (beta = -2.49; 95% CI: -4.71, -0.27), verbal memory (beta = -3.59; 95% CI: -6.95, -0.23), cogn

196 ) of 130 patients in tests of non-verbal and verbal memory (BMIPB).

197 .7 points, 95% CI 3.6-7.8; p<0.0001) and non-verbal memory (decline of 6.8 points, 4.8-8.7; p<0.0001)

198 categorical fluency test 1.1, -0.3 to 2.6), verbal memory (paragraph recall test 0.29, -1.2 to 1.8),

199 mpus MAO-A VT was negatively correlated with verbal memory (r = -.44, p = .023).

200 , we noted significant worsening on tests of verbal memory (T score decline of 5.7 points, 95% CI 3.6

201 7 Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test), and Verbal Memory (Verbal Paired Associates, Logical Memory,

202 er than the norm on short-term and long-term verbal memory (z score = -1.40 [1.58], p = 0.016; z scor

203 tive Syndrome Scale) and cognitive function (verbal memory [California Verbal Learning Test, second e

204 ment, a significant postoperative decline in verbal memory and confrontational naming was observed in

205 red with placebo is associated with improved verbal memory and other cognitive functions in older men

206 In contrast, for verbal memory and phonology, the data may suggest that d

207 correlated with performance on language and verbal memory and positively with visuospatial ability.

208 gher disease severity correlated with larger verbal memory deficits (RAVLT delayed recall, r = -0.40;

209 gnition, r = -0.41; P = .04) correlated with verbal memory deficits.

210 the cingulum was negatively associated with verbal memory delayed recall (left: beta = -0.52, p = 0.

211 campal volume was positively associated with verbal memory delayed recall (left: beta = 0.44, p = 0.0

212 psychological measures of speeded attention, verbal memory or visuospatial functions, nor were signif

213 Between time points, deteriorating verbal memory performance correlated with decreasing upp

214 cline group demonstrated significantly lower verbal memory performance including immediate recall (F

215 w DHub values accurately predicted declining verbal memory performance.

216 mine concentrations correlated with impaired verbal memory performance.

217 up had significant improvements in immediate verbal memory recall over time.

218 Indeed, previous studies have suggested that verbal memory retrieval leads to the reinstatement of ac

219 inical Dementia Rating Scale sum of boxes, a verbal memory test (logical memory), and a controlled or

220 nning, which correlated with memory decline (verbal memory test, unstandardized beta = -0.79, P < 0.0

221 We found that visual memory and verbal memory were better predicted by FC, whereas visua

222 Impaired verbal memory, attention, and some executive functions m

223 five domains-attention, response inhibition, verbal memory, decision speed, and information processin

224 were associated with worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, and psychomotor speed

225 erall performance and worse verbal learning, verbal memory, executive function, psychomotor speed, an

226 h a significant decline in global cognition, verbal memory, language, and executive function, and ele

227 multiple domains (attention, visual memory, verbal memory, language, motor, and visual) in a cohort

228 emained associated with overall performance, verbal memory, psychomotor speed, and fine motor skills,

229 ey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) for verbal memory, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)

230 n that yielded measures of global cognition, verbal memory, visual memory, attention, language, execu

231 so included measures of sustained attention, verbal memory, visual-motor integration, and fine motor

232 ent cognitive impairments in working memory, verbal memory, visuospatial memory and attention signifi

233 uospatial navigation, cognitive flexibility, verbal memory, working memory, decision speed, informati

234 working memory, whereas MR was implicated in verbal memory.

235 nhibitory tDCS improved semantic accuracy in verbal modality, and right-inhibitory tDCS improved proc

236 predominating with living categories in the verbal modality.

237 n of the periphrastic 'do', and variation in verbal negation.

238 itualistic-repetitive behaviors and impaired verbal/non-verbal communication.

239 ive disorder, neuroticism, schizophrenia and verbal-numerical reasoning (absolute rg effect sizes bet

240 (n = 79757 [cases, 34486; controls, 45271]); verbal-numerical reasoning (n = 36035) and reaction time

241 GWA analyses were performed for verbal-numerical reasoning (N=36 035), memory (N=112 067

242 identified between trail-making measures and verbal-numerical reasoning (rg>0.6), general cognitive f

243 ction (z score, -4.43; P = 9.42 x 10-6), and verbal-numerical reasoning (z score, -5.43; P = 5.64 x 1

244 ased heritabilities of 31% (s.e.m.=1.8%) for verbal-numerical reasoning, 5% (s.e.m.=0.6%) for memory,

245 ied: 2 loci shared between schizophrenia and verbal-numerical reasoning, 6 loci shared between schizo

246 d the cognitive domains of reaction time and verbal-numerical reasoning, as well as general cognitive

247 Responses can be verbal or by matching the target symbol.

248 fitness should not be a basal ingredient in verbal or mathematical descriptions of evolution.

