ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual motion

1 not sufficient for the perception of global visual motion.

2 ption of an elementary circuit for detecting visual motion.

3 s selective for faces and areas sensitive to visual motion.

4 ntire protocerebral bridge and was driven by visual motion.

5 objects by exploiting panoramic patterns of visual motion.

6 ennae in a direction opposite to that of the visual motion.

7 al ganglion cells (DSGCs) encode the axis of visual motion.

8 is closely associated with the perception of visual motion.

9 the motor system adapts to restore straight visual motion.

10 ions between multiple possible directions of visual motion.

11 n MST, but not MT, independent of imagery of visual motion.

12 nd instead more strongly in the direction of visual motion.

13 actile stimuli unlikely to induce imagery of visual motion.

14 ted their contribution to working memory for visual motion.

15 a MT (V5) are selective for the direction of visual motion.

16 osely mimics the learning instructed by real visual motion.

17 extra-striate visual areas are activated by visual motion.

18 , such as representations of visual form and visual motion.

19 responsible for the detection of wide field visual motion.

20 ex includes some sensitivity to direction of visual motion.

21 on to be early and critical for awareness of visual motion.

22 avior that is tightly linked to the speed of visual motion.

23 so might include sensitivity to direction of visual motion.

24 or response, an orienting behavior evoked by visual motion.

25 fic spatiotemporal correlations that signify visual motion.

26 ispheres during memory-guided comparisons of visual motion.

27 uit described likely contributes to encoding visual motion.

28 epancies between self-generated and external visual motion.

29 changes, resulting in enhanced perception of visual motion.

30 anced the human ability to perceive coherent visual motion.

31 y linked to the processing and perception of visual motion.

32 ignals to select dynamic properties, such as visual motion.

33 movement, can be independently modulated by visual motion.

34 rovide an important stage in the analysis of visual motion.

35 In the specific case of visual motion, a central, "perceptual" role has been ass

36 This contextual effect generalized to purely visual motion, active movement without vision, passive m

37 ily driven apparent motion produced a robust visual motion aftereffect in the opposite direction, whe

38 In the well-known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in

39 epeated exposure to tactile motion induces a visual motion aftereffect, biasing the perceived directi

40 Here we extend this work, examining whether visual motion also exhibits similar generalization acros

41 Area MT, an important region for processing visual motion, also shows weak activation in response to

42 havioral variability observed in response to visual motion and appears sufficient for eliciting turns

43 lance the strength of self-induced bilateral visual motion and bilateral wind cues, but it is unknown

44 rectional congruence between decisions about visual motion and decision-irrelevant saccades.

45 Area MT is heavily implicated in processing visual motion and depth, yet previous work has found lit

46 multimodal processing system that integrates visual motion and locomotion during navigation.

47 ng plays a fundamental role in perception of visual motion and position.

48 isual cortex both mediates the perception of visual motion and provides the visual inputs for behavio

49 urons reflect task-related information about visual motion and represent decisions that may be based,

50 Saccades modulate the relationship between visual motion and smooth eye movement.

51 ea (MSTd) cortical neuronal responses to the visual motion and spatial location cues in optic flow.

52 cision formation, the epoch between onset of visual motion and the initiation of the eye movement res

53 We developed a change blindness paradigm for visual motion and then showed that presenting an attenti

54 hophysical and neurophysiological studies of visual motion and vibrotactile processing show that the

55 imately one-half as large as the response to visual motion and were distinct from those in another vi

56 n both within modalities (e.g., visual form, visual motion) and across modalities (auditory and visua

57 ibutes of word meaning (color, shape, sound, visual motion, and manipulability) and encodes the relat

58 The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-unders

59 in behavioral contexts where these speeds of visual motion are relevant for course stabilization.

60 he bin appears to be one-to-one: activity in visual 'motion area' MT is highly correlated with percep

61 cleus (LGN), primary visual cortex (V1), and visual motion area (V5) in humans to determine where sup

62 For example, reentrant projections from the visual motion area (V5) to V1 are considered to be criti

63 ic resonance imaging, we found that cortical visual motion area MT+/V5 responded to auditory motion i

64 For visual motion area MT, previous investigations have repo

65 associated with tactile motion perception in visual motion area V5/hMT+, primary somatosensory cortex

66 visual motion integration bilaterally in the visual motion areas hMT+/V5+ and implicate the posterior

67 Although visual motion blindness was predominantly observed in th

68 N neurons respond phasically to swim-induced visual motion, but little to motion that is not self-gen

69 lzheimer's disease impairs the processing of visual motion, but these conclusions are based on confli

70 The brain estimates visual motion by decoding the responses of populations o

71 Animals estimate visual motion by integrating light intensity information

72 pecialized for processing different types of visual motion by studying the cortical responses to movi

73 Visual motion can be represented in terms of the dynamic

74 l (LIP) area and PFC in monkeys performing a visual motion categorization task.

