戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  approaching the level inferred prior to the violent 1914 Plinian eruption.
2 re also less likely to ever have committed a violent act (ARR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98).
3 xperienced any of the following triggers for violent acts between January 1, 2001, and December 15, 2
4 mpare the risk of the individual engaging in violent acts in the week following the exposure to a tri
5 orders, but the contribution of triggers for violent acts to these risks is uncertain.
6  disorder) have elevated risks of committing violent acts, particularly if they are comorbid with sub
7                   In explaining variation in violent aggression across populations, the age structure
8 nd 25 are disproportionately responsible for violent aggression in every society, and increases in vi
9 distress, which may partly account for their violent and antisocial behavior.
10 y with psychopathic traits, who present with violent and antisocial behaviors, tend to value other pe
11                                         Both violent and charitable acts are over-determined, and a m
12 ward increasingly clear distinctions between violent and nonviolent acts.
13                             Exposure to both violent and nonviolent civil insecurity had negative ass
14                                              Violent and nonviolent criminal convictions and medical
15 ound between low systolic blood pressure and violent and nonviolent criminality and for assault injur
16 trate the emergence of semantically distinct violent and nonviolent trial genres.
17 ecialists for treatment more often occur for violent and sexual offenses than for other offenses.
18                       Have humans evolved as violent and warlike?
19 of other people and severe, premeditated and violent antisocial behaviour.
20 , drug-related crime, less severe crime, and violent arrest), and was stronger in patients who were p
21 her after initial self-harm events involving violent as compared with nonviolent methods (hazard rati
22 o 0.23%]; interaction P = .01), a history of violent behavior (1.04% [95% CI, 0.35% to 1.73%] vs 0.00
23 esion protein) are associated with extremely violent behavior (at least 10 committed homicides, attem
24 behavior at baseline significantly predicted violent behavior (RR=13.9, p=0.001; RR=8.3, p=0.003, res
25 ated whether psychosis increased the risk of violent behavior among released prisoners and whether tr
26 nt behavior and violent ideation and outcome violent behavior and conversion to psychosis in at-risk
27 o examine the relationships between baseline violent behavior and violent ideation and outcome violen
28 ta on risk factors at an initial wave and on violent behavior at 1-year follow-up were collected in t
29                                              Violent behavior at 6 or 12 months following early inter
30                    Both violent ideation and violent behavior at baseline significantly predicted vio
31       There appear to be diverse pathways to violent behavior during FEP.
32 inquency trajectories increased the risk for violent behavior during FEP.
33 re included if outcome data on aggression or violent behavior either as a binary outcome or as a quan
34  active symptoms of psychosis at the time of violent behavior explained associations between untreate
35  geographical locations across England, with violent behavior information available for 670 first-epi
36                                              Violent behavior occurred within 7 days (SD 35 days) of
37 l and illicit drug use, sexual activity, and violent behavior remain significant concerns in perioper
38  risk for psychosis for violent ideation and violent behavior using the Structured Interview for Psyc
39 class growth analysis, and associations with violent behavior were quantified.
40 dule) and interviewed about their displaying violent behavior while experiencing psychotic symptoms d
41 olent ideation at baseline, 12 (6%) reported violent behavior within 6 months pre-baseline, and 8 (4%
42  the relationships between violent ideation, violent behavior, and early, particularly attenuated, ps
43  factors in the etiology of extreme criminal violent behavior, and imply that at least about 5-10% of
44 luding anxiety, tachycardia, hallucinations, violent behavior, and psychosis.
45 eir adverse effects, which include delirium, violent behavior, and suicide ideation in severe cases.
46 ds appears to directly increase the risk for violent behavior, independent of psychosis-related risk
47 igated associations between gang membership, violent behavior, psychiatric morbidity, and use of ment
48  to recidivistic violent offending or severe violent behavior, such as homicide.
49 y different than their subsequent targets of violent behavior.
