戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 otor impairment in 11-year-old children with very low birth weight.
2 d more for white than for black infants with very low birth weights.
3  of nosocomial infections among infants with very low birth weights.
4 % vs 5.6%), low birth weight (9.4% vs 9.0%), very low birth weight (1.6% vs 1.5%), and death in the f
5                   In unadjusted comparisons, very low birth weight (500-1,499 g) was more likely amon
6 istics information for all 1563 infants with very low birth weights (500 to 1500 g) born from 1987 th
7                                Despite their very low birth weight, all were neurologically normal wi
8 dults who were born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight and 106 term-born control subjects
9 r, ultrasound, vaginal birth after cesarean, very low birth weight, and newborn death.
10 tive risk of death among black newborns with very low birth weights as compared with white newborns w
11 ease inhibitors (5 percent) had infants with very low birth weight, as compared with nine women who r
12  outcomes was explained among all births and very low birth weight babies, respectively.
13 eased 17 percent, from 220.3 deaths per 1000 very-low-birth-weight babies born alive (in 1987 through
14 ces in neonatal mortality among infants with very low birth weight (below 1500 g) among NICUs with va
15    The childhood respiratory consequences of very low birth weight (birth weight < or =1,500 g) are i
16 dults who were born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight, cBF volumes were significantly re
17 hors followed to age 8 years a cohort of 384 very low birth weight children from six regional neonata
18 piratory symptoms were twice as common among very low birth weight children.
19             A reduction in early preterm and very-low birth weight could be important clinical and pu
20                     Less than one quarter of very-low-birth-weight deliveries occurred in facilities
21 el of care and had a high volume, but 92% of very-low-birth-weight deliveries occurred in urban areas
22 .4, 3.1), respectively; the relative risk of very low birth weight for infants with US-born Black mot
23 the mortality rate among white newborns with very low birth weights (from 261.5 per 1000 to 155.5 per
24                                          The very-low-birth-weight group reported less alcohol and dr
25          Adults who were born preterm with a very low birth weight have higher blood pressure and imp
26 entilation for the treatment of infants with very low birth weight have not been established.
27 effective use of preventive therapies in the very low birth weight infant population.
28  compassionate use of tin mesoporphyrin in a very low birth weight infant with intrauterine growth re
29                                              Very low-birth-weight infant infection rates were 16.4%
30                              The majority of very low birth weight infants (52%) were discharged on f
31                                              Very low birth weight infants are at high risk, particul
32 eding support by nurses have higher rates of very low birth weight infants discharged home on human m
33 evel between the dependent variable (rate of very low birth weight infants discharged on "any human m
34                  Most conventionally managed very low birth weight infants experience postnatal growt
35 oid (GC) therapy, while approximately 19% of very low birth weight infants receive postnatal GC thera
36 e risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very low birth weight infants receiving indomethacin (IN
37 cently provided reference range for uNGAL in very low birth weight infants shows that normative value
38       Chinese women were less likely to have very low birth weight infants than were whites.
39 exists regarding the best method of managing very low birth weight infants with PDA and whether to em
40           Diminution in risk was greater for very low birth weight infants, amounting to a sevenfold
41  liver disease, necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants, and hepatic encephalopath
42 dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic lung disease of very low birth weight infants, associated with oxygen th
43 e nature of dermal structure and function in very low birth weight infants, evidence of mechanical fr
44 Prevention of IC has become a major focus in very low birth weight infants, with fluconazole increasi
45 al palsy in a geographically based cohort of very low birth weight infants.
46  of other morbid conditions in full-term and very low birth weight infants.
47 sk factor for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants.
48 y protein intake may improve growth in these very low birth weight infants.
49  and aggressive administration of protein to very low birth weight infants.
50  possible after birth at 2.5-3.0 g/kg/day in very low birth weight infants; however, there are no lon
51 easure clinical risk and illness severity in very low birth-weight infants.
52  (2500-3999 g), while the admission rate for very low-birth-weight infants (<1500 g) was 844.1 per 10
53 r, double-blind randomized clinical trial in very low-birth-weight infants (birth weight <1500 g) adm
54                             Major surgery in very low-birth-weight infants is independently associate
55 al population, but levels of vaccination for very low-birth-weight infants lag slightly behind.
56  life yielded similar short-term outcomes in very low-birth-weight infants regarding safety and effic
57 ctice did not improve outcomes in premature, very low-birth-weight infants requiring a transfusion.
58 our weeks of age in 371 ventilator-dependent very-low-birth-weight infants (501 to 1500 g) who had re
59 th a high level of care and a high volume of very-low-birth-weight infants (more than 100 per year),
60                              We studied 5447 very-low-birth-weight infants (those weighing between 40
61                                              Very-low-birth-weight infants (those weighing less than
62 ree days of life and compared them with 7606 very-low-birth-weight infants born at centers in the net
63  We compared a cohort of 242 survivors among very-low-birth-weight infants born between 1977 and 1979
64        The neonatal mortality rate among all very-low-birth-weight infants decreased 17 percent, from
65  among black infants, the mortality rate for very-low-birth-weight infants did not change significant
66 occurring within 72 hours after birth) among very-low-birth-weight infants have changed in recent yea
67                                              Very-low-birth-weight infants have high levels of duoden
68 proportionate number of low-birth-weight and very-low-birth-weight infants in the United States, in p
69                        Mortality rates among very-low-birth-weight infants varied according to both t
70                              Mortality among very-low-birth-weight infants was lowest for deliveries
71 assess neonatal mortality rates among 48,237 very-low-birth-weight infants who were born in Californi
72 lation in terms of the pulmonary outcome for very-low-birth-weight infants without an increase in the
73 ver the past 2 decades on the development of very-low-birth-weight infants' oral feeding skills.
