ライフサイエンスコーパス: vocalization

1 nal premotor interneuronal output system for vocalization.

2 to produce the expiratory drive required for vocalization.

3 to gain access to the motoneurons generating vocalization.

4 d/or during the monkeys' motor production of vocalization.

5 as when visual orofacial movements precede a vocalization.

6 ity to acoustic frequencies in its courtship vocalization.

7 i were presented as auditory concomitants of vocalization.

8 plex (BLA) evoked freezing and/or ultrasonic vocalization.

9 on driven by acoustic characteristics of the vocalization.

10 essential biomechanical parameters used for vocalization.

11 control of which is necessary for generating vocalization.

12 ,3], yet we know little about other types of vocalizations.

13 malities similar to those found in the mouse vocalizations.

14 ct sound types- clicks, chirps, whistles and vocalizations.

15 w the consistent trajectories observed in WT vocalizations.

16 oral features in speech and species-specific vocalizations.

17 euronal responses of PyrNs to pup ultrasonic vocalizations.

18 r high-frequency stimuli, such as ultrasonic vocalizations.

19 including human speech and nonhuman primate vocalizations.

20 sensory perceptions and motor production of vocalizations.

21 In mice, these displays include ultrasonic vocalizations.

22 ace- and voice-onset asynchronies in primate vocalizations.

23 Foxp1 correlates with defects in ultrasonic vocalizations.

24 th sexes produce virtually indistinguishable vocalizations.

25 or BAB) to create two functionally distinct vocalizations.

26 of both facial gestures and the accompanying vocalizations.

27 s, produce an increased number of ultrasonic vocalizations.

28 petitive behaviors and decreased affiliative vocalizations.

29 able of modifying spectral features in their vocalizations.

30 aspects of articulate speech and non-verbal vocalizations.

31 ing of natural sounds such speech and animal vocalizations.

32 e role of the basal ganglia during affective vocalizations.

33 ouch were twofold stronger than responses to vocalizations.

34 role in higher level organization of learned vocalizations.

35 ponse to mating preferences for more complex vocalizations.

36 information, which are present in faces and vocalizations.

37 ess of auditory cortex neurons to ultrasonic vocalizations.

38 ent) and mismatching (incongruent) faces and vocalizations.

39 ry and heterogeneous responses to ultrasonic vocalizations.

40 assifier to evoked potentials to conspecific vocalizations.

41 pectral or temporal features of the original vocalizations.

42 ion of complex sounds, including conspecific vocalizations.

43 activity, freezing behavior, and expressive vocalizations.

44 eotypy) as well as regulate context-specific vocalizations.

45 nt for control of fundamental frequencies of vocalizations.

46 to cognition is tuned specifically to human vocalizations.

47 ng preference is tuned specifically to human vocalizations.

48 s the BNST plays a role in the initiation of vocalizations.

49 amental element of music, speech, and animal vocalizations.

50 te with changes in the acoustic structure of vocalizations.

51 arity of tone combinations to harmonic human vocalizations.

52 ated with reported population differences in vocalizations.

53 nalyzing real-time generated echoes of their vocalizations.

54 raining for singing and other highly-skilled vocalizations.

55 control of the spectro-temporal structure of vocalizations.

56 ally encode individual identity in mammalian vocalizations [12], this is the first example of this ph

57 ain responses were within the categories of: vocalization (39.4%), social behavior (21.8%) and facial

58 actions with negative or positive emotional vocalizations [7], or neutral sounds.

59 o assess the degree of N1 suppression during vocalization, a putative measure of auditory predictive

60 t these recording sites during times of high vocalization activity raises significant concerns that c

61 ars tuned to the dominant frequency of their vocalizations, allowing discrimination from background n

62 ber a face and vocalization pair or just the vocalization alone.

63 y is greater during active echolocation than vocalization alone.

64 progression in neural coding of conspecific vocalizations along the ventral auditory pathway.

65 Neuronal circuits that control vocalization and breathing overlap and rely on motor neu

66 owering (all animals), followed by increased vocalization and escape-like behaviors (seven animals),

67 rom the advantages of recognizing biological vocalization and human vocalization in particular.

68 striatal and global decrease of Mef2c rescue vocalization and striatal spinogenesis defects of Foxp2-

69 ection of 5-HT2CR shRNA AAV vector decreased vocalizations and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors

70 ntal origin of this early link between human vocalizations and cognition.