50 elusions in untreated schizophrenia explains violent behavior.
51 hosis, past drug use, positive symptoms, and violent behavior.
52 o confirm associations between delusions and violent behavior.
53 ocesses and proximal factors associated with violent behavior.
54  associated with substance use disorders and violent behavior.
55  the intact dlPFC could treat aggressive and violent behavior.
56 s medical consequences, including psychosis, violent behaviors, tachycardia, hyperthermia, and even d
57 ere at particularly high risk for expressing violent behaviors.
58  withdrawal, and withdrawal by physician for violent behaviour).
59  making among family members, as well as non-violent behaviour.
60 rtial cavitation events, as characterised by violent bubble collapse and the generation of broadband
61 ent-related injury, apart from high rates of violent child death in the USA.
62 ssociations between localized nonviolent and violent civil insecurity during key child nutritional pe
63 s should be visible in the multigenerational violent conflict between Palestinians and Israelis which
64 ship between climate trends and the risks of violent conflict have yielded contradictory results, par
65 ootage from a murder or broadcast replays of violent contact in professional football demonstrate tha
66 tion toward violence in both samples and for violent convictions among our black sample.
67 ithin 12 months were conviction for previous violent crime (adjusted odds ratio 5.03 [95% CI 4.23-5.9
68 domestic violence (beta, 0.088; P = .12) and violent crime (beta, 0.029; P = .006).
69                              Conviction of a violent crime according to the Swedish penal code.
70                  Main Outcomes and Measures: Violent crime after release from prison.
71 ide risk, premature mortality, homelessness, violent crime and incarceration.
72           They engaged in more violence (eg, violent crime and intimate partner abuse) and needed mor
73 ores, and violence as measured by reports of violent crime and reports of domestic violence, operatio
74 HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34, p < 0.001), non-violent crime arrests (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20, p <
75 ween SSRIs and violent crime convictions and violent crime arrests varied by age group.
76 in those aged 15 to 24 y were also found for violent crime arrests with preliminary investigations (H
77 , 2.22 to 5.32]) to have been arrested for a violent crime before hospitalization.
78 ychotics and mood stabilisers on the rate of violent crime committed by patients with psychiatric dis
79 e hazard ratio was 4.9 (95% CI, 4.8-5.0) for violent crime conviction in exposed individuals compared
80 was an overall association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19, 95%
81 HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.41, p < 0.001), non-violent crime convictions (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34,
82            The association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions and violent crime arrests vari
83  a significant association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions for individuals aged 15 to 24
84  a significant association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions for males aged 15 to 24 y (HR
85                               Information on violent crime convictions was extracted from the Swedish
86 ers, of whom 2657 (6.5%) were convicted of a violent crime during the study period.
87 ds when participants were not on medication, violent crime fell by 45% in patients receiving antipsyc
88 ength by 0.006 for each additional report of violent crime in a 500-m radius of a child's home (beta
89 mply that at least about 5-10% of all severe violent crime in Finland is attributable to the aforemen
90 vents were associated with increased risk of violent crime in the week following exposure.
91  In developed countries, the majority of all violent crime is committed by a small group of antisocia
92               Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of violent crime occurring in the week following the exposu
93 isers were associated with a reduced rate of violent crime only in patients with bipolar disorder.
94          The largest 1-week absolute risk of violent crime was observed following exposure to violenc
95                                  The rate of violent crime was significantly associated with a decrea
96                        Notable reductions in violent crime were also recorded for depot medication (H
97 x regression analyses to compare the rate of violent crime while individuals were prescribed these me
98 ]; P = .04), as did children exposed to more violent crime within 500 m of their home (beta [SE] -0.0
99 nia, bipolar disorder, substance misuse, and violent crime) were highly heritable (h(2)=53-71%).
100    The primary outcome was the occurrence of violent crime, according to Sweden's national crime regi
101 erse outcomes, including the perpetration of violent crime, is unclear.