74 such facilities might reduce mortality among very-low-birth-weight infants.
75 ious levels of care and different volumes of very-low-birth-weight infants.
76 gulase-negative staphylococcal infections in very-low-birth-weight infants.
77 ncommon but potentially lethal problem among very-low-birth-weight infants.
78 rcent of low-birth-weight and 4.3 percent of very-low-birth-weight infants.
79 and oligodendrocytes, in preterm babies with very low birth weight is associated with decreased cereb
80                        The rate of births at very low birth weight (&lt; 1,500 g) decreased by 6% in the
81                  Infant low birth weight and very low birth weight (&lt; 1,500 g) risks were also reduce
82  Systemic candidiasis affects 1.6 to 4.5% of very low birth weight (&lt;/= 1,500 g) infants.
83 tion of the low-birth-weight babies having a very low birth weight (&lt;1,500 g) in the more recent birt
84 birth weight (less-than-or-equal 2500 g) and very low birth weight (&lt;1500 g) among infants conceived
85 infants born to both groups; and the rate of very low birth weight (&lt;1500 g) was 2 percent for the gr
86 n a weekend concentration of high-mortality, very low-birth-weight (&lt;1500 g) births.
87 on 422 duodenal aspirates collected from 122 very-low-birth-weight (&lt;1,500-g) newborns, at the time o
88                                              Very-low-birth-weight men, but not women, were significa
89                   Prophylactic GM-CSF in the very low birth weight neonate may reduce the incidence o
90 en suggested as a way to reduce mortality in very low birth weight neonates.
91 igned for pediatric patients; and surgery in very low birth weight neonates.
92  mo corrected age for a historical cohort of very-low-birth-weight neonates (<1250 g) who were admitt
93 ohort and a restricted subcohort of preterm, very low birth weight (P-VLBW) infants.
94                                              Very-low-birth-weight participants had a lower mean IQ (
95     Educational disadvantage associated with very low birth weight persists into early adulthood.
96                                              Very low birth weight preterm newborns are susceptible t
97    A multicentered clinical trial found that very low-birth weight preterm infants given bovine lacto
98 double-blind, randomized controlled study of very-low-birth-weight preterm neonates randomly allocate
99                     Outcomes included low or very low birth weight, preterm birth, and intrauterine g
100                                          The very low birth weight rate (<1,500 g) was 2.6% for infan
101 have disparate moderate rates but equivalent very low birth weight rates.
102 protease inhibitors and an increased risk of very low birth weight requires confirmation.
103 ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.3) and very low birth weight (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) than wi
104 Heavy growth of E. coli had a higher risk of very low birth weight than light growth (RR, 2.4; 95% CI
105                       The authors considered very low birth weight (VLBW) (<1,500 g), low birth weigh
106 ded particulates (TSP) and risk for having a very low birth weight (VLBW) baby, i.e., one weighing le
107                 Premature children born with very low birth weight (VLBW) can suffer chronic hypoxic
108                                              Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at risk for chi
109                                              Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are dependent on to
110                Fifty-two term infants and 58 very low birth weight (VLBW) infants without significant
111 ving infants born very preterm (VPT) or with very low birth weight (VLBW) is necessary to guide clini
112 ry preterm (VPT) at 32 weeks or less or with very low birth weight (VLBW) of 1250 g or less.
113                              Infants born at very low birth weight (VLBW) require high levels of nurs
114                            Low birth weight, very low birth weight (VLBW), preterm birth, and very pr
115 eton birth categories: 450 fetal deaths; 782 very low birth weight (VLBW, < 1,500 g); 802 moderately
116  extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g), very low birth weight (VLBW, 1000-1499 g), moderately lo
117 or morphometric analysis was performed on 50 very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight </=1500 g), 49
118    The authors examined the relation between very low birth weight (VLBW: < 1,500 g) and possible dev
119 olitis represent a high-risk subgroup of the very low-birth-weight (VLBW) (<1500 g) population that w
120 improvement (CQI) projects aimed at reducing very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infant morbidities.
121 splasia (BPD) remains a serious morbidity in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g).
122 end of antibiotic use among all hospitalized very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants across Canada and t
123 inatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly s
124 ) is typically benign in term infants but in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants can cause pneumonit
125           The annual volume of deliveries of very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants has a greater effec
126                                      Preterm very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants have a high prevale
127                         Importance: For many very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants, there is insuffici
128 can cause serious morbidity and mortality in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.
129 ast milk can lead to severe acute illness in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) preterm infants.
130 rt study from January 2010 to February 2014, very low-birth-weight (VLBW, </=1500 g) infants, within
131 ent how parents adapt to the experience of a very low-birth-weight (VLBW; <1500 g) birth despite soci
132               Recent nutritional research in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants is focused on the p
133 f initiation of parenteral lipid infusion to very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants varies widely among
134 sure total body water (TBW) was evaluated in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.
135 entricular hemorrhage (IVH) are common among very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.
136 irth weight ([LBW] 1.8 to 2.24 kg) and three very low birth weight ([VLBW] < or = 1.36 kg) infants, f
137 fections are commonly present in preterm and very low-birth-weight (VLWB) infants and might contribut
138 dults who were born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight was specifically associated with b
139 survival without disability in children with very low birth weights who were assessed at 5 years.
140 mounting to a sevenfold reduction in risk of very low birth weight with first trimester supplementati
141                                        Fewer very-low-birth-weight young adults than normal-birth-wei

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top