71 The bat's adaptive control of sonar vocalizations and ear positioning occurs on a millisecon

72 produce highly specific effects in mouse pup vocalizations and establish the mouse as an attractive m

73 s and compete with rivals by performing both vocalizations and hind limb gestural signals, called "fo

74 in infancy produced fewer isolation-induced vocalizations and in adulthood exhibited less anxiety-li

75 eceptor antagonist did not alter affiliative vocalizations and increased MDMA-induced social contact.

76 on Heschl's gyrus that process natural human vocalizations and pitch perturbations in the auditory fe

77 oss an animal's entire repertoire of natural vocalizations and sequences.

78 ngs overturn decades-old ideas about primate vocalizations and show that marmoset monkeys are a compe

79 per unit time and had longer pauses between vocalizations and that the entropy of the temporal seque

80 frontal cortex (VLPFC) encode both faces and vocalizations and that VLPFC is active when animals need

81 ulatta) respond to and integrate conspecific vocalizations and their accompanying facial gestures.

82 s shed new light on the diversity of primate vocalizations and vocal morphology, highlighting the imp

83 discrepancies between the intended and heard vocalization, and contains information about the resulti

84 ve coordinated behaviors, such as breathing, vocalization, and locomotion.

85 x neurons when marmosets heard a conspecific vocalization, and that these changes corresponded to sub

86 rds and mammals, rapid exchanges of the same vocalization, and vocal exchanges between paired individ

87 uch sounds are normative events in mammalian vocalizations, and can be directly traceable to the nonl

88 riety of sound categories, including speech, vocalizations, and music, and we discuss how our underst

89 ts, stereotyped activity, abnormal postnatal vocalizations, and other autistic-like behaviors in the

90 of ASD, including social impairment, reduced vocalizations, and repetitive behavior.

91 oop with adaptation in generating repetitive vocalizations, and suggest sensory adaptation is importa

92 how auditory neurons encode complex, learned vocalizations, and the potential role of norepinephrine

93 combine to generate acoustic features of the vocalizations, and thus cannot meaningfully relate those

94 h showed social behavior impairment, altered vocalization, anxiety-like behavior, neuroanatomical abn

95 processing of auditory feedback during self-vocalization are poorly understood.

96 On encountering terrestrial predators, both vocalizations are combined into a "mobbing sequence," po

97 iod of sensorimotor integration during which vocalizations are evaluated via auditory feedback and pr

98 These vocalizations are generated by the emotional motor syste

99 Although mammalian vocalizations are predominantly harmonically structured,

100 In birds, the physical mechanisms by which vocalizations are produced and controlled remain unresol

101 How vocalizations are represented by spatiotemporal activity

102 produce elaborated and complex sequences of vocalizations, are of particular interest for this topic

103 esistance to change and decreased ultrasonic vocalization as well as abnormal levels of serotonin in

104 n in the songbird forebrain by using natural vocalizations as stimuli and manipulating the category a

105 Behaviorally, subjects were slower to detect vocalizations as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased, bu

106 g forebrain leads to impairments in neonatal vocalizations as well as neocortical cytoarchitectonic a

107 ngruent species-specific facial gestures and vocalizations as well as their unimodal components.

108 "hits" had cumulative effects on ultrasonic vocalizations at postnatal day 3.

109 cetes are unique in producing high-frequency vocalizations at the phonic lips, a constriction in the

110 rather than cortical malfunctions for early vocalizations/babbling.

111 We compared the temporal structure of vocalization bouts, the types of vocalizations, the patt

112 ed in the perceptual processing of faces and vocalizations but also in their mnemonic processing.

113 precisely the advantages conferred by human vocalizations, but by 6 mo, nonhuman primate vocalizatio

114 They generate vocalization by activating the prefrontal-PAG-NRA-motone

115 By contrast, production of vocalizations by humans and animals involves complex and

116 Thus, the interception of predator vocalizations by male sperm whales disrupted functional

117 Thus, the interception of their vocalizations by unintended cetacean receivers may be pa

118 However, vocalizations can also play an important role in both ma

119 is plasticity in the degree to which learned vocalizations can change in both humans and songbirds is

120 ence that the interception of heterospecific vocalizations can mediate interactions between different

121 n between acoustically similar pup and adult vocalization categories among a physiologically defined

122 ion to represent a behaviorally relevant pup vocalization category-contrary to expectations from the

123 The neural basis of how learned vocalizations change during development and in adulthood

124 sitive to distorted auditory feedback during vocalization, compared with during passive listening.