102 ciated with substantially increased rates of violent crime, suicide, and premature mortality.
103 ight also include reductions in the rates of violent crime.
104 ugs, of whom 604 (1.4 %) had convictions for violent crime.
105 of the climatic basis of race differences in violent crime.
106 e association between nonfatal self-harm and violent crime.
107 s violence by 43% over 16 months (3.95 fewer violent-crime arrests per 100 youth).
108 35%-44%) higher hazard of being convicted of violent crimes and a 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) higher hazard
109 utor of evidence in investigations involving violent crimes because of the unique composition of prot
110 lcohol is associated with nearly half of all violent crimes committed in the United States; yet, a po
111 ls who were prescribed SSRIs, and subsequent violent crimes during 2006 through 2009.
112 erved following exposure to violence (70-177 violent crimes per 10000 persons).
113  substance use disorders and convictions for violent crimes, between 1973 and 2013, were obtained fro
114 n-individual analyses to compare the rate of violent criminality during the time that patients were p
115  fifth (21%; 20-22%) of the correlation with violent criminality in bipolar disorder but none of the
116 patterns of increased risk for self-harm and violent criminality were observed in both sexes, althoug
117 ce was associated with an increased risk for violent criminality, nonviolent criminality, exposure to
118  associated with substance use disorders and violent criminality.
119 ]) than in men (self-harm: 1.61 [1.53-1.69]; violent criminality: 1.58 [1.53-1.63]).
120 men (self-harm: IRR 1.94 [95% CI 1.85-2.02]; violent criminality: 2.16 [1.97-2.36]) than in men (self
121 ries were more likely to suffer a subsequent violent death, interventions focused on breaking the cyc
122  firearms in the home increases the risk for violent death.
123 icators, but less than two-fold variation in violent deaths or maltreatment-related injury, apart fro
124    The VDC recorded 143 630 conflict-related violent deaths with complete information between March 1
125                 We analysed conflict-related violent deaths with complete information on date, place,
126  with reports of relatives bereaved by other violent deaths.
127 ion were increased after all combinations of violent, drug/alcohol-related, and self-inflicted injury
128 dolescents discharged after an admission for violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury
129 ospitalisation for adversity-related injury (violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury)
130 ncy admissions for adversity-related injury (violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury;
131                    Another mechanism for the violent ejection of mass in massive stars may be require
132  of electromagnetic forces and the typically violent environments.
133 ny aimed to separate the effect of recalling violent events from the effect of emotions of fear and a
134             Prior exposure to similar and/or violent events may render some individuals vulnerable to
135 nal dynamics, we show that the production of violent events tends to accelerate with increasing size
136                                              Violent extremist groups are currently making intensive
137 ree surface, resulting in the unclamping and violent 'flapping' of the hanging-wall wedge.
138 tial aggressive cognition related to initial violent game play at the beginning of the study than old
139 forming clumps, which are thought to form by violent gravitational instabilities in highly turbulent
140 erimentation, orphanage, illegal seizure, or violent human conflict were more likely to display signs
141 ese data suggest that checking carefully for violent ideation and behavior in clinical high-risk pati
142 nships between baseline violent behavior and violent ideation and outcome violent behavior and conver
143                                         Both violent ideation and violent behavior at baseline signif
144 uals at clinical high risk for psychosis for violent ideation and violent behavior using the Structur
145                 The targets of the subjects' violent ideation at baseline were completely different t
146         Fifty-six individuals (28%) reported violent ideation at baseline, 12 (6%) reported violent b
147                            Information about violent ideation was obtained only by indirect, but not
148 ck of insight into the relationships between violent ideation, violent behavior, and early, particula
149 y by indirect, but not direct, inquiry about violent ideation.