249 Differential Ability Scales Verbal (P < 0.001) and Nonverbal (P = 0.002) performance

250 ssment to evaluate episodic memory using the verbal paired associates test.

251 ymbol Substitution Test), and Verbal Memory (Verbal Paired Associates, Logical Memory, Animal Naming,

252 of words [9-11], as participants performed a verbal paired-associates task.

253 his mechanism correlates with impairments in verbal performance.

254 sychosis was significantly predicted by high verbal (premorbid) abilities (beta = 0.40; hazard ratio

255 long-lasting deficits in language skills and verbal production, but the location of the problem is un

256 from interlocutors via nonverbal gestures or verbal questions and display a heightened tendency to en

257 Verbal R-REM is most common, but physical mistreatment a

258 discomfort was evaluated using a four-point verbal rating scale hourly for the first 8 hours after s

259 and quality of life were assessed using the Verbal Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale, and Short Form

260 unotherapy was significantly correlated with verbal (RAVLT recall after interference, r = -0.48; P =

261 with tests for executive function, language, verbal reasoning and concept formation, and working, imm

262 Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed verbal recall (HVLT-R-DR) after four ECT treatments, usi

263 rwent a neuropsychological assessment, three verbal recognition memory tasks assessing familiarity an

264 oacoustic tests correlated with conventional verbal repetition tests.

265 In the absence of verbal report, these nociceptive responses are used as m

266 Immediately before verbal response, high-gamma augmentation involved the po

267 neural substrate of awareness of one's own (verbal) response.

268 vocalizations, conversational turns, parent verbal responses to child utterances, and words produced

269 (mean [SD] number of errors, 10.3 [4.0]) and verbal retention (mean [SD] number of errors, 8.33 [5.2]

270 episodic memory, attention, working memory, verbal semantic fluency, or calculation.

271 xistence of a left temporal-pole network for verbal semantics selectively modulated through both left

272 dimensions of nurse-patient interaction, non-verbal social skills negatively influenced patient engag

273 Additionally, although verbal social skills positively affected most dimensions

274 their working memory (WM) capacity limits in verbal, spatial, and object domains.

275 scores than controls for executive function, verbal speed, processing speed, auditory memory, and fin

276 immediate recall tasks involve more complex verbal stimuli (e.g. longer words versus digits); and (i

277 We administered an eight-item verbal survey to patients or surrogates approached for c

278 rspective taking using both visuospatial and verbal tasks in right-hemisphere stroke patients with an

279 erformance significantly in both spatial and verbal tasks.

280 nsion with repetition in both verbal and non-verbal tasks.

281 4 organizations), as well as all written and verbal texts produced by this network between 1993-2013

282 low-level linguistic features resulting from verbal utterances could aid diagnosis of patients with p

283 for learning linguistic biomarkers from the verbal utterances of elderly individuals could help the

284 orporeal membrane oxygenation are at risk of verbal, visual-spatial, and working memory problems.

285 pulating "living"/"nonliving" categories and verbal/visual modalities.

286 chizophrenia patients and 40 controls during verbal WM performance, and evaluated underlying function

287 Specifically, synchronous tACS during the verbal WM task increased parietal activity, which correl

288 he ratio of glutamine to glutamate to MMN to verbal working memory (P = .38 [root-mean-square error o

289 Verbal working memory (vWM) involves storing and manipul

290 matter volumes in these clusters related to verbal working memory capacity, but not other cognitive

291 The role of glutamate and GABA in MMN and verbal working memory deficits in schizophrenia has been

292 matergic and GABAergic regulation of MMN and verbal working memory function in schizophrenia.

293 Reduced MMN amplitude was linked to poor verbal working memory in schizophrenia (P = .002).

294 hed group of uninfected controls performed a verbal working memory task during magnetoencephalography

295 n before they performed a visuospatial and a verbal working memory task.

296 gth implicated by the AF entail emergence of verbal working memory, a prerequisite for language learn

297 cerebellar role in prediction to its role in verbal working memory, suggesting that these predictions

298 uppression and also affects cognition (here, verbal working memory, WM).

299 onnectivity has been shown to correlate with verbal working memory-a specifically human trait providi

300 ccuracy and processing speed in the combined verbal x living condition.