125 Songbirds learn vocalizations composed of syllables; in adult birds, eac

126 Analysis of the EMGs demonstrated that these vocalizations consist of only small parts of the emotion

127 The results show that each type of vocalization consists of a specific, circumscribed motor

128 Numbers of adult words, child vocalizations, conversational turns, parent verbal respo

129 ity and standardize frequency measurement of vocalization data across species.

130 pression of a human FoxP2 mutant that causes vocalization deficits decreases neurogenesis, suggesting

131 s between self-generated and passively heard vocalizations, detects discrepancies between the intende

132 edback refers to the monitoring of one's own vocalizations during call production and has been intens

133 Like humans, songbirds learn their vocalizations during development, and they provide an ex

134 involved in the production of self-initiated vocalizations during natural vocal communication.

135 esponses for processing periodicity in human vocalizations during vocal production and motor control.

136 tions in emotional speech prosody, nonverbal vocalizations (e.g., crying), and (silent) facial expres

137 While ultrasonic vocalizations elicited a rather weak population response

138 e causes of five distinct positive emotional vocalizations elicited by what adults would consider fun

139 s question, we compared ultrasonic courtship vocalizations emitted by chronically deaf and normal hea

140 Unlike the vocalizations exhibited by the majority of land vertebra

141 lfully produced "wookies" - an idiosyncratic vocalization exhibiting a unique spectral profile among

142 lly breeding teleost fish that (1) courtship vocalization exhibits an endogenous circadian rhythm und

143 pidly adapted sonar call design in the first vocalization following the jamming signal, revealing a r

144 r vocal organ transforms motor commands into vocalizations for social communication.

145 this issue here in a study of body size and vocalization frequencies conducted across 91 mammalian s

146 inverse relationships between body size and vocalization frequencies in primates and carnivores, fil

147 s inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foun

148 : rigorous comparisons between body size and vocalization frequencies remain scarce, particularly amo

149 ng the structure of a meaningful referential vocalization from conspecifics.

150 antaneously detect, localize and classify MM vocalizations from diverse species over an approximately

151 We compared vocalizations from mice engineered to carry a mutation i

152 eloped a microphone array system to localize vocalizations from socially interacting, individual adul

153 genetically triggered neonatal phenotype in vocalization generates a negative environmental loop in

154 eurochemical microstimulation also generated vocalizations (guttural sounds).

155 when faces, vocalizations or both faces and vocalization had to be remembered.

156 the physical attributes of a self-generated vocalization has remained elusive for vertebrates.

157 Such flexible affect expression of vocalizations has not yet been reported for any nonhuman

158 For over half a century now, primate vocalizations have been thought to undergo little or no

159 As Vldlr was previously implicated in avian vocalization, here we investigate vocalizations of neona

160 nds with harmonic structures, such as animal vocalizations, human speech, and music.

161 direct access to the motoneurons involved in vocalization, i.e., the motoneuronal cell groups innerva

162 uses dysfunction in predictive coding during vocalization in a manner similar to the dysfunction obse

163 onist, ketamine, on predictive coding during vocalization in healthy volunteers and compared them wit

164 ilarities in the biomechanical mechanisms of vocalization in humans and songbirds, songbirds offer an

165 reduction impairs development of ultrasonic vocalization in mice.

166 us tractus solitarius (NTS) is essential for vocalization in mice.

167 synaptogenesis of corticostriatal inputs and vocalization in neonates.

168 It exerts opposing effects on vocalization in nocturnal versus diurnal species at the

169 est deep roots for functional flexibility of vocalization in our primate heritage.

170 ecognizing biological vocalization and human vocalization in particular.

171 y predicted whether subjects would produce a vocalization in response.

172 Vocalization in young mice is an innate response to isol

173 primate VLPFC in the processing of faces and vocalizations in a manner that is similar to the inferio

174 ulates selectivity for behaviorally relevant vocalizations in a specific part of the caudomedial nido

175 ferret primary auditory cortex to speech and vocalizations in four conditions: clean, additive white

176 , and biomechanical modeling, we showed that vocalizations in infant marmoset monkeys undergo dramati

177 n and maternal separation-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in pups.

178 to imagine speaking or generating nonverbal vocalizations in response to external stimuli.

179 ating bat controls the features of its sonar vocalizations in tandem with the positioning of the oute

180 Moreover, the information about vocalizations in the caudal sectors was similar to the i

181 necessary to explain differential coding of vocalizations in the rostral areas.

182 We recorded "fictive vocalizations" in the in vitro CPG from the laryngeal ne

183 hat shows rudimentary voluntary control over vocalization, indicating that some neural control is alr

184 e was evident even before subjects heard the vocalization, indicating that the probability of a conve

185 y, and, at the same time, they modulate this vocalization into words and sentences by activating the

186 atic motor system, they are able to modulate vocalization into words and sentences.