150 avior is consistent with the occurrence of a violent impact that produced vapor out of which a thick
151 d four in the control group) and two serious violent incidents (one in each group) were noted, but no
152  abuse, but only a small percentage of these violent incidents are reported to law enforcement, healt
153 m 1.67 to 5.35, compared with 1.25 following violent injury alone (girls: 1.09 to 3.25, compared with
154 ldings, and natural surroundings, and severe violent injury among youth.
155                                              Violent injury contributes significantly to trauma morta
156 ended to drug-related or alcohol-related and violent injury in adolescence.
157 r girls, and 4.51 [3.89-5.24] for boys), and violent injury in boys (1.43 [1.15-1.78]) versus acciden
158                    Given what is known about violent injury in general, the burden of critical violen
159                                              Violent injury is a reoccurring disease, with one-third
160 nt injury in general, the burden of critical violent injury is likely substantial, yet little is know
161  provides an overview of what is known about violent injury requiring critical care, including child
162 ikely substantial, yet little is known about violent injury requiring critical care.
163 the AI group had almost twice the risk for a violent injury requiring ED care within 2 years compared
164 e-third of our AI group experiencing another violent injury requiring ED care within 2 years of the i
165 increased risk of suicide in girls following violent injury versus accident-related injury was not si
166 flicted, drug-related or alcohol-related, or violent injury) affects 4% of 10-19-year-olds.
167 flicted, drug-related or alcohol-related, or violent injury) or accident-related (for which there was
168 or self-inflicted injury (i.e., with/without violent injury), for which age-adjusted hazard ratios fo
169 inical care, outcomes, and costs of critical violent injury.
170 nt and mitigate the consequences of critical violent injury.
171 sity-related injury except for girls who had violent injury.
172  motivator of great apes' (including humans) violent intergroup conflict, but mountain gorillas are n
173 coordination and coalitionary support during violent intergroup conflicts.
174                We demonstrated high rates of violent interpersonal injury (71.6% of intentional injur
175 s a powerful predictor of the propensity for violent interstate conflict.
176  sex, age, trait aggressiveness, exposure to violent media, interest in guns, and number of guns at h
177                                              Violent men and gang members had higher prevalences of m
178 d with service use in gang members and other violent men.
179 hows that the matter that is expelled in the violent merger of two neutron stars can assemble into he
180 nique hardness, is expected to happen during violent meteor impacts.
181                           Patients who use a violent method for their initial self-harm, especially f
182 completion than men, due in part to the less-violent methods used, they have a higher rate of suicide
183 nts using nonviolent methods, those who used violent methods were at significantly increased risk of
184                                  Unlike more violent methods, which are almost universally fatal, sur
185 r climatic extremes may increase the risk of violent mobilization.
186 unsentenced; in female inmates, committing a violent offence against an individual was also a factor.
187 ion sample, 830 (1%) individuals committed a violent offence within 12 months of their patient episod
188 of men and 2.7% of women were convicted of a violent offence, and 3.3% of men and 2.0% of women died
189 tality, with follow-up until conviction of a violent offence, emigration, death, or end of follow-up
190 st, we investigated rates of conviction of a violent offence, suicide, and premature mortality, with
191  adverse outcomes, including conviction of a violent offence, suicide, and premature mortality.
192 personnel in the criminal justice system for violent offences.
193                                       In the violent offender group, striatal 5-HT1BR binding was pos
194                                              Violent offenders (1,369 [11.0%]) were the most prevalen
195                        Nineteen incarcerated violent offenders and 24 healthy control nonoffenders we
196  MRI (fMRI) study in 50 men, of whom 12 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder a
197 ersonality disorder and psychopathy, 20 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder b
198                      This difference between violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder w
199                The present study examined 17 violent offenders with ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28
200 nders with ASPD and psychopathy (ASPD+P), 28 violent offenders with ASPD without psychopathy (ASPD-P)
201      In comparison to healthy non-offenders, violent offenders with ASPD+P and those with ASPD-P show
202  observed for either MAOA or CDH13 among non-violent offenders, indicating that findings were specifi
203 al cluster was most strongly associated with violent offending (2.01, 1.50-2.70; p<0.0001).
