戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 g is integral for the topographic mapping of visual space.
2 ls contains topographic maps of auditory and visual space.
3 ions tested within the central 10 degrees of visual space.
4  have receptive fields which are adjacent in visual space.
5 ent of activation across the cortical map of visual space.
6 ee by the rate of target displacement across visual space.
7 ociations of auditory cues with locations in visual space.
8  within a single bilateral representation of visual space.
9 eptive field center and surrounding areas of visual space.
10 emporal) and vertical (dorsoventral) axes of visual space.
11 r elements located in surrounding regions of visual space.
12 esponses to other stimuli in the surrounding visual space.
13 ceptive fields that sample a small region of visual space.
14 rons are located in about the same region of visual space.
15  representations of stimulus orientation and visual space.
16 ithin a remarkably precise representation of visual space.
17 ions with non-overlapping representations of visual space.
18 es containing overlapping representations of visual space.
19  control systems containing internal maps of visual space.
20 ere symmetrically representing contralateral visual space.
21  to quantify the size of these fields across visual space.
22 ells establish the optimal representation of visual space.
23 orming a binocular representation of frontal visual space.
24 tively enhanced, neuronal representations of visual space.
25 t cell clusters represent adjacent points of visual space.
26  neurons to integrate over larger regions of visual space.
27 , affects the allocation of attention in the visual space.
28  the overall bias that can be exerted across visual space.
29 eye movement-into a stable representation of visual space.
30 inotopically organized maps of contralateral visual space.
31 ially complete representation of a region of visual space.
32 vements toward successful error reduction in visual space.
33 t intensities from two neighboring points in visual space.
34 y to perform task 2 in specific locations in visual space.
35 ishing a continuous neural representation of visual space.
36  topographic representation of contralateral visual space.
37 d modulates the distribution of attention in visual space.
38 ishing a continuous neural representation of visual space.
39 along the nasotemporal (azimuth) axis of the visual space.
40 along the nasotemporal (azimuth) axis of the visual space.
41 ntains mutually aligned maps of auditory and visual space.
42 zed for adequate coverage of each feature in visual space.
43 fragmented or asymmetrical representation of visual space.
44 nd antagonism and regular mosaic sampling of visual space.
45 rent types of TGCs within the same column of visual space.
46 oup of RFs that tile a continuous portion of visual space, (2) constructing a population-level measur
47 ovide each FEF with information about all of visual space, a prerequisite for higher level sensorimot
48 ther stimuli that overlap the same region of visual space, a process known as masking.
49  fields but encompasses the entire region of visual space across which the current receptive field wi
50 with response fields overlapping the part of visual space affected by the D1 receptor manipulation.
51 hich axons that monitor identical regions of visual space align.
52 f cortex are confined to a compact region of visual space and display a smooth visuotopic progression
53  intact or with the limbs and torso apart in visual space and either unoccluded or occluded by a set
54 at entails a discontinuity in the mapping of visual space and fragmentation of V2 into isolated corti
55 ally distinct relationships with the maps of visual space and orientation preference.
56 erret, the relationships between the maps of visual space and response features are predicted by a "d
57 As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descendi
58 nuity in the mapping of both orientation and visual space and the generation of a columnar map of abs
59 these connections with respect to the map of visual space and the map of orientation preference remai
60 ses could be elicited from a large region of visual space and were prolonged.
61 ural time difference (ITD), and locations in visual space, and acquire new neurophysiological maps of
62 nd executed trajectories remain congruous in visual space, and enforces this correspondence even at t
63 o the idea that the characteristics of human visual space are determined probabilistically.
64  field, where approximately 30(o) of central visual space are represented bilaterally.
65                Saccades cause compression of visual space around the saccadic target, and also a comp
66 tions between auditory cues and locations in visual space as a result of abnormal visual experience c
67                  If movements are planned in visual space, as indicated from a variety of studies on
68  interocular position shift, the distance in visual space between the center positions of the two eye
69 res respond to stimuli in the same region of visual space, but they have different spatial summation
70 ulus can be manipulated in a local region of visual space by adapting to oscillatory motion or flicke
71                 By measuring the coverage of visual space by the receptive fields of the recorded cel
72   These cells might link the 2D depiction of visual space by the retina with the need of the body to
73 ration of information over extended areas of visual space can be measured psychophysically in a task
74  direction tendency from an extended area of visual space containing widely disparate local direction
75 have access to an accurate representation of visual space despite a constantly moving eye.
76 ields are distributed over a wider region of visual space, display substantial visuotopic scatter, an
77 on in order to reconstruct three-dimensional visual space during motion in depth.
78 ows, as well as the tiling hypothesis of the visual space for different curvature values.
79 y defined uncrossed retinal projections into visual space gives binocular congruence if the optical a
80                 The left and right halves of visual space had independent capacities and thus are dis
81 x photoreceptors that view the same point in visual space have to be sorted into synaptic modules cal
82 buted with respect to the topographic map of visual space, however, has not been resolved.
83 on specifically along the third dimension of visual space (i.e., from close to far or vice versa), co
84  but these always cover a coherent region of visual space, implying visuotopic order at the single-un
85 ing stimuli from the corresponding region of visual space in all Rt subdivisions.
86 nhancement of visual attention to peripheral visual space in deaf individuals.
87             The collective representation of visual space in high resolution visual pathways was expl
88 ye position, but almost all cortical maps of visual space in monkeys use a retinotopic reference fram
89 ield demonstrated a global representation of visual space in MT.