75 cortex (PPC) before and after training on a visual motion categorization task.

76 Recent evidence suggests that a key visual motion centre in the brain ignores extra-retinal

77 responses to targets that provided apparent visual motion consisting of a sequence of stationary fla

78 Vestibular activation specifically reduces visual motion cortical excitability, whereas other visua

79 Visual motion cues are used by many animals to guide nav

80 navigating in their environment, animals use visual motion cues as feedback signals that are elicited

81 Many animals use visual motion cues for navigating within their surroundi

82 tio-temporal changes in luminance to extract visual motion cues have been the focus of intense resear

83 The BBD learned which visual motion cues predicted impending collisions and us

84 Visual motion cues provide animals with critical informa

85 ions, the ability to detect and discriminate visual motion declined significantly (P < 0.05) with inc

86 tion that functionally manifests as superior visual motion detection ability in the deaf animal.

87 imilar correlation-based mechanism underlies visual motion detection across the animal kingdom.

88 deafness, such that behavioral advantages in visual motion detection are abolished when a specific re

89 Many animals rely on visual motion detection for survival.

90 At the neural level, visual motion detection has been proposed to extract dir

91 Visual motion detection in insects is mediated by three-

92 n the neuropil thought to be responsible for visual motion detection, the medulla, of Drosophila mela

93 lementation of a computational algorithm for visual motion detection.

94 ion-detection task and a second group with a visual motion-detection task, and compared performance o

95 el of how a simple neural circuit can detect visual motion, developed from work on insect vision but

96 We describe a new phenomenon in which visual motion direction adapts nonsymbolic numerosity pe

97 d on multivariate analysis methods to decode visual motion direction from measurements of cortical ac

98 ff DSGCs), which are important for computing visual motion direction in the mouse retina.

99 uditory timing strongly influenced perceived visual motion direction, despite providing no spatial au

100 ed that improved perceptual performance on a visual motion direction-discrimination task corresponds

101 w that in monkeys performing a reaction-time visual motion direction-discrimination task, neurons in

102 nd influencing spatio-temporal processing of visual motion direction.

103 action requiring accurate discrimination of visual motion direction.

104 e trained monkeys to classify 360 degrees of visual motion directions into two discrete categories, a

105 cate that the learning and representation of visual motion discrimination are mediated by different,

106 T to reduce the SNR focally and thus disrupt visual motion discrimination performance to visual targe

107 led that, in a two-alternative forced-choice visual motion discrimination task, reaction time was cor

108 ty is modified by prior expectation during a visual motion discrimination task.

109 s both choice and saccade response time on a visual motion discrimination task.

110 uld improve not just simple but also complex visual motion discriminations in humans with long-standi

111 o human observers' performance on two global visual motion discriminations tasks, one requiring the c

112 oth rotational and translational patterns of visual motion, Drosophila actively moved their antennae

113 rent animal models imply that lack of normal visual motion during a critical period of development in

114 ) cells exhibit a boost in their response to visual motion during flight compared to quiescence.

115 to suppress the perception of self-generated visual motion during intended turns.

116 thought to respond to local orientation and visual motion elements rather than to global patterns of

117 We exploit the close connection between visual motion estimates and smooth pursuit eye movements

118 In the domain of visual motion, estimates of target speed are derived fro

119 rcuits, represents a valuable feature of its visual motion estimator.

120 We recorded visual motion evoked potentials (EPs) at occipital and p

121 nt in Alzheimer's disease hypothesizing that visual motion evoked responses to optic flow simulating

122 y interpreted as reflecting the retrieval of visual-motion features of actions.

123 s higher for verbs than nouns, regardless of visual-motion features.