204 31, 2008, we developed predictive models for violent offending (primary outcome) within 1 year of hos
205 nts during deployment also increased risk of violent offending (violent offending in 104 [4.1%] of 27
206 , the highest absolute risk observed was for violent offending among individuals admitted to hospital
207 nd post-deployment mental health problems on violent offending among military personnel relative to p
208 c disease and risks of attempted suicide and violent offending among offspring.
209 rimination and calibration for prediction of violent offending at 1 year using specified risk cutoffs
210                                  For risk of violent offending at 1 year, with a 5% cutoff, sensitivi
211                                              Violent offending by veterans of the Iraq and Afghanista
212 are well documented, the potential legacy of violent offending has yet to be ascertained.
213 nt also increased risk of violent offending (violent offending in 104 [4.1%] of 2753 men with exposur
214 ociated with post-deployment alcohol misuse (violent offending in 120 [9.0%] of 1363 men with alcohol
215 aumatic event, 1.77, 1.21-2.58, p=0.003; and violent offending in 122 [5.1%] of 2582 men with exposur
216 risk, even after adjustment for confounders (violent offending in 137 [6.3%] of 2178 men deployed in
217 ; p<0.0001), post-traumatic stress disorder (violent offending in 25 [8.6%] of 344 men with post-trau
218 evels of self-reported aggressive behaviour (violent offending in 56 [6.7%] of 856 men with an aggres
219 cal prediction rule to determine the risk of violent offending in released prisoners.
220 al assessment in individuals at high risk of violent offending is required to establish who might ben
221 ave been shown to contribute to recidivistic violent offending or severe violent behavior, such as ho
222                                              Violent offending was strongly associated with post-depl
223      Risks for offspring suicide attempt and violent offending were elevated across virtually the ful
224 n parental psychiatric disease and offspring violent offending were stronger for female than for male
225                  The strongest predictors of violent offending within 12 months were conviction for p
226 t (suicide attempt, 3.42; 95% CI, 3.29-3.55; violent offending, 3.31; 95% CI, 3.19-3.44).
227 r (suicide attempt, 3.96; 95% CI, 3.72-4.21; violent offending, 3.62; 95% CI, 3.41-3.84) and cannabis
228 e (suicide attempt, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.25-3.92; violent offending, 4.05; 95% CI, 3.72-4.39), and for par
229 , indicating that findings were specific for violent offending, and not largely attributable to subst
230 ntifying those who are at low risk of future violent offending, and those at high risk of violent reo
231 ependently associated with increased risk of violent offending, but serving in a combat role conferre
232  among disadvantaged youth is a key cause of violent offending, programs to remedy youth unemployment
233 ister enabled ascertainment of self-harm and violent offending, respectively, as adverse outcomes at
234 participants and assess the risk factors for violent offending.
235  by identifying those who are at low risk of violent offending.
236  estimated for offspring suicide attempt and violent offending.
237 d with an increased risk of conviction for a violent offense in both sexes.
238 economic status, an almost doubled hazard of violent offense remained (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.8
239 sentences of 2 or more years for a sexual or violent offense were classified into four groups: no psy
240 h century the semantic content of trials for violent offenses is functionally indistinguishable from
241                    Psychotic persons who are violent often explain their violence as being due to del
242 ge groups can be very efficient for limiting violent output from these fora.
243 t that microbial communities exposed to more violent perturbations should have higher diversity.
244 llowed the deep biosphere to thrive, despite violent phases during Earth's history such as the late h
245  a broad host range alphaherpesvirus, causes violent pruritus in many different animals, but the mech
246 e psychosis (FEP), most have simply compared violent psychotic individuals with nonviolent psychotic
247  cues give rise to negative, fearful or even violent reactions.
248 tment after release can substantially reduce violent recidivism among prisoners with schizophrenia.