90 uning of delay cells, neurons that represent visual space in the absence of sensory stimulation.
91 ila visual system elaborate a precise map of visual space in the brain.
92 is complex connectivity pattern reconstructs visual space in the first optic ganglion, the lamina.
93 a result of this navigational error, maps of visual space in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) hav
94  responses and topographic representation of visual space in the LGN.
95 fields of ganglion cells cover each point in visual space in the salamander, consistent with anatomic
96 vity revealed continuous topographic maps of visual space in the VG3-AC plexus.
97 map of orientation preference and the map of visual space in tree shrew V1.
98 lation activity, we conclude that the map of visual space in V1 is orderly at a fine scale and has un
99 ter training and is limited to the region of visual space in which training occurred.
100  In vision, retinal ganglion cells partition visual space into approximately circular regions termed
101 ate that (i) parietal-mediated perception of visual space is affected in Parkinson's disease, with bo
102                        The representation of visual space is anisotropic, with the elevation and azim
103 ndritic Ca2+ signals to stimulus location in visual space is correlated with their anatomical positio
104 This evidence implies that the perception of visual space is determined by the probability distributi
105 rojection of the path of the transition into visual space is highly biased toward lower visual fields
106                The size of central binocular visual space is nearly normal and is flanked by monocula
107   We conclude that columnar organization for visual space is not only defined by the spatial location
108                                      Indeed, visual space is not sampled uniformly across the vertebr
109            The topographic representation of visual space is preserved from retina to thalamus to cor
110  in a regular mosaic, so that every point in visual space is processed for visual primitives such as
111                                        Thus, visual space is represented across the retina in paralle
112 timuli, we find that a substantial region of visual space is represented bilaterally.
113    We recently demonstrated that position in visual space is represented by grid cells in the primate
114         In turn, the local representation of visual space is smooth, as predicted when many features
115 visual cortex, the representation of central visual space is supplied by matching geniculate inputs t
116 which a flickering target (a bar oriented in visual space) is rendered invisible by two counter-phase
117 NS plans arm movements based entirely on the visual space kinematics of the movements, or whether the
118 or specific stimulus features in a region of visual space known as the receptive field, but can be mo
119 tterns falling within a restricted region of visual space known as the receptive field.
120      The auditory space map aligned with the visual space map in the Ipc.
121 y space map with the prismatically displaced visual space map.
122 int-by-point comparison between auditory and visual space maps or on a foveation-dependent visual ass
123 ls, those that report upon a small region of visual space may need to receive a denser synaptic input
124 atic analysis has now shown that mice encode visual space non-uniformly, increasing their spatial sam
125 lier and were more widely distributed across visual space, nonspecific suppression was found more oft
126    We find, on the contrary, that the map of visual space on cat V1 shows strong and systematic local
127 de a useable head-centered representation of visual space on timescales that are compatible with the
128                                   The map of visual space on V1, in contrast, has been assumed to be
129 the target stimuli to an untrained region of visual space or by having the subjects take a mid-day na
130 sensus about either the genesis of perceived visual space or the implications of its peculiar charact
131                               The subjective visual space perceived by humans does not reflect a simp
132          Such differential representation of visual space poses a substantial challenge to the idea o
133 s and demonstrated that the effect occurs in visual space (rather than the early representations of t
134 nner: thresholds decrease at the location in visual space represented by the stimulated SC site, but
135                                       How is visual space represented in cortical area MT+?
136 toward or away from the trained subregion of visual space, respectively.
137 eptive fields that form a sampling mosaic of visual space, resulting in a series of retinotopic maps
138 icting how the integration of signals across visual space shapes the outputs of retinal ganglion cell
139              This predicts that positions in visual space should be represented more reliably during
140 system contains organized representations of visual space.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Primates have specia
141 plete or biased toward particular regions of visual space, suggestive of specializations for processi
142 ction site but spanned a greater distance in visual space than the ARF of the injection site.
143 erminal boutons, along an axis in the map of visual space that corresponds to the preferred orientati
144 in constructing the stable representation of visual space that is an essential aspect of conscious pe
145  the sampling of information from regions of visual space that lie along a neuron's axis of preferred
146 enting the central and peripheral regions of visual space to adjust differently, according to the opt
147 iate cortices and cover anisotropic parts of visual space, unlike V1 horizontal connections that are
148 cover portions of V1 representing regions of visual space up to eight times larger than receptive fie
149  and the topographical representation of the visual space was mapped in the tectum.
150                   Representations of central visual space were identified within dorsal portions of L
151 nal, coarse representations of contralateral visual space were identified within ventral medial and d
152             Nevertheless, representations of visual space were typical in dorsal face-selective regio
153 theless, postoperatively, representations of visual space were typical in dorsal face-selective regio
154 Blur could in principle fill in the parts of visual space where disparity is imprecise.
155         The eCRF is defined as the region of visual space where stimuli cannot elicit a spiking respo
156 w the thalamus might form a resampled map of visual space with the potential to facilitate detection
157 h maps contain an inversion of contralateral visual space with the upper visual field represented ven
158  cortical area contains a topographic map of visual space, with different areas extracting different
159       We also assessed the representation of visual space within each region, finding that four visua
160 maging, we found multiple representations of visual space within the ventral human pulvinar and exten
161 maging, we found multiple representations of visual space within ventral IT cortex of macaques that i
162 spans enough columns to sample 75 degrees of visual space, yet the area that evokes calcium responses

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top