ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual field test

1 ts within the central 10 degrees of the 24-2 visual field test.

2 end primarily to the PASAT while taking each visual field test.

3 ults from cross-sectional studies evaluating visual field tests.

4 nt changes were detected in visual acuity or visual field tests.

5 nocular baseline SITA-standard (SITA-S) 24-2 visual field tests.

6 y-summation algorithm and all five binocular visual field tests.

7 an did the Esterman and four novel binocular visual field tests.

8 the acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare, and visual field tests.

9 ed with measures of retinal sensitivity from visual field testing.

10 OCT imaging, mfERG testing, and, in 1 case, visual field testing.

11 inography (ERG), multifocal ERG, and central visual field testing.

12 giography, optical coherence tomography, and visual field testing.

13 eyes (19 subjects) underwent VEP, mfVEP, and visual field testing.

14 lso included pupil size data obtained during visual field testing.

15 moderate, and severe glaucoma, determined by visual field testing.

16 with statistical abnormalities in automated visual field testing.

17 tients were followed up with angiography and visual field testing.

18 ptical coherence tomography (OCT), automated visual field testing (10-2 visual field mean deviation [

19 48+/-0.13; P = 0.006), and mean deviation on visual field testing (-10.0+/-10.3 vs. -1.2+/-1.2; P < 0

20 evaluated using IOP measurements and data on visual field testing/a diagnosis of glaucoma (if availab

21 d techniques and also with two types of 24-2 visual field tests: a full-threshold SWAP blue-on-yellow

22 nxiety or distraction on subjects performing visual field testing, also in random order.

23 An online visual field test (an 'app') was developed as part of a

24 jects, but their performance at the scotopic visual field test and perceptual task did not differ sig

25 ional examinations were performed, including visual field testing and electro-oculography (EOG).

26 Esterman binocular visual field testing and four other binocular visual fie

27 d flow and standard glaucoma evaluation with visual field testing and quantitative structural imaging

28 One patient also underwent visual field testing and spectral domain-optical coheren

29 plemented to improve patient experience with visual field testing and to increase reliability.

30 on) who had 2 or more reliable 24-2 and 10-2 visual field tests and good-quality spectral-domain opti

31 eyes of the 107 participants underwent 10-2 visual field tests and SD-OCT scans, and all participant

32 erwent SD-OCT of the optic nerve head (ONH), visual field testing, and clinical examination.

33 race, gender, year of publication, method of visual field testing, and effect of reliance on IOP in t

34 domain optical coherence tomography, kinetic visual field testing, and electroretinography.

35 , best-corrected VA, digital fundus imaging, visual field testing, and measurement of intraocular pre

36 tion, central corneal thickness measurement, visual field testing, and stereoscopic fundus photograph

37 examinations including intraocular pressure, visual field testing, and stereoscopic fundus photograph

38 , central corneal thickness measurement, and visual field testing; and a thorough general examination

39 -lamp and optic nerve examination; automated visual field testing; and fundus color photography.

40 Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA) and had visual field testing at the same visits.

41 New devices may allow patients to complete visual field tests at home, which could relieve patients

42 Trust in Provider Scale (TPS) and performed visual field tests at least two years apart.

43 urement, Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) visual field testing, autorefraction, A-scan biometry an

44 graphy, provide an alternative to subjective visual field testing but are not yet ready for widesprea

45 od for monitoring patient vigilance during a visual field test by using pupillometry.

46 c stereophotographs taken within 6 months of visual field testing, conducted within a 3-month period.

47 isual field testing and four other binocular visual field tests (designated peripheral 20 dB [p20], p

48 gical examination, color fundus photography, visual field testing, detailed electrophysiological asse

49 n K-pro patients should be monitored through visual field testing, direct visualization and structura

50 Glaucoma Treatment Study patients with >/=5 visual field tests during follow-up were included.

51 rticipants who passed the Esterman binocular visual field test for driving in the United Kingdom (at

52 41 of 43 patients (95%) passed the Esterman visual field test for driving; after completion of laser

53 Clinical investigations included visual field testing, fundus examination, high-resolutio

54 The visual field test had slightly higher area under the cur

55 Visual field testing has played an essential role in the

56 The binocular visual field test (HEVF) seems not be as efficient as th

57 was the mean deviation (MD) of an automated visual field test (Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss M

58 They underwent three visual field tests-Humphrey visual field analyzer 24-2,

59 The monocular visual field test (HVF) gave more specific information a

60 Participants (n = 6082) underwent Humphrey visual field testing (HVF), frequency doubling technolog

61 Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with t

62 Spatial scale characterized the visual field tested in perimetry well and can contribute

63 layer (GCL) thickness, macular thickness and visual field testing in migraine patients without aura.

64 ed (FASTPAC) and white (SITA) 10-2 automated visual field testing in the course of their management.

65 Each participant underwent visual field testing, including FDT perimetry screening,

66 patients in hospital where access to formal visual field testing is difficult, or indeed in rapid te

67 For detection of functional loss standard visual field testing is not optimum; a combination of tw

68 disease with psychophysical measures such as visual field tests is important to clarify to determine

69 were measured at locations corresponding to visual field test loci up to 21 degrees eccentricity.

70 Clinical visual field testing may be unreliable when visual field

71 mely investigations, including an iPad-based visual field test (Melbourne Rapid Field, (MRF)) conduct

72 hrey Matrix 24-2 testing strategy provides a visual field testing method for optic nerve and chiasmal

73 ic Depression Scale (GDS) questionnaires and visual field tests obtained over a mean follow-up time o

74 Moreover, Humphrey visual field test, OCT examination and recording of mfVE

75 nge, 4.5 to 10.5 years) and a mean number of visual field tests of 9.5 (range, 7 to 16) were included

76 Focusing visual-field testing on the locations of present scotoma

77 pharmacy records and who were evaluated with visual field testing or spectral-domain optical coherenc

78 Participants with 5 or more visual field tests over a 2- to 5-year period were inclu

79 Visual acuity, automated visual field testing, pattern electroretinogram, and spe

80 significant progression or improvement of a visual field test point was defined if its regression sl

81 he assessment of a pituitary mass, objective visual field testing represents a valuable means of eval

82 the 4 central fixation squares on a reliable visual field test result.

83 visual fields, analysis of a small number of visual field test results (<8) overestimated the number

84 Goldmann visual field test results improved in all patients.

85 ed glaucoma histories and Humphrey threshold visual field tests (San Leandro, CA) were obtained from

86 During the visual field testing, the PASAT was again administered c

87 t has a significant effect on the results of visual field testing, the Visual Field Index may be less

88 ffect did not enhance the reliability of the visual field test to a statistically significant degree.

89 eristic curves were created for the UFOV and visual field tests, to determine accuracy in detecting t

90 Visual field testing uses high-contrast stimuli in areas

91 s in functional variables (Humphrey photopic visual field testing using the Swedish interactive thres

92 Their mean deviation (SD) from visual field testing was -5.5 (4.3) dB.

93 Visual field testing was performed in each eye, and IVF

94 All visual field testing was performed on the right eye usin

95 The mean (+/-SD) number of visual field tests was 7.89 +/- 3.04.

96 Criteria for abnormality on each visual field test were selected to approximate a specifi

97 lberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), and visual field tests were repeated every 6 months.

98 Visual field testing will continue to have an important

99 acuity examination, fundus photography, and visual field testing with screening frequency-doubling t

100 s of 114 patients with OHT with four or more visual field tests with standard automated perimetry ove