戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n, although E2 is predicted to be a class II viral fusion protein.
2 ible and did not lead to inactivation of the viral fusion protein.
3 ks any of the defining features of a typical viral fusion protein.
4 ein, while gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusion protein.
5 H/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein.
6  the viral spike (S) glycoprotein, a class I viral fusion protein.
7 RS-CoV viral spike glycoprotein is a class I viral fusion protein.
8 le similar to the proposed fusogenic core of viral fusion proteins.
9 g domain is not critical for the activity of viral fusion proteins.
10 he mechanism of fusion promoted by these two viral fusion proteins.
11 and an evolutionary connection between these viral fusion proteins.
12 entiates them from many other low-pH-induced viral fusion proteins.
13 g blocks of the unilaterally acting class-II viral fusion proteins.
14 oteins and falls into the group of class III viral fusion proteins.
15  consistent with the requirement for TMRs in viral fusion proteins.
16 oped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins.
17 lambda spanins, which are similar to class I viral fusion proteins.
18 k domains may be a common feature of class I viral fusion proteins.
19 le fusogenic conformational changes in other viral fusion proteins.
20 onmental pH that can trigger the activity of viral fusion proteins.
21 ons of which extend to BNAb targets on other viral fusion proteins.
22  a founder member of the class III family of viral fusion proteins.
23 tions mediated by their structurally similar viral fusion proteins.
24 ils like those in cellular SNAREs or in some viral fusion proteins.
25 sponsible for proteolytic activation of many viral fusion proteins.
26 roposed for the fusion mechanisms of class I viral fusion proteins.
27                           Similarity between viral fusion proteins and recently discovered cellular p
28                                        Other viral fusion proteins and the SNARE fusion protein compl
29 protein that is very large compared to other viral fusion proteins, and all except a short carboxy-te
30 idate for structural studies of the class II viral fusion proteins, and we report conditions that gen
31 ediated by influenza hemagglutinin and other viral fusion proteins apparently involve local lipidic c
32 SAV entry machinery exhibits typical class I viral fusion protein architecture.
33                                              Viral fusion proteins are intriguing molecular machines
34                                     Class II viral fusion proteins are present on the envelope of fla
35                                         Many viral fusion proteins are primed by proteolytic cleavage
36            The transmembrane (TM) domains of viral fusion proteins are required for fusion, but their
37 ished data showed that both peripherin-2 and viral fusion proteins are transmembrane proteins that pr
38                                         Many viral fusion proteins are type I integral membrane prote
39            The transmembrane (TM) domains of viral fusion proteins are typically required for fusion.
40 tein, gH/gL does not resemble any documented viral fusion protein at a structural level.
41                    Many class I, II, and III viral fusion proteins bear fusion loops for target membr
42 epeat regions (HR1 and HR2, respectively) of viral fusion proteins can block infection of viruses in
43                                              Viral fusion proteins catalyze merger of viral and cell
44                                              Viral fusion proteins catalyze the merger of the virus e
45 n residues can affect folding or function of viral fusion proteins, direct analysis of TM-TM interact
46 ion and postfusion crystal structures of the viral fusion protein E1 in conjunction with biochemical
47 lls expressing the low pH-triggered class II viral fusion protein E1 of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) we
48 lains how specific residues in this class II viral fusion protein enable virus infectivity.
49                                         Many viral fusion proteins exhibit a six-helix bundle as a co
50  of endosomal protease for activation of the viral fusion protein (F).
51                                Paramyxovirus viral fusion proteins (F) insert into the target cell me
52 membranes.Crystal structures for a number of viral fusion proteins facilitating this process have con
53 on peptide and transmembrane domains of many viral fusion proteins form stable helical bundles and in
54  HIV-1 gp41, providing further evidence that viral fusion proteins from diverse families such as Orth
55                         Unlike other class I viral fusion proteins, GPC retains its stable signal pep
56  fusion (F) protein, a member of the class I viral fusion protein group.
57                              While work with viral fusion proteins has demonstrated that the transmem
58 nistic properties, three distinct classes of viral fusion proteins have been identified to date.
59 ture, VSV G has been classified as class III viral fusion protein, having a predicted bipartite fusio
60                             The absence of a viral fusion protein implies that these quasi-enveloped
61  have shown that GPC is unique among class I viral fusion proteins in that the mature complex retains
62 ith the structures observed for other type 1 viral fusion proteins in their fusion-competent state.