187 tion can transform a dense representation of vocalizations into a sparse and background-invariant rep

188 The control of vocalization is critically dependent on auditory feedbac

189 e demonstrated that predictive coding during vocalization is disrupted in schizophrenia.

190 First, fine control over vocalization is not easy for physical reasons, and moder

191 information can be conveyed via gesture and vocalization is present in infancy.

192 A new study shows that nocturnal courtship vocalization is regulated by a circadian rhythm and pote

193 evant aspect of periodicity in natural human vocalizations, is encoded in Heschl's gyrus (HG), and ho

194 following muscles were recorded during these vocalizations: larynx (cricothyroid, thyroarytenoid, and

195 t two arguments why physical adaptations for vocalization may be as important as neural adaptations.

196 parameters ex vivo, suggesting that in vivo vocalizations may also not be specified by unique motor

197 in the cat generates four different types of vocalization, mews, howls, cries, and hisses.

198 his implies that the frequency of blue whale vocalizations might be directly proportional to the size

199 volunteers listened to non-speech-affective vocalizations morphed on a continuum between anger and f

200 king memory paradigm using naturalistic face-vocalization movies as memoranda.

201 in response to incongruent versus congruent vocalization movies.

202 vocalizations, but by 6 mo, nonhuman primate vocalizations no longer exert this advantageous effect.

203 ex, and (3) motor/language activation during vocalization of the retrieved item.

204 cal sounds based on auditory experience with vocalizations of adult "tutors", and then use auditory f

205 We exploited the brief vocalizations of echolocating bats to trace the time cou

206 The behavior and vocalizations of four group-housed squirrel monkeys were

207 ological template that initially encompasses vocalizations of human and nonhuman primates (but not ba

208 At birth, infants prefer listening to vocalizations of human and nonhuman primates; within 3 m

209 n the emergence of functional flexibility in vocalizations of human infants.

210 d in avian vocalization, here we investigate vocalizations of neonatal mice with a reduction or absen

211 We found significant differences in the vocalizations of pups with the human Gnptab stuttering m

212 simulated predator presence by broadcasting vocalizations of their main predators, leopards or eagle

213 sed by the bat for spatial orientation-sonar vocalizations-offering support for the hypothesis that s

214 nts' responses to human and nonhuman primate vocalizations offers new insights - and brings new quest

215 Although animal vocalizations often comprise combinations of meaningless

216 monkeys (Macaca mulatta) while they produced vocalizations on command or passively listened to monkey

217 ooling, and examined performance when faces, vocalizations or both faces and vocalization had to be r

218 e activity, but not the increased ultrasonic vocalizations or motor deficits, is rescued in juvenile

219 We found that the sequences of short vocalizations, or introductory notes (INs), preceding so

220 units are multisensory and respond to faces, vocalizations, or their combination, a subset of neurons

221 e ability of subjects to remember a face and vocalization pair or just the vocalization alone.

222 ombined holistically at higher levels of the vocalization pathways.

223 vioral phenotypes including altered neonatal vocalization patterns.

224 nd that mice with the mutation emitted fewer vocalizations per unit time and had longer pauses betwee

225 language will also require understanding of vocalization perception, especially in the auditory cort

226 Vocalizations play a significant role in social communic

227 s on the basis of visual and olfactory cues, vocalizations potentially provide a much richer source o

228 exhibit multisensory responses to faces and vocalizations presented simultaneously.

229 mance were related to the type and number of vocalizations produced.

230 At 3 and 4 mo, nonhuman primate vocalizations promote object categorization, mirroring p

231 pressure levels and the estimated effective vocalization radii, estimated through spherical spreadin

232 e region: fin, humpback, blue and minke have vocalization rate trends that are highly correlated to t

233 The recorded vocalization rates are diel (24 h)-dependent for all MM

234 Males and females jointly increased their vocalization rates during chases.

235 esis, we conducted playbacks of killer whale vocalizations recorded during herring-feeding activity t

236 s simply responded to a particular face or a vocalization regardless of the task period, others exhib

237 cale imaging approach also readily localized vocalization regions and neurons.

238 tion of neural circuits important to learned vocalizations remains unclear.

239 le control over the structure of referential vocalizations represents a key discontinuity with langua

240 areas, whereas species with higher frequency vocalizations respond less severely.

