ライフサイエンスコーパス: virus transmission

1 eta7(high) T cells and promotes cell-to-cell virus transmission.

2 d socioeconomic variables favoring efficient virus transmission.

3 ne and microbicide efficacy assess cell-free virus transmission.

4 V-1 group O and likely facilitated secondary virus transmission.

5 ins in macrophages by enhancing cell-to-cell virus transmission.

6 mline of some individuals, allowing vertical virus transmission.

7 of mucosal immunity in preventing influenza virus transmission.

8 une protection sufficient to dampen A(H3N2)v virus transmission.

9 ract to trigger incompatibility and restrict virus transmission.

10 and asymmetric, gene-specific influences on virus transmission.

11 udy the underlying mechanisms of influenza B virus transmission.

12 particles in a cell-to-cell culture model of virus transmission.

13 where native mosquito species are capable of virus transmission.

14 efforts, and mathematical modeling of dengue virus transmission.

15 ridae that evolved as a mechanism to enhance virus transmission.

16 or nonpolarized assembly, but both result in virus transmission.

17 activation from latency occurs, resulting in virus transmission.

18 at immune components in milk prevent mucosal virus transmission.

19 IL-2 signaling and Jak activation in HTLV-1 virus transmission.

20 e found that p12 expression greatly enhanced virus transmission.

21 are of the risk of further expansion of Zika virus transmission.

22 easles was insufficient to interrupt measles virus transmission.

23 women and/or prevent human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

24 tion and treatment strategies by identifying virus transmission.

25 ole of p12 in regulating cellular growth and virus transmission.

26 tative biochemical correlate for influenza A virus transmission.

27 us sequence at or near the estimated time of virus transmission.

28 e levels of biosecurity and how this affects virus transmission.

29 nificant cofactor for human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

30 ed AMs represents an additional mechanism of virus transmission.

31 to monovalent vaccine may finally interrupt virus transmission.

32 selectively maintained because it increases virus transmission.

33 use of deterministic mathematical models of virus transmission.

34 al to cause hemorrhagic dengue and increased virus transmission.

35 rovide a selective advantage for CCR5-tropic virus transmission.

36 by enhancing the antibody-resistant mode of virus transmission.

37 with ICAM-3 do not promote DC-SIGN-mediated virus transmission.

38 outcomes and enhanced human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

39 this microenvironment is highly conducive to virus transmission.

40 serious adverse events, thrombogenicity, or virus transmission.

41 and increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

42 e tonsil during reactivation plays a role in virus transmission.

43 ular milieu but may not inhibit cell-to-cell virus transmission.

44 s to why there is no evidence for bloodborne virus transmission.

45 l bite or other event associated with rabies virus transmission.

46 were considered informative for hepatitis B virus transmission.

47 d immunization with polio vaccine interrupts virus transmission.

48 king HIV-CD4 binding are expected to inhibit virus transmission.

49 etongue and provide opportunities to prevent virus transmission.

50 rve as a cofactor for human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

51 mportant design for the study of respiratory virus transmission.

52 aegypti and thus provides a means to examine virus transmission.

53 ric occurrence of bats is a major factor for virus transmission.

54 s are thought to play a major role in dengue virus transmission.

55 enetic changes have been shown to facilitate virus transmission.

56 hylaxis regimen could have a major impact on virus transmission.

57 y to reactivate from latency are crucial for virus transmission.

58 ic IgA responses in the context of postnatal virus transmission.

59 panzee-to-gorilla, but not gorilla-to-human, virus transmission.

60 living female macaques, SEVI did not enhance virus transmission.

61 ease burden and a contributor to blood-borne virus transmission.

62 used as a strategy to block exosome-mediated virus transmission.

63 ven largely ineffective in preventing sexual virus transmission.

64 between cells at this synapse and facilitate virus transmission.

65 the efficacy of wolbachia in reducing dengue virus transmission.

66 o a significant reduction in cell-associated virus transmission.

67 it disease progression and blocking vertical virus transmission.

68 ct the environment encountered during sexual virus transmission.

69 s, including enhanced human immunodeficiency virus transmission.

70 immunities to influenza and their effect on virus transmission.

71 cted ferrets under conditions that permitted virus transmission.

72 ctions and exhibit higher rates of postnatal virus transmission.