249                                 The risk for violent reinjury among high-risk, assault-injured youth
250                                     Women in violent relationships were more likely to have concealed
251                                              Violent releases of space plasma energy from the Earth's
252 eloped a 14-item derivation model to predict violent reoffending and tested it in an external validat
253 ion for prediction of our primary outcome of violent reoffending at 1 and 2 years using cutoffs of 10
254                                  For risk of violent reoffending at 1 year, sensitivity was 76% (95%
255                                     Rates of violent reoffending during medicated periods were compar
256 ween 2001 and 2009, with 11 263 incidents of violent reoffending during this period.
257 egisters, we developed predictive models for violent reoffending for the cohort.
258  were associated with an increased hazard of violent reoffending in male (adjusted HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.
259 uming causality, up to 20% (95% CI 19-22) of violent reoffending in men and 40% (27-52) in women was
260                                The hazard of violent reoffending increased in a stepwise way with the
261      Of individuals with a predicted risk of violent reoffending of 50% or more, 88% had drug and alc
262 e found some evidence of stronger effects on violent reoffending of alcohol and drug use disorders an
263 ptics were not significantly associated with violent reoffending rates (HR = 1.09 [95% CI, 0.83-1.43]
264 Among released prisoners in Sweden, rates of violent reoffending were lower during periods when indiv
265 violent offending, and those at high risk of violent reoffending who might benefit from drug and alco
266        We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for violent reoffending with Cox regression.
267 uals released from prison have high rates of violent reoffending, and there is uncertainty about whet
268 ajor classes of psychotropic medications and violent reoffending.
269 rders, including substance use disorder, and violent reoffending.
270 ted with a substantially increased hazard of violent reoffending.
271  difference of 42.8 (95% CI, 2.2-67.6) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
272 difference of 23.2 (95% CI, 10.3-34.1) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
273  difference of 36.4 (95% CI, 2.1-54.0) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
274 difference of 39.7 (95% CI, 11.3-57.7) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
275 .4 years), 4031 individuals (18.1%) had 5653 violent reoffenses.
276                                              Violent ruminative thinking, violent victimization, and
277 behaviour are also typically associated with violent self-harm (e.g., poor self-control).
278               Links between perpetration and violent sexual media are apparent, suggesting a need to
279  reward systems in response to aggressive or violent social stimuli.
280 such as loss of coordination, paralysis, and violent spasms.
281 ipants also received lower severity-weighted violent (standardized estimate=-0.37) and drug (standard
282 ntrasting highly stressful, threatening, and violent stimuli versus nonaversive neutral visual stimul
283 nalysis of two decades of data, we find that violent storms and hurricanes contribute less than 1% to
284  The intrinsic resistance of salt marshes to violent storms and their predictable erosion rates durin
285  disturbance of forests by timber harvest or violent storms causes an increase in stream nitrate conc
286 onditions-such as temperature, rainfall, and violent storms-influence the nature of societies and the
287 rs about differences in risks of suicide and violent suicide among the armed services and may help gu
288 fects were found in the entire sample and in violent suicides.
289 g populations, implying that states are less violent than small-scale societies.
290 n societies, where ethnic conflicts are more violent, traditional overt forms of prejudice still exis
291  we examined the relationship between recent violent victimization and mental health status, mental h
292                                     Risk for violent victimization or crime perpetration after firear
293 ciated with a heightened risk for subsequent violent victimization or crime perpetration.
294                 Violent ruminative thinking, violent victimization, and fear of further victimization
295 ve modeling demonstrated that the effects of violent video game play are mediated primarily by aggres
296 dinal studies have demonstrated an effect of violent video game play on later aggressive behavior, li
297 ly associated with experiences of abusive or violent voices (p=0.024).
298 ies closer to the equator are generally more violent." We point to the lack of credible empirical evi
299                                          The violent winds of these storms induce deep mixing of the
300    Perpetrators reported greater exposure to violent X-rated content.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top