241 The latest work revealed vocalization-sensitive regions both within and beyond th

242 Event-related band power responses to vocalizations showed sustained frequency following respo

243 tial distortion, responses of neurons to the vocalization signal remained stable, maintaining the sam

244 Four types of pain responses: vocalization, social behavior, muscle tone and activity

245 , but seeing mouth movements associated with vocalizations sped up detection.

246 ata show that at least three types of infant vocalizations (squeals, vowel-like sounds, and growls) o

247 pond to changes in either modality of a face-vocalization stimulus.

248 formation flow enclosed in fast time-varying vocalization streams emitted by conspecifics.

249 an brain copes with information from natural vocalization streams remain poorly understood.

250 o speak but has no apparent effect on innate vocalizations such as human laughing and crying or monke

251 Vocalizations such as mews and cries in cats or crying a

252 that transform infant cries into more mature vocalizations, such as cooing sounds and babbling.

253 d potential elicited by speech sounds during vocalization (talk) and passive playback (listen) were c

254 aughter is a stereotyped, innate, human play vocalization that provides an ideal simple system for ne

255 ed before marmosets even heard a conspecific vocalization that, as a population, almost perfectly pre

256 espiratory amplitude result in the different vocalizations that comprise infant vocal sequences.

257 While non-human primates can produce vocalizations that refer to external objects in the envi

258 ditions, a change in the auditory component (vocalization), the visual component (face), or both comp

259 When this response followed the onset of vocalization, the magnitude of the response was the same

260 tructure of vocalization bouts, the types of vocalizations, the patterns of syllables, and the acoust

261 H specialization when processing conspecific vocalizations, the presence of hemispheric biases in dom

262 However, when mouth motion accompanied the vocalization, these responses were uniformly faster.

263 pass those of humans, and they develop their vocalizations through vocal imitation in a way that is v

264 The use of vocalizations to communicate information and elaborate s

265 then use auditory feedback of self-produced vocalizations to gradually match their motor output to t

266 ocal learning, in which animals modify their vocalizations to imitate those of others, has evolved in

267 similarity, and the difficulty of assigning vocalizations to individuals, the vocal contribution of

268 oothed whales) rely upon echoes of their own vocalizations to navigate and find prey underwater [1].

269 y of howler monkeys shows that males who use vocalizations to ward off rivals invest less in producin

270 the emission of prosocial 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) paralleled by a lack of social appro

271 Throughout life, rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) when confronted with an aversive sit

272 Rodents communicate via ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) and newborn pups emit distress USVs

273 Rodent ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) are a vital tool for linking gene m

274 Rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) that are thought to serve as situat

275 Like ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), DA signals were modulated by deliv

276 Ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), freezing, and corticosterone respo

277 ctro-temporal measures to compare ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), which limits the ability to addres

278 he state of the frontal cortex at the time a vocalization was heard, and not by a decision driven by

279 N1 suppression to self-produced vocalizations was significantly and similarly diminished

280 ral sectors, however, the classification for vocalizations was significantly better than that for the

281 rforming playbacks with natural and modified vocalizations, we show that males are sensitive to call

282 For the case of affective vocalizations, we suggest partly extending the model to

283 s of the electromyograms (EMGs) during these vocalizations were analyzed.

284 Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations were previously attributed to the courting

285 In addition, 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations were utilized to measure negative affectiv

286 as innate [1] and virtually universal [2, 3] vocalizations, what makes screams a unique signal and ho

287 ession both before and during self-initiated vocalizations when marmosets, a highly vocal New World p

288 manner that resembled how humans alter their vocalizations when speaking to infants, that was distinc

289 l communication systems, including great ape vocalization, where extensive study has produced meager

290 ation sounds (conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations), whereas GABAB receptor antagonists [10 m

291 s increased affiliative social behaviors and vocalizations, whereas methamphetamine had only modest e

292 t males have a very restricted repertoire of vocalizations which are given in response to a wide vari

293 control circadian rhythms, reproduction, and vocalization, which may be selected upon over evolutiona

294 ociated with an increased rate of ultrasonic vocalizations, which are emitted at the whisking rate (

295 , but not with self-initiated or spontaneous vocalizations, which casts doubt on the role of the fron

296 rong predictors - species with low-frequency vocalizations, which experience greater spectral overlap

297 pecially for learned natural categories like vocalizations, which often share overlapping acoustic fe

298 voices and nonvocal sounds or heard binaural vocalizations with attention directed toward or away fro

299 In contrast, upstream neurons represent vocalizations with dense and background-corrupted respon

300 ustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals.