ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual stimulation

1 ht and left primary visual areas (full-field visual stimulation).

2 as potently as pyramidal cell spiking during visual stimulation.

3 te visual cortex in response to a structured visual stimulation.

4 supra-granular V1 neurons from responding to visual stimulation.

5 ynamic circuit mechanisms that are guided by visual stimulation.

6 greatly reduced by widespread and intensive visual stimulation.

7 these pathways and how they interact during visual stimulation.

8 tion or depression of targeted synapses with visual stimulation.

9 caque V4 cortical networks in the absence of visual stimulation.

10 ter a modulation block of prolonged (10 min) visual stimulation.

11 in macaque primary visual cortex (V1) during visual stimulation.

12 d-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal after visual stimulation.

13 all-or-none' calcium transients modulated by visual stimulation.

14 ve the properties of a 'clock' signal during visual stimulation.

15 ntations that are activated by corresponding visual stimulation.

16 nditions, including spontaneous activity and visual stimulation.

17 in conflict with the reality of the physical visual stimulation.

18 e changing background synaptic activity with visual stimulation.

19 modulated by FEF stimulation, independent of visual stimulation.

20 spatially and temporally coincident auditory-visual stimulation.

21 persists for several minutes without further visual stimulation.

22 via intense synaptic drive caused by natural visual stimulation.

23 EPSPs during spontaneous activity and during visual stimulation.

24 must still respond appropriately to relevant visual stimulation.

25 n neurons from animals after 4 h of constant visual stimulation.

26 thalamic input as a consequence of abnormal visual stimulation.

27 ncrease in gamma oscillations in response to visual stimulation.

28 normal, even exceeding the levels seen after visual stimulation.

29 at depends on search target identity but not visual stimulation.

30 tors beneath blood vessels are denied normal visual stimulation.

31 lels compensation of delays for time-varying visual stimulation.

32 Activation was compared with passive visual stimulation.

33 ons in infected cortex responded normally to visual stimulation.

34 creased significantly (P <.05) during erotic visual stimulation.

35 ncreased baseline activity in the absence of visual stimulation.

36 activity in the retina-choroid complex after visual stimulation.

37 r 20 Hz (gamma band), that were activated by visual stimulation.

38 se of the regarded cell could be elicited by visual stimulation.

39 any, saccade-related activity independent of visual stimulation.

40 esponses in the primary visual cortex during visual stimulation.

41 ntial dynamics regardless of the presence of visual stimulation.

42 r as a phenomenon that occurs independent of visual stimulation.

43 ained neurons that were highly responsive to visual stimulation.

44 elds was observed following brief periods of visual stimulation.

45 and more consistent psychomotor responses to visual stimulation.

46 valence of plasticity after 4 hr of dark and visual stimulation.

47 intensity, with or without variable-contrast visual stimulation.

48 rrently memorized content, despite identical visual stimulation.

49 iChloC suppressed spiking activity evoked by visual stimulation.

50 homeostatic plasticity induced by patterned visual stimulation.

51 sleep and wakefulness, and after controlled visual stimulation.

52 of awake mice in the presence and absence of visual stimulation.

53 of visual alpha activity is possible through visual stimulation.

54 ual cortex in the absence of any feedforward visual stimulation.

55 showed stronger, more reliable responses to visual stimulation.

56 as is the basis of their suppression during visual stimulation.

57 ived of V1 inputs showed robust responses to visual stimulation.

58 lamic excitation onto layer 4 neurons during visual stimulation.

59 resynaptic activation reduce AP responses to visual stimulation.

60 s of neocortex, are activated differently by visual stimulation.

61 iminative of data epochs before versus after visual stimulation.

62 ency measured during rest, in the absence of visual stimulation.

63 and glx changes in visual cortex induced by visual stimulation.

64 he normal rat retina associated with various visual stimulations.

65 nly a subset of neurons spike in response to visual stimulation, a far larger proportion of the circu

66 In response to visual stimulation, a subset of neurons in the striate a

67 Physostigmine also decreased activations to visual stimulation across all tasks within primary visua

68 isphere, and the lower-field and upper-field visual stimulations activate the superior and inferior p

69 Visual stimulation after repetitive TMS revealed long-te

70 However, how V4 neurons respond to visual stimulation after V1 injury remains unclear: Whil

71 Our data suggest that visual stimulation alters the interactions between rod-

72 st to the hemispheric symmetry observed with visual stimulation, an asymmetry emerged during VSTM wit

73 l areas is modulated by a combination of the visual stimulation and contextual factors, such as salie

74 t the interaction between exogenous rhythmic visual stimulation and endogenous brain rhythms can have

75 -positive neurons in mouse V1 independent of visual stimulation and largely through nicotinic inputs

76 etal cortex contains neurons that respond to visual stimulation and motor behaviour.

77 ibitory neurons in awake mice during passive visual stimulation and performance of visual and auditor

78 e primary visual cortex of awake mice during visual stimulation and spontaneous activity.

79 sts this activity is in response to both the visual stimulation and the abrupt appearance, or salienc

80 the relationship between the strength of the visual stimulation and the firing rate, we found that at

81 ented by blocking polyamine synthesis during visual stimulation and was rescued when Ca2+-permeable A

82 left primary visual cortex (right hemifield visual stimulation) and in both right and left primary v

83 result from decision formation as opposed to visual stimulation, and are specific to the oculomotor s

84 It is not related to foveal or peripheral visual stimulation, and it represents the position of th

85 Moreover, eEF2 phosphorylation is induced by visual stimulation, and NMDAR blockade before stimulatio

86 dently of evoked activity, persisted without visual stimulation, and predicted behavioral success in

87 assifies greater than 1700 neurons following visual stimulation; and stimulates individual neurons us

88 rally-presented crosshair while intermittent visual stimulation appeared in their top-right visual-fi

89 at during wakefulness, cortical responses to visual stimulation are dominated by synaptic inhibition,

90 and visual cortex blood flows in response to visual stimulation are poorly understood.

91 To determine whether OFF signals in visual stimulation are required for OFF RGC dendritic de

92 that the functional coupling observed during visual stimulation arises from coordinated or nearly syn

93 deafened adults revealed robust responses to visual stimulation as well as receptive fields that coll

94 was largely complementary to that driven by visual stimulation, as well as the activity of other neu

95 whole-cell recordings, we show that pairing visual stimulation at a given retinal location with spik

96 The FF declined in response to visual stimulation at all tested locations, even in the

97 Eublepharis macularius) embryos to patterned visual stimulation beginning at either 1 week or 2 weeks

98 , both in the absence and in the presence of visual stimulation, biasing signals due to selective att

99 During periods with no visual stimulation, but while the subject was experienci

100 ecreased responses to low frequency periodic visual stimulation, but, while causing some increases in

101 During visual stimulation, BV responses to flickering light of

102 tate injection augmented the CBF response to visual stimulation by 38-53% in regions of the visual co

103 es to bolus lactate injection at rest and in visual stimulation by using positron-emission tomography

104 However, a brief period of visual stimulation can drive these neurons to start gene

105 lectrical stimulation of the NB, paired with visual stimulation, can induce significant potentiation

106 arvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons during visual stimulation, challenging the disinhibition model.

107 Visual stimulation, consisting of rotating hemicircles a

108 During visual stimulation, correlations increased when both cel

109 rapid loss of responsiveness to deprived-eye visual stimulation could be due to a decrease in intraco

110 Conversely, high-contrast visual stimulation could suppress the response to low-in

111 Embryos exposed to substantially augmented visual stimulation demonstrated a postnatal preference f

112 ically suppressing simple spikes only during visual stimulation demonstrated that simple spikes are r

113 et Ca(2+) elevations following physiological visual stimulation despite robust dilations of adjacent

114 In contrast, visual stimulation did not evoke gamma-band activity in

115 mbryos exposed to lesser amounts of prenatal visual stimulation did not show a preference for either

116 eloping brain circuits, specific patterns of visual stimulation drive functional plasticity of indivi

117 etal sulcus (IPS) and are revealed by direct visual stimulation during functional magnetic resonance

118 In this study, we show that visual stimulation during locomotion, which increases th

119 urons in mouse V1 increase their response to visual stimulation during locomotion.

120 The synaptic activity that is evoked by visual stimulation during wakefulness is unknown.

121 ttern formation that occurs for unstructured visual stimulation (e.g., empty-field flicker).

122 toward a spatial location in the absence of visual stimulation enhances future visual processing at

123 ic input within V1 at fixed delays following visual stimulation entrains neural responses that mimic

124 Over the initial 40 ms of visual stimulation, excitation from recurrent circuits i

125 hat at eye opening, the cortical response to visual stimulation exhibits several immaturities, includ

126 the modulated response amplitude to optimal visual stimulation (F1 values), significantly shortened

127 The influence of visual stimulation far from the receptive field center i

128 itored synaptic currents that were evoked by visual stimulation (flashing dark spots).

129 p10 mice were subjected to audio (70 db) and visual stimulation (flashing lights) for six hours per d

130 Rhythmic visual stimulation ("flicker") is primarily used to "tag

131 Visual stimulation for 4 h enhanced the stability of the

132 fulness, it predicted them equally well, and visual stimulation further enhanced predictions of inhib

133 nd oscillations (8-14 Hz) immediately before visual stimulation has been shown to predict perceptual

134 e substantially augmented amount of prenatal visual stimulation hatched significantly earlier than th

135 Neurons responsive to visual stimulation have now been described in the audito

136 ed LTP EEG paradigm that uses high-frequency visual stimulation (HFvS) to induce neural potentiation

137 Visual stimulation, however, led to responses more consi

138 In the absence of visual stimulation, however, when single simple cells we

139 both amplitude and timing of the response to visual stimulation in advanced CAA.

140 f the retina-choroid complex associated with visual stimulation in anesthetized cats (n = 6).

141 ivity related to attention in the absence of visual stimulation in extrastriate cortex when subjects

142 o measure the spatial spread of responses to visual stimulation in human early visual cortex.

143 yramidal cells and PV(+) interneurons during visual stimulation in mouse primary visual cortex.

144 were made with healthy controls deprived of visual stimulation in one quadrant ["artificial scotoma"

145 found that combining touch on one hand with visual stimulation in the anatomically corresponding hem

146 bolites were measured at baseline and during visual stimulation in the occipital lobe using (31)P mag

147 Here we report a biphasic BOLD response to visual stimulation in the primary visual cortex of cats.

148 f the retinal and choroid vascular layers to visual stimulation in the retina.

149 rom the DRN may modulate c-Fos expression to visual stimulation in these subnuclei of the lateral gen

150 Pases in the structural plasticity driven by visual stimulation in vivo.

151 h fluctuations are most prominent, prolonged visual stimulation increased the probability of the up s

152 Although visual stimulation increases dendritic arbor growth rate

153 ing Xenopus tadpoles to 4-5 hr of persistent visual stimulation increases the intrinsic excitability

154 re specifically responsible for the enhanced visual stimulation-induced changes in neuronal responses

155 neural firing were only slightly modified by visual stimulation, irrespective of the sensory input.

156 h and the branch patterning, suggesting that visual stimulation is required for the acquisition of sp

157 However, it is not clear whether visual stimulation is required for the establishment of

158 ested that the shunting inhibition evoked by visual stimulation is responsible for the nonlinear comp

159 minate visually evoked responses, repetitive visual stimulation leads to long-term depression of GABA

160 nd three of them responded also to different visual stimulation (light-off, movement).

161 esponses after dark and increased them after visual stimulation, matching plasticity in excitatory ne

162 in the EOMs from P10 to P15 and suggest that visual stimulation may play a role in the signals that r

163 activity in visual cortex in the absence of visual stimulation may reflect a top-down bias of neural

164 sion in the occipital cortex with full-field visual stimulation (mean +/- standard error of the mean

165 l evoked potential (VEP) induced by repeated visual stimulation might reflect synaptic plasticity.

166 ed for normal development of V1 responses to visual stimulation, multiple forms of experience-depende

167 e, we demonstrate that adaptation with short visual stimulation of a direction-selective ganglion cel

168 is believed to be triggered exclusively from visual stimulation of individual RF subregions.

169 activity with extracellular electrodes under visual stimulation of the center and surround.

170 ior optic tubercle (AOTu) of honey bees upon visual stimulation of the compound eye to analyze chroma

171 h-aura patients and 6 normal controls during visual stimulation of the occipital cortex.

172 In this paradigm, visual stimulation of the receptive field and its near e

173 uit and compared these effects with those of visual stimulation of the same retinal ganglion cells.

174 iolet cones, and when transmitter release or visual stimulation of ultraviolet cones is perturbed.

175 The effect of visual stimulation on the climbing fiber activity was st

176 Our results show that the hemifield visual stimulation only activates LGN in the contralater

177 By contrast, visual stimulation only weakly modified co-activation pa

178 e activated in response to both auditory and visual stimulation, only the neural patterns recorded in

179 Four hours of visual stimulation or addition of intracellular spermine

180 Using either visual stimulation or current injection, we show that br

181 ference in the brain's response to a primary visual stimulation or in the physiology underlying BOLD

182 Visual stimulation or locomotion alone did not enhance r

183 exposed to the moderately augmented prenatal visual stimulation or not exposed to any prenatal visual

184 etinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is increased by visual stimulation or using chemogenetics, their axons r

185 Visual stimulation outside the classical receptive field

186 l stimulation or not exposed to any prenatal visual stimulation (p < .01).

187 ncy (4, 8, and 16 Hz) reversing-checkerboard visual stimulation paradigm.

188 With right hemifield visual stimulation, perfusion was significantly increase

189 Moreover, although visual stimulation plays a modulatory role, it is neithe

190 appear in over 95% of the brain for a simple visual stimulation plus attention control task.

191 Fish learned to swim in response to visual stimulation preceding tactile stimulation of the

192 strated in humans by showing that repetitive visual stimulation produces lasting enhancement of visua

193 hallucinogenic drugs, full-field flickering visual stimulation produces regular, geometric hallucina

194 The same visual stimulation protocol also induces a polyamine syn

195 is finding was not replicated in the case of visual stimulation, providing evidence for time-locked p

196 Parameters measured were reactivity to visual stimulation (quantified as blood oxygen level-dep

197 We test whether 4 hr of increased visual stimulation regulates glutamatergic retino-tectal

198 We interpret these results as that visual stimulation regulates the maturation of RGC synap

199 rated by sustained neurons during maintained visual stimulation remained sufficiently robust to allow

200 or moving ungrouped local elements while the visual stimulation remained the same.

201 s impulses, while Anonymous impulses (during visual stimulation) render the LGN slightly refractory f

202 right peripheral position in the absence of visual stimulation resulted in differential modulations

203 es in V1 and LGN, whereas in the presence of visual stimulation, saccades led to suppression of visua

204 erior cingulate cortex (CGp) is modulated by visual stimulation, saccades, and eye position, suggesti

205 echniques, we demonstrate that during normal visual stimulation scene information peaks in mid-layers

206 r (MCS) or parallel fiber (ZCS) input during visual stimulation; SCS cells fired complex spikes assoc

207 nearby local populations driven by different visual stimulation showed different gamma frequencies.

208 nsitive to both visible and invisible cardio-visual stimulation, showing reduced activation for visua

209 Visual stimulation significantly modulated auditory acti

210 Furthermore, visual stimulation strongly modulates the bipolar cell p

211 e synthesis inhibitors blocked the effect of visual stimulation, suggesting that visual activity regu

212 neurons in anesthetized cats and found that visual stimulation suppressed low-frequency membrane pot

213 In response to visual stimulation, T1rho imaging revealed a significant

214 dings from an identified ganglion cell type, visual stimulation targeted at individual cone photorece

215 ed oscillations in membrane potential during visual stimulation that are largely absent during period

216 ing in conjunction with carefully calibrated visual stimulation that emulated either congruent or opp

217 D2 mice showed no response to visual stimulation that evoked robust optomotor response

218 duced fixation offset establishes the foveal visual stimulation that is required to restore the balan

219 a reduction in its response to deprived eye visual stimulation, the transgenic mouse V1 had already

220 functional coupling to be very common during visual stimulation: the simple cell's spikes tended to o

221 Under visual stimulation, these areas in both hemispheres code

222 stimulus orientation and less responsive to visual stimulation through either eye.

223 cortical neurons unresponsive to subsequent visual stimulation through the deprived eye.

224 Using a new method for restricting visual stimulation to a selected retinal region, we exam

225 ell patch recordings from cat area 17 during visual stimulation to examine the generation and integra

226 y in healthy participants, we used ambiguous visual stimulation to probe the relationship between del

227 By presenting ultrasound and visual stimulation together, we found that ultrasonic st

228 Visual stimulation triggered regenerative local dendriti

229 vert attention in the absence of significant visual stimulation using a threshold-contrast detection

230 With visual stimulation using two short pulses in the human b

231 n-stressful neutral, pleasant and unpleasant visual stimulation (VES) via emotionally laden slides.

232 i concerning comparable aspects of light and visual stimulation via collateralized axons.

233 s in the locust Schistocerca gregaria during visual stimulation via lateral LCD screens.

234 The activation at three out of four rates of visual stimulation was greater for the patients with sch

235 resonance imaging (fMRI) signal response to visual stimulation was measured in retinotopic mapping-d

236 hermore, this modulation depended on whether visual stimulation was present or absent.

237 Visual stimulation was provided by the display of moving

238 Fine-grained visual stimulation was used to identify the location, ty

239 ecorded for 5 intensity tones with emotional visual stimulation was used, for the first time, to test

240 fMRI responses to visual stimulation were related to differences in RNFL t

241 cortex of cats, and the effects of prolonged visual stimulation were studied.

242 ed sub-additive responses to optogenetic and visual stimulation, which depended lawfully on stimulati

243 kes but enhanced voltage responses evoked by visual stimulation, which selectively boosted transmissi

244 t in the FEF, are most effectively driven by visual stimulation, while behavioral engagement is not s

245 during either full-field or right hemifield visual stimulation with a black and white reversing chec

246 tex during sleep and wakefulness, and during visual stimulation with fixation.

247 the LFP oscillation became more entrained by visual stimulation with higher frequencies (>10 Hz).

248 tors in shaping the relay neuron response to visual stimulation with the AMPA component being importa

249 entrainment of ongoing alpha oscillations by visual stimulation, with concomitant consequences for pe

250 versal of the normal beta suppression during visual stimulation, with visual stimuli eliciting beta m