63 shares the characteristics of FPs of class I viral fusion proteins, including high Ala/Gly content, i
64 with functionally analogous regions of other viral fusion proteins, including the presence and distri
65 against other enveloped viruses with class I viral fusion proteins, indicating specificity for arenav
66        Our data allow the visualization of a viral fusion protein inserted in its target membrane and
67  authors show that a chemical inhibitor to a viral fusion protein is effective in reducing viral titr
68 ovirus and lentivirus vectors with different viral fusion proteins is a useful strategy to alter the
69  present at the N-terminal region of class I viral fusion proteins is believed to initiate viral and
70        Because the trimeric oligomer of many viral fusion proteins is often stabilized by hydrophobic
71 tion of a hydrophobic fusion peptide (FP) in viral fusion proteins is still poorly understood.
72 monstrated similarities between gB and other viral fusion proteins, leading to the hypothesis that gB
73 e trimer-of-hairpins conformation of class I viral fusion proteins, less is known about intermediate
74  and exposed to low pH, indicating that this viral fusion protein may function in a manner unique amo
75 Thus, Gly residues in the TM domain of other viral fusion proteins may also prove to be important for
76                            Understanding how viral fusion proteins mediate entry will provide valuabl
77                                              Viral fusion proteins of classes I and II differ radical
78                           Within the class I viral fusion proteins of many enveloped viruses, the FP
79 on models developed from numerous studies of viral fusion proteins, our results indicate that these a
80                          We propose that the viral fusion proteins produced by virulent PRV infection
81                                          The viral fusion proteins require a triggering event to unde
82                                      Class I viral fusion proteins share common mechanistic and struc
83  identified structural relationships between viral fusion proteins shift the paradigm for how these p
84  now extends this description to "class III" viral fusion proteins, showing that reversibility of the
85 The C-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) of viral fusion proteins such as HIV gp41 and influenza hem
86 n proteins distinguish them from the class I viral fusion proteins, such as influenza virus hemagglut
87                Its topological similarity to viral fusion proteins suggests how the SNARE complex mig
88  = 0.004) more abundant in the TM domains of viral fusion proteins than in those of nonfusion protein
89 ARS-CoV) spike glycoprotein (S) is a class I viral fusion protein that binds to its receptor glycopro
90                               It is a type 1 viral fusion protein that characteristically contains tw
91 executed by glycoprotein B (gB), a class III viral fusion protein that is conserved across all herpes
92 nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) is a class III viral fusion protein that mediates pH-triggered membrane
93 tides are short N-terminal regions of type-1 viral fusion proteins that are critical for virus entry.
94                     Similar to other class I viral fusion proteins, the fusogenic stalk domain sponta
95                     Similar to other class 1 viral fusion proteins, the heptad repeat regions of SARS
96                         Unlike other class I viral fusion proteins, the mature GP-C complex retains a
97                  In the HIV-1 gp41 and other viral fusion proteins, the minimal oligomerization state
98                             Like all class 1 viral fusion proteins, the paramyxovirus F protein is th
99                              Typical of many viral fusion proteins, the sequence of the Newcastle dis
100                          As in other class I viral fusion proteins, this process proceeds through a s
101 e that AVP-p induces premature activation of viral fusion proteins through membrane perturbance.
102  demonstrate for the first time that class I viral fusion protein TM domains can self-associate as tr
103 e receptor-binding molecule must trigger the viral fusion protein to mediate fusion and entry of the
104 with CoV and LP IAV pseudoparticles, cleaved viral fusion proteins to fusion-primed fragments and pot
105 nctions, including endogenous neuropeptides, viral fusion proteins, topogenic peptides, and amyloids.
106  initiated by a conformational change in the viral fusion protein, triggered by receptor binding, an
107                During fusion, these class II viral fusion proteins trimerize and refold to form hairp
108                                              Viral fusion protein trimers can play a critical role in
109                            Unlike most other viral fusion protein trimers, the monomers of GP64 are c
110                                Since several viral fusion proteins undergo disulfide bond rearrangeme
111                              Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformation
112 een widely assumed that HCV E2 is a class II viral fusion protein (VFP), the newly determined structu
113 the membrane fusion activity of heterologous viral fusion proteins when GS is coexpressed with those
114                            gB is a class III viral fusion protein, while gH/gL does not resemble any
115 or part of the membrane-spanning domain of a viral fusion protein with sequences that encode signals
116 data suggest a novel priming mechanism for a viral fusion protein, with a critical proteolytic cleava
117 ich is structurally categorized as a class I viral fusion protein, within the same group as influenza

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top