ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual stimulus

1 gle or negative-angle rule (depending on the visual stimulus).

2 the same temporal phase relationship to the visual stimulus.

3 TMS alone, without the need for the physical visual stimulus.

4 humans appear to improve many aspects of the visual stimulus.

5 e and negative BOLD associated with a simple visual stimulus.

6 the eyes to make a saccade in response to a visual stimulus.

7 vey its selectivity for the orientation of a visual stimulus.

8 ientation and the direction of motion of the visual stimulus.

9 to elicit escape, even in the absence of any visual stimulus.

10 ed repeated presentations of a nonreinforced visual stimulus.

11 d by cocaine injections and a cocaine-paired visual stimulus.

12 ocal features, respectively, of a reversible visual stimulus.

13 that sound is localized toward a coincident visual stimulus.

14 ex in response to the abrupt appearance of a visual stimulus.

15 n hemoglobin concentrations in response to a visual stimulus.

16 redicts the perceptual fate of a forthcoming visual stimulus.

17 ten observed after the cessation of a bright visual stimulus.

18 late early visual areas in the presence of a visual stimulus.

19 visual areas, but only in the presence of a visual stimulus.

20 nsion will push them away from the expanding visual stimulus.

21 which faces may represent a special class of visual stimulus.

22 nd even if the goal does not correspond to a visual stimulus.

23 visual occipital activity before an expected visual stimulus.

24 than during fixation, despite the lack of a visual stimulus.

25 ally on the spatiotemporal properties of the visual stimulus.

26 tagonistic or integrative depending upon the visual stimulus.

27 e generally to emphasize novel features of a visual stimulus.

28 ts responded to the color or the motion of a visual stimulus.

29 onal activity of the retina in response to a visual stimulus.

30 (CCD) camera in response to a green (540 nm) visual stimulus.

31 with (cued by), but not directed toward, the visual stimulus.

32 , this must be investigated as a function of visual stimulus.

33 rm a spatial cognitive operation on a static visual stimulus.

34 of observed spike responses to a stochastic visual stimulus.

35 influence how long it takes to respond to a visual stimulus.

36 ed time-varying responses to a novel natural visual stimulus.

37 ward (pro-reach) or away (anti-reach) from a visual stimulus.

38 tina to the brain transmit the position of a visual stimulus.

39 energy (local variance in intensity) in the visual stimulus.

40 n which juice was substituted with a neutral visual stimulus.

41 description of how these neurons encode the visual stimulus.

42 s unaffected by the presence or absence of a visual stimulus.

43 utton-presses each produced a specific audio-visual stimulus.

44 onses are self-initiated or in reaction to a visual stimulus.

45 selective for the direction of movement of a visual stimulus.

46 ulation of the cortex with a briefly flashed visual stimulus.

47 revented them from firing in response to the visual stimulus.

48 t alter the classical mislocalization of the visual stimulus.

49 x during (activation) and after (recovery) a visual stimulus.

50 ions in the properties and complexity of the visual stimulus.

51 cts reached away from rather than toward the visual stimulus.

52 redicting the occurrence, timing and type of visual stimulus.

53 es the objective, physical properties of the visual stimulus.

54 ex, influencing processing of a simultaneous visual stimulus.

55 mber of prospects on a branching multivalued visual stimulus.

56 tory target's timecourse matched that of the visual stimulus.

57 is greater if reward is associated with the visual stimulus.

58 when to perform an action following a brief visual stimulus.

59 ed to the specific orientation of the moving visual stimulus.

60 alry by promoting dominance of the congruent visual stimulus.

61 followed by a short lateralized auditory or visual stimulus.

62 xation is modulated by the presentation of a visual stimulus.

63 orded waves of activity elicited by a moving visual stimulus.

64 strongly dependent on the parameters of the visual stimulus.

65 we demonstrate that presentation of a novel visual stimulus (a single oriented grating) causes immed

66 g prolonged presentations of a high-contrast visual stimulus, a process we termed high-contrast adapt

67 ed whether the semantic content of a looming visual stimulus affects perceived time-to-collision by m

68 or orientation as the normal response to the visual stimulus alone.

69 he sound originates from the location of the visual stimulus, an illusion known as the ventriloquism

70 ssociation between the drug and a tactile or visual stimulus and (iii) a test that offers a choice be

71 t included the time required to perceive the visual stimulus and decide which hand to react with; the

72 al flow is modulated upwards on onset of the visual stimulus and downwards, typically with a slower t

73 e other 12 trials the tone was preceded by a visual stimulus and not reinforced.

74 tronger in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the visual stimulus and response hand.

75 xygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity to the visual stimulus and the area responding to the central 3

76 lus, both psychophysical sensitivity to that visual stimulus and the responsiveness of high-order neu

77 specifically, to express the delay between a visual stimulus and the reward that it portends.

78 lation between the conscious perception of a visual stimulus and the synchronous activity of large po

79 lation between the conscious perception of a visual stimulus and the synchronous activity of large po

80 r estimates of the hemodynamic response to a visual stimulus and, under the conditions of a calibrate

81 in activity time-locked to the onset of the visual stimulus, and inhibitory responses.

82 ains depends on the frequency content of the visual stimulus, and that 'relative', not absolute, prec

83 in the direction of the spatially disparate visual stimulus, and the aftereffect did not transfer ac

84 l bases of the interaction between a dynamic visual stimulus approaching the body and its expected co

85 rceptions of the whole and of the parts of a visual stimulus are mediated by different brain regions.

86 fect on pursuit speed and direction when the visual stimulus arises from the coherent motion of a hig

87 re motion or (shape) trajectories before the visual stimulus arrives.

88 where the participants always perceived the visual stimulus as having come first.

89 button-press generated either the same audio-visual stimulus as learned initially, or the pair associ

90 ntion, but we could decode the location of a visual stimulus as well as the endpoint of saccades towa

91 100 ms were temporally linked to an attended visual stimulus, as reflected by robust cross-modal spre

92 at when humans and monkeys were provided the visual stimulus asynchronously with the sound but as fee

93 behavioral task in which they attended to a visual stimulus at one location while remembering a seco

94 When interrupted by a visual stimulus at random intervals, participants scored

95 The time course of the response to the visual stimulus at the paired RF location is altered, wi

96 Directing attention toward a visual stimulus at the receptive field of the recorded n

97 sites that encode the retinal location of a visual stimulus before and after a saccade.

98 classes bear different relationships to the visual stimulus, both qualitatively (in terms of the ave

99 not only in the retinotopic location of the visual stimulus, but also at the occipital pole (OP), co

100 ear-nonlinear model that operates not on the visual stimulus, but on the afferent responses of a popu

101 ly enhance behavioral performance based on a visual stimulus, but the degree to which attention modul

102 ust to changes in the temporal contrast of a visual stimulus by imaging activity in vivo.

103 However, repetition of a visual stimulus can also be considered in terms of the s

104 A salient visual stimulus can be rendered invisible by presenting

105 that, during classical fear conditioning, a visual stimulus can be transmitted to the amygdala via e

106 iod between two presentations of an oriented visual stimulus can be used to decode the remembered sti

107 stimulation (TMS) shortly after the end of a visual stimulus can cause a TMS-induced 'replay' or 'vis

108 on in visual cortex and suggest that a prior visual stimulus can influence subsequent perception at e

109 Repeated experience with a visual stimulus can result in improved perception of the

110 ered architecture of the brain for different visual stimulus categories is one of the most fascinatin

111 ptual expectation effects vary for different visual stimulus categories.

112 lized regions for processing faces and other visual stimulus categories.

113 eraction of Alzheimer's disease severity and visual stimulus complexity in relation to regional brain

114 rvae develop an enhanced motor response to a visual stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) when it is pa

115 of the saccade decreased, independent of the visual stimulus configuration.

116 depended on the retinotopic position of the visual stimulus, confirming that the effect was due to t

117 ctile stimuli also promoted dominance of the visual stimulus congruent with the supramodal frequency.

118 of perceptual decisions (independent of the visual stimulus), consistent with a role for MT in provi

119 ere strikingly reproducible across different visual stimulus contexts.

120 nerally showed response suppression when the visual stimulus contrast was high whereas this effect wa

121 nse and this effect was not changed when the visual stimulus contrast was varied.

122 We further show that, across visual stimulus contrasts, retinal circuits continued to

123 spatial location and orientation of a local visual stimulus coupled to a deep layer of neurons that

124 ht, the initial pause after the onset of the visual stimulus decreased.

125 Using a visual stimulus detection task, we provide evidence from

126 ponsive to synaptic burst stimuli, improving visual stimulus detection.

127 Furthermore, we found that the same visual stimulus did not affect performance in auditory c

128 A visual stimulus display was created that enabled us to e

129 We used an immersive visual stimulus dome that allowed us to present spatiote

130 scriminate one of the features that define a visual stimulus (e.g., its orientation) can transfer to

131 In the absence of a visual stimulus, electrical stimulation of the electrode

132 The presentation of a visual stimulus elicits a trial-by-trial stimulus-locked

133 so selectively to the spatial structure of a visual stimulus even when there are no energy changes.

134 at a single scalar feature computed from the visual stimulus experienced by the animal is sufficient

135 wn about the neural representation of simple visual stimulus features (for example, orientation, dire

136 s behavior, from the detection of particular visual stimulus features and the timescales of sensory p

137 spatial receptive fields and sharp tuning to visual stimulus features including orientation and spati

138 ate lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) encodes visual stimulus features while they are perceived and wh

139 lationships to value, movement direction, or visual stimulus features.

140 representing reward properties together with visual stimulus features.

141 ponse in the hemisphere contralateral to the visual stimulus, followed by a remapped response in the

142 e task that required the crows to remember a visual stimulus for later comparison.

143 subjects are shown an angry face as a target visual stimulus for less than forty milliseconds and are

144 levant sounds occurring synchronously with a visual stimulus from a different location was larger whe

145 d by a saccade as saccadic omission [1]: the visual stimulus generated by the saccade is omitted from

146 The appearance of a novel visual stimulus generates a rapid stimulus-locked respon

147 was performed on a color monitor driven by a visual-stimulus-generating video board, with stimulus pa

148 during or after presentation of the critical visual stimulus have little or no effect on the subject'

149 We found that exposure to an uninformative visual stimulus (i.e. white light) while simultaneously

150 However, a change of visual stimulus immediately preceded reach onset, raisin

151 imply as a result of presenting a stationary visual stimulus in and out of the adapted retinal region

152 cotine infusions or a moderately-reinforcing visual stimulus in daily 1-h sessions.

153 between reported visual awareness ("I see a visual stimulus in front of me") and the social attribut

154 itive control on the initial processing of a visual stimulus in humans.

155 more often perceived an inherently ambiguous visual stimulus in one of its perceptual instantiations.

156 ponses are no longer driven primarily by the visual stimulus in the receptive field, but by the broad

157 e (1) highly responsive to the presence of a visual stimulus in the RF, (2) heterogeneous, and (3) no

158 so activity-regulated in vitro or induced by visual stimulus in the visual cortex, suggesting that th

159 The use of video playback as a visual stimulus in this experiment permitted complete is

160 stimulation, OND RGCs respond earlier as the visual stimulus increases in size.

161 e drugs induce characteristic alterations in visual stimulus-induced and/or spontaneous eye movements

162 ctations about the identity of a forthcoming visual stimulus influence the neural mechanisms of perce

163 vector average, but the contribution of the visual stimulus inside the affected field was decreased,

164 ual event can be dramatically reduced if the visual stimulus is accompanied by a startling sound.

165 Repeated exposure to a visual stimulus is associated with corresponding reducti

166 afterimage induced by prior adaptation to a visual stimulus is believed to be due to bleaching of ph

167 ors affecting the time taken to respond to a visual stimulus is contrast, and studies of reaction tim

168 Analysis of the movement of a complex visual stimulus is expressed in the responses of pattern

169 emovements made in the Wheeless task, when a visual stimulus is followed after a short delay by anoth

170 hows that paying attention to the color of a visual stimulus is manifested by an early endogenous sca

171 Consequently, when the same visual stimulus is presented repeatedly, postsynaptic cu

172 When a salient visual stimulus is presented shortly before a saccade, t

173 ivity when a non-informative, suprathreshold visual stimulus is presented, there are highly consisten

174 monstrated that the bottom-up signaling of a visual stimulus is subserved by interareal gamma-band sy

175 Because the visual stimulus itself is unchanged, this variability in

176 controlled trial-to-trial differences in the visual stimulus itself, potentially confounding this dis

177 d that their response after the removal of a visual stimulus lasting 1 min was similar in amplitude a

178 Spikes in bipolar cells encode a visual stimulus less reliably than spikes in ganglion ce

179 ts received nonreinforced presentations of a visual stimulus (light) during the 1st training session,

180 Male rats were trained either to associate a visual stimulus (light) with footshock or were exposed t

181 press or completely eliminate responses to a visual stimulus located inside the RF in nitrous oxide s

182 es a continuous representation of remembered visual stimulus locations with respect to constantly cha

183 wing spectral pattern: before the onset of a visual stimulus, low-frequency oscillations (beta, 12-20

184 cyclovergence, its decay in the absence of a visual stimulus may be incomplete.

185 an escape take-off in response to a looming visual stimulus, mimicking a potential predator [8].

186 development have directional preferences for visual stimulus motions; i.e., they give better response

187 The optokinetic response (OKR) to a visual stimulus moving at constant velocity consists of

188 anipulating task difficulty independently of visual stimulus noise, here we test the hypothesis that

189 The visual stimulus of a top predator (coral trout, Plectrop

190 a pronounced decrease in their response to a visual stimulus of different contrasts and orientations.

191 in neural activity due to adaptation when a visual stimulus of the same duration was repeatedly pres

192 icient accuracy to precisely reconstruct the visual stimulus on the retina.

193 In this way, we were able to pit the visual stimulus (one vs. two stimulating directions) aga

194 We found that (1) before visual stimulus onset (-200 to 0 ms), attention to visua

195 applied to left dMFC starting 100 ms before visual stimulus onset and ending 100 ms afterward.

196 raphy to demonstrate that detecting auditory-visual stimulus onset asynchrony activates a large-scale

197 We found that, while the response latency to visual stimulus onset was earlier for V1 neurons than su

198 he incorrect response) starting 180 ms after visual stimulus onset.

199 rsal intraparietal sulcus (IPS) 100 ms after visual stimulus onset.

200 r analyses revealed that eye acceleration at visual-stimulus onset primarily limited working velocity

201 , neurons across visual areas respond to any visual stimulus or contribute to any perceptual decision

202 tent effect when applied before presenting a visual stimulus or during recovery from motion adaptatio

203 upport processing of elemental features of a visual stimulus or scene, such as local contrast, orient

204 conditions used here, such as the choice of visual stimulus or spike measurement time window, and th

205 lation did not depend on the presence of the visual stimulus or the behavioral choice of the animal.

206 tion is focused on an object such as a small visual stimulus or the breath.

207 Selectivity to visual stimulus orientation is a basic cortical function

208 f neuronal responses to the orientation of a visual stimulus (orientation tuning).

209 Two measures of conditioned responding to a visual stimulus, orienting behavior (rearing on the hind

210 Monkeys made saccades in the presence of a visual stimulus outside of the receptive field.

211 perception when the evoked phosphene and the visual stimulus overlapped in time and space in the plac

212 ould care about an almost infinite number of visual stimulus patterns, but we don't: we distinguish t

213 stronger than any suppression evoked by the visual stimulus per se.

214 introduce trial-to-trial variability in the visual stimulus, potentially confounding such measures.

215 ning engaged upon first encountering a novel visual stimulus predicts the degree of perceptual fluenc

216 Transient pupil dilation was elicited after visual stimulus presentation regardless of target lumina

217 ee epochs of the memory-guided saccade task: visual stimulus presentation, the delay interval, and mo

218 neurons in 24 neurosurgical patients during visual stimulus presentation.

219 ite during naming started 250-300 msec after visual stimulus presentation.

220 wn that the responses of many Ipc units to a visual stimulus presented inside the classical receptive

221 lifting a finger or an arm in response to a visual stimulus presented to either hemifield, this acal

222 d pattern of activation corresponding to the visual stimulus presented.

223 concurrent multiunit firing and facilitates visual stimulus processing.

224 What parts of a visual stimulus produce the greatest neural signal?

225 The visual stimulus produced statistically significant negat

226 We show that closed-loop control of a visual stimulus promotes temporal coordination across th

227 ms of groups of neurons (channels) tuned for visual stimulus properties.

228 ways, in a manner that can be dependent upon visual stimulus properties.

229 nglion cells in the mouse retina over a wide visual stimulus range.

230 on anti-reaches encoded the location of the visual stimulus rather than the movement goal.

231 Here, we found that brief (50 ms) visual stimulus re-exposure during a repetitive foil tas

232 Shifting attention away from a visual stimulus reduces, but does not abolish, visual di

233 ral mechanisms leading to the awareness of a visual stimulus remain unclear.

234 In the main task, the visual stimulus remained constant, but covert visual spa

235 was that neurons in the FEF report whether a visual stimulus remains stable or moves as a saccade is

236 e focused on identifying which features of a visual stimulus render it salient--i.e., make it "pop ou

237 , two GCaMP5 variants detected twice as many visual stimulus-responsive cells as GCaMP3.

238 hat the task-relevant feature of an upcoming visual stimulus (S2) was, while high-density electroence

239 ain neurons implicated in navigation-display visual stimulus selection.

240 s by which spike frequency adaptation shapes visual stimulus selectivity in an identified visual inte

241 following repetitive presentation of a given visual stimulus, spatiotemporal activity patterns resemb

242 pants directed their attention to one of two visual stimulus streams located adjacent to each hand.

243 tended selectively to one of two lateralized visual-stimulus streams while task-irrelevant tones were

244 presented human observers with an ambiguous visual stimulus (structure-from-motion) that can give ri

245 influenced by the low-level salience of the visual stimulus, such as luminance, contrast, and color,

246 When a visual stimulus suddenly appears, it captures attention,

247 umans lengthened the perceived duration of a visual stimulus, suggesting the rSMG is involved in basi

248 Initiating a movement in response to a visual stimulus takes significantly longer than might be

249 In phase 1 of the DMST, a complex visual stimulus (target) was followed immediately by a f

250 he modes represent localized features of the visual stimulus that are distinct from the features repr

251 is played by a common representation of the visual stimulus that can be applied at different stages.

252 tterns represent specific messages about the visual stimulus that differ significantly from what one

253 In natural viewing, a visual stimulus that is the target of attention is gener

254 g theory to train a discrimination between a visual stimulus that predicted reward (conditioned excit

255 and extent of switching a response toward a visual stimulus that was previously not, but has become,

256 ome, associated with reward (and away from a visual stimulus that was previously, but is no longer, r

257 t for encoding global motion, we developed a visual stimulus that yields a global direction yet inclu

258 The task employs a continuously varying visual stimulus that, for any moment in time, selectivel

259 ntity versus attractiveness) within the same visual stimulus (the face).

260 itations of TMS-induced replay with the same visual stimulus, the replay can be induced by TMS alone,

261 le, when monkeys direct their attention to a visual stimulus, the response gain of specific subsets o

262 ngle of polarization of a linearly polarized visual stimulus, thereby maximizing the polarization con

263 Visual stimulus to be detected was a temporally modulate

264 the efficiency of disengaging from a central visual stimulus to orient to a peripheral one in a cohor

265 surprise associated with the occurrence of a visual stimulus to provide a formal quantification of th

266 show spontaneous oddity preference for all 3 visual stimulus types tested (photos, shapes, and patter

267 s responded very differently to an identical visual stimulus under different visual discrimination ta

268 hen attention is deployed on a high-contrast visual stimulus using a discrimination task.

269 he neural activity evoked by an extinguished visual stimulus, using event-related functional MRI (fMR

270 s to mislocalization of the sound toward the visual stimulus (ventriloquism illusion).

271 In order to direct a movement towards a visual stimulus, visual spatial information must be comb

272 ral SC deactivation, orienting to the static visual stimulus was abolished throughout the entire visu

273 When the visual stimulus was absent or had low contrast, these LF

274 t location was larger when that accompanying visual stimulus was attended versus unattended.

275 he asynchronous condition, but only when the visual stimulus was body related.

276 Around the time of the saccade, a visual stimulus was flashed either at the location occup

277 ficantly predicted whether a threshold-level visual stimulus was later consciously perceived.

278 However, the proportion of V1 active to our visual stimulus was lower for the older observers than f

279 g behavior (rearing on the hind legs) when a visual stimulus was paired with food.

280 ed rats exhibited normal responding when the visual stimulus was presented alone and paired with food

281 In contrast when the visual stimulus was presented synchronously with the sou

282 A visual stimulus was presented to the eye, and responses

283 the left or right hand to indicate whether a visual stimulus was relatively large or small.

284 , we found previously that when a flickering visual stimulus was repeated, individual cells fired act

285 food on some trials, while on other trials a visual stimulus was simultaneously presented along with

286 The strength of the visual stimulus was titrated around psychophysical thres

287 both in the presence and in the absence of a visual stimulus, was a tonic hyperpolarization.

288 spread," i.e., impulse response to a minimal visual stimulus, was as rapid and retinotopically specif

289 When we repeated the same visual stimulus, we found that the same mode was robustl

290 lty in learning to correct their choice of a visual stimulus when it is no longer associated with rew

291 e enhancement of attentional processing of a visual stimulus when its predictive value was altered.

292 Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle

293 red light in the retinal region exposed to a visual stimulus, which was significant in three of five

294 Following one action the audio preceded the visual stimulus, while for the other action audio lagged

295 ortex are selective for the orientation of a visual stimulus, while the receptive fields of their tha

296 ssion by following a large-field, patterned, visual stimulus with a magnetic pulse.

297 rategy that links the luminance profile in a visual stimulus with an association (the percept) that r

298 ), we show that association of a directional visual stimulus with reward results in broadened orienta

299 s whose amplitude varied independently and a visual stimulus with varying radius, while manipulating

300 ated whether changing the probability that a visual stimulus would be selected as the target for a sa