ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual evoked potential

1 processing (visual P1 and 25-Hz steady-state visual evoked potential).

2 est, and cluster) and an abnormal multifocal visual evoked potential.

3 vertical disparities were measured using the visual evoked potential.

4 (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and visual evoked potentials.

5 rsts and enhanced paired-pulse depression of visual evoked potentials.

6 ne patient, an interhemispheric asymmetry in visual evoked potentials.

7 and monitoring frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials.

8 tency delay on full-field, pattern-reversal, visual-evoked potentials.

9 sual acuity, visual field, color vision, and visual-evoked potential amplitude.

10 We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential, an oscillatory response of the

11 otography, electroretinography analysis, and visual-evoked potential analysis.

12 g in humans using source-imaged steady state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis o

13 Here we used source-imaged, steady-state visual evoked potentials and visual psychophysics to det

14 Visual function, visual evoked potential, and optic nerve magnetic resona

15 Diagnostic investigations include MRI, visual evoked potentials, and CSF examination.

16 g; electrophysiologic testing, such as sweep visual-evoked potentials; and perceptual testing, allow

17 n and atrophy of brain microvasculature with visual evoked potential anomalies.

18 ameters affecting the utility of the pattern visual evoked potential as an outcome measure in potenti

19 Objective visual evoked potential assessment of visual acuity can

20 ble the detection of multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials associated with visual field st

21 high-frequency (30-90 Hz) power, but not in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attent

22 coherence tomography, visual assessments and visual evoked potentials at presentation (median 16 days

23 front analysis for amblyogenic factors and a visual evoked potentials-based screening tool for the pr

24 show abnormalities in brainstem auditory and visual evoked potentials (BSAEP and VEP) and in sleep pa

25 In the optic nerve, visual evoked potentials can indicate demyelination and

26 of the electroretinogram, and the multifocal visual-evoked potential can detect early glaucomatous da

27 duced both a clear reduction of the earliest visual evoked potential components, the C1 and the N1, a

28 Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, or sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

29 Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

30 rent motion confound might not have obtained visual evoked potentials entirely due to vernier offset.

31 We characterized electrically elicited visual evoked potentials (eVEPs) in Argus II retinal imp

32 neural circuit dynamics of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials extracted from concurrent EEG-f

33 ic nerve conduction latency using full-field visual evoked potential (FF-VEP) versus the unaffected f

34 died in unexperienced observers by measuring visual evoked potentials from 64-channels.

35 lectroretinography (full field and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, a

36 photopic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoked potential (FVEP) also were recorded before

37 en nerve fibre layer anatomy and the pattern visual evoked potential has been addressed, correlating

38 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell counting indicate

39 f visuocortical engagement, the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to naturalistic angr

40 Visual acuity was measured by visual evoked potentials in 244 infants who completed th

41 Abnormal visual-evoked potentials indicated that the hypomyelinat

42 The multifocal visual evoked potential is a relatively new technique th

43 Further, the multifocal visual-evoked potential is the only one of these tests t

44 After multivariate analysis, prolonged visual evoked potential latency and impaired color visio

45 h visual dysfunction and demyelination (long visual evoked potential latency) during acute optic neur

46 ed with impaired visual acuity and prolonged visual evoked potential latency.

47 In optic nerve tumours, the pattern visual evoked potential may help identify and monitor th

48 Furthermore, the observed reduction of N170 visual-evoked potentials may be a key mechanism underlyi

49 Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potential measures are suitable for detect

50 The aim of this study was to compare visual evoked potential measures of contrast sensitivity

51 global and sectoral multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials metrics to discriminate glaucom

52 are the diagnostic performance of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and standard automated p

53 VCC scans, stereophotographs, and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) data were collected at b

54 To test the efficacy of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique after long-ter

55 Electroretinogram (mfERG) and the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP), which provide an object

56 4-2 Humphrey visual fields (HVF), multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP), and optical coherence

57 al coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).

58 of which is directionally asymmetric motion visual evoked potentials (motion VEPs).

59 of horizontal motion and in cortical motion visual evoked potential (mVEP) responses in normal infan

60 s, San Diego, CA) and in the P100 latency of visual evoked potentials; no changes were detected in vi

61 ts, OA and OCA were confirmed with 5-channel visual evoked potentials (optic nerve misrouting).

62 ation processing is further examined using a visual-evoked potential paradigm and normalization model

63 a for the global BCI multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials parameter was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.8

64 Brain FC was estimated using steady-state visual evoked potential partial coherence before and 90

65 Visual evoked potential plasticity might represent a rel

66 Pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) was the most frequently s

67 s of electroretinography (ERG) and patterned visual evoked potentials (pVEPs).