124 mpact of depth ordering on the perception of visual motion, few attempts have been made to identify t

125 x (LPFC) contains accurate representation of visual motion from across the visual field, supplied by

126 ection makes it clear that we do not see the visual motion generated by our saccadic eye movements.

127 Many animals use the visual motion generated by traveling straight-the transl

128 Temporal integration of visual motion has been studied extensively within the fr

129 outline of the neural pathways that compute visual motion has emerged.

130 inance variation can evoke the perception of visual motion has long been a controversial issue.

131 The estimation of visual motion has long been studied as a paradigmatic ne

132 Adaptation to visual motion has strong perceptual effects, so we studi

133 erns and show that many units are excited by visual motion in a direction-selective manner.

134 paradigm, we found that repeated exposure to visual motion in a given direction produced a tactile mo

135 d noise within the sensory representation of visual motion in extrastriate visual area MT.

136 maging (fMRI) data of delayed recognition of visual motion in human participants were analyzed with t

137 known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in one direction causes a subsequently pre

138 sensory neurons maximizes information about visual motion in pursuit eye movements guided by that co

139 have different effects on postural sway; 3) visual motion in the anterior-posterior plane induces ro

140 In response to rotational visual motion, increases in passive antennal movements a

141 Why does the world appear stable despite the visual motion induced by eye movements during fixation?

142 Convergence of visual motion information (optic flow) and vestibular si

143 ry motion information (signal vs noise), (2) visual motion information (signal vs noise), and (3) rel

144 Highly active insects and crabs depend on visual motion information for detecting and tracking mat

145 Visual motion information from the retina is known to be

146 tor planning could reflect the conversion of visual motion information into a categorical decision ab

147 er the temporal tuning of neurons that carry visual motion information into the central brain.

148 Convergence of vestibular and visual motion information is important for self-motion p

149 Rather, visual motion information must be mediated to higher-tie

150 us (PUL), and concomitantly the cortex, with visual motion information through its dense projections

151 al motion information, or in the transfer of visual motion information to the sensorimotor areas that

152 In Drosophila, small-field T4/T5 cells carry visual motion information to the tangential cells that a

153 in the left extrastriate areas that extract visual motion information, or in the transfer of visual

154 hich might optimize sensory integration with visual motion information.

155 judgments on word pairs varying in amount of visual-motion information.

156 he targeting saccade weights the presaccadic visual motion inputs by the distance from their location

157 rsuit eye movements in monkeys, we show that visual motion inputs compete with two independent priors

158 l when smooth eye movement is driven only by visual motion inputs.

159 th-pursuit eye movements transform 100 ms of visual motion into a rapid initiation of smooth eye move

160 how the human brain integrates auditory and visual motion into benefits in motion discrimination.

161 Sensitivity to visual motion is a fundamental property of neurons in th

162 information about these distinct features of visual motion is combined.

163 The perception of visual motion is critical for animal navigation, and fli

164 rate signals over a shorter time window when visual motion is fast and a longer window when motion is

165 The source of visual motion is inherently ambiguous such that movement

166 Visual motion is processed by neurons in primary visual

167 -surround interactions are a key property of visual motion mechanisms.

168 multiplication enables DSGCs to discriminate visual motion more accurately in noisy visual conditions

169 ations in selectivity patterns revealed that visual motion, object form, and the form of the human bo

170 Older people can discriminate visual motion of large, high-contrast stimuli better tha

171 sible for the patient to perceive the global visual motion of moving random dot patterns.

172 hen pursuit was selectively enhanced for the visual motion of that target and suppressed for the othe

173 ted in the modulatory effect of attention to visual motion on cortical responses as measured by funct

174 We exploited the known influence of visual motion on the apparent positions of targets, and

175 move through the environment, the pattern of visual motion on the retina provides rich information ab

176 Humans and monkeys use both vestibular and visual motion (optic flow) cues to discriminate their di

177 specialised neurons to read the patterns of visual motion - optic flow - induced by the their moveme

178 The visual motion - or optic flow - that results from an obs

179 Neurons of the fly's visual motion pathway have been claimed to represent per

180 s in primates restores normal development of visual motion pathways in the cerebral cortex, measured

181 In the fly's visual motion pathways, two cell types-T4 and T5-are the

182 Monkeys had to identify and remember a visual motion pattern and compare it to a second pattern

183 To examine this, we trained monkeys to group visual motion patterns into two arbitrary categories, an

184 , it was largely attributable to deficits of visual motion perception (R(2) adj = 0.57, P < 0.001).