73 B cells can result in salivary shedding and virus transmission.

74 cas successfully interrupted endemic measles virus transmission 8 years after setting a regional meas

75 (DC-SIGN) binding in human immunodeficiency virus transmission across the mucosal barrier was invest

76 consensus about the risk assessment of Ebola virus transmission after accidental exposure, and to inv

77 determined by a complex relationship between virus transmission, age of infection, and receptor bindi

78 There were 3 cases of unexpected hepatitis C virus transmission, all from an active IVDU donor who wa

79 anisms and environmental factors that affect virus transmission among bat species in closely related

80 of an influenza pandemic requires efficient virus transmission among humans, which is associated wit

81 The extent of virus transmission among individuals and species is gene

82 selective pressures acting during influenza virus transmission among mammals impose a significant bo

83 for cytoplasmic envelopment of VZV capsids, virus transmission among neuronal cells, and probably th

84 , it is important to understand the modes of virus transmission and develop mitigation and management

85 ively acquired antiviral antibodies modulate virus transmission and disease progression in human pedi

86 ween localized innate immunity and influenza virus transmission and disease progression.

87 hat differences in this region may influence virus transmission and disease.

88 in the prevention and control of hepatitis E virus transmission and disease.

89 ous period that potentially enhances measles virus transmission and hinders measles control.

90 a new molecular platform for the analysis of virus transmission and immunopathogenesis and for the ge

91 in the growth of new villi, contributing to virus transmission and impairing compensatory developmen

92 proteins is selected against at the level of virus transmission and is selected for during chronic in

93 However, the significance of DC-SIGN for virus transmission and pathogenesis in vivo remains uncl

94 o in protecting others by limiting influenza virus transmission and potentially reducing the size of

95 o suggest strategies for the intervention of virus transmission and spread within the mucosa of the h

96 titers by the ducks, which could facilitate virus transmission and spread.

97 tence of this process changes our concept of virus transmission and the potential functions, virus, a

98 Knowledge of the proteins that regulate virus transmission and their predicted locations will ai

99 PEMV-APN interaction designed to block plant virus transmission and to suppress aphid populations.

100 e produced virus-neutralizing Abs that block virus transmission and virally induced disease.

101 able model for influenza virus pathogenesis, virus transmission, and antiviral therapy studies.

102 to species and the primate hosts involved in virus transmission, and by their domestic and sylvatic c

103 terilizing immunity, extend the timeframe of virus transmission, and can trigger disease.

104 mune cells, whereas respiratory shedding and virus transmission are due to infection of nectin4-posit

105 We hypothesize that they may limit virus transmission, as extensive examination showed that

106 To test whether inflammation facilitates virus transmission--as predicted from human studies--we

107 demonstrate periods of increased horizontal virus transmission associated with the pregnancy/lactati

108 idemic to an epidemiological model of dengue virus transmission based on climate and mobility data fr

109 mptomatic individuals, and the potential for virus transmission between infected patients and contact

110 and chimpanzees, including three examples of virus transmission between linked donors and recipients.

111 Our findings indicate that virus transmission between mice has both airborne and di

112 in some pumas, suggesting relatively common virus transmission between these species.

113 at vic2, vic6, or vic7 resulted in enhanced virus transmission, but did not prevent barrage formatio

114 We identified limited person-to-person H3N2v virus transmission, but found no evidence of efficient o

115 ell and the target cell from separating upon virus transmission, but how Env's fusion activity is con

116 Vegetative incompatibility restricts virus transmission, but this factor alone is a poor pred

117 r the first time that HC-Pro is required for virus transmission by a vector other than aphids.

118 eview describes our current understanding of virus transmission by aphids, thrips, whiteflies, leafho

119 We studied the genetic architecture of virus transmission by crossing a vector and a non-vector

120 spread through insect populations and block virus transmission by mosquitoes, providing an important

121 to describe the dynamic process of influenza virus transmission by taking advantage of our unique cli

122 s set a goal of interrupting endemic measles virus transmission by the end of 2000.

123 a specific viral determinant associated with virus transmission by thrips.

124 donor monkeys, but there was no evidence of virus transmission by whole-blood transfusion to naive m

125 By detection of the Tat protein, virus transmission can be detected in high-risk individu

126 Virus transmission can occur either by a cell-free mode

127 s for engineering fungal hosts with superior virus transmission capabilities.

128 Surprisingly, in virus transmission-competent F2 genotypes, the isoelectr

129 r, limited, nonsustained human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission could not be ruled out in four famili

130 epidemiology will provide key information on virus transmission dynamics and help to inform HIV preve

131 Our description of dengue virus transmission dynamics is unprecedented in detail,

132 ty using a mathematical model of hepatitis-B virus transmission dynamics that shows, for the first ti

133 nvector genotypes of S. graminum showed that virus transmission efficiency is a heritable trait regul

134 ion across countries at risk of yellow fever virus transmission from 1970 to 2016.

135 virus were very small, implying a defect in virus transmission from cell to cell.

136 eillance in pigs has revealed that influenza virus transmission from humans to swine is far more freq

137 and that the symbionts play key roles in the virus transmission from mother to progeny.

138 Concerns have been raised that the risk of virus transmission from such pigs may be increased due t

139 gen in the trachea, which supports increased virus transmission from these animals.

140 pothesized that such immunization may reduce virus transmission from vaccinated, infected animals.

141 virus entry into host target cells and halt virus transmission from virus-infected cells to non-infe

142 mac-DC-SIGN preserves the virus transmission function of hu-DC-SIGN, capturing and

143 m the period 2003-2008 indicate that rubella virus transmission has occurred across wide age ranges (

144 and northward spring migration might play in virus transmission have hardly been explored.

145 educe maternal-infant human immunodeficiency virus transmission (HIV), but its consequences for disea

146 We also discuss ideas relating to virus transmission, host restriction, and pathogenesis.

147 d from the successful end of endemic measles virus transmission (i.e., elimination) in the United Sta

148 a single particle with progressive cell-cell virus transmission (i.e., the normal situation), HSV ind

149 is expected to translate into reduced dengue virus transmission if sufficient individuals are vaccina

150 evance, our understanding of how influenza A virus transmission impacts the overall population dynami

151 gest that conditions may become suitable for virus transmission in a larger number of locations and f

152 We demonstrated that ongoing virus transmission in a mixed lemur species exhibit was

153 prevent postnatal and, possibly, intrapartum virus transmission in a primate model.

154 en inherently neutralizes HIV-1 and prevents virus transmission in animal models, yet the factor(s) r

155 iochemical mechanisms regulating circulative virus transmission in aphids, as well as in identifying

156 l and biological correlates of cross-species virus transmission in bats and rodents, another importan

157 mild influenza virus infections to influenza virus transmission in household, institutional, and comm

158 ritis and facilitates human immunodeficiency virus transmission in men is weak, although biologically

159 intestinal tract and the rarity of postnatal virus transmission in natural hosts of SIV.

160 see the fascination of ecological impacts on virus transmission in nature and its spillover into huma

161 zed, and these studies have implications for virus transmission in nature, where vertebrate hosts are

162 To study oral virus transmission in primate models, we exposed rhesus

163 ity required to interrupt indigenous measles virus transmission in Romania.

164 important strategy for interrupting measles virus transmission in the European Region, although spec

165 We have recently shown that influenza virus transmission in the guinea pig model is most effic

166 ay reduce milk virus load or protect against virus transmission in the infant gastrointestinal tract.

167 milk of AGMs may contribute to impedance of virus transmission in the infant oral/gastrointestinal t

168 e used to assess the relevance of DC-SIGN in virus transmission in vivo.

169 emical basis for the observed differences in virus transmission, in this study, we have developed an

170 standing the driving forces of cross-species virus transmission is central to understanding the natur

171 nderstanding the mechanisms of cross-species virus transmission is critical to anticipating emerging

172 cation of aphid genes and proteins mediating virus transmission is critical to develop agriculturally

173 tter understand the mechanisms that regulate virus transmission is critical to developing countermeas

174 Understanding the key elements of Ebola virus transmission is necessary to implement adequate in

175 nd transfer steps, indicating that efficient virus transmission is not simply due to tethering of vir

176 s in guinea pigs demonstrated that influenza virus transmission is strongly modulated by temperature

177 Respiratory vaccinia virus transmission is well established, yet the effects

178 elative humidity (RH) affects both influenza virus transmission (IVT) and influenza virus survival (I

179 at now enforces species-specific barriers to virus transmission, limiting both the cross-species and

180 r behaviors linked to human immunodeficiency virus transmission (mail = 7.1%, telephone = 4.2%), were

181 s for blocking cell-free and cell-associated virus transmission may be different.

182 to occur via urine, our results suggest that virus transmission may be highest in the early stages of

183 findings suggest that this efficient mode of virus transmission may facilitate the escape of macropha

184 We used a dynamic mosquito population and virus transmission model driven by meteorological data t

185 Design: Vector-borne Zika virus transmission model fitted to epidemiologic data fr

186 We extended an Ebola virus transmission model published by the Centers for Di

187 virus species and to potentially establish a virus transmission model.

188 eral model systems for viral replication and virus transmission: multistep growth curves in different

189 rriving from countries with widespread Ebola virus transmission must be aware of alternate diagnoses

190 ribed 54 HIV-1-discordant couples in whom no virus transmission occurred despite extensive sexual con

191 We established conditions under which virus transmission occurs and showed that transmission e

192 ne its cellular tropism and demonstrate that virus transmission occurs through cell-mediated transfer

193 hibitors block cell-free and cell-associated virus transmission of diverse HIV-1 strains with differe

194 icate that, like in the case for influenza A virus, transmission of influenza B viruses is enhanced a

195 The model was used to estimate Ebola virus transmission parameters and investigate the effect

196 For virus transmission, PEMV binds to a heavily glycosylated

197 competent parental lineage aligned with the virus transmission phenotype with high precision.

198 ell transmission, and in the context of free virus transmission (Q.

199 ystem is geared towards detection of measles virus transmission, rapid discovery of measles outbreaks

200 emic infection, but many details surrounding virus transmission remain unresolved.

201 n an infected cell versus cell-free HIV-1 to virus transmission remains debated.

202 Our primate data recapitulate virus transmission risks observed in humans, thus establ

203 s aimed at preventing human immunodeficiency virus transmission should emphasize the influence of sub

204 the guinea pig as a model host for influenza virus transmission studies.

205 ly informative on the key parameters driving virus transmission, such as the basic reproduction numbe

206 uld more effectively prevent cell-associated virus transmission than the use of individual antibodies

207 We developed a model of Ebola virus transmission that integrates detailed geographical

208 ere, we uncovered an additional mechanism of virus transmission that is regulated by the HTLV-1-encod

209 mine the molecular epidemiology of influenza virus transmission, the nucleotide sequences of the HA1

210 tures involved in modeling transplacental NT virus transmission: the placenta and the fetal blood-bra

211 his infection probability is higher for free-virus transmission, then treatment susceptibility is low

212 pply also demands novel therapeutics to stop virus transmission though transfusion.

213 g infant could reduce human immunodeficiency virus transmission through breast-feeding.

214 es by enhancing CD4-independent cell-to-cell virus transmission through CCR5-mediated fusion.

215 Here we evaluate the risk of Zika virus transmission through mucosal contact in rhesus mac

216 Unlike the 2 previous clusters of rabies virus transmission through solid organ transplantation,

217 vaccination in areas at risk of yellow fever virus transmission to achieve the 80% population coverag

218 synapse as a conduit not only for selective virus transmission to activated CD4 T cells but also for

219 pp71 also facilitated late gene expression, virus transmission to adjacent cells, and plaque formati

220 manipulation of mosquito vectors to disrupt virus transmission to human populations.

221 nimize the importance of host alternation in virus transmission to humans and initial infection at th

222 le virus (WNV) vectors, altering the risk of virus transmission to humans.

223 use of Wolbachia to control dengue and Zika virus transmission to humans.

224 otential to contribute significantly more to virus transmission to mosquitoes than previously recogni

225 d I/LnJ cells, and thus completely prevented virus transmission to offspring.

226 s against HIV must function near the time of virus transmission to prevent the establishment of a chr

227 Virus transmission to queens during mating may be common

228 s an underlying cause of IUGR, regardless of virus transmission to the fetus.

229 esponse may have a role in the prevention of virus transmission to the fetus.

230 ress culminating in recurrent disease and/or virus transmission to uninfected animals.

231 lf/non-self recognition system that inhibits virus transmission under laboratory conditions but its e

232 We also observed a significant reduction in virus transmission using a combination of two different

233 By inhibiting cell-free virus transmission using a neutralizing antibody, we als

234 By inhibiting cell-free virus transmission using agarose or neutralizing antibod

235 ional change, may facilitate avian influenza virus transmission via respiratory droplets in mammals.

236 results suggest that there is a risk of Zika virus transmission via the mucosal route, but that the r

237 The pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus transmission via the rectal route remains poorly u

238 Endemic measles virus transmission was interrupted in 2002.

239 The role of exhibition swine in influenza A virus transmission was recently demonstrated by >300 inf

240 gged DC-SIGN revealed that the efficiency of virus transmission was strongly affected by variations i

241 ssion, the predominant mode of parainfluenza virus transmission, was modeled accurately by direct i.n

242 Using a mouse model of influenza A virus transmission, we demonstrate that a candidate "uni

243 For free virus transmission, we find that under preliminary param

244 understand the mechanism of DC-SIGN-mediated virus transmission, we generated and functionally evalua

245 ond advancing our understanding of influenza virus transmission, we hope that this work will provide

246 pical microbicide reduces the probability of virus transmission when applied to the vagina or rectum

247 ight act as a migratory bridge for influenza virus transmission when birds aggregate in high concentr

248 Substantial genetic conservation during virus transmission within households is indicated.

249 rchetype and prototype virus and the mode of virus transmission within the body and between individua

250 vely use human and rhesus dendritic cells in virus transmission without the cells becoming directly i

251 Although blocking plant virus transmission would allow for crop protection, viru