68 CAM-null mice displayed reduced responses to visual evoked potentials recorded from layer IV in the b

69 mechanisms, we used electroretinography and visual evoked potential recording in patients, and multi

70 suggested that the signal in the multifocal visual-evoked potential response may be linearly related

71 tile esotropia (ET) has led to the idea that visual evoked potential responses to horizontal motion (

72 Steady-state visual-evoked potential responses were recorded over the

73 patially distributed pattern of steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses to flickering

74 encephalography (EEG) to assess steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in human subjects and s

75 x was assessed by recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by each of th

76 entical nontargets and recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by these stim

77 We monitored frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in humans and found th

78 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were recorded from act

79 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were recorded from the

80 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were used to quantify

81 essing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

82 ng in 12-week-old infants using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

83 educed auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, suggesting fatigue of synaptic

84 The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that ce

85 rs visual cortical function, swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) responses of healthy pret

86 The swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) was used to measure contr

87 esholds can be measured with swept-parameter visual evoked potentials (sVEPs) and may therefore be us

88 ith Alzheimer's dementia (AD), using a sweep visual evoked potential technique.

89 Subjects were evaluated with the sweep visual evoked potential technique.

90 ntextual interactions using a dual-frequency visual-evoked potential technique in developing human in

91 Electroretinogram and visual evoked potential tests showed visual pathway invo

92 e amplitude of the earliest component of the visual evoked potential, the C1.

93 We tracked steady-state visual evoked potentials to label distinct visual cortic

94 We used source imaging of visual evoked potentials to measure neural population re

95 in a large cohort of infants by using sweep visual evoked potential (VEP) acuity as the functional o

96 s in several studies have suggested that the visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude can vary with st

97 GCs within 1 day after rAION, with a loss of visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude that persisted i

98 tive of this study was to investigate if the visual evoked potential (VEP) could be used as an unbias

99 tly been demonstrated that plasticity of the visual evoked potential (VEP) induced by repeated visual

100 ous evidence for a progressive shortening of visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies and to determine

101 he association of RNFL loss with a prolonged visual evoked potential (VEP) latency suggests that acut

102 After a clinical examination and visual evoked potential (VEP) measurement, each patient

103 henomenon affects visual function, the sweep visual evoked potential (VEP) was used to evaluate corti

104 rdings, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual evoked potential (VEP), and grading of skin and h

105 on optic nerve function, assessed using the visual evoked potential (VEP).

106 ations demonstrated clear modulations in the visual evoked potentials (VEP) recorded.

107 A clinical examination and measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP) was performed on each pat

108 On the basis of lesion, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and neuroimaging evidenc

109 stimulation produces lasting enhancement of visual evoked potentials (VEP).

110 Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) following optic neuritis

111 as the peak latency of pattern-reversal (PR) visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have been found to be a

112 RECENT FINDINGS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) may be useful as an obje

113 In awake mice, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded in layer 4 of b

114 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to check reversal (163-1

115 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were measured in 10 pati

116 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded over three

117 Structural MRI, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and optical coherence t

118 ld and multifocal electroretinography (ERG), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), spectral-domain optical

119 changes in visual acuity, visual field, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs).

120 arly recorded action potentials (spikes) and visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) align with the video imp

121 Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) to contrast reversing gr

122 Here we record steady-state visual evoked potentials via electrocorticography to dir

123 fed control formula had significantly poorer visual evoked potential visual acuity at 12 mo of age th

124 There were no significant differences in visual evoked potential visual acuity between the 3 amou

125 n glaucoma, including the electroretinogram, visual evoked potential, visual spatial acuity, and cont

126 The first clear effect of monovision on visual evoked potentials was the C1 amplitude reduction,

127 Brainstem auditory and visual evoked potentials were both abnormal in op/op mic

128 Visual evoked potentials were elicited by standard visua

129 N1 and P1 wave amplitudes of the visual evoked potentials were not significantly differen

130 escein angiography, electroretinography, and visual evoked potentials were obtained preoperatively, a

131 x at rest was enhanced and somatosensory and visual evoked potentials were of high amplitude.

132 Visual evoked potentials were recorded in response to a

133 Visual evoked potentials were subjected to principal com

134 Visual-evoked potentials were obtained for stimuli compo

135 iction experimentally using the steady-state visual evoked potential where we stimulated the visual c

136 and thereby elicited separable steady-state visual-evoked potentials, which were used to examine the

137 The present study aimed to measure the visual evoked potentials with a high-density electrode a