185 gnals across space underlies many aspects of visual motion perception and has therefore received cons

186 zed networks that support functions, such as visual motion perception and language processing.

187 ns that perform different functions, such as visual motion perception and language processing.

188 Visual motion perception has long been associated with t

189 Visual motion perception is critical to many animal beha

190 Visual motion perception is fundamental to many aspects

191 Perceptual studies suggest that visual motion perception is mediated by opponent mechani

192 area MT, a cortical area whose importance to visual motion perception is well established.

193 Visual motion perception relies on two opposing operatio

194 ve attention, and psychophysical measures of visual motion perception to all subjects.

195 TMS degraded visual motion perception when the evoked phosphene and t

196 s, (2) neuronal signals in human MT+ support visual motion perception, (3) human MT+ is homologous to

197 om the primary visual cortex (V1), a role in visual motion perception, and a suggested role in "blind

198 hips between the integrity of the M pathway, visual motion perception, and reading ability.

199 ate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have l

200 e of these pathways normally mediate complex visual motion perception, we asked whether specific trai

201 atory/inhibitory imbalance in the context of visual motion perception.

202 relationship between cortical physiology and visual motion perception.

203 g, as evidenced by a sound-induced change in visual motion perception.

204 rea MT, a primate region that is involved in visual motion perception.

205 ta support the hypothesis that, at least for visual motion, perception and action are guided by input

206 nt provides a natural interpretation of many visual motion percepts, indicates that motion estimation

207 s underwent open-field navigational testing, visual motion perceptual threshold determination and a b

208 integration assume separate substrates where visual motion perceptually dominates tactile motion [1,

209 idence in a manner that mimicked a change in visual motion, plus a small increase in sensory noise.

210 regions involved in executive functions and visual motion processing (P < .01).

211 ple with autism may suffer from a deficit in visual motion processing and proposed that these deficit

212 ng ability and activity in area V5/MT during visual motion processing and, as expected, also found lo

213 PMLS is also an extrastriate visual motion processing area and is widely considered t

214 ng findings demonstrate strong activation of visual motion processing areas by tactile stimuli [3-6],

215 organization of neural systems important in visual motion processing by comparing hearing controls w

216 emonstrate that a recurrent network model of visual motion processing can reconcile these different p

217 this motion as a proxy for changes in early visual motion processing caused by microsaccades.

218 vehicular navigation are linked to impaired visual motion processing in Alzheimer's disease.

219 Thus, perceptual relearning of complex visual motion processing is possible without an intact V

220 Visual motion processing plays a key role in enabling pr

221 Physiological models of visual motion processing posit that 'pattern-motion cell

222 e closely related to sensory inputs from the visual motion processing system.

223 sual processing, we applied a psychophysical visual motion processing task in which healthy young adu

224 s from extrastriate visual areas involved in visual motion processing to DZ may contribute to the cro

225 We address these questions in the context of visual motion processing, a perceptual modality characte

226 ssociation indicates relatively intact early visual motion processing, but a failure to use efference

227 Despite decades of work on visual motion processing, it remains unclear how 3D dire

228 n that may lead to a deeper understanding of visual motion processing.

229 nected brain regions known to be involved in visual motion processing.

230 bout the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing.

231 tentional load effects on neural activity in visual motion-processing and attention-processing areas.

232 hat the peak-to-peak responses of a class of visual motion-processing interneurons, the vertical-syst

233 of motion to the retinal image, complicating visual motion produced by self-motion or moving objects.

234 For many animals, visual motion provides essential information for navigat

235 conclude that noise in sensory processing of visual motion provides the major source of variation in

236 ident on a battery of neuropsychological and visual motion psychophysical measures.

237 hy controls were tested using a self- versus visual-motion psychophysical experiment.

238 that these PLTC regions did not overlap with visual-motion regions.

239 neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural com

240 asure of the processing of faces, houses and visual motion, respectively.

241 tations or body movements) best engages this visual motion response.

242 monkey is associated with maldevelopment of visual motion responsiveness, one manifestation of which

243 relations exist between the global (summed) visual motion score and the average quantitative motion,

244 ng perceptual thresholds for optic flow, the visual motion seen during observer self-movement.

245 Visual motion sensing neurons in the fly also encode a r

246 neurons in the middle temporal area (MT), a visual motion-sensitive region that projects heavily to

247 Food-deprived flies reduce the gain of a visual-motion-sensitive interneuron whilst walking, and

248 tion (ccPAS) protocol to transiently enhance visual motion sensitivity and demonstrate both the funct

249 or intelligence and overall reading ability, visual motion sensitivity explained independent variance

250 e related to previously described changes in visual motion sensitivity in these patients.

251 that V6 is involved primarily in processing visual motion signals and does not appear to play a role

252 mation reflects the reweighting of bottom-up visual motion signals and top-down spatial location sign

253 areas are well studied, sensory estimates of visual motion signals are formed quickly, and the initia

254 We find that the answer must reside in how visual motion signals are interpreted by perception, bec

255 Externally generated visual motion signals can cause the illusion of self-mot

256 ological response and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre- and po

257 The implication is that visual motion signals exist in the brain that can be use

258 Such cues include visual motion signals produced both by self-movement and

259 t initiation arises mostly from variation in visual motion signals that provide common inputs to the

260 egration primarily for degraded auditory and visual motion signals while obtaining near ceiling perfo

261 ption of self-motion requires integration of visual motion signals with nonvisual cues.

262 at reveals a compensation mechanism based on visual motion signals.

263 ng gain of postural response with increasing visual motion speed.

264 al components with opposite relationships to visual motion speed.

265 sitions of objects are strongly modulated by visual motion; stationary flashes appear shifted in the

266 n in the vestibular cortex, despite constant visual motion stimulation.

267 ularly surprising given that the learning of visual motion stimuli is generally thought to be mediate

268 ted human subjects' prior expectations about visual motion stimuli, and probed the effects on both pe

269 rmance in tasks involving classic random dot visual motion stimuli, corrupted by noise as a means to

270 Based on the responses to a broad panel of visual motion stimuli, we have developed a model by whic

271 Hz and 40 Hz but not 240 Hz) and to dynamic visual-motion stimuli.

272 ." By briefly perturbing the strength of the visual motion stimulus during the formation of perceptua

273 spontaneously or in response to patterns of visual motion such as expansion [6-8].

274 ed in one of the most basic functions of the visual motion system: extracting motion direction from c

275 It is clear that the initial analysis of visual motion takes place in the striate cortex, where d

276 carry up to twice as much information about visual motion than does population spike count, even whe

277 ions often involve comparisons of sequential visual motion that can appear at any location in the vis

278 ely accepted biophysical model for computing visual motion, the elementary motion detector proposed n

279 on known to be involved in the processing of visual motion, the posterolateral lateral suprasylvian a

280 In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interacti

281 We found that although perception of visual motion through a cloud of dots was unimpaired wit

282 ne locomotor kinematics, we used whole-field visual motion to drive zebrafish to swim at different sp

283 l mechanisms that analyze global patterns of visual motion to perform computations that require knowl

284 Humans adeptly use visual motion to recognize socially relevant facial info

285 inal ganglion cells convey information about visual motion to the brain.

286 is, the representation of eye movements and visual motion, to compare the functional characteristics

287 d show that qualitatively different types of visual motion tuning and levels of response sparsity are

288 rea (STPa) have demonstrated selectivity for visual motion using stimuli contaminated by nonmotion cu

289 However, even minimal visual motion was sufficient to cause a loss of position

290 ce (sound, color, shape, manipulability, and visual motion) was used to predict brain activation patt

291 d stronger calcium transients in response to visual motion when flies were walking rather than restin

292 T) have been implicated in the perception of visual motion, whereas prefrontal cortex (PFC) neurons h

293 area to determine the perceived direction of visual motion, whereas psychophysical studies tend to ch

294 ving stimuli are likely to induce imagery of visual motion, which is known to be a powerful activator

295 acaca mulatta) to determine the direction of visual motion while we recorded from their middle tempor

296 repeated presentations of identical stimuli (visual motion) while only the attentional component of t

297 To achieve this, neurons must combine visual motion with extra-retinal (non-visual) signals re

298 viously demonstrated that MT neurons combine visual motion with extraretinal signals to code depth-si

299 d tuning even when the stimulus consisted of visual motion with gradual speed changes.

300 neurons in prefrontal cortex (PFC) represent visual motion with precision comparable